Consequently, if an illegal branding for any part of the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. should remain in existence, then the majority of the company shares of an entity holding said brand must be held by C.S..
For example, if the branding of the Ontoscope variant branded as iPhone should remain in existence, then the company Apple has to handover the brand to our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), which will happen when Apple pays its damage compensations, the higher of apportioned compensation, profit, and value.
The same with other companies, such as Microsoft, Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Samsung, Huawei, ZTE, Xiaomi, etc., etc., etc., and other brands, such as Android, iOS, iPad, Windows, Galaxy, etc., etc., etc..

See also for example the notes

05:29 UTC+1
Remove OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, Perplexity, and Co. from appstores

Anything based on our

• Foundational Model (FM),
• Capability and Operational Model (COM),
• Modular Model (MM or ModM),
• MultiModal Model (MMM or MulM),
• MultiLingual Model (MLM or MulLM),
• Language Model (LM),
• Machine Learning Model (MLM),
• Artificial Neural Network Model (ANNM), including
  • Foundation Model (FM),
  • Large Language Model (LLM),
  • unified or integrated ANNM, including
    • unified or integrated LLM, symbol processing LLM, Reasoning LLM, etc.,
  • etc.,
• integrated (unified and hybrid) subsymbolic and symbolic system, including
  • hybrid symbolic LLM,
  • ontology, Domain Specific Language (DSL) with LLM,
• etc.,

• Formal Modeling (FM),

• Logic Programming (LP),
• Literate Programming (LP or LitP),
• Natural Language Programming (NLP),
• Multiparadigmatic Programming (MP),
• Multimodal Multimedia Programming (MMP),
• etc.,

• transformative, generative, and creative Bionics,
• Bridge from Natural Intelligence (NI) to Artificial Intelligence (AI) (Bridge from NI to AI), and
• prompt engineering, forming, shaping, configuring respectively cognitive processing, educating, teaching, learning, etc.,
• etc.

• Ontologic Model-Based Autonomous System (OMBAS),
• Cognitive System (CS or CogS),
• Conversational Agent System (CAS or ConAS),
• Conversational Artificial Intelligence (CAI or ConAI),
• (Information) Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG),
• etc.,

is only allowed with a written

as required by our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) with the consent and on behalf of C.S..

Any refuse to comply with this demand is considered a violation of the

which are already the compromise, and the

in connection with blackmailing, conspiracy, and so on.

This legally required action will be expanded with Meta Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and so on.

Poaching in the walled garden is still punished by death.
It is the law worldwide.

02.February.2025

06:53 and 14:00 UTC+1
Exactly, data center, web hosting, VPS

A Virtual Private Server (VPS) hosting provider offers a web hosting service, where a physical server is divided into multiple virtual servers.
VPS is based on HardWare Virtualization (HWV) respectively Virtual Machine Monitor (VMM) or hypervisor, and Virtual Machine (VM), and also a rudimentary user right management (e.g. UNIX jails). But both, HWV resp. VMM and VM, and jails, are not operating system-level Virtualization (osV) or containerization, microVirtual Machine (mVM), operating system-level Sandbox (osS) or container sandbox, operating system Virtual Machine (osVM), and so on.

There is the white, yellow, or red line with some Web Services (WS), some rudimentary software agents, software robots (software bots or softbots), and other robots, and so on with some limited compositions, integrations, and so on on the one side and the rest on our side.

07:07 UTC+1
Clarification

We have already shown in detail in the Clarification #2 of the 21st of October 2024 that prompt engineering or simply prompting is based on the ontological relativism and the model-level reflective and interactive approach respectively modifying an ontological frame by adding an ontology (of an agent) respectively cognitive processing, learning, forming, educating by utilization, operation, etc. created with our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) with its

• Multi-Agent System (MAS),
• Conversational Agent System (CAS or ConAS),
• Multimodal User Interface (MUI),
• Intelligent Agent System (IAS), and
• Cognitive Agent System (CAS or CogAS),

• Foundational Model (FM),
• Capability and Operational Model (COM),
• Modular Model (MM or ModM),
• MultiModal Model (MMM or MulM),
• MultiLingual Model (MLM or MulLM),
• Language Model (LM),
• Machine Learning Model (MLM),
• Artificial Neural Network Model (ANNM), including
  • Foundation Model (FM),
  • Large Language Model (LLM),
  • unified or integrated ANNM, including
    • unified or integrated LLM, symbol processing LLM, Reasoning LLM, etc.,
  • etc.,
• integrated (unified and hybrid) subsymbolic and symbolic system, including
  • hybrid symbolic LLM,
  • ontology, Domain Specific Language (DSL) with LLM,
• etc.,

• Formal Modeling (FM),

• Logic Programming (LP),
• Literate Programming (LP or LitP),
• foundation of Natural Language Programming (NLP),
• Multiparadigmatic Programming (MP),
• Multimodal Multimedia Programming (MMP),
• etc.,

• foundation of transformative, generative, and creative Bionics,
• foundation of Bridge from Natural Intelligence (NI) to Artificial Intelligence (AI) (Bridge from NI to AI), and
• foundation of prompt engineering, forming, shaping, configuring respectively cognitive processing, educating, teaching, learning, etc.,
• etc.

