We would like to recommend interested parties to clean the deck and catch up on other things in the meantime.

It is very nice to support us.
It is always better to collaborate with us.
It is even better to be part of us.

06.June.2024

07:35 UTC+2
Ontonics Further steps

We made progress with the formal procedures and other preparations in relation to new business units and subsidiaries, which will be discussed only behind closed doors.
Investors, who are interested in our investment program series

of our Hightech Office Ontonics need not wait very much longer anymore.

We also got the information that a leading social network platform expressed its interest in teaming up with a designated joint venture partner.
Taking this development and similar and other developments together, one can see how our Ontoverse (Ov) and New Reality (NR) are developing, specifically in the fields of communication and collaboration, and eXtended Mixed Reality (XMR), and how they will be devoloping in other fields.

09:34 UTC+2
Stock exchanges have to stop trading of crypto ETPs, e.g. ETCs, ETFs, etc.

Exchange Traded Product (ETP)
example given (e.g.)
Exchange-Traded Commodity (ETC)
Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF)
et cetera (etc.)

09:53, 11:02, and 23:23 UTC+2
DoJ and FTC actions demand establishment of JVs

The legal actions of the U.S.American Department of Justice (DoJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are independent of the exercise of the exclusive moral rights and Lanham (Trademark) rights of C.S. (e.g. exploitation (e.g. commercialization (e.g. monetization))), the payment of damage compensations, and the related establishment of new companies as Joint Ventures (JVs).
In wise foresight, we

See also the Ontonics Further steps of the 5th of March 2024.

23:55 UTC+2
Robinhood already blacklisted

We have prohibited illegal cryptocurrencies, such as for example Bitcoin, Ether, and Co., and illegal crypto exchanges and other illegal crypto technologies, goods, and services.

07.June.2024

16:18 UTC+2
Higher wages, higher inflation rates, higher chaos

We always say that too much money has been printed, too much debt has been made, and too much money is in the market.
Higher wages and higher inflation rates would be the answer, but this leads to our notes

08.June.2024

01:43 UTC+2
F.R.German clique has to comply with ToS

Federal Republic of Germany (F.R.G.)
Terms of Service (ToS)

The countermeasures are already in place, including the line up of the wolves to tear apart potential strays and unteachable dreamers.

01:48 UTC+2
BYD has to stop dreaming and comply with ToS

Terms of Service (ToS)

23:18 UTC+2
Other labels for our works of art prohibited

According to the Terms of Service (ToS) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), other desginations for our works of art are prohibited.

If a licensee choose the option to avoid labelling of our originals, when it performs and reproduces certain parts of our Ontologic System (OS) under its own brand, which might be phased out as a licensing option in the future, then this also holds for all other entities, for sure, specifically for an entity, that has been blacklisted by our SOPR due to its illegal plagiarism and fake of the

Needless to say, this also prohibits a formal announcement of a partnership with a blacklisted entity. A licensee has a partnership with our SOPR directly.

We do not tolerate any infringements of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation and will take very decisive counter actions to enforce them worldwide beginning with the milder action of blacklisting.

23:25 and 28:30 UTC+2
Smarts are dead

Eventually, the era of the so-called smartphone, smarttablet, smartwatch, smartglasses, smart Head-Mounted Display (HMD) (smartHMD), smartdisplay, smartspeaker, smart TeleVision (smartTV), smartdevice, smartthing, smartcar, smarttruck, smarthome, etc. is already over since several years inofficially and since several months officially. With our

it is obvious that the adjective smart does not refer to the intelligent capability and functionality of a machine, device, building, etc., but to its ontologic quantity and quality respectively that the designation smart is merely an illegal synonym for a specific part of our original and unique works of art titled Evolutionary operating system and Ontologic System and is used to mislead the public about the true origin.

We do not tolerate any infringements of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation and will take very decisive counter actions to enforce them worldwide beginning with the milder action of blacklisting.

11.June.2024

04:20 UTC+2
SOPR added clause for end of no labelling

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) added to the regulation regarding the no labelling licensing option the following clause:

• Apple AiMac, AiPhone, AiPad, and Apple AiWatch,
• Alphabet (Google), Samsung, Huawei, Baidu, HTC, ZTE, Oppo, Xiaomi, Vivo, and Co. Android AI Personal Computer (AIPC), AIphone, AItablet, AIwatch, AIglasses, AI Head-Mounted Display (HMD) (AIHMD), AIdisplay, AIspeaker, AI TeleVision (AITV), AIdevice, and AIthing,
• Amazon Kindle and Echo, AIPC
• Meta (Facebook) AIHMD,
• Toyota, General Motors, Ford, Porsche/Volkswagen, Daimler, and Co. AIcar, and AItruck,
• AIhome,
• etc..

From this point in time, technologies, goods, and services have to be labelled either with at least one of the designations of the used Ontologic System Components (OSC) and Ontoscope Components (OsC), Ontologics, or another of our labels, trademarks, and so on.

See also the note Other labels for our works of art prohibited of the 8th of June 2024.

