Also note, that Utility Computing (UC) and Grid Computing (GC) on the one side and Cloud Computing (CC) on the other side are 2 totally different approaches, paradigms, architectures, developments, etc..

Similar conclusions and statements can be made in relation to Web Services (WS), Service-Oriented technologies (SOx), models, and so on.

19:30 UTC+1
SOPR refined demands

The chart (updated on the 4th of January 2024) below shows a comparison of the performance of the shares of the companies Microsoft, Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Nvidia, Oracle, Apple, IBM, and Meta (Facebook) in linear mode.

yahoo!finance

The chart even shows the conspiracies and plots of Microsoft, Meta (Facebook), and Nvidia.

We are very sure that everybody is able to

• ratios of up to 95% + 5% of the company shares in a newly formed joint venture respectively executed company takeover or merger, and
• royalties of up to
  • 37.5% of the revenue generated with the performance and reproduction of Ontologic technologies (Ox),
  • 27.5% of the revenue generated with the performance and reproduction of Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS), and
  • 9% of the revenue generated with the performance and reproduction of Ontoscope Components (OsC) and other HardWare (HW)

are still Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC), and

• participate in this performance as part of the damage compensations and
• enforce our demands at the courts worldwide.

See also the note SOPR able to show missed opportunities at stock markets of the 14th of December 2023.

We also already made clear that a payment of triple damage compensations, including damages for

• unpaid royalties for unauthorized performances and reproductions,

• obmitted referencing respectively citation with attribution,
• damaged reputations,
• harmed integrities,

• frustrated momenta, and
• thwarted, obstructed, and blocked commercial business possibilities and follow-up opportunities

has to be aligned proportionally to the

Some rough estimations (4th of January 2024:1st of January 2015):

We have several options to design and establish a joint venture respectively execute a company takeover or merger.
If the takeover share of us is higher, then the royalties of others for Ontologic technologies (Ox) provided in and Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) exectuted on the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies are lower and vice versa.

Another point is the purchase of additional shares. As we always say, we do not pay for our rights and properties stolen by others.
One option is to take the 1st of January 2015 as due date for setting the purchase price, though the 1st of January 2011 would not be wrong either.
Another option is to have a relative price, which is coupled to the ratio of the increased value compared to the value projected on the basis of historic data and additional relevant data.

But legal hurdles exist from shareholders, market regulators, and other entities.

05.January.2024

21:28 UTC+1
Microsoft needs more than a new key

The company Microsoft needs more than a new key on the keyboard, specifically legal certainty, a signed contract and agreement, and the allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. under the Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) terms and conditions of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), so that the new key has a function, which is legal.

One could also say that Microsoft needs a new owner or being more precise gets a new owner.

A dstribution or ratio of the shares of a joint venture respectively company takeover or merger with 86.49% for us and 13.51% for Microsoft is considered more than FRANDAC as one can easily see by a look at the chart in the note SOPR refined demands of the 3rd of January 2024 (line in azure blue colour).
Please note that the profits generated illegally are not included in this rough estimation, so that a ratio of 90% + 10% is also a no-brainer.
So much about our copilot, our bot, our windows, our office, our net, our web, our cloud, our metaverse, etc., etc., etc.. :)

09.January.2024

02:34 UTC+1
Nuance Communications blacklisted

The exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies comprise subsystems and platforms in the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse (Ov).

Also note that a regulation of the Terms of Service (ToS) prohibits plagiarisms and fakes of our coherent Ontologic Model (OM), including our Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Language Model (LM) (ANNLM) (e.g. Large Language Model (LLM)), which is an essential part of our original and unique Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and our Ontologic roBot (OntoBot) of our Ontologic System (OS).

Needless to say, this blacklisting also comprises its corporate spin-off or spin-out Cerence.
Finally, that game is also over in general and in the field of Bionic Automotive in particular, as seen before in other fields such as Information and Communication Technology (ICT), engineering, production software, and so on. :)

23:47 UTC+1
Samsung still in LaLaLand

We have more than crystal clearly communicated that no Bixby fraud of the company Samsung will happen once again, as Bixby 2.0, Galaxy AI, or whatsoever, as we did with all the other Intelligent Agent System (IAS) (e.g. (voice-based or speech controlled) virtual assistant, Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA) or Personal Intelligent Assistant (PIA)), which were already based on our Evoos and our OS and therefore already infringed the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation.
Our decision is neither discussible nor negotiable.

