slightly.
Some estimations and preliminary decisions in relation to the payment of damage compensations, the higher of apportioned compensation, profit, and value:

Cash only and without delay and deferral.

The remainder has to pay royalties in accordance with Terms of Service (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR).

See also the notes

05.November.2024

14:08 UTC+2
Ontonics Further steps

We observed that oversmart autocrats, democrats, and such alike, investors, and other entities are trying to jump on the next bandwagon in relation to the

• OntoLab Vision Fund™, and
• Blitz Fund™.

But we can already tell every bad actor that in addition to the worldwide copyright our Superbolts™ and Superunicorns™ will also be guarded by the worldwide patent right. Correspondingly, we have already begun to gather a one of a kind elaborated patent portfolio since around 10 years, which will significantly accelerate every dispute at the courts. :þ ©™
Therefore, all those activities of them are only a waste of time.

By the way:

06.November.2024

Comment of the Day #1

"So, we will get 4 years of entertainment.", [C.S.' mother, Today]

Comment of the Day #2

"Alternative for America (AfA)", [C.S., Today]

20:52 and 25:49 UTC+1
Do not believe the crypto crap bubble

As others and we have shown again and again, cryptocurrencies, crypto exchange platforms for pure speculative trading, crypto Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs), and so on are just only a giant fraud made out of essential integrations of basic components of our Ontologic System (OS), vast amounts of electricity, and hot air.
Some even simply said 'Here are 100 billion tokens of our fantasy coins' and then sold some of them to total morons so that as a result that nonsense was valued at 132 billiion U.S. Dollar.
And it goes on like this: "75 percent of the total fees paid to the network take the form of [its own] tokens, which are typically taken out of circulation - or "burned" - and thus are not counted in its published revenue figures." Unverified, unregulated, untaxed.

The whole artificially created zombie value just does not exist in the real world and the whole magic show is only running due to pseudo-liquidity or popularity or idiocy.
"Buyer beware. The lunatics are running the crypto asylum."

23:00 UTC+1
Style of Speed Further steps

We got another scientific confirmation by a very well known university that one of our fascinating solutions has an incredibley high efficiency, which again results in a never seen before high efficiency of an overall technology.
Even better, this specific variant matches another one of our fascinating solutions.
Therefore, we already moved from the basic Research and Development (R&D) phase to the prototyping phase several years ago and can focus on the final details regarding the design and production. Basically, this is ready for its worldwide mass production, market access, and revolutionary impact.

We also begun the R&D phase of its second generation, which also comprises 2 different integrations with existing technologies, and it will be interesting to see how far this solution can be pushed.

07.November.2024

Comment of the Day

"Holy Beavis and Saint Butt-Head", [C.S., Today]

08.November.2024

02:10 UTC+1
Italy has to comply with ToS

Terms of Service (ToS)

As in the case of the U.S.America, the P.R.China, the French Republic, the United Kingdom, the F.R.Germany, Republic of Turkey, and so on, Musk also cannot help Italy in circumventing the

specifically the utilization of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies.

See also the notes

02:59, 03:34, and 03:50 UTC+1
SOPR made some considerations

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is neutral and treats every entity equally in America, Europe, Africa, Asia, Australia, and Antartica, and therefore our SOPR will not change its position in relation to the future administration of the U.S.America, which is becoming effective on the 20th of January 2025.

Furthermore, despite some slightly thought-provoking actions of its founder and its Chief Executive Officer (CEO) recently, our SOPR will not change its position in relation to the company Amazon for the same reasons as in the case of the U.S.America (see also the List of damages update of the 2nd of November 2024).