We would also like to recall that we have regulations with clauses regarding the

04:41 UTC+2
OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps

The Time Engine feature of our Ontologic System (OS), which

• time travel feature on Google Maps Street View of the subsidiary Alphabet→Google and
• history retrace tool Recall of the OS variant Windows of the company Microsoft,

should be integrated in all eligible Unix variants and Unix derivatives, Android, and iOS, MacOS, and so on (no Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) license).

The Time Engine feature needs an own section in the Settings area, if it does not already exist, and might be a part of Application properties and not (only) Privacy and Security settings.
It could also be something like an application attribute configured as a general property of an application (e.g. right mouse click on an icon, properties, settings, app attribute under file attribute, other tab (card), or own tab).

12.June.2024

16:04 UTC+2
TeraWulf blacklisted

This action should be self-explanatory for everybody concerned and interested.

16:15 and 29:45 UTC+2
Success story continues and no end in sight

The first phase of the establishment of our Ontoverse (Ov) has been accomplished with the implementation of the a basic part of our Ontologic Net (ON).

We quote and translate a first report about the companies Oracle and OpenAI: "However, company boss [...] is forecasting double-digit growth rates for the current financial year. The driving force behind this development is the high demand for cloud capacities for computationally intensive Artificial Intelligence (AI). "In the fourth quarter alone, Oracle signed more than 30 AI contracts [...] - including a contract with OpenAI to train ChatGPT in the Oracle Cloud."

We quote and translate a second report about the companies Oracle, Alphabet (Google), Microsoft, and OpenAI: "Late on Tuesday evening, the [company] announced an expansion of its cooperation with Microsoft and the ChatGPT inventor OntoBot implementer OpenAI when it presented its business figures for 2023/24. Microsoft's cloud AI platform will also run on Oracle data centres. The search engine giant Google also wants to offer Oracle database technology in on its cloud platform."

Comment
SoftBionics as a Service (SBaaS) technologies (e.g. capability and operational models, systems, and platforms) (SBaaSx), including

• Artificial Intelligence as a Service (AIaaS) technologies (AIaaSx),
• Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) technologies (MLaaSx),
• Computational Intelligence as a Service (CIaaS) technologies (CIaaSx),
• Artificial Neural Network (ANN) as a Service (ANNaaS) technologies (ANNaaSx),
• Computer Vision (CV) as a Services (CVaaS) technologies (CVaaSx),
• and so on

belong to the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR).
But we guess that Oracle is only providing (grid) computing power or has chosen to become a Joint Venture (JV) partner of our corporation.

What can also be observed by these and other reports related to the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) industrial sector is the connection and integration of what is wrongly called Cloud Computing (CC or CloudC) and Bionics according to our Evolutionary operating system Architecture (EosA) and our Ontologic System Architecture (OSA), which provides us the next evidence that shows a causal link with our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and our Ontologic System (OS), and that they have been used as sources of inspiration and blueprints.

We quote a report about the company Apple and our Ontologic roBot (OntoBot): "In a post-keynote event, Apple [...] confirmed that the company would work with other third-party models beyond OpenAI, with Google's Gemini model being highlighted as the first example. He clarified that Apple had "nothing to announce right now, but that's our general direction.""

Comment
As we said, it does not matter which model Apple takes.
Thank you very much for making this and other facts crystal clear to the public.
And so much about the blah blah blah of the lying press.

The reports also show that our 2 social media graces will have no other choice than to sign, pay, comply as well, and also utilize the exclusive and mandatory infrastrucutures of our SOPR and our other Societies with their set of foundational and essential facilities, technologies, goods, and services.

Also keep in mind that the ongoing atmosphere and mindset around the business in the fields of HardBionics (HB) and SoftBionics (SB) (e.g. Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Computational Intelligence (CI), etc.) are based on fantasy and imagination to a considerable extent, because for example the

• payment of damage compensations, which again are the higher of the apportioned compensation, profit, and value, or 2 or more of them,
• transfer of all illegal materials, and
• excution of other legal actions.

16:48 UTC+2
AI too clever to take all jobs away

Artificial Intelligence (AI) will only work for what one can never have enough of: bandwith and electric power.

17:39 UTC+2
Marathon Digital blacklisted

This action should be self-explanatory for everybody concerned and interested.

13.June.2024

08:33 UTC+2
Without complete damages no essential facilities

Please note that in the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse (Ov) our corporation

We would like to give the reminder of a legal requirement, which holds for all companies in the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) industry and also other industrial sectors.

Nix, nada, nothing will vanish into thin air.

13:55 and 16:38 UTC+2
Apple has to overwork iOS

The company Apple has to remove the string "ChatGPT" out of its partial Ontologic System (OS) variant iOS, substitute it with the string "OntoBot", or do something else, which is legally permissible, immediately, because according to the

The temporary allowance for the utilization of other coherent Ontologic Models (OMs) only comprise the utilization, but not the referencing or labelling of a supplier or even the illegal designation of a plagiarist.

In the past, our SOPR has directly blacklisted every entity, that presented an illegal plagiarism and fake of our Ontologic roBot (OntoBot), specifically a combination or integration of our OntoBot with our Ontoscope (Os), and we also made crystal clear that we will not exclude anybody from this legal measure.