If Samsung wants to remain a leading company, then it has to comply with the

This game is over, obviously, doubtlessly, and definitely.
See also the note Amazon and Co. are now in existential trouble of the 12th of November 2023.

We also would like to recall that the payment of damage compensations, have as the due date the 1st of January 2007 and are the higher of the apportioned

• unpaid and thus outstanding royalties for unauthorized performances and reproductions,
• obmitted referencing respectively citation with attribution, and
• thwarted, obstructed, blocked, and otherwise missed commercial business possibilities and follow-up opportunities,

by performing and reproducing our Evoos and our OS in whole or in part, or

Alternatively, a company can option for the establishment of a new company as a joint venture. :)

11.January.2024

22:12 UTC+1
Walmart has to comply with ToS

Terms of Service (ToS)

22:36 UTC+1
SOPR considering own and only Ov coins again

Obviously, our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) has no other choice than to introduce our own and only currency or currencies and our own and only virtual commodity or commodities (e.g. virtual gold) of our Ontologic Financial System (OFinS), which will be the exclusive and mandatory means for every financial transaction in the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse (Ov), which again will require exchanges between official currencies of central banks, federal reserve systems, and other monetary authorities, and our one or more Ov coins all the time.

22:53 UTC+1
Entities can only license P&R of own assets

Once again, entities, like for example media companies, can only license the Performance and Reproduction (P&R) of their copyrighted assets, but not the fair use, like for example their use as training data for our Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Language Model (LM) (ANNLM) (e.g. Large Language Model (LLM)) and our legal use of an ANNLM and as part of our generative and creative Bionics, Ontologic roBot (OntoBot), and Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS).
Simply said, as long as a copyrighted work is not performed or reproduced (in a substantially similar way), there does not exist an infringement of the copyright protection of said work.

We also would like to warn about legal actions against publishers, traders, distributors, etc. of incorrect copyrighted assets, like all of the manipulated reports about C.S. and our corporation, and all the other subjective and even false media contents. The damages could become extremely expensive, if so-called high-quality contents produced by so-called trustworthy brands is reproduced and distributed by our ANNLM.
Please also note that no hallucination of our generative and creative Bionics is required to reproduce and distribute that low-quality contents of dirty fellows.

See also the notes

and the other publications cited therein.

09:51, 22:26, and 23:32, and 23:52 UTC+1
Everything related to Bitcoin blacklisted

Just a reminder.
We also have blacklisted 10 more financial product issuers and asset managers, and will blacklist them completely.

since 1st of April 2022

since 9th of August 2022 and 11th of January 2024 (today)

since 11th of January 2024 (today)

No allowance and license for Ontologic System (OS)
No Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV)
No Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS)
No Universal Ledger (UL)
No Distribute Ledger Technology (DLT)
No connectivity
No exchange
No, Nix, Nada, Nothing
In the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse (Ov), also known as OntoLand, Bitcoin and Co. are absolutely useless and are only a gamble of hot air.

We quote a report, which is about the U.S.American Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Exchange-Traded Crypto Crap (ETCC): "[...]
In a scathing statement following the SEC's announcement, the [...] president and [Chief Executive Officer (]CEO[) of the investor watchdog group Better Markets,] Dennis Kelleher[,] pulled no punches. "With the flagrantly lawless crypto industry crashing and burning due to a mountain of arrests, criminal convictions, bankruptcies, lawsuits, scandals, massive losses, and millions of investor and customer victims, who would have thought that the SEC would come to its rescue by approving a trusted and familiar investment vehicle that will enable the mass marketing of a known worthless, volatile, and fraud-filled financial product to Main Street Americans."
[...]"

Comment
Exactly.
We also would like to recall all the other fraudulent and even serious criminal and terrorist activities made possible in this way.