Moreover, the view and plan of kingdoms in the region Middle East are understandable and comprehensible. But if one puts this into practice, then one has to realize that our original and unique, and liberal and progressive visions, creations, and expressions of idea are already here since 25 years, and a lot of other dependencies exist, so that eventually the ideal is not feasible. Therefore, one has to find (market) niches, and this is where one can start producing instead of only consuming.
And indeed, our Hightech Office Ontonics with its SOPR has reserved some special areas, tasks, etc., but we will not go into the details, because this is only for the investment partners of Ontonics (see also the Ontonics Further steps of the 5th of November 2024) and the licensing partners of our SOPR.
Eventually, companies, like for example Microsoft, Amazon, etc., and also Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chace, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, Barclays, etc., BlackRock, Citigroup, Standard Chartered, Bridgewater Associates, Third Point, etc., rogue governments, and other very special actors will not be of much help, when it comes to the

specifically the utilization of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies.
See also for example the note Geopolitical regions should avoid legal interfaces of the 22nd of June 2024.
We also would like to recall our recommendation to the member states of the Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa and other countries (BRICS+ or BRICS Plus) organization that they should also invest in their peoples, freedoms, equalities, and liberal and progressive ideas, and not merely in their domestic and foreign markets.

09.November.2024

00:00 UTC+1
18 years of official start of OS

18 years of more outstanding, original and unique, unforeseeable and unexpected, personal and copyrighted revolutions far beyond the digital transformation.

By the way:

And we also recall the 9/11, which reflects the 11/9.

Comment of the Day

"It's the stupidity, stupid.", [C.S., Today]

Keep It Simple, Stupid (KISS).

10.November.2024

21:20 UTC+1
SOPR preparing official start of Ov coins

As discussed and announced multiple times throught the last years, our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is preparing the introduction of our exclusive and mandatory digital and virtual currencies in the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse (Ov), specifically in the

• Ontologic Bank (OB or OntoBank),
• Ontologic Payment System (OPS or OntoPay),
  • Amazon Pay,
  • Google Pay (formerly Android Pay),
  • Microsoft Pay (formerly Microsoft Wallet),
  • Apple Pay,

  • Samsung Pay,
  • Huawei Pay,
  • Xiaomi Mi-Pay,
  • Alibaba Alipay,
  • Tencent WeChat Pay or Weixin Pay,
  • PayPal,
  • etc.,
• Ontologic Payment Processing System (OPPS),
• Ontologic Exchange (OEx, OntoEx, or OntoExchange),
• etc.

• Marketplace for Everything (MfE),
  • Amazon,
  • Alibaba,

  • Amazon Appstore,
  • Google Play (Store) and Chrome Web Store,
  • Microsoft Store (formerly Windows Store and Xbox Store),
  • Apple App Store,

  • Samsung Galaxy Store,
  • Huawei AppGallery,
  • Xiaomi Mi GetApps,
  • etc.,
• and so on,

• Amazon Web Services,
• Google Cloud Platform,
• Microsoft Azure,
• Oracle Cloud,
• SAP Cloud,
• Samsung Cloud,
• Alibaba Cloud,
• Tencent Cloud,
• etc.,

and also what is wrongly and in some cases even illegally called

Please note that Terms of Service (ToS) do apply, including

• digital wallet,
• etc.

and

Ontological Applications and Ontological Services (OAOS) will be handled in accordance with the ToS:

One point of further consideration are Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) and other financial products and services.

12.November.2024

09:24 and 21:26 UTC+1
Mozilla has to overwork Firefox

The Mozilla Foundation has to remove the strings "Anthropic Claude", "ChatGPT", "Google Gemini", "HuggingChat", and "Le Chat Mistral" out of its web browser, substitute them with the string "OntoBot", or do something else, which is legally permissible, immediately, because according to the

The temporary allowance for the utilization of other coherent Ontologic Models (OMs) only comprise the utilization, but not the referencing or labelling of a supplier or even the illegal designation of a plagiarist.

In the past, our SOPR has directly blacklisted every entity, that presented an illegal plagiarism and fake of our Ontologic roBot (OntoBot), specifically a combination or integration of our OntoBot with our Boot to Web (B2W) based on (web) browser engines, and Free and Open Source Software (FOSS), and we also made crystal clear that we will not exclude anybody from this legal measure.