In fact, Apple is moving in the right general direction, but in general we have already moved further and in particular what Apple tried here is to differentiate between the functionalities of a SoftWare Agent-Based System (SWABS), specifically the

and also the applications and services based on

and thought to be very clever by

which nevertheless

• vision,
• creation,
• expression of idea,
• compilation (collection and assembling),
• selection,
• arrangement,
• composition,
• integration,
• fusion, and
• unification,

  and also

• foundation,
• design,
• architecture,
• component,
• application, and
• service,
• art asset, and
• look and feel manifestation,
• and so on,

and

Indeed, an exception exists for a Joint Venture (JV) partner, if and only if (iff) our corporation holds the majority of its company shares (compare with Copilot of the company Microsoft, Google AI of the subsidiary Alphabet→Google, Alexa, Rufus, and Q of the company Amazon), because this ownership structure changes the legal situation regarding the moral rights and Lanham (Trademark) rights of C.S..
But we do not know, if a proposed JV has already become a designated JV in case of Apple.

See the related messages, notes, explanations, clarifications, investigations, and claims, specifically

We are also looking at the Software Development Kits (SDKs) and the Application Programming Interfaces (APIs).
Specifically the

are too proprietary to get the approval of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), which also applies to other SDKs and APIs of other entities.

Another point are other functionalities, applications, and services, which are separating the OS variants iOS, watchOS, visionOS, etc., and Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) from the common infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Socities with their set of foundational and essential facilities, technologies, goods, and services.
Specifically the

show a certain tendency of separating its partial OS variants from the common infrastructures and cultivating its so-called walled garden, which was never legal in its entirety. Now, it is obvious that it was always, is, and will be in the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse (Ov).
Apple should take care of its plants and focus on possibilities and synergies provided by our Ontoverse (Ov) and our SOPR, but should not be concerned about our rights and properties, and also businesses.
In this context, we do not say that a "company would work with other third-party models", but all companies have to utilize the one and only, singular, exclusive and mandatory infrastrucutures of our SOPR and our other Societies with their set of foundational and essential facilities, technologies, goods, and services.

We also do not like certain other parts such as the

Please note or recall once again that the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. are not part of proprietary technologies, goods, and services, walled gardens, economic systems, pseudo monopolies, and so on. The competition does not take place for said AWs and IPs, but on the basis of them, which is provided as the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies.
Furthermore, our Ontoscope (Os) and its various types and variants are access devices in our Ontoverse (Ov), besides its creation and interpretation as an immobot head, cyborg head, and (abstract) cybernetic self-reflection, self-portrait, or self-image, and cybernetic reflection, augmentation, and extension, and also ontological argument or ontological proof, and belief system (of C.S.) besides other genres.
And as we said in other cases, Apple will not get an own Ontologic System (OS) (see also the Comment of the Day of the 25th of February 2024). And quality, safety and security, resilience, and so on are no arguments, because it is very well known where this also comes from.
By taking our Evoos and our OS as sources of inspirations and blueprints voluntarily, Apple has decided to become part and is now a part of a much bigger thing. :)

By the way:

16:26 UTC+2
Bitfarms blacklisted

This action should be self-explanatory for everybody concerned and interested.

16:27 UTC+2
Cleanspark blacklisted

This action should be self-explanatory for everybody concerned and interested.

14.June.2024

08:40 UTC+2
Just start with improved Recall

Every adversary entity (e.g. hacker), that is able to get access to the data store of the history retrace tool Recall, is also able to get access to the other (areas of the) data stores and the network communication channels.
But the latter ability is not a reason for Microsoft to take down Windows. Is not it? :)

08:54 UTC+2
OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps

The generative emotion icon feature and the generative pictograph and picture character==emoji of our Ontologic System (OS), which are based on the

should be integrated in all eligible Unix variants and Unix derivatives, Android, and Windows, and so on (no Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) license).

12.46 and 14:44 UTC+2
% + %, % OAOS, % HW #12

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) noted that the adaption of more essential elements of our Evoos and our OS is already ongoing for some time, because one cannot realize the various facilities, technologies, goods, and services based on our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and our Ontologic System (OS) in some few months.
But honestly, we have to admit that we anticipated this development since some years.
Howsoever, our SOPR adjusted fees and ratios of the special offer option.

The ratio of shares of the special fast track damage compensation option or requirement below is developing, is not yet determined, and only indicates the direction of decision making and therefore is non-binding.

We decided for +% to % + % in case of the ratio in relation to shares of proposed Joint Venture (JV), because of the continuation of avoidable damages and control, and the incorporation of new insights of older decisions and actions
60% + 40% in case of Apple

The fees remain as usual for a JV partner:
17% for OAOS
17% for BCO GC, CC, SC, DC HW (see also the issue % + %, % OAOS, % HW #11 of the 24th of May 2024)
10% for GC, CC, SC, DC HW
7% for other HW

The fees remain as usual for another licensing partner:
27% for OAOS
27% for BCO GC, CC, SC, DC HW
10% for GC, CC, SC, DC HW
7% for other HW

The utilization of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies remain for all business partners.