• Ontologic Model-Based Autonomous System (OMBAS),
• Cognitive Agent System (CAS or ConAS),
• Conversational Agent System (CAS or ConAS),
• foundation of Conversational Artificial Intelligence (CAI or ConAI),
• foundation of (Information) Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG),
• etc.,

What we missed to say is the simply fact that a Large Language Model (LLM) is a bionic, cybernetic, and ontonic approach based on the specifics of context change or the context specifies change, which obviously provides us another causal link with our Evoos and our OS.

See also the related messages, notes, explanations, clarifications, investigations, and claims, specifically

This clarification will be moved to the Clarification #2 of the 21st of October 2024.

07:11 UTC+1
Remove OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, Perplexity, and Co. from ON, OW, OV, and Os

Ontoverse (Ov) and New Reality (NR), including our

• Autonomic technologies (Ax) (e.g. Autonomic Computing (AC)),
• Resource-Oriented technologies (ROx) (e.g. Resource-Oriented Computing (ROC)),
• what is wrongly and illegally called Cloud, Edge, and Fog Computing (CEFC), Cloud-native Computing (CnC), etc.,
• Interconnected supercomputer (Intersup), and
• what is wrongly and illegally called Artificial Intelligence (AI) infrastructure, AI supercomputer, AI supercomputer infrastructure, AI cluster, AI cluster infrastructure, AI cloud, Intelligent Cloud, Edge, and Fog Computing (ICEFC), intelligent cloud infrastructure, etc.,
• eXtended Mixed Reality (XMR) or simply eXtended Reality (XR),
• what is wrongly and illegally called Metaverse (Mv),
• Multiverse,

and also

Anything based on our Ontologic Model (OM), Ontologic Programming (OP), Ontologic Computing (OC), Bridge from Natural Intelligence (NI) to Artificial Intelligence (AI) (Bridge from NI to AI), Ontologic roBot (OntoBot), Conversational Artificial Intelligence (CAI or ConAI), (Information) Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), etc. is only allowed with a written

as required by our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) with the consent and on behalf of C.S..

Any refuse to comply with this demand is considered a violation of the

which are already the compromise, and the

in connection with blackmailing, conspiracy, and so on.

This legally required action will be expanded with Meta Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and so on.

Poaching in the walled garden is still punished by death.
It is the law worldwide.

See also the notes

03.February.2025

03:30 and 11:00 UTC+1
Integration of ABS, LLM, CAI, etc. 100% copyright infringement

*** Work in progress - better formulation ***
it should be very easy to see that we are in the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse (Ov), which in this context of the fields of Natural Language Processing (NLP), Natural Language Understanding (NLU), and Natural Language Reasoning (NLR), and also Language Model (LM), specifically LM based on Artificial Neural Network (ANN), is always the case since some few years or several months.
The integration of the fields of

• Multi-Agent System (MAS),
• Conversational Agent System (CAS or ConAS),
• Multimodal User Interface (MUI),
• Intelligent Agent System (IAS), and
• Cognitive Agent System (CAS or CogAS),

• Foundational Model (FM),
• Capability and Operational Model (COM),
• Language Model (LM),
• Machine Learning Model (MLM),
• Artificial Neural Network Model (ANNM), including
  • Foundation Model (FM),
  • Modular Model (MM or ModM),
  • MultiModal Model (MMM or MulMM),
  • MultiLingual Model (MLM or MulLM),
  • unified or integrated ANNM,
  • Artificial Neural Network General Purpose Model (ANNGPM), including
    • Foundation Model (FM),
    • General Purpose Language Model (GPLM),
    • Global Language Model (GLM),
    • Large Language Model (LLM),
    • Ultra Large Language Model (ULLM),
    • Large MultiModal Model (LMMM),
    • Large Action Model (LAM),
  • Artificial Neural Network MultiModal Model (ANNMMM),
    • Large MultiModal Model (LMMM),
  • etc.,

and further

{not logically correct} or/and

• Model-Based Autonomous System (MBAS) or Immobile Robotic System (ImRS or Immbot),

• Logic Programming (LP),
• Literate Programming (LP or LitP),
• Natural Language Programming (NLP),
• Multiparadigmatic Programming (MP),
• Multimodal Multimedia Programming (MMP),
• etc.,

• transformative, generative, and creative Bionics,
• Bridge from Natural Intelligence (NI) to Artificial Intelligence (AI) (Bridge from NI to AI), and
• prompt engineering, forming, shaping, configuring respectively cognitive processing, educating, teaching, learning, etc.,

• Ontologic Model-Based Autonomous System (OMBAS),
• Cognitive System (CS or CogS),
• Conversational Agent System (CAS or ConAS),
• Conversational Artificial Intelligence (CAI or ConAI),
• (Information) Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG),
• etc.,

• Function as a Service (FaaS),

is an infringement of the rights and properties (e.g. copyright) of C.S. and our corporation for 100%, which becomes even more obvious with the integration of the fields wrongly and illegally called

In this relation, we also gathered and gave some more examples (see also for example the notes SOPR has reviewed discounts of the 26th of May 2023 and SC strategy does not work without OS of the 31st of January 2024), which are exclusive and mandatory for the very well discussed and known reasons, including

due to

We also recall that the

See also the

And the only legal designations worldwide are

This is the law worldwide. What is there not to understand?

See also the notes

By the way:

04.February.2025

12:21 and 23:40 UTC+1
Palantir Technologies around 95%

At first, we quote an online encyclopedia about the subject Palantir Technologies: "[...]