We also quote a recent marketing report of the company Fidelity Investments, which is already blacklisted since 2022: "Bitcoin is best understood as a monetary good ... because bitcoin is the most (relative to other digital assets) secure, decentralized, sound digital money. Any other project or blockchain network that requires its users to believe they are transacting with a token that has real monetary value likely needs to be directly or indirectly connected to bitcoin as the ultimate monetary good."

Comment
And the fraud continues, as if no illegal activities would have happened before.

But for sure, that claim is completely wrong and deliberately misleading the members of the addressed and interested public in multiple ways, because we have the one and only legal DLT and UL as part of our original and unique OS, and we do not need to connect with any other cryptocurrency.

Furthermore, an entity only needs to clone, mirror, or subdivide one single block of a specific blockchain for implementing and starting some kind of a parablockchain with paracoins and related technologies, goods (e.g. applicatons) and services, which are compatible and even equal to any other technology, good, and service based on the original blockchain.
As a simple implication, the value does not lie in the rarity or scarcity of a block or crypto coin respectively a cryptocurrency at all, but in the foundational technologies, goods, and sercives, which are part of our OS.

Last but not least, our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) makes the Terms of Service (ToS) and one of its general regulation says that our Ontologic Financial System (OFinS) with its Ontologic Bank (OntoBank) will provide the fundamental and hence ultimate subsystems and platforms, and also monetary goods and services.

Moreover, all that crypto crap interferes with, and also obstructs, undermines, and harms the exclusive moral rights respectively Lanham (Trademark) rights (e.g. exploitation (e.g. commercialization (e.g. monetization))) of C.S. and our corporation.

Any other claim of a financial service provider is just a bold and illegal lie to conduct an already busted crypto scam.

It is unbelievable: Everything was in order. Then came that crypto crap on all social levels. Then we managed to get rid off it and restore order. And those morons have nothing else to do to restart that mess once again.
But this time the situation is already known completely and crystal clear.
Now, everybody can see that we have only an infringement of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation by serious criminal actors at the financial markets supported by governments and federal authorities.
A trick only works once and therefore will not work once again.

The SEC and other commissions and regulators have to prohibit Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs), Exchange-Traded Commodities (ETCs), Exchange-Traded Products (ETPs), Exchange-Traded Notes (ETNs), etc. immediately.
That SEC dude is incompetent and should be dismissedl immediately as wel.
The U.S.American treasury has to prohibit all crypto currencies immediately.
Those persons responsible are incompetent and should be dismissed immediately as wel.

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) has already taken actions against the U.S.America, the European Union (EU), and the other unknowing, unteachable, or unconscious entities. Simply said, they will pay for the damages in one way or another. :)

17.January.2024

08:42 UTC+1
Question of the Day

"Generative AI: Steam Engine of the Fourth Industrial Revolution?", [World Economic Forum (WEF), 2024]

Not quite, because our generative and creative Bionics is only the boiler in this metaphor and we are already talking about electricity, fire making, and spirit.

18:50 UTC+1
Further steps

In relation to the note SOPR refined demands of the 3rd of January 2024, we have thought about the various options to establish a new company as joint venture respectively execute a company takeover or merger:

It must be explained to shareholders, market regulators, lawmakers, and other entities and understood by them that the chosen procedure

because the returned rights and properties belong to C.S. and our corporation all the time anyway, including the technologies, goods, and services of the fields of

• Information Filtering (IF) System (IFS), including
  • Recommendation System or Recommender System (RecS),
• Search System (SS) or Search Engine (SE), and
• Question Answering (QA) System (QAS),

• Semantic Search Engine (SSE),

• Knowledge Management (KM) System (KMS),

• Speech Processing (SP)
  • speech recognition system and
  • speech synthesis system,

• Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA),

19.January.2024

14:06 and 28:34 UTC+1
Meta (Facebook) still in LaLaLand

The "sine qua non of copyright is originality.", [Judge Sandra Day O'Connor, Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991)].
The intent of copyright law is "to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts" (U.S. Const. Art. I, § 8, cl. 8), which means to encourage creative expression.
Create an own original and unique expression of idea without substantial similarity to our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and our Ontologic System (OS) with its Ontoscope (Os) in whole or in part.
Not knowing how to is no argument in relation to the idea-expression distinction doctrine.
Reference prior art respectively make proper referencing respectively citation with attribution.