Ontologic Applications and Services (OAOS)
Bionic, Cybernetic, and Ontologic Computing (BCOC) and Networking
Grid Computing (GC or GridC) and Networking
Cluster Computing (CC or ClusterC) and Networking
Cloud Computing (CC or CloudC) and Networking
SuperComputing (SC or SupC) and Networking
Data Center (DC)
HardWare (HW)

Without sign, pay, comply, including the payment of the complete and true damage compensations (the higher of the apportioned compensation, profit, and value, or 2 or more of them) retroactively for 20 years respectively from the due data 1st of January 2007 (criminal copyright infringement, wire fraud, conspiracy, etc., etc., etc., allowance and licensing for the continued performance and reproduction, and utilization of essential facilities) or alternatively the establishment of this JV, as discussed multiple times in the past, Apple will not continue to exist as an independent company in the not so far away future, as is the case for some other graces, because of various reasons and developments, which are exceeding the capabilities of Apple and others (by far). :)
See also the note Without complete damages no essential facilities of the 13th of June 2024 (yesterday).

16.June.2024

07:17 UTC+2
Comment of the Day

"We are not first, not best, not first best [that comes along], but best first.", [C.S., Today]

08:53 and 12:21 UTC+2
Success story continues and no end in sight

We quote a report, which is about the company Apple and our Ontologic System (OS) and was publicized on the 11th of June 2024: " In the 60 hours after Apple's Monday event, however, the company's stock price (AAPL) rose by as much as 10%, boosting Apple's market capitalization by more than $300 billion, rocketing past Nvidia and putting Apple back in contention with Microsoft for largest market value.

Comment
Oh, ... what ...!?
What we have here is a crystal clear and court-proof evaluation of the apportioned business value increased by the continued unauthorized performance and reproduction of our Ontologic System (OS) with its Ontologic System Architecture (OSA), Ontologic roBot (OntoBot), and Ontoscope (Os).

But it does not stop here in case of Apple, because we add the higher of the apportioned compensation, profit, and value for all the other infringements of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation of the last 3 years.

But it does not stop here in case of Apple, because we add the apportioned compensation, profit, and value of the last 20 years respectively since the 1st of January 2007 due to the reason due to the reason that Apple it wants to get the allowance and license to continue with this performance and reproduction of certain parts of our OS, including the utilization of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies with their set of foundational and essential facilities, technologies, goods, and services, which we do not have to provide to Apple, if this interferes with and also obstructs, undermines, and harms the exclusive moral rights respectively Lanham (Trademark) rights (e.g. exploitation (e.g. commercialization (e.g. monetization))).

But it does not stop here in case of Apple, because we add the higher of the apportioned compensation, profit, and value, or 2 or more of them, of the last 20 years respectively since the 1st of January 2007 due to the reason of the more than 27 to 100 other legal reasons.

But it does not stop here in case of other companies, because their legal situations are the same in general.

See also the note SOPR refined demands of the 3rd of January 2024.

We will consult the first 3 proposed or even designated Joint Venture (JV) partners, which are the companies Alphabet (Google), Microsoft, and Amazon, about the further actions regarding other entities, because we have the opinion that more opinions are required to be heard before really good decision can be made.

18.June.2024

07:10 UTC+2
% + %, % OAOS, % HW #13

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) noted that the adaption of more essential elements of our Evoos and our OS is already ongoing for some time, because one cannot realize the various facilities, technologies, goods, and services based on our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and our Ontologic System (OS) in some few months.
But honestly, we have to admit that we anticipated this development since some years.
Howsoever, our SOPR adjusted fees and ratios of the special offer option.

The ratios of the special fast track damage compensation option or requirement below are developing, are not yet determined, and only indicates the direction of decision making and therefore are non-binding.

We decided for +% to % + % in case of ratio in relation to shares of proposed Joint Venture (JV), because of the continuation of avoidable damages and control, and the incorporation of new insights of older decisions and actions:
64% + 36% in case of Apple (same as Microsoft and Nvidia) (see also the issue % + %, % OAOS, % HW #12 of the 14th of June 2024)

The fees remain as usual for a JV partner:
17% for OAOS
17% for BCO GC, CC, SC, DC HW (see also the issue % + %, % OAOS, % HW #11 of the 24th of May 2024)
10% for GC, CC, SC, DC HW
7% for other HW

The fees remain as usual for another licensing partner:
27% for OAOS
27% for BCO GC, CC, SC, DC HW
10% for GC, CC, SC, DC HW
7% for other HW

The utilization of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies remain for all business partners.

Ontologic Applications and Services (OAOS)
Bionic, Cybernetic, and Ontologic Computing (BCOC) and Networking
Grid Computing (GC or GridC) and Networking
Cluster Computing (CC or ClusterC) and Networking
Cloud Computing (CC or CloudC) and Networking
SuperComputing (SC or SupC) and Networking
Data Center (DC)
HardWare (HW)

19.June.2024

05:17 UTC+2
Ark Investment pump and dump scheme?!

That company is not the only one in the finance industry.

08:43 and 11:08 UTC+2
SOPR will not give up on controls and damages

In relation to the Joint Venture (JV) regulations of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and the companies Apple, Nvidia, Oracle, Dell, Broadcom, Samsung, Huawei, Tencent, Alibaba, Baidu, and so on, we would like to recall that we will not give up on the controls over the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. and the complete damage compensations.

See also the last section of the note % + %, % OAOS, % HW #12 of the 14th of June 2024.