History

2003-20082010: Founding and early years
[...] Thiel saw Palantir as a "mission-oriented company" which could apply software similar to PayPal's fraud recognition systems to "reduce terrorism while preserving civil liberties."[15]
[...]
[...] The only early investments were $2 million from the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency's venture capital arm In-Q-Tel, and $30 million from Thiel himself and his venture capital firm, Founders Fund.[9][10][18][19][20]
Palantir developed its technology by computer scientists and analysts from intelligence agencies over three years, through pilots facilitated by In-Q-Tel.[21][9] The company stated computers alone using artificial intelligence could not defeat an adaptive adversary. Instead, Palantir proposed using human analysts to explore data from many sources, called intelligence augmentation.[22]

2010-2012: Expansion
[...] On June 18, 2010, Vice President Joe Biden and Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag held a press conference at the White House announcing the success of fighting fraud in the stimulus by the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board (RATB). Biden credited the success to the software, Palantir, being deployed by the federal government.[24] He announced that the capability will be deployed at other government agencies, starting with Medicare and Medicaid.[25][26][27][28]
[...]

2013-2016: Additional funding
A document leaked to [a global online newspaper] revealed that Palantir's clients as of 2013 included at least twelve groups within the U.S. government, including [(list points added)]

However, at the time, the United States Army continued to use its own data analysis tool.[30] Also, according to [a global online newspaper], the U.S. spy agencies such as the CIA and FBI were linked for the first time with Palantir software, as their databases had previously been siloed.[30 [Leaked Palantir Doc Reveals Uses, Specific Functions And Key Clients. [11th of January 2015]]]
[...]
[...] As of December 2014, the company continued to have diverse private funders, Ken Langone and Stanley Druckenmiller, In-Q-Tel of the CIA,[35] Tiger Global Management, and Founders Fund, which is a venture firm operated by Peter Thiel, the chairman of Palantir. As of December 2014, Thiel was Palantir's largest shareholder.[34]
[...]
In August 2016, Palantir acquired data visualization startup Silk.[40]

2002
[...]
In December 2020, Palantir was awarded a $44.4 million contract by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, boosting its shares by about 21%.[45]

[...]

Products
Palantir Gotham
Released in 2008, Palantir Gotham is Palantir's defense and intelligence offering. It is an evolution of Palantir's longstanding work in the United States Intelligence Community, and is used by intelligence and defense agencies. Among other things, the software supports alerts, geospatial analysis, and prediction. Users can use Gotham to analyze multiple types of intelligence. Palantir's online demo shows how the software can be used to track an adversary's troop movements.[55] Foreign customers include the Ukrainian military.[56] Palantir Gotham has also been used as a predictive policing system, which has elicited some controversy over racism in their AI analytics.[57]

Palantir Foundry [successor of Palantir Metropolis, which is successor of Palantir Finance]
Palantir Foundry is a software platform offered for use in commercial and civil government sectors. It was popularized for use in the health sector by its use within the National Covid Cohort Collaborative, a secure enclave of Electronic Health Records from across the United States that produced hundreds of scientific manuscripts and won the NIH/FASEB Dataworks! Grand Prize. Foundry was also utilized by the Center NHS England in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic in England to analyze the operation of the vaccination program. A campaign was started against the company in June 2021 by Foxglove, a tech-justice nonprofit, because "Their background has generally been in contracts where people are harmed, not healed." Clive Lewis MP, supporting the campaign said Palantir had an "appalling track record."[58]
As of 2022, Foundry was also used for the administration of the UK Homes for Ukraine program.[59] to give caseworkers employed by local authorities access to data held by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, some of which is supplied by the UK Home Office.
In November 2023, NHS England awarded a 7-year contract to Palantir for a federated data platform to access data from different systems through a single system, worth £330 million, criticized by the British Medical Association, Doctors Association UK and cybersecurity professionals.[60][61][62] In 2024, picketing by medical professionals outside NHS England HQ demanding cancellation of the deal occurred.[63]

Palantir Apollo
Palantir Apollo is a continuous delivery system that manages and deploys Palantir Gotham and Foundry.[64] Apollo was built out of the need for customers to use multiple public and private cloud platforms as part of their infrastructure. Apollo orchestrates updates to configurations and software in the Foundry and Gotham platforms using a micro-service architecture. This product has led Palantir's business model toward providing software as a service and away from developing bespoke solutions for customers as similar to a consulting company.[65] [Bingo!!!]

Other
The company has been involved in a number of business and consumer products, designing in part or in whole. For example, in 2014, they premiered Insightics, which according to [a finance journal] "extracts customer spending and demographic information from merchants' credit-card records." It was created in tandem with credit processing company First Data.[66]

Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP)
In April 2023, the company launched Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP) which integrates large language models into privately operated networks. The company demonstrated its use in war, where a military operator could deploy operations and receive responses via an AI chatbot.[67][68] Citing potential risks of generative artificial intelligence, CEO Karp said that the product would not let the AI independently carry out targeting operations, requiring human oversight.[69][70] Commercial companies have also used AIP across many domains. Applications include infrastructure planning, network analysis, and resource allocation.[71][72]
AIP lets users create LLMs called "agents" through a GUI interface. Agents can interact with a digital representation of a company's business known as an ontology. This lets the models access an organization's documents and other external resources. Users can define output schemas and test cases to validate AI-generated responses. AIP comes with a library of templates that can be extended by clients.[73]
[...] [HyperBingo!!!!]