See also the notes

13.November.2024

22:12 UTC+1
Contracts of AWS, Anthropic, Palantir, DoD, and Co. void

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
U.S. American Department of Defense (DoD)

Even if no details of legal documents have been presented and signed by others and us, the already proposed general outlines make clear that such a contract is illegal in general and will not be accepted by our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) in particular, because the whole matter does not comply with the

specifically the utilization of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies, including

The companies Palantir Technologies, as a member of the illegal European project Gaia-X, and Anthropic are blacklisted.
The U.S.American administration and federal authorities are not in the position to control the related rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation and we explained multiple times in the last years why they never will be for various legal and financial reasons.
Therefore, any contract is void and will be corrected and revised As Soon As Possible (ASAP).

We already had this issue in the past with other original and unique, unforeseeable and unexpected, personal and copyright protected parts of our Ontologic Net (ON) and Ontologic Web (OW), also wrongly and illegally called Cloud, Edge, and Fog Computing (CEFC) and Cloud-native technologies (Cnx).

The same holds for for example

We also would like to note that utilizing a hallucinating bionic system for tasks related to the national security and defense is irresponsible and is exactly that, what should not be done.

See also the notes

and the other publications cited therein.

14.November.2024

12:14 and 23:27 UTC+1
Clarification

*** Work in progress - some few explanations and links missing ***
We are looking at the fields of

to draw the white, yellow, or red line respectively define the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse (Ov) more precisely.
See also the related notes, messages, clarifications, publications (about ABos) of the past.

What we can clearly see is that the highly suspicious

were taken as prior art in relation to our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and our Ontologic System (OS), specifically for mSx, Slx, and FaaS.
Simply said, one could have the impression that

or to put it the other way around, ABos could also be called mSOos.

To be called an agent, a microService "must possess at least two of the qualities autonomous, learning or cooperative".
And indeed,

which are

(see also actor model, agent model, and os daemon).
But "[t]o be called an agent, the [microService] would need to be able to initiate communication using a [(serverless)] peer-to-peer [(P2P)] protocol" as well and despite of the facts that the microService Architecture of the first generation (mSA 1.0) is an Event-Driven Architecture (EDA) and the EDA does not exclude communication based on a P2P protocol, a related mS 1.0 is deployed as an os daemon, application, service, etc. and therefore mSA 1.0 is also a Client-Server Architecture (C-SA), but it is not a ServerLess Architecture (SLA), including the Peer-to-Peer Architecture (P2PA), including the Many-to-Many Architecture (M2MA), of the fields of operating system (os) and Distributed System (DS).
See again the ABos, and the section about mSA and overlay networking below.

Other important characteristics of an mS are the ways of its

In case of the ABos, an agent is just an os or a user application, service, etc. and installed as such.

os-native execution

In case of the microService Architecture of the first generation (mSA 1.0), an mS 1.0 is "packaged as a single executable [Java archive (]jar[) file or similar approach of another programming language ...] along with their configuration and Unix standard rc.d scripts", which is deployed either

os-native execution

In case of the microService Architecture of the second generation (mSA 2.0), an mS 2.0 along with its runtime and dependencies (binaries and libraries) is packaged as a single container image, which is "commonly deployed in [an isolated] container" and installed as an independent Runtime Environment (RE), that operates as a regular os process.

operating system-level virtualization or containerization
At least in case of the Platform as a Service (PaaS) and the Function as a Service (FaaS) delivery models, a container managed by a customer is optional, because resources are more abstracted and services are more managed (e.g. serverless) by a provider. However, as part of a Distributed System (DS) or network proper isolation of an mS or a function by namespace and cgroup (initially called container, then control group) is still required and therefore handled as part of the management of a service provider.

In case of the ABos, the os integrates basic properties of the subfields of

and the ABos has a

In case of the ABos, only an agent for an os capability is executed in the kernel layer, while an agent for a middleware capability is executed in the service layer and a user application, including a business capability, is executed in the user layer.