20.June.2024

06:44 and 08:44 UTC+2
All Cos and DCos considered © infringements

Cloud operating system™ (Cos™ or COS™)

Data Center operating system (DCos)

We already discussed this topic in for example the note DCos, CnC, aaSx, SDN, SD-WAN, ON, OW, OV, etc. no license of the 27th of February 2024.
Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) demands the transfer of all illegal materials, including all materials of the fields of

which were developed by taking our Evoos and our OS as sources of inspirations and blueprints, and are interfering with, and also obstructing, undermining, and harming the exclusive moral rights respectively Lanham (Trademark) rights (e.g. exploitation (e.g. commercialization (e.g. monetization))) of C.S. and our corporation.
In case of a Joint Venture (JV) partner this transfer is not required for obvious legal reasons.

This also includes all activities in the P.R.China and at other locations worldwide.
The latter has also consequences for Ecplise, Android, Redhat, and other developers of Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) (e.g. McDonald's and Kentucky Fried Chicken), that have no headquarter in the P.R.China.

Some examples:

By the way:

• national and international laws, regulations, and acts, as well as agreements, conventions, and charters,
• rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation, and
• Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) Terms of Service (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR),

and also a friendly reminder that harmony, continuity, stability, and prosperity are based on a mutual giving and taking, which begin here.

06:49 UTC+2
SOPR recalls demand for network equipment

Manufacturers of variants of our original and unqiue Ontoscope (Os) have to use network equipment provided by our corporation, as made crystal clear over the last few years, or our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) will reject the allowance and licensing of the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our Ontologic System (OS) and begin with filling the injunctions, as announced crystal clearly over the last few years.

See also the note Robots, drones, etc. in Ov are Os of the 26th of April 2024.

07:10 UTC+2
% + %, % OAOS, % HW #14

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) noted that the adaption of more essential elements of our Evoos and our OS is already ongoing for some time, because one cannot realize the various facilities, technologies, goods, and services based on our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and our Ontologic System (OS) in some few months.
But honestly, we have to admit that we anticipated this development since some years.
Howsoever, our SOPR adjusted fees and ratios of the special offer option.

The ratios of the special fast track damage compensation option or requirement below are developing, are not yet determined, and only indicates the direction of decision making and therefore are non-binding.

We decided for +% to % + % in case of ratio in relation to shares of proposed Joint Venture (JV), because of the continuation of avoidable damages and control, and the incorporation of new insights of older decisions and actions:
64% + 36% in case of Huawei (same as Microsoft, Nvidia, and Apple) (see also the issues % + %, % OAOS, % HW #6 China special of the 29th of April 2024, % + %, % OAOS, % HW #12 of the 14th of June 2024, and % + %, % OAOS, % HW #13 of the 18th of June 2024)
This decision was also made under the mutual Golden Power regulations.

The fees for a JV partner remain as usual:
17% for OAOS
17% for BCO GC, CC, SC, DC HW (see also the issue % + %, % OAOS, % HW #11 of the 24th of May 2024)
10% for GC, CC, SC, DC HW
7% for other HW

The fees for another licensing partner remain as usual:
27% for OAOS
27% for BCO GC, CC, SC, DC HW
10% for GC, CC, SC, DC HW
7% for other HW

The utilization of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies remain for all business partners.

Ontologic Applications and Services (OAOS)
Bionic, Cybernetic, and Ontologic Computing (BCOC) and Networking
Grid Computing (GC or GridC) and Networking
Cluster Computing (CC or ClusterC) and Networking
Cloud Computing (CC or CloudC) and Networking
SuperComputing (SC or SupC) and Networking
Data Center (DC)
HardWare (HW)

By the way:

07:44 UTC+2
OpenAtom Foundation blacklisted

The reason for this blacklisting is the same like in case of for example the Linux Foundation, Apache Foundation, and other illegal FOSS organizations, foundations, etc., which in fact do not have so much societal and social goals, if any at all, but are more about the infringement of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation.

15:15 UTC+2
OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps

An equalizer for our Ontologic System (OS), like for example the Equalizer APO, should be integrated in all eligible Unix variants and Unix derivatives, Android, and Windows, and so on.

Ideally, the equalizer application can also be started inside the system Settings menu and the Quick Settings menu, and allow the sharing of configuration files for earphones, In-Ear Monitors (IEM), and headphones.
Potentially, a developer of an existing equalizer is willing to sell.

Later, a similar application might be available for Wearable computer (WC) and Head-Mounted Display (HMD), and also Brain Computer Interface (BCI) variants of our Ontoscope (Os) and for other devices.

21.June.2024

10:00 UTC+2
% + %, % OAOS, % HW #15

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) noted that the adaption of more essential elements of our Evoos and our OS is already ongoing for some time, because one cannot realize the various facilities, technologies, goods, and services based on our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and our Ontologic System (OS) in some few months.
But honestly, we have to admit that we anticipated this development since some years.
Howsoever, our SOPR adjusted fees and ratios of the special offer option.

The ratios of the special fast track damage compensation option or requirement below are developing, are not yet determined, and only indicates the direction of decision making and therefore are non-binding.