[...]

Palantir Metropolis
Palantir Metropolis (formerly known as Palantir Finance) was[81][82] software for data integration, information management and quantitative analytics. The software connects to commercial, proprietary and public data sets and discovers trends, relationships and anomalies, including predictive analytics.[83 [Peter Thiel's data-mining company is using War on Terror tools to track American citizens. The scary thing? Palantir is desperate for new customers. [19th of April 2018]]][84 [Report: Palantir Helped JPMorgan Spy on Employees. [19th of April 2018]]] Aided by 120 "forward-deployed engineers" of Palantir during 2009, Peter Cavicchia III of JPMorgan [Chase] used Metropolis to monitor employee communications and alert the insider threat team when an employee showed any signs of potential disgruntlement: the insider alert team would further scrutinize the employee and possibly conduct physical surveillance after hours with bank security personnel.[83][84] The Metropolis team used emails, download activity, browser histories, and GPS locations from JPMorgan owned smartphones and their transcripts of digitally recorded phone conversations to search, aggregate, sort, and analyze this information for any specific keywords, phrases, and patterns of behavior.[83][84] In 2013, Cavicchia may have shared this information with Frank Bisignano who had become the CEO of First Data Corporation.[83] Palantir Metropolis was succeeded by Palantir Foundry.[85]

[...]

Customers
Corporate use
See also: Information Warfare Monitor
Founded as a defense contractor, Palantir has since expanded to the private sector. These activities now provide a large fraction of the company's revenue. Palantir [...] serves foreign customers as well. Example applications include telecommunications and infrastructure planning.[86]
Palantir Metropolis was used by hedge funds, banks, and financial services firms.[9][10][88][89]
Palantir Foundry clients include Merck KGaA,[90] Airbus[91] and Ferrari.[92]
[...]

U.S. civil entities
[...]

U.S. military, intelligence, and police
[...]
Palantir took over the Pentagon's Project Maven contract in 2019 after Google decided not to continue developing AI unmanned drones used for bombings and intelligence.[104] [See also the chapter Controversies below.]
In 2024, Palantir emerged as a "Trump trade" for further enforcing the law on illegal immigrants and profiting on federal spending for national security and immigration.[105]

[Europe]
[U.K.]
British National Health Service (NHS)
[...]

Europe
[Denmark]
The Danish POL-INTEL predictive policing project has been operational since 2017 and is based on the Gotham system. According to the AP the Danish system "uses a mapping system to build a so-called heat map identifying areas with higher crime rates."

[F.R.Germany and Europol]
The Gotham system has also been used by German state police in Hessen [(project Hessendata or Hessen-Data) (see below)] and Europol.[57]
[There is also a giant constitutional scandal in relation to mass surveillance and data privacy, and a giant procurement scandal due to the lack of the legally required public tendering and some kind of intransparent blank order of at least 3 governments of federal states in the F.R.Germany (see below).]
And Palantir is also a member of the illegal Gaia-X project, which is another giant copyright infringement scandal in Europe by the same F.R.German bad actors.]

[Begin of quote and translation of the German version]
Deutschland==Germany
According to press releases from the beginning of April 2018, the Hessian police have purchased the Palantir software Gotham to combat Islamist terrorism and serious and organized crime and are training their personnel on it. A price was not specified by the Hessian Ministry of the Interior for "reasons of the security interests of the state of Hesse".[50] The project runs under the name Hessendata [or Hessen-Data].[51] Because there was no tender, a committee of inquiry of the Hessian state parliament investigated the processes.
On 8 June 2019, the Hessian Minister of the Interior, Peter Beuth, was presented with a Big Brother Award for the second time, as Hessen was taking another major step towards a "control and surveillance state" with Hessendata. In addition, the American company gained access to the highly sensitive data network of the Hessian police.[52][53] [...]
From the third quarter of 2020, the North Rhine-Westphalian State Office of Criminal Investigation wanted to use a system that was supposed to be very similar to Hessendata (i.e. Palantir Gotham) according to the tender. In North Rhine-Westphalia, this is called DAR (System zur Datenbankübergreifenden Analyse und Recherche==System for cross-Database Analysis and Research) and was to cost 14 million euros.[55][56] However, the system could only be released for regular use from May 2022 following an amendment to the state police law in April 2022 and cost a total of around 39 million euros.[57]
At the beginning of March 2022, it was announced that the Bavarian police would be using one or more products in the future.[58] According to a statement from the Bavarian state government in February 2023, [a fraudulant research] Institute for Secure Information Technology, which was commissioned to review the source code, has now completed its work and its report has been evaluated by the Bavarian State Criminal Police Office. A specific introduction date has not yet been set, but the Bavarian Police Duties Act will first be amended to allow the system to be used in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Constitutional Court==BundesVerfassungsGericht (BVerfG) ruling of February 2023.[59]
On February 16, 2023, the BVerfG announced that the First Senate had repealed regulations in Hessen (Paragraph 25a Section 1 Alt. 1 of the Hessian Act on Public Safety and Order) and Hamburg (Paragraph 49 Section 1 Alt. 1 of the Hamburgian Police Data Processing Act), on the basis of which the police can further process stored personal data as part of an automated data analysis (Hessen) or data evaluation (Hamburg) for the preventive combating of criminal offenses, were declared unconstitutional. This was justified on the grounds that they violate the general right to privacy under Article 2 Section 1 in conjunction with Article 1 Section 1 of the German Basic Law [(comparable to a constitution)] in its form of informational self-determination, as they allow the automated processing of unlimited data sets using methods, that are not legally restricted. According to the ruling, the legal regulation in Hamburg - where the system is not yet in use - is null and void, [while] Hessen has until the end of September 2023 to amend it[60].
The [partially State-Owned Enterprise (SOE)] Deutsche Telekom is also said to have been interested in collaborating with Palantir. According to sources close to the company, [Chief Exectuive Officer (]CEO[)] Tim Höttges met with Palantir's management in 2016. However, Deutsche Telekom did not want to publish any details about this[61 [Geheimsache Palantir==Secret Matter Palantir. [3rd of May 2016]]].
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Palantir offered governments around the world the free use of its Foundry product for crisis management in health authorities. Some countries, such as the U.K. and Greece, accepted the offer.[62] As of April 2020, the German Federal Ministry of the Interior had no plans to work with this company during the coronavirus crisis. The Chaos Computer Club fundamentally rejects the use of Foundry as "Covid-washing", as Palantir develops surveillance technologies[63].
[End of the German version]