Our original and unique Evoos and OS are

but just pure, original and unique, personal, scientifically fictitious, copyrighted sui generis works of art:

and also

as well as

As already made clear in the past, for the creation of our sui generis works of art, that go beyond conventional genre boundaries respectively establish their own genre, we use technological designations

which is also copyrighted.

Therefore, there will be no legal Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Language Model (LM) (ANNLM) (e.g. Large Language Model (LLM)) and no legal use of an ANNLM other than the ones provided as part of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies with their subsystems and platforms, and other essential facilities.
The same holds for our

See for example the note

Sign, pay, comply, or file chapter 11.

23.January.2024

Comment of the Day

"Aspirational me, myself, and I", [C.S., Today]

06:09 and 07:23 UTC+1
Infrastructure strategy does not work without OS

Ontologic System (OS)

We have already shown that the reactivation of the Global Brain of the first generation (GB 1.0) strategy does not work to circumvent our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and our Ontologic System (OS) with its Ontoscope (Os). Therefore, the infrastructure strategy does not work, as is the case for the Ubiquitous Computing (UbiC) and Internet of Things (IoT), Cyber-Physical System (CPS), and Networked Embedded System (NES) strategy.
In fact, they directly end in our

In this relation, we also would like to recall that our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) considers semiconductors, processors, and other HardWare Components (HWC) as Ontoscope Components (OsC), if they have a causal link to our Evoos and our OS with its Os.

24.January.2024

09:10 UTC+1
ToS with LM and MCM not negotiable

Terms of Service (ToS)
License Model (LM)
Main Contract Model (MCM)

We would like to recall that the ToS with the LM and the MCM are not negotiable as part of an out-of-court agreement, but are negotiable at the courts, and regulate the exclusive exploitation of AWs and IPs included in the oeuvre of C.S. regarding the

• triple damage compensations induced, resulting from
  • unpaid and thus outstanding royalties for unauthorized performances and reproductions,
  • obmitted referencing respectively citation with attribution, and
  • thwarted, obstructed, blocked, and otherwise missed commercial business possibilities and follow-up opportunities,
• profit generated illegally, and
• value increased illegally (share price, market capitalization, etc.), or
• 2 or more of them,

Everything else (e.g. collaboration, cooperation, integration, etc.) inbetween the limits of the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse (Ov).

The set of legal documents is in preparation and coming soon.

11:25, 13:11, and 17:21 UTC+1
OS and Os are originals

We would like to recall that our original and unique Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) integrates all in one by our liquid or molecular system composition approach with single functions viewed as atoms, molecules, etc. of for example the Ontologic System Components (OSC)

and for example the (optional) Ontoscope Components (OsC)

and therefore the so-called circle to search functionality is also part of our OS since ever.

Our original and unique OS is also able to work in realtime.
The latter also holds for its Ontologic System Components (OSC), including our OntoBot, which is utilized for the fields of

among many other fields if not to say all fields.

Our original and unique OS also integrates Bionics and photography and video in new ways.
Our Ontoscope is also viewed as robot head and cybernetic reflection of C.S.' head. Integration of Bionics and photography always included since ever.

Therefore, the

We also would like to recall that

are compilations (collections and assemblings), which reflect and are substantially similar to at least 30 old, and new, and also essential functionalities selected, integrated, or/and created with our OS, and therefore constitute

Furthermore, Android, iOS, Windows, and so on are misused to interfere with, and also obstruct, undermine, and harm the

with intent to shield the existence of C.S. and our corporation and destroy the oeuvre and business completely.

Moreover, the One Handset Alliance (OHA), also known as Android alliance, is a conspiracy and plot against C.S. and our corporation.