We decided for +% to % + % in case of ratio in relation to shares of proposed Joint Venture (JV), because of the continuation of avoidable damages and control, and the incorporation of new insights of older decisions and actions (see also for example the note There is only one OS and Ov #3 of the 9th of May 2024):
61% + 39% in case of Amazon

The fees remain as usual for a JV partner:
17% for OAOS
17% for BCO GC, CC, SC, DC HW (see also the issue % + %, % OAOS, % HW #11 of the 24th of May 2024)
10% for GC, CC, SC, DC HW
7% for other HW

The fees remain as usual for another licensing partner:
27% for OAOS
27% for BCO GC, CC, SC, DC HW
10% for GC, CC, SC, DC HW
7% for other HW

The utilization of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies remain for all business partners.

Ontologic Applications and Services (OAOS)
Bionic, Cybernetic, and Ontologic Computing (BCOC) and Networking
Grid Computing (GC or GridC) and Networking
Cluster Computing (CC or ClusterC) and Networking
Cloud Computing (CC or CloudC) and Networking
SuperComputing (SC or SupC) and Networking
Data Center (DC)
HardWare (HW)

By the way:

• legal scope of our digital rights, digital interests, and digital properties,
• legal scope of our Ontologic System (OS),
• domain of our New Reality (NR) respectively
• sovereign space of our Ontoverse (Ov), also known as OntoLand (OL).

We said that governments have to talk with us directly.

15:05 UTC+2
Eclipse Foundation blacklisted

The reason for this blacklisting is the same like in case of for example the Linux Foundation, Apache Foundation, and other illegal FOSS organizations, foundations, etc., which in fact do not have so much societal and social goals, if any at all, but are more about the infringement of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation.

22.June.2024

09:27 UTC+2
Geopolitical regions should avoid legal interfaces

Our messages, notes, explanations, clarifications, investigations, and other publications clearly show that

• coherent Ontologic Model, including integrated multidimensional, multidomain, multilingual, multiparadigmatic, multimodal, multimedia Foundation Model (FM), Foundational Model (FM), Capability and Operational Model (COM), Artificial Neural Network Model (ANNM), Large Language Model (LLM), etc.,
• integrated multidimensional, multidomain, multilingual, multiparadigmatic, multimodal, multimedia transformative, generative, and creative Bionics, and
• what is wrongly called Cloud-native Computing (CnC), AIphone, etc.,

at least

• around 15 years in case of our Evoos and
• around 8 years in case of our OS,

which proves the status as protected works of art another time.

We would like to recall that the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies with their set of fundamental and essential facilities, technologies, goods, and services, including

have to be utilized to avoid a very expensive interface between the

and illegal plagiarisms and fakes.
Utilizing illegal infrastructures, subsystems, platforms, applications, services, and so on merely shifts the problem and its solution to another location, but in the end our SOPR will always control the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. and collect fixed fees and relative shares as royalities worldwide. And this will definitely be unsustainably expensive and even comprise blacklisting respectively the rejection of the allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our Evoos and our OS.

Geopolitical regions such as Northern America, Central America, Southern America, Western Asia, Middle East, Central Asia, Southern Asia, Northern Africa, Central Africa, Southern Africa, and other locations should avoid very expensive legal interfaces, because they are very expensive.

25.June.2024

07:03 UTC+2
Uncharted Labs, Udio blacklisted

The Text-To-Audio (TTA) model, and also application and service, specifically the Text-To-Music (TTM) model, and also application and service, of the company Udio (formerly Unchartd Labs) are based on our

By the way:

• All deals with OpenAI and Co. are void of the 23rd of May 2024 and
• [Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), including] Sony Music [Entertainment, UMG Recordings, and Warner Records,] is wrong 23rd of May 2024.

07:03 UTC+2
Suno AI blacklisted

The Text-To-Audio (TTA) model, and also application and service, specifically the Text-To-Music (TTM) model, and also application and service, of the company Suno AI are based on our

By the way:

• All deals with OpenAI and Co. are void of the 23rd of May 2024 and
• [Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), including] Sony Music [Entertainment, UMG Recordings, and Warner Records,] is wrong 23rd of May 2024.

09:00 and 09:13 UTC+2
Success story continues and no end in sight

We quote a first report, which is about the companies Alphabet (Google), Microsoft, Apple, and Meta (Facebook), and our coherent Ontologic Model (OM), Ontologic roBot (OntoBot), and Ontoscope (Os) in the Head-Mounted Display (HMD) variant, and was publicized on the 4th of June 2024: "[... A market researcher] believes Apple will start with the commercialization of [generative Artificial Intelligence (]gen AI[)] with [its Os HMD variant] Vision Pro, but the bigger impact will ultimately impact businesses.
[...]
Meta, for example, has already expressed interest in teaming up with Microsoft, which has been heavily integrating its Copilot technology - powered by ChatGPT - our OntoBot - based on our coherent Ontologic Model (OM) and integrated multidimensional, multidomain, multilingual, multiparadigmatic, multimodal, multimedia transformative, generative, and creative Bionics - into its own suite of products. [A market researcher] said a likely partnership would allow Meta's Quest headset lineup to utilize Copilot as an assistant or for training purposes. Google might follow in the same footsteps."