Schweiz==Swiss Confederation or Switzerland
Zu den Schweizer Kunden zählen unter anderem die Großbank Credit Suisse, das Medienunternehmen Ringier und der Rückversicherer Swiss Re.[64][65]
In Altendorf befindet sich Palantirs Europa-Standort.[66] Der Hauptsitz von Palantir Technologies Geneva Sàrl befindet sich in Genf, mit einer Zweigniederlassung in Freienbach.[67][68] Die Palantir Technologies Switzerland GmbH hat ihren Hauptsitz in Zürich.[69]
End of German version]

[Norway]
The Norwegian Customs is using Palantir Gotham to screen passengers and vehicles for control. Known inputs are prefiled freight documents, passenger lists, the national Currency Exchange database (tracks all cross-border currency exchanges), the Norwegian Welfare Administrations employer- and employee-registry, the Norwegian stock holder registry and 30 public databases from InfoTorg. InfoTorg provides access to more than 30 databases, including the Norwegian National Citizen registry, European Business Register, the Norwegian DMV vehicle registry, various credit databases etc. These databases are supplemented by the Norwegian Customs Departments own intelligence reports, including results of previous controls. The system is also augmented by data from public sources such as social media.[122]

Ukraine
[...]

Israel
The London office of Palantir was the target of demonstrations by pro-Palestine protesters in December 2023 after it was awarded a large contract to manage NHS data. The protesters accused Palantir of being "complicit" in war crimes during the 2023 Israel-Hamas war because it provides the Israel Defence Force (IDF) with intelligence and surveillance services, including a form of predictive policing.[70] In January 2024, Palantir agreed to a strategic partnership with the IDF under which it will provide the IDF with services to assist its "war-related missions".[128 [Thiel's Palantir, Israel Agree Strategic Partnership for Battle Tech. [12th of January 2024]]] Karp has been emphatic in his public support for Israel. He has frequently criticized what he calls the inaction of other tech leaders. His position has prompted several employees to leave Palantir.[129] [See also the notes listed at the end.]

Other
Palantir Gotham was used by cyber analysts at Information Warfare Monitor, a Canadian public-private venture which operated from 2003 to 2012.
Palantir was used by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to verify if Iran was in compliance with the 2015 agreement.[35]

Partnerships and contracts
International Business Machines
On February 8, 2021, Palantir and IBM announced a new partnership that would use IBM's hybrid cloud data platform alongside Palantir's operations platform for building applications. The product, Palantir for IBM Cloud Pak for Data, is expected to simplify the process of building and deploying AI-integrated applications with IBM Watson. It will help businesses/users interpret and use large datasets without needing a strong technical background. Palantir for IBM Cloud Pak for Data will be available for general use in March 2021.[130]

Amazon (AWS)
On March 5, 2021, Palantir announced its partnership with Amazon [Web Services (]AWS(]). Palantir's [Enterprise resource planning (]ERP[)] Suite was optimized to run on Amazon Web Services. The ERP suite was used by BP.[131]
[On November 7, 2024, "Palantir, Anthropic announce partnership with Amazon Web Services [GovCloud]" and "Anthropic teams up with Palantir and AWS to sell AI [(LLM Claude)] to defense customers".]

Microsoft
[On Dec 4, 2012, "[a service provider for Office 365 solutions is] pleased to announce that The Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board (RATB), is on Office 365 for Government and has granted the Authority to Operate (ATO) under the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA)." (Note that the "Microsoft 365 is a product family of productivity software, collaboration and cloud-based services owned by Microsoft", which is based on our Ontologic System (OS) to a considerable extent based, which again is licensed by our SOPR with the consent and on behalf of C.S. as is also the case with Planatir's ERP plagiarism and fake.)]
On Aug 8, 2024, Palantir and Microsoft announced a partnership where Palantir will deploy their suite of products on Microsoft Azure Government clouds. Palantir stock jumped more than 10% for the day. [132]

Babylon Health
Palantir took a stake in Babylon Health in June 2021. Ali Parsa told the Financial Times that "nobody" has brought some of the tech that Palantir owns "into the realm of biology and health care".[58]

Controversies
[...]