In case of the microService Architecture of the first generation (mSA 1.0), an mS 1.0 is a business capability and an os capability, which means a user application is also handled like an os unit, module, component, application, or service and therefore an mS 1.0 is executed as part of an os without multiple os layers (spaces, modes), such as a

in contrast to ABos and related oss.

In case of the microService Architecture of the second generation (mSA 2.0), an mS 2.0 is a business capability, which is executed as part of a container respectively regular os process with its isolation provided by a namespace and a cgroup within an

in a user layer (space, mode).

Both execution modes of mSA, the

were created with our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) with its Evolutionary operating system Architecture (EosA) and our Ontologic System (OS) with its Ontologic System Architecture (OSA), because we

We also note the following facts:

This implies once again that the field of microService technologies (mSx), and also the closely connected fields of os-level Virtualization (osV) or containerization, ServerLess technologies (SLx), and Cloud-native technologies (Cnx) are something new, which was intentionally created with our Evoos and our OS, and has always been explained in this sense.

This also explains the intentional

in the context of mSx, SOx, and Cloud, Edge, and Fog Computing (CEFC) and for these partial plagarisms.
We quote an online encyclopedia about the subject cloud computing: "The service-oriented architecture (SOA) promotes the idea of "Everything as a Service" (EaaS or XaaS [...]).[...] This concept is operationalized in cloud computing through several service models [or (business) capability models and (cloud) operational models ...]."

This direct reference to the field of os also explains the connection of mSA 1.0 with the fields of Resource-Oriented Computing (ROC) and reflective system (e.g. reflective Service-Oriented technologies (SOx)) (see the clarifications or investigations about the plagiarism and fake Netkernel in October and December 2018 and February, March, and October 2019, and our Java Jini Operating System (JJOS)).

"For complex networking needs, [one] can create the network namespace

Service-to-Service (S2S) invocation (see also RMI and RPC)

The ServerLess Architecture (SLA), including the Peer-to-Peer Architecture (P2PA), including the Many-to-Many Architecture (M2MA) in general and the Chord protocol and algorithm for a P2P Distributed Hash Table (DHT) in particular, the field of Software-Defined Wide Area Network (SD-WAN), etc. belong to the field of overlay network.
This overlay is the missing ability to initate a communication using a P2P protocol, which eventually makes an mS an agent.
But Docker, Kubernetes, Kata Containers, gVisor, etc. without SLA are already infringments of our Evoos Architecture (EosA) due to os-level virtualization and our OS Architecture (OSA) due to in-kernel Key-Value (K-V) store and microVirtual Machine (mVM).
At least in relation to Docker and Kubernetes the designation agent is used: "For example, running Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS) on EC2 instances requires that you use Docker for the ECS agent to launch containers."

The facts above also show that Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) with Event-Driven Architecture (EDA) or Service-Oriented Architecture of the second generation (SOA 2.0) is already included in our Evoos due to the integration of the

Despite of the many other possibilities and solutions, specifically those already existing in the fields of Agent-Oriented technologies (AOx) (e.g. Multi-Agent System (MAS)) and Service-Oriented technologies (SOx) (e.g. Web Services (WS), Java, and Java Jini), system developers, service providers, and other members of the addressed and interested public have taken our Evoos and our OS as sources of inspiration and blueprints.

However, a lot is not working in the case of ABos and thus also not in the case of mSA and therefore even not in the case SOA such as the performance and scalability of

Furthermore, a lot is even missing such as

• AI,
• Distributed Artificial Intelligence (DAI) (Multi-Agent System (MAS), MAS agency or Agent Society (AS), and Distributed Problem Solving (DPS)),

and their

Note that "such a [BlackBoard Architecture (BBA) or] design violates the idea of autonomicity autonomy since the agents do not get the right to decide for themselves who is next to run" and "the agents will be run as separate processes, but they will still run on a core designed especially for the agents. In this sense the system will host fully autonomous agents but still be a federated agent system".
Well, if one takes the

then a Multi-Agent System (MAS) based on the BBA must not be a federated system, but can be a fully autonomous system.