We quote and translate a second report, which is about the company Apple and Meta (Facebook), and our coherent Ontologic Model (OM), and was publicized on the 24th of June 2024 (yesterday): "Apple and Facebook parent company Meta are discussing a collaboration in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), according to a report in [... a] Journal. Both companies have discussed integrating Meta's AI model into Apple's announced AI system "Apple Intelligence", the newspaper reported on Sunday, citing sources familiar with the matter."

Comment
See also the notes

and the other publications cited therein.

We quote a third report, which is about the company Huawei and the partial Ontologic System (OS) variants HarmonyOS and HarmonyOS NEXT, and was publicized on the 24th of June 2024 (yesterday): "The Chinese giant, which has been a flashpoint in the escalating rivalry between Washington and Beijing, says more than 900 million smartphones now use its in-house operating system Harmony OS.
"We have done in 10 years what our European and American counterparts have done in more than 30 years, and have achieved independent control of the core technology of the operating system," Richard Yu, the chairman of Huawei's consumer business group, said at a developer forum [(HDC 2024)] on Friday[, the 21st of June 2024].
[...]
The company's net profit soared 564% to $2.71 billion in the first quarter, and that robust jump comes after it recorded its fastest revenue growth in four years in 2023, thanks to a pick-up in its consumer segment and income from new businesses like smart car components.
[...]"

Comment
We have the opinion that these marketing statements need more background informations and facts.
The correct number of Ontoscopes running on HarmonyOS is not known, but could be 900 million reproductions since 2019.
We also note that this number has to be related to HarmonyOS based on Android, but not HarmonyOS NEXT, which all are partial Ontologic System (OS) variants.

Furthermore, the company Huawei

because the

• Ontologic Core (OC),
• Ontologic roBot (OntoBot),
• Ontologic Base (OntoBase),
• Ontologic File System (OntoFS),
• Ontologic Scope (OntoScope),
• Ontologic Computer-Aided technologies (OntoCAx) (e.g. OntoBlender),
• Ontologic Net (OntoNet),
• Ontologic Web (OntoWeb),
• and so on,

and therefore belong to the exclusive rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation protected worldwide.
But to be precise, if Huawei is a Joint Venture (JV) partner of our corporation, then the statement about independent control is right due to the control of the JV by us.

See also the notes

and the other publications cited therein.

We quote a fourth report, which is about the U.S.American government, and was publicized on the 21st of June 2024: "U.S. Moves Ahead With Plan to Restrict Chinese Technology Investments
[...]
The Biden administration on Friday outlined its plans to curb new American investment in critical Chinese technology industries that could be used to enhance China's military, further straining economic ties with Beijing at a time when trade tensions are rising.
The proposed Treasury Department rules would prohibit certain U.S. investments in Chinese companies that are developing semiconductors, quantum computers and artificial intelligence systems. The Biden administration is trying to restrict American financing from helping China develop advanced technology that could be used for weapons tracking, government intelligence and surveillance.
The regulations are expected to be finalized later this year. They come nearly a year after President Biden signed an executive order calling for the investment ban, which will largely affect venture capital and private equity firms that do business with Chinese companies.
"This proposed rule advances our national security by preventing the many benefits certain U.S. investments provide - beyond just capital - from supporting the development of sensitive technologies in countries that may use them to threaten our national security," said Paul Rosen, the Treasury Department's assistant secretary for investment security.
The restrictions require investors to notify the Treasury Department about certain kinds of transactions, and some types of investments are explicitly prohibited. As part of the program, the Treasury Department has the power to force a divestment and violations could be referred to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution.
The rules apply to equity investments, debt financing that could be converted to equity, and to joint ventures.
[...]"

Comment
Guess why the U.S.American administration has to take this and other related measures instead of prohibiting ... our Evoos and our OS.
Exactly, the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. is are not a creation, an invention, a compilation, an architecture, etc., and hence not a right, a property, and so on neither of the U.S.American, or the P.R.Chinese, nor any other union of federal states, single sovereign state, federal state of a union of states, economic zone (of sovereign states (e.g. European Union)), trade union, or zone of other interests.
And if an entity wants something from us, then it has to

• national and international laws, regulations, and acts, as well as agreements, conventions, and charters,
• rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation, and
• Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) Terms of Service (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR)

As we already made crystal clear, none of these companies get their own OS and substitute our corporation with our SOPR, but all of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation will be restored, restituted, and so on.

See also the notes

10:09 UTC+2
Zhejiang Geely has to comply with ToS

Terms of Service (ToS)
New Energy™
Pure Electric™

12:30 UTC+2
JVs with SOEs required for 5G NR, 5G NG, and 6G

Joint Venture (JV)
State-Owned Enterprise (SOE)
5th Generation mobile networks or 5th Generation wireless systems (5G) New Radio (5G NR)
5th Generation mobile networks or 5th Generation wireless systems of the Next Generation (5G NG)
6th Generation mobile networks or 6th Generation wireless systems (6G)

China Telecom and Co., we hope that all Telecommunication Service Providers (TSPs) are ready worldwide. :)

26.June.2024

20:56 UTC+2
Governments should not fall prey to illusions

It is very well known that we are following and documenting the developments in fields like what is wrongly called Cloud Computing (CC or CloudC), Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), and so on since years. And for sure, they all always want what we have created.
But we have several issues with this.