Project Maven (since 2018)
After protests from its employees, Google chose not to renew its contract with the Pentagon to work on Project Maven, a secret artificial intelligence program aimed at the unmanned operation of aerial vehicles. Palantir then took over the project. Critics warned that the technology could lead to autonomous weapons that decide who to strike without human input.[104]

[...]"

Comment
First of all, we note that C.S. is not nobody, obviously and doubtlessly.

The company Palantir Technologies depends on our

of our Ontologic System (OS), specifically our

which together with SoftBionics as a Service (SBaaS), including Big Data Processing (BDP), and other foundational and essential facilities, technologies, goods, and services are parts of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies.

Furthermore, it does not matter for the laws in general and the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation in particular at all, if a network is a private or public one, as is the case with the various utilizations, applications, and services, because prior art just has

in total contrast to our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and our Ontologic System (OS) for

• Ontologic Net (ON) with its Interconnected supercomputer (Intersup), Universal Space or Grid of the second generation (Grid 2.0),
• Ontologic Web (OW) with its Universal Brain Space (UBS) or Global Brain of the second generation (GB 2.0), and
• Ontologic uniVerse (OV) with its eXtended Mixed Reality (XMR) or simply eXtended Reality (XMR),

We also note that LLMs are designated as agents, despite a Large Language Model (LLM) is not an agent, but both are included in our coherent Ontologic Model (OM) and our Ontologic roBot (OntoBot) of our Ontologic System (OS), which allows such a view due to the basic property of (mostly) being reflective, fractal, holonic.
We also already explained that the Arrow System (AS) of the TUNES OS has no subsymbolic Artificial Intelligence (AI) system, which was created with our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) with its coherent Ontologic Model (OM), Cognitive System (CS or CogS), including learning, including transformative, generative, and creative Bionics, and prompt engineering, and discussed Domain Specific Languages (DSLs) in this context.

We directly saw that Palantir was implementing something like the Polygon(al) Data(base) Model (PDM) and Management System (PDMS), which has been referenced in the section Semantic File/Storage System of the webpage Links to Software of the website of OntoLinux.
And we also directly concluded that Palantir is another fake company solely established to infringe the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation, as seen before with for example Alphabet (Google), Docker, and some other documented on this website of OntomaX. That dirty trick of governments and federal agencies, such as the CIA, and also supersmart (not really) investors is a very old hat.
And as not expected otherwise, Palantir continued with its stealing, which eventualy had to result in this crystal clear no-brainer copyright infringement in relation to that AI platform and its integration with those other illegal technologies, goods, and services.
In this relation, the timing is also interesting, because we publicized the meassage Use of our OS for military use prohibited of the 5th of January 2023 only 3 months before its launch.

And the various very disappointing conspiracies, including the ones between the governments of the U.S.America, and the U.K., and also those federal states of the F.R.Germany, also need no further elaboration and discussion.
Howsoever, it is particularly striking that the political scandals (Hessen-Data, Gaia-X, etc.) all bear the handwriting and signature of the political party CDU/CSU, but are also tolerated, promoted, and supported by the SPD and the foreign governments.

Therefore, it is no surprising that Palantir has already been blacklisted by our SOPR and will definitely get no allowance and license from our SOPR, like Gaia-X and other fraudulent and even serious criminal endeavours.

We also wonder, if German politicians do not know that Peter Thiel is a libertarian, who has long expressed opposition to democracy and is called system opponent of liberal democracy by those politicians.

Also note that our SOPR will not tolerate that governments blatantly disrespect and ignore the

which are already the compromise, and the

which are our voluntary offer and goodwill, which we do not have to show, but can withdraw at any time, as discussed again and again and more than only crystal clearly.

In relation to the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies, our SOPR also will not accept the establishment of those intermediaries between governments and other third entities on the one side, and us on the other side, specifically to get the control over the properties of C.S. and our corporation and to avoid the payment of royalties according to the LM of our SOPR by paying said unauthorized intermediaries a fee according to their individual LMs as part of their illegal exploitation (e.g commercialization (e.g. monetization)) of the exclusive moral rights respectively Lanham (Trademark) rights of C.S. and then paying us a share of said fee instead of paying the fee to an intermediary and the difference of our royalties minus said fee to our SOPR.
This will only lead to even more ridiculous situations, where an intermediary would take no fee, for example by claiming to use illegal Free and Open Source Software (FOSS), so that we would get no royalties at all. But we would like to recall that the Terms of Service (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of our SOPR also regulates this case and demands a minimal fixed fee as royalty and also estimates the lost revenue to determine the share of the revenue to compensate any lost royalty.

We do not know in which fantasy world they all do live.
We only add that all those entities involved should at least be aware that they are in need of an explanation for their extremely disappointing attitude, and we have another evidence, which shows a causal link between its infringements of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation, and its market capitalization, which again is relevant for the payment of damage compensations, the higher of apportioned compensation, profit, and value. The latter results in a ratio of 1:17.85, that makes 95% of the company shares, including share capital or capital stocks, including voting and prefered shares, or common and preferred stocks, if it is unable to pay the damage compensations.

See also the

Any questions?

See also the related messages, notes, explanations, clarifications, investigations, and claims, specifically

and the other publications cited therein.

Any questions?