Also note that Cluster Computing (CC or ClusterC) is mentioned, but not integrated: "IBM are making a great show about their thin clients, so called [Network Computers (]NCs[)] [14 [JavaStation NC. Slashing the Total Cost of Ownership for Fixed Function Applications. [1996]]], no one is talking about removing the processing power from the clients. The alternative, to have dedicated workstations that are part of the processor pool, is visible in today's clustering techniques [15 [Sun Announces New HPC Server Clustering Capabilities Supporting up to 256 Processors. [11th of November 1997]]], but only organizations with high requirements on servers will use clustering." and "the servers should of course work as a cluster, cooperating to store the data in a fault-tolerant way and update servers that have been down with the changes made during their absence".
Well, we took SuperComputing (SC or SupC), High-Performance Computing (HPC), High-Throughput Computing (HTC), Cluster Computing (CC), Parallel Computing (PC or ParaC), Grid Computing (GC or GridC), Wide Area Network (WAN) SuperComputing (SC) (WANSC) and so on directly as the foundation for our Evoos and our OS, specifically for the integration, etc. on the basis of Distributed Shared Memory (DSM), message passing, resileince, synchronization, and so on as well.

Also note that "parts of the kernel with arbitrary levels of intelligence" also has to be viewed in the context of Agent-Oriented Programming (AOP) and the statements that "AI researchers being as they are tend to want agents to have all sorts of [logic-based] AI concepts like planners, theorem provers and such [34 [Pitfalls of Agent-Oriented Development. [1998]]]", and "intelligent, reflective, or even learning software [35 [Computerized Agents from a Linguistic Perspective. [1997]]] [...] is inherently not possible within a formal system, and a computer can not perform anything which is not describable in a formal system".
Well, deterministic chaos and fractals are mathematical concepts and included in our Evoos and our OS in addition to for example random number generator, Evolutionary Computing (EC) based on randomly generated candidate solutions, subsymbolic, connectionist (neural), probabilistic, and statistic system, integrated subsymbolic and symbolic system, specifically unified subsymbolic and symbolic system, also known as connectionist symbol processing system, or subsymbolic Artificial Intelligence (AI) system, ... or integrated connectionist model (e.g. neuro-symbolic AI), and our transformative, generative, and creative Bionics. One needs only a zero and the fun begins.

Furthermore, from the legal point of view ABos and Java Jini are alternatives for the expression, realization, or implementation of one of several basic ideas, which implies that our Evoos and our OS are different expressions of idea, compilation, integration, unification, architecture, etc. considered as parts of the artistic style in this relation and include, integrate, etc. (the functionalities of) OAA, ABOS, and Java Jini as well. Therefore, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux as Distributed operating system (Dos) with or without osVM (e.g. kernel Virtual Machine (kVM)), Hardware Abstraction Layer (HAL) and microkernel operating system used as microVirtual Machine (mVM), Kata Containers, container sandbox, gVisor, Container as a Service (CaaS), Kubernetes as a Service (KaaS), Cnx, etc., and much more are definitely in the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse (Ov).
Now, the members of the interested public can also see, why Cloud Computing of the first generation (Cloud 1.0) and the Cloud Computing of the second generation (Cloud 2.0) failed and our Cloud Computing of the third generation (Cloud 3.0), or being more precise, our Ontologic Net (ON) and Ontologic Web (OW) succeeded.

Also note that the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), a web engine, etc. are an Abstract Machine (AM), which interprete code, but do not virtualize hardware and operating system.

Once again, we have the opinion that a well-founded basis for decision-making and reaching an amicable joint compromise does exist. Especially relevant are the core businesses and the exceptions of law.
And eventually and obviously, as always, the negotiations are only about details and due to the reason that we have a seamless simulation of an ordinary technological progress by external entities and also integrated prior art, one can also see that our works of art have been taken as sources of inspiration and blueprints all the time and not only, if at all, the prior art alone.

15.November.2024

05:59 UTC+1
Anduril Industries blacklisted

The company Anduril Industries and its customers have to comply with the

specifically the utilization of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies.