First of all, the basic technologies and our creations are around 2 to 3 decades old, and everybody is following us and copying respectively performing and reproducing our expressions of idea, creations, compilations, integrations, unifications, fusions, architectures, and so on without meeting a minimum of legal requirements and certainly without having the allowance.
This means that the infrastructures with their foundational and essential facilities, technologies, goods, and services 'R' us. Nobody will interfere with, and also obstruct, undermine, and harm the exclusive moral rights of C.S. (e.g. exploitation (e.g. commercialization (e.g. monetization))) or continue with that.
Furthermore, the market is already divided up as well. Honestly, we arranged it in such a way so that we only have to handle just some very few market leaders. :D

An implication is that the strategies and plans of many governments cannot be realized in general and to the planned extent in particular.
We do know that those entities, who have infringed the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation, have put this illusion of sovereign cloud, intelligence, and so on into the minds of governments by their illegal marketing and are selling the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S., despite they just do not own them. We will not list them once again, because it is obvious about who we are talking.

We are also wondering a little where all the customers for these AI, ML, etc. services are. They are definitely not in the U.S.America, the European Union, and the P.R.China, who are also having their own strategies, plans, and ... illusions.
Therefore, the question is, where are market niches for specialized solutions. They are definitely not our businesses.

We also highly recommend once again to invest in the own people, culture, and domestic market, share the wealth, and develop the local economy further, instead of unrestrained luxury, prestige, and military.

See also the note Geopolitical regions should avoid legal interfaces of the 22nd of June 2024.

Instead of giving away a model as open source, one should keep it closed, demand the customary licensing fee, and then defer the payment of the bill.
But our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) will also get every model sooner or sooner.

It is a mutual taking and giving. We have already given.

27.June.2024

07:03 and 11:05 UTC+2
-x-o-x-o-x-o-x-o-x-

We would like to make the following suggestions:
Microsoft
Domain-Specific Languages, Images, Sounds, and Models, and SoftWare Agent-Based System (SWABS)(*) compatible with

in general and

in particular.

rest confidential

Alphabet (Google)
Domain-Specific Languages, Images, Sounds, and Models, and SoftWare Agent-Based System (SWABS)(*) compatible with

in general and

in particular.
rest confidential

Amazon
Domain-Specific Languages, Images, Sounds, and Models, and SoftWare Agent-Based System (SWABS)(*) compatible with

in general and

in particular.
rest confidential

* common base for one OS

• weather,
• geography,
• government,
• education,
• finance,
• commerce,
• infrastructures
  • public and
  • private,
• utilities
  • power,
  • water,
  • communication,
  • collaboration,
  • etc.,
• engineering,
• manufacturing,
• agriculture,
• mining,
• travel,
• goods,
• etc.

• primarily symbolic, logic, validated and verified, and rational (core),
• secondarily unified and hybrid (more peels, skins, less edges),
• tertiary subsymbolic, connectionist, probabilistic, and statistic (less peels, skins, more edges)

Due to the transfer of all illegal materials, sufficient plagiarisms and fakes, and also other materials are available.

Data Centers (DCs), clusters, and superclusters must work together and be connected by public and private exchange points as part of our Ontologic eXchange (OX or OntoX) in our Ontoverse (Ov) (more and more), so first preparations can begin.
The same holds for other proposed and even designated Joint Venture (JV) partners.

Our share of the profits and royalties of Joint Ventures (JVs) can be reinvested, but no share buyback, or deposited in an account for later use, at least until the set of legal documents will be signed. .

As already discussed several years ago, this becomes the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies.
Therefore, we cannot recommend to implement a plagiarism and fake, but become a member and licensing partner of our SOPR and utilize these infrastructures for example by using the subsystems and platforms directly, or hooking own subsystems and platforms into the them and use them indirectly so to say.
The Terms of Service (ToS) of our SOPR also comprises regulations for more (elaborated ...) partnerships, for example as Main Contractor (MC) or Joint Venture (JV) partner if the preconditions are fulfilled.

23:39 UTC+2
Ontonics Further steps

Investment funds and comparable investment vehicles, like the one of the Berkshire Hatherway conglomerate, the Vision fund and other funds financially supported by Saudi Arabia, the MGX fund of the United Arab Emirates, and all others have to join the investment programs of our HighTech Office Ontonics.

In general, we said the following in the issue SOPR #311 of the 15th of December 2020: "Investors have the opportunity to invest unlimitedly in the

also managed by our business unit Ontonics due to the reasons that our

• performing and replicating our ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S.,
• mimicking C.S. and our corporation, including our SOPR, and also
• damaging the goals and even threatening the integrities of C.S. and our corporation, including our SOPR."

In particular, we also said that up to 10% of each single

is available, whereby we ask 10 billion U.S. Dollar for 1%.
The same height of investment will be made by our Ontonics.

Involvement in the management of the funds should be possible, but this requires more negotiations about the preconditions and other details.
Factories, service hubs, and other facilities are located, where the investments come from.

Anything else will not work. Do not try it at home. It never worked. Safe your money.
It is a legal story in the first place with a financial story as a secondary scene.
Our horizon into the future is much further ahead, as proven multiple times in the last 2 decades.

See also the notes