In this conjunction, we also discussed the manipulations at the financial markets and the fraud on potential investors and existing shareholders, specifically by the violation of reporting obligations and insider trading.

Therefore, the copyright infringement by Android is a criminal copyright infringement and the statue of limitations of 3 years is not effective.

Similar and other arguments do apply so that we arrive at the same conclusion in relation to Apple, Microsoft, Huawei, ZTE, and many other companies.

And the same holds for what is called

See also the note

26.January.2024

07:59 and 10:09 UTC+1
FTC, CMA, EC and Co. still rejecting reality?

We have already asked at least once if somebody could be so nice and inform the U.S.American Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the British Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), the European Commission (EC), and the other market regulators that the companies Microsoft, Alphabet (Google), Amazon, OpenAI, Anthropic, and other companies in Silicon Valley (SV), on Silicon Alley (SA), and at other locations (et al) worldwide belong directly (e.g. rights and properties (e.g. copyright)) or indirectly (e.g. damages, restitutions, transfers of all illegal materials, etc.) to C.S. and our corporation, because they are doing nothing else than performing and reproducing parts of the original and unqiue ArtWorks (AWs) and futher Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. without allowance and license.

First the copyrights of us rule, then the competition rights of others.This hierarchy is also statuary in case of the few conflicts.
As a simple implication, we are no so-called gatekeepers in relation to the digital markets, but holders of exclusive rights and properties, because we have worked hard, created, presented, and discussed original and unqiue AWs and further IPs, and therefore were awarded with exclusive rights and properties by the societies.
Certain parts of said original and unqiue AWs and further IPs are utilized as our essential facilities, technologies, goods, and services provided as the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies for everything under FRANDAC terms and conditions and inbetween other legal limits, specifically without interfering with, and also obstructing, undermining, and harming our interests, such as the exclusive exploitation (e.g. commercialization (e.g. monetization)) of said original and unique AWs and further IPs.
Moving the goal posts is considered a prohibited capricious act, specifically not retrospectively.
Societies in general and governments, commissions, and federal authorities in particular must accept compromises as well for the benefit of the public, such as the laws being effective and being the compromise.

If our current first optional solution is not realized, which is the establishment of new companies as joint ventures respectively execution of company takeovers or mergers, then we have to take the other option, which is to act against the copyright infringement and stop it, which again will (most potentially) lead to the insolvency and the subsequent takeover by us.
We already explained multiple times that the first solution is best for the benefit of the public and the last chance for the societies to avoid a giant economic chaos, which is already developing and becoming out of control.

Honestly, we have certain concerns about the first optional solution, because it creates another new situation, which has to be handled.
But we are proceeding as announced and something will happen in the next weeks, which at least is that all cards will be open on the table. The only question is whether the table is standing in the back room our in the public courtroom.

By the way:

27.January.2024

06:51, 08:53, and 16:30 UTC+1
Only new joint ventures

Our concerns regarding the establishment of new companies as joint ventures respectively execution of company takeovers or mergers increased drastically in the last weeks. The main reasons are the

Specifically, we must separate the liabilities resulting from illegal plagiarisms and fakes. This seems to work only by the common way, which is to demand the payment of damage compensations, which again will result in a filing for insolvency (e.g. chapter 11), and so on.

Furthermore, we also have to separate the different industrial sectors and companies, and draft and make individual agreements and contracts.

The establishment of new companies as joint ventures still seems to be working. But the ratios of business shares have to be aligned with the damage compensations or otherwise chapter 11.

Critical assets resulting in more damages could remain at the old company, but would be provided exclusively to the new company respectively joint venture, though the latter is obsolete somehow, because it is exclusive anyway.

Another option might be to increase our shares of the new companies to compensate these damages as well, though the damages are already huge and considerable efforts are needed to recover or at least compensate them.
Another option might be to let the former shareholders pay these damages.

06:51 and 09:06 UTC+1
Deepfake media and platforms are problems

The problem of illegal synthetic media and deepfake media is not new.