Therefore, Anduril Industries gets no own Ontologic System (OS), specifically not a kind of meta software platform, which serves as the central operating system (os) for war, like every other entity.
And all those creative circumscriptions, reformulations, and misleading descriptions of plagiarisms and fakes are also useless, because the originality and uniqueness of an expression of idea is relevant.

By the way:

06:06 and 08:18 UTC+1
SOPR thinks deal making is fun

We do not say explicitly that intelligence and military matters go exclusively to the designated Joint Venture Partners (JVPs), such as for example

or designated takeover candidates respectively subsidiaries of our corporation, such as for example

*working name

because

as an additional line and bulwark of legal defense, so that

And once again, no entity gets an own Ontologic System (OS), or a kind of meta software platform, or a software platform, which serves as a central operating system (os), or an all-domain management system for a customer, which is based on facilities, technologies, goods, and services, which again belong to the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies. If at all, then such a platform has to be based on legal facilities, technologies, goods, and services to 100%.

But as a consequence of the prohibiting regulation, our SOPR cannot grant license agreements or even take royalties, because a judge might view such an act as an unspoken consent or agreement.
Nevertheless, every entity, including governments, intelligence agencies, armies, and so on, has to pay its fair share in accordance with the ToS with its License Model (LM) of our SOPR.
How we solve this contradiction has not been decided. Maybe, we add a tariff for U.S.American companies, which

Or our Hightech Office Ontonics just cannot assign the posts in the balance sheets of the JVPs.

17.November.2024

Comment of the Day

Instant service™
Instant as a Service™

The use of the terms serverless and serverless computing in relation to an as a Service (aaS) capability and operational model are misleading, if said aaS is based on the Client-Server Architecture (C-SA), but not the ServerLess Architecture (SLA), including the Peer-to-Peer Architecture (P2PA), including the Many-to-Many Architecture (M2MA), of the field of Distributed Computing (DC).
In the context of the related original and unique works of art created by C.S. we consider this misdirection even as am illegal deliberate deception of the members of the interested public due to our kernel-less Distributed operating system (klDos).

Stateless is also a better term for the term serverless.

19.November.2024

Comment of the Day

"Nice view from the plateau.", [C.S., Today]

18:24 and 25:34 UTC+2
99.99999% 'R' Us + 0.00001% Nvidia

We add

Furthermore, we have to note in relation to the items listed above that Nvidia evolved its range of software, so that it has become even more similar, which means substantial similarity has been established and matches are now obviouis and very easy to demonstrate.

If one looks at its marketing material of the last 2 decades, which is about

including the breaks and the changes, then one can see one constant respectively one pattern, which shows its business plan, strategy, and way of realization alone and in collaboration, which again is about the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation, specifically our Ontologic System (OS) and our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), but not its core business of hardware acceleration (processors, Graphics Processing Unit (GPU), etc.) with related hardware drivers and software libraries.

Like every other entity concerned, Nvidia gets no allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our Ontologic System (OS), because foundational and essential facilities, technologies, goods, and services in general, and SoftBionics as a Service (SBaaS) in particular belong to the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies.
And Nvidia will also not squeeze itself between the end customers and our corporation, will not make decision regarding the Terms of Service (ToS) with its License Model (LM) of our SOPR, and will not continue with damaging the goals and even threatening the integrities of C.S. and our corporation, specifically of our SOPR by interfering with, and also obstructing, undermining, and harming the exclusive moral rights respectively Lanham (Trademark) rights and also the copyrights, including the exclusive rights for

• referencing respectively citation with attribution,
• designation,

and also

of C.S. and our corporation.

Finally, we leave it up to our fans and readers to estimate the damage compensations, which are the higher of apportioned compensation, profit, and value, and set it in relation to 99.99999%, and find out that our estimation points to the correct range due to the existing evidences, causalities, and laws.

See also the notes

and the other publications cited therein.