07.February.2025

09:15 and 21:20 UTC+1
Hidden Ponzi schemes OpenAI, Palantir, and Co. already failed and damages mean ca. 100% 'R' Us

The situations for fraudulent and even serious criminal start-ups, such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Palantir Technologies, and Co., is similar to the ones of the company Tesla Motors, and others, because they could legally exploit

But that is not possible anymore and like all the other plagiarists those start-ups also have no time anymore for stealing more of our work of art titled Ontologic System and created by C.S.. :)

See also the related messages, notes, explanations, clarifications, investigations, and claims, specifically

and the other publications cited therein.

Furthermore, the public should not be fooled by those big investment banks and Co., and also the lying press, because they only want to create an even bigger bubble.
For example, Palantir Technologies' revenue increased by 28.79% since last year, 22.03% in its 4th fiscal quarter year-on-year, and 14.06% since its 3rd fiscal quarter, but its expense increased as well, while its net income decreased by 41.09% year-on-year and around 45% since its 3rd fiscal quarter, and its net profit margin decreased by 37.81% year-on-year.
A clear sign for a hidden Ponzi scheme. In this sense: "7th of November 2024, 10:57 UTC+1, Palantir Technologies Downgraded to 'Sell' Amid Unsustainable Valuation and [...]".

17:40 and 20:14 UTC+1
SOPR considering penalty of 300% for U.K. and F.R.G.

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is considering a penalty of 300% (triple damages) or up to 81% of the revenue in case of the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) licensee class according to the Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) Terms of Service (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of our SOPR, because the governments with their federal agencies, research institutes, industries, and other domestic entities are not respecting the

which are already the compromise, and the

which are our voluntary offer and goodwill, which we do not have to show, but can withdraw at any time, as discussed again and again and more than only crystal clearly.
For sure, the measure would apply in the U.S.America, the P.R.China, and other locations as well.

See also the notes

and the other publications cited therein.

Contracts of AWS, Anthropic, Palantir, DoD, and Co. void.
Contracts of Microsoft, OpenAI, SAP, and Co. void, too.

Neither

will help anybody in this relation.

They will not get away with that this time.

Pride goes before a fall. They are all very well advised not to lean so far out of the window.

20:20 and 26:33 UTC+1
Do not be fooled by SoftBank, OpenAI, and Co.

We gave no authorization for anything the companies SoftBank, OpenAI, and others do in relation to the original and unique, visionary and unbelievable, unforeseeable and unexpected, personal, metaphysical and science-fictional, and copyrighted and prohibited for fair dealing and fair use works of art created by C.S..

And we are uncatchable and unassailable artistically, legally, technologically, and economically. And we means not only C.S. and our corporation, but also other companies much larger than SoftBank, OpenAI, and Co. with their illegal plagiarisms and fakes or our creations, and also marketing blah blah blah and vaporware.
Somehow we have the impression to observe a totally absurd freak show.

See also the notes

We also quote and translate a report, which is about the company OpenAI and was publicized by the Bayerische Rundfunk==Bavarian Broadcast, which again belongs to a public-law broadcaster of the F.R.Germany: "[ChatGPT Makers open German Branch in Munich]
High-tech Location gets even stronger: OpenAI comes to Munich
After Google, Microsoft, and Apple, OpenAI is now coming to Munich. The U.S. AI company is opening its first office in Germany in the Bavarian capital. However, the move does not come as a complete surprise.
About this topic is reporting: BR24 on the radio on 07.02.2025 at 06:01.
The exact location has not yet been determined. It is also not yet entirely clear how many employees the new branch will have and in which areas. Nevertheless, the news that OpenAI is coming to Munich is generating a lot of excitement.

OpenAI founder praises Germany
Germany has become a global pioneer in the introduction of AI, the company's founder, Sam Altman, told [a newspaper] (external content). From manufacturing to retail to start-ups: German companies using their AI have already seen significant increases in productivity and innovation, he added. The new office is intended to help attract new customers in Germany, an important growth market for OpenAI, as explained by the group. [As far as we do know, it is only a company. Maybe the authors meant Microsoft.]
Especially, industry, pharmaceuticals, financial services, and healthcare are named as future customer groups. The company has big plans. This year, the focus will be on the real benefits of AI in practice. Experiments were carried out last year. There are not few critics, who are already wondering whether the billions invested in the new technology will pay off at some point and whether the high expectations can be met at all.

Bavarian state government pleased about OpenAI settlement
The Bavarian minister of economic affairs, Hubert Aiwanger, has confirmed and welcomed the move. He said in a press release that it was a great gain for the free state Bavaria. Munich shows that a perfect ecosystem has grown here, which is attractive for high-tech companies from all over the world.
With its "High-Tech Agenda", the Bavarian state government has provided the right impetus in this respect to further expand Munich's leading position. According to him, "Invest in Bavaria" has contributed to this success. This agency is part of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and is responsible for attracting companies to the region. It has provided OpenAI with intensive support on its way to Bavaria, emphasizes Aiwanger. [So, so, interesting.]
What makes Munich so attractive for many companies has long been the connection between business, science and research. According to Bavaria's Science Minister Markus Blume, the Bavarian capital is even well on the way to becoming an AI Mecca. [We do not think so.]
The federal state capital has the two best universities in Germany and is particularly innovation-friendly, he explains. He points out that there are 134 professorships for artificial intelligence alone. The talent density and technological strength is unique in Germany and perhaps even Europe.