One can only sue the platforms for the

But as we made crystal clear in the past, sueing the distribution and utilization of illegal ANNLMs as for example illegal Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) can only be done by the copryright holder, who is C.S., and our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) has already begun to blacklisted all entities, because we have never given them the allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of the related parts of our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and our Ontologic System (OS) for many reasons, including the mess in the field of Algorithmic/Generative/Evolutionary/Organic ... Art/Science and the so-called fields of synthetic media and deepfake media.

And once again, techniques such as labelling, watemarking, etc. do not work as a solution for the problem, specifically due to the reason that our generative and creative Bionics is too powerful. Guess why we have created certain essential parts of our Ontologic System (OS).

11:36 UTC+1
SOPR already opened next legal front

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) has already opened the next legal front, which is against the fraudulent and even serious criminal activities of banks, asset managers or portfolio managers (e.g. fund managers or investment advisers), stock traders, investors, share holders, and other entities in the financial industry sector.
And to make it crystal clear, the shares of the listed companies of the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) industrial sector are worth nothing without the allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our Ontologic System (OS).
All those entities are involved in what is going on with selling and trading the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation at the financial markets and therefore are held responsible for that mess as well. We will also drive them into insolvency on the basis of damage compensations, if there is no law and order instantely.
Yes of course, we are talking about taking over the Wall Street as well. :)

28.January.2024

10:27 UTC+1
Comment of the Day

"No liar's dividend", [Legal principle]

31.January.2024

08:58 and 11:13 UTC+1
Comment of the Day

"There is only one Ontologic System (OS) and this is our OS. [...]
We will see whose proposition is truly preposterous.", [C.S., Today]

And our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) exists since December 1999 and our Ontologic System (OS) exists since October 2006 officially. Therefore, day 1 is long gone and we are neither in the early days nor in the Wild West and the World Wild Web anymore.

In fact, we already have documented that virtually all industries have taken the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. as sources of inspiration and blueprints since the true beginnings and even before by espionage, which resulted in a huge amount of very significant, substantial, strong, clear, and decisive evidences for showing the required causal links with said original and unique AWs and further IPs.
See for example the note

Furthermore, the societies have already awarded C.S. and our corporation with the exclusive moral rights respectively Lanham (Trademark) rights and copyrights for our creations, first moves, works, achievements, and so on, specifically for the creation, presentation, and discussion of said original and unique AWs and further IPs.
And the rights and properties (e.g. copyright) of C.S. and our corporation will not be democratized and are not up for any discussions and negotiations, and our competences will not be questioned and ignored, as the very concepts of right, property, and competition are not up for redefinitions, neither by Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) trolls nor by any companies, specifically those, that are unable to compete in the markets by complying with the laws.

The rule-based law and order environment is already the compromise and the level playing field.
And all those arguments about competition, competitor focused strategy, customer focused whatsoever, innovation, experimentation, benefit for the public, etc. are irrelevant respectively void, because we have created and presented at first and therefore do have the exclusive rights for the exploitation (e.g. commercialization (e.g. monetization)) of said original and unique AWs and further IPs, but others have merely presented plagiarisms and fakes, which is not an alternative choice, innovation, and competition and therefore does not provide a benefit for the public
Furthermore, we already provide to a more than sufficient extent certain parts of our OS and essential facilities with the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) our other Societies inbetween the laws being effective, which means so far that no interference with, and also obstruction, undermining, and harm of the exclusive rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation will take place.
We have absolutely no need to compete for what is already our right and property.
Societies in general and governments, commissions, and federal authorities in particular must accept compromises as well for the benefit of the public, such as the laws being effective and being the compromise, and therefore they have to destroy those illegal monopolies and accept our legal, innocent monopoly.

See also the

But we already do have our SOPR and it its existence will not be questioned and not be threatened.
An entity has to ask for the allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our OS and the utilization of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies, and we make the rules, and tell the terms and conditions, inclusive the regulations for the performance and reproduction of our generative and creative Bionics.

And companies have no legal certainty, because they still have no allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our OS.
Even more important is the following regulation of the Terms of Service (ToS) of our SOPR:

• terminate a clause related to legal certainty, or
• terminate a clause related to the allowance and license.