21.November.2024

01:56 UTC+1
SOPR grants discounts only for JVPs

We would like to recall that our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) grants discounts only for an enterprise, that

and becomes a Joint Venture Partner (JVP) in this way.

See also the notes

and the other publications cited therein.

01:48, 02:31, and 04:29 UTC+1
Most media companies omit important information

We quote a report, which is about Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Large Language Model (LLM), which are a part of our original and unique coherent Ontologic Model (OM), our transformative, generative, and creative Bionics, and our Ontologic roBot (OntoBot), and was publicized on the 19th of November 2024: "AI is hitting a wall just as the hype around it reaches the stratosphere
The narrative from Silicon Valley is that the AI train has left the station and any smart investor had better hop on before these products become "superintelligent" and start solving all the world's problems. (To the true believers, that's not hyperbole, and those expectations have helped turn once-niche companies like chipmaker Nvidia [...] into some of the most valuable assets on the planet.)
Of course, the key to that narrative is the promise that large language models (LLMs) like [partial plagiarisms of our OM and our OntoBot] keep improving at an exponential rate.
Some AI skeptics have warned for years about "scaling laws" - the idea that you can continually improve a model's output just by throwing more data and computing power at it. These aren't so much laws as they are educated guesses, though. And the truth is, even the scientists who build LLMs don't fully understand how they work.
Now, some of the leading language models appear to be hitting a wall, according to at least three reports last week. See here:

OpenAI [Chief Executive Officer (]CEO[)] Sam Altman appeared to push back on the reports, posting on [a social media platform] last week that "there is no wall."
Whether it's a wall or a mountain or a plateau or whatever you want to call it, even AI bulls say it's possible we've reached a turning point just based on the products that have been released.
"We haven't seen a breakthrough model in a while," [...a] managing director at [an] investment group [...] told me. "Part of it is that we've exhausted all the human data, and so just throwing more compute at the same data may not yield better results."
[...]
But if we have indeed hit a scaling wall, "it may mean that the the mega-cap technology companies have over-invested" and it's possible that they could scale back in the near future.
That's the AI optimist/pragmatist view.
For a less rosy outlook, I turned to [a] professor emeritus and outspoken critic of [the] AI hype.
"The economics are likely to be grim," [a professor emeritus] wrote earlier this month on his [website]. "LLMs will not disappear, even if improvements diminish, but the economics will likely never make sense ... When everyone realizes this, the financial bubble may burst quickly; even Nvidia might take a hit, when people realize the extent to which its valuation was based on a false premise."

Comment
From the technological point of view, we already were at this point around 23 years ago and already discussed the basic problem of the brute force approach over the last years. But what is their solution? Of course more computing power.
See also the notes

And for sure, we have overinvested, and others and we made that very clear in the last months, because we are the only entity that can afford this and we take and eventually get all of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation back in one way or another.
See also for example the notes

But after Goldman Sachs forecasted that the growth will only be 3% in the next 10 years, it said 2 days ago that it will be 10% in 2025, which shows how the investment banks adapt their stories to keep the bubble at the stock markets intact, increase our damages, and continue to channel our money into their pockets.
Howsoever, it is very easy to determine the damage compensations in case of every entity concerned, and the next step is to collect the damage compensations respectively company shares respectively enterprises.

Not surprisingly, the quality media have not reported about this very important matter, like they always do, despite some of them even cite the media company, which has publicized the report quoted above, in relation to the same topic.

By the way:

08:30 UTC+1
Bakkt Holdings blacklisted

We already own the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies with their set of foundational and essential facilities, technologies, goods, and services, including our

• Ontologic Bank (OB or OntoBank),
• Ontologic Payment System (OPS or OntoPay),
• Ontologic Payment Processing System (OPPS),
• Ontologic Exchange (OEx, OntoEx, or OntoExchange),
• and so on,

  as well as our digital and virtual currencies

• OntoCoin,
• OntoTaler, and
• Qoin,

  which are exclusive and mandatory in the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse (Ov) (see also the message SOPR preparing official start of Ov coins of the 10th of November 2024),

and also

By the way:

22.November.2024

12:52 UTC+1
Further steps

We are still cleaning up this website, harmonizing explanations and definitions, and drawing the white, yellow, or red line more precisely to produce more significant legal mass in relation to our

• Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV), which collectively are our Ontoverse (Ov) and New Reality (NR),
• as a Service (aaS) capability and operational models, also summarized as as a Service technologies (aaSx), and
• Ontologic Net (ON), and Centric/Named networking,

The result will also be adopted directly as the contents of legal documents, whereby we will focus on the personal, artistical, architectural science-fictional, unforeseeable and unexpectable, as well as the overall sui generis aspects and characteristics.

Likewise, additional contents have been collected, so that the next step is the sorting and arrangement followed by filling the gaps and adding missing parts.

24.November.2024

06:56 UTC+2
List of damages update

We have updated the list of damages of the

slightly.
Some estimations and preliminary decisions in relation to the payment of damage compensations, the higher of apportioned compensation, profit, and value:

25.November.2024

17:23 UTC+2
microServices 'R' Us

Cloud 3.0 'R' Us
Cloud-native 'R' Us
SoftBionics 'R' Us
Ontologies 'R' Us
Ontologics 'R' Us
Ontologic Model 'R' Us
Trusted Artificial Intelligence 'R' Us
Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence 'R' Us
Smarts 'R' Us
Hightech 'R' Us

We finally found the bottom and can draw the white, yellow, or red line bottom-up regarding our works of art and architectures.

For example, we also have Reflective operating system (Ros), Kernel-Less operating system (KLos), Virtual Machine Monitor (VMM) or hypervisor, and Virtual Machine (VM), operating system Virtual Machine (osVM), microVirtual Machine (mVM), operating system-level virtualization or containerization, Peer-to-Peer Virtual Machine (P2PVM), etc. for the aspect of the real and metaphysical, bionic, cybernetic, and ontologic self-reflection or self-image of the memory, mind, consciousness, etc. in addition to Cognitive System (CS or CogS), Memory Model (MM) (e.g. Multi-store Model or Modal Model), Synergetics, Synergetic Computer (SynC), Bioholonics, Autonomic Cognitive Computer (ACogC), The Society of Minds, Associative Memory (AM) or Content-Addressable Memory (CAM), BlackBoard System (BBS), Distributed operating system (Dos), Agent-Based operating system (ABos), Unix, Linux, etc..

Furthermore, we have Machine Learning (ML), Computational Intelligence (CI), Soft Computing (SC), Fuzzy Logic (FL), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Probabilistic Model (PM or ProM), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Genetic Programming (GP), and our transformative, generative, and creative Bionics, Ontologic Model (OM) (e.g. Foundational Model (FM)), (MultiModal) Large Language Model (LLM), etc. in addition to Ontology, Epistemology, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Natural Language Understanding (NLU), Language Model (LM), Conversational System (CS or ConS), MultiModal User Interface (MUI or MMUI), etc..

Centric/Named networking, Interconnected supercomputer (Intersup), etc. in addition to Content-Addressable Storage (CAS), Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2PC), Cluster Computing (CC or ClusterC), Interconnected network (Internet), etc..

eXtended Mixed Reality (XMR) or eXtended Reality (XR), Semantic Reality (SR or SemR), Multiverse, Caliber/Calibre, etc., in addtion to Pure, Proper, Physical Reality (PR), Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), Mixed Reality (MR), Synthetic Reality (SR or SynR), Simulated Reality (SR or SimR), Mirror World, Cyber-Physical System (CPS), Internet of Things (IoT), etc..

Ontoverse (Ov) and New Reality (NR) in addition to World Wide Web (WWW), Global Brain (GB), Semantic (World Wide) Web (SWWW), etc..

And all together.

28.November.2024

06:38 UTC+1
SV, SA, et al should avoid corruption, etc.

Silicon Valley (SV)
Silicon Alley (SA)
and at other locations (et al)