11:20, 12:41, and 18:11 UTC+1
Microsoft confirmed our claims once again

The company Microsoft has confirmed our claims once again in relation to the

by the unauthorized performance and reproduction of parts of our

specifically its broad

which are based on our

• OntoBlender,

of our Evoos and our OS, or simply said our original and unique, personal, scientifically fictitious, unforeseeable and unexpected, copyrighted sui generis works of art:

and also

as well as

Its profit margin in the last fiscal quarter of 35.5% also shows that our demand to pay royalties of 27.5 to 37.5% of the revenue under Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) terms and conditions, and With No Discounts Granted (WNDG) is unsustainable even for Microsoft and hence for all other companies in the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) industrial sector.

As in the case of all the other so-called Cloud Service Providers (CSPs), like for example the companies Amazon and Alphabet (Google), but also all providers of unauthorized Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS), and performances and reproductions of our Ontologic roBot (OntoBot) and our generative and creative Bionics, Microsoft has to pay what we demand or transfer its business units to our corporation, where it always belonged to anyway.

The insolvency due to the demand for damage compensations will not be discussed here once again.

14:45 UCT+1
Ontonics Further steps

We would like to suggest the option to register or incorporate respectively establish new companies as joint ventures together with U.S.American companies in the U.S.American state of Delaware.

21:28 and 23:22 UTC+1
SC strategy does not work without OS

*** Work in progress - writing out completely ***

SuperComputing (SC or SupC)
Ontologic System (OS)

Prior art

Bionics

Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KRR), and Knowledge Retrieval (KR)

Multimedia

Problem Solving Environment (PSE),
Simulation, simulation models,

Cybernetics

Computing

Evoos

OS

From hardware virtualization and operating system-level Virtualization to Network Virtualization (NV) and Network Function Virtualization (NFV) (2012) to holistic integration. Our Evolutionary operating system Architecture (EosA), and our Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) compiles, unifies, and integrates all in one.

The red line is quite obvious and runs through the fields of os, DC, ClusterC, KRR, ANN, and GB 1.0 in this specific case:

The same holds with the field of CloudC and the utilization of os.
The same holds with the fields of MMx, SOx, ROx, GB, etc., etc., etc..

We have already shown that one specific strategy does not work to circumvent our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and our Ontologic System (OS) with its Ontoscope (Os). Therefore, the supercomputing strategy does not work, as is the case for another specific strategy and just another strategy.
In fact, they directly end in our

The essential facilities for the capability, operability, and interoperability, and also variants of our Ontologic roBot (OntoBot), specific Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS), and other essential parts of our Evoos and our OS, specifically the ones based on SoftBionics (SB) (e.g. AI, ML, CI, ANN, CV, CL, NMP and NMU, CAS, etc.) are provided with the exclusive and mandatory infrastractures of our SOPR and our other Societies, but no other entities, specificaly no illegal monopolies and their satellite start-ups, that are refusing to guarantee and protect freedom of choice, experimentation, innovation, and competition pro bono publico==for the public good by infringing the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation for making them proprietary parts of their walled gardens and perverting the whole principle in this way, though

The public demands the original and the whole benefits, which can only be provided by our SOPR.

Telecommunication Service Providers (TSPs), Internet Service Providers (ISPs), Web Service Providers (WSPs), Cloud Service Providers (CSPs), and other companies can provide our SOPR connectivity, computing power, storage, and other technologies, goods, and services as contractors, which requires the compliance with the Terms of Service (ToS) with the License Model (LM) and the Main Contract Model (MCM) of our SOPR, specifically the payment of damages on the one hand and the win of public tenders on the other hand.
But they are not allowed to provide this to third parties directly, because this is done by the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies.
This is the way how freedom of choice, innovation, and competition for the benefit of the public truly works.

In this relation, we also would like to recall that our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) considers semiconductors, processors, and other HardWare Components (HWC) as Ontoscope Components (OsC), if they have a causal link to our Evoos and our OS with its Os.

See also the notes

and the other publications cited therein or/and publicized elsewhere on this website of OntomaX.