IT specialists in Munich cheaper than in the USA
Sam Altmann was able to see this for himself in 2023, when he came to the packed Audimax at the Technical University of Munich in May. The event was organized by [a first scientist] of Machine Learning. Leading OpenAI employees were last in Munich at the beginning of January [2025] to get an idea of what was going on, as he told BR. [So, so, interesting.]
Berlin has the advantage of being the seat of the German government. The fact that OpenAI has nevertheless opted for Munich is a very good sign for the technology location, says [a professor], adding that it also makes perfect sense given the AI environment in the city. According to [a first scientist], it is interesting that there are already many developer start-ups in Germany that are already building products with ChatGPT. [None of them got the allowance and license from our SOPR and thus have no legal security.]
[A second scientist ...] from the Chair of Innovation and Technology Management at the University of Regensburg and board member of Münchner Kreis e.V. sees another reason why US tech companies are keen to relocate here. The price-performance ratio for well-trained specialists from the IT sector is very attractive in Munich compared to the US.
The starting salary for well-qualified Master's students in computer science is generally much higher in the USA than in Germany. [A second scientist] sees this as an important reason why Google, IBM, Microsoft, and Apple, among others, have set up their development sites in Munich. [So, so, not interesting.]"

Comment
The whole situation is totally capricious.
Plagiarists are supported, but creators of original artworks, holders of moral rights and copyrights, and true inventors are not asked.
That so-called high-tech agenda looks more like a looting of our corporation.
They even established a Zentrum für vertrauenswürdige Künstliche Intelligenz (ZfVK==Center for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence, as they have done before with that Deutsche ForschungsInstitute für Künstliche Intelligenz (DFKI)==German Research Institute For Artificial Intelligence,
And how many of those 134 professorships have respected the moral rights of C.S. and referenced respectively cited with attribution properly, is also a simple answer. Hint: The number looks like an egg.

As is very well known, we are working on the general legal matter. In fact, all entities concerned got not allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our original and unique works of art from our SOPR with the consent and on behalf of C.S. and thus no legal security. And we do not have the impression that this next move besides the construction of data centers by the company Microsoft and the many others scandals around other federal activities and companies (see also the note Palantir Technologies around 95% of the 4th of February 2025 keywords Hessendata or Hessen-Data, and Gaia-X) will be helpful.
None of them got the allowance and license from our SOPR and therefore have no legal security.
Moreover, according to the Terms of Service (ToS) of our SOPR SoftBionics as a Service (SBaaS) belongs to the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies. The latter connects this activity of Microsoft and OpenAI with what is wrongly and illegally called Stargate project in the U.S.America, and also with many other illegal activities. The dots can be easily connected even by a judge with no skill in the art.

Furthermore, what most of our friends and readers outside the F.R.Germany do not know is that Alphabet (Google), IBM, Microsoft, and Apple are at that location since many years and long before all those illegal plagiarisms and fakes of our coherent Ontologic Model (OM) and Ontologic roBot (OntoBot), and so on.
And this also answers all questions regarding that German branch of OpenAI and other legal matters.

More importantly, we had a giant scandal with Hubert Aiwanger (Freie Wähler) and Marcus Söder (CSU) in 2023, because H. Aiwanger

We quote and translate an online encyclopedia about Hubert Aiwanger: "Hubert Aiwanger (born January 26, 1971 in Ergoldsbach) is a German politician (Freie Wähler==Free Voters). He has been Deputy Bavarian Minister-President and Minister of State for Economic Affairs, Regional Development, and Energy since November 6, 2018. He is also the federal and Bavarian state chairman of the Free Voters and was their parliamentary group leader in the Bavarian state parliament from 2008 to 2018. He has been a member of the Bavarian state parliament since 2008. His constituency is Lower Bavaria; his constituency is Landshut, which he won directly for the first time in the 2023 state election.

[...]

Pamphlet or Flyer or Leaflet affair
The leaflet affair refers to the allegations published by the Süddeutsche Zeitung on August 25, 2023 that Aiwanger was the author of an anti-Semitic leaflet that he allegedly created as a pupil in the 1987/88 school year. Aiwanger's alleged authorship could not be proven, but his brother declared that he was the author of the leaflet. The extent of the reactions described must be seen in the context of the state elections in Bavaria, which took place on October 8, 2023. [We know that at least one author exists with his brother and in the context brothers in spirit and a smoking gun with his fingerprints do exist (see below).]
See also: Section "Berichterstattung zu Hubert Aiwanger==Reporting on Hubert Aiwanger" in the article "Süddeutsche Zeitung"
At the beginning of August 2023, the Süddeutsche Zeitung (SZ) reported that it had received initial information about a flyer with "right-wing extremist" and "anti-Semitic" content. The editorial team had previously been unaware of the flyer. The Süddeutsche Zeitung spoke to "more than two dozen people" ("former teachers, classmates, and others") and commissioned an expert report. According to the report, the flyer was "very probably" written on a typewriter, on which a technical paper by Hubert Aiwanger was also written. The editorial team then confronted Aiwanger with the research for the first time on August 17 and asked him twice more for comment. Aiwanger did not answer the questions - including those about the author of the flyer. Instead, his press spokesperson rejected the accusations across the board, spoke of a "smear campaign" and threatened "legal action including claims for damages in the event of publication."[54][55]
On August 25, 2023, the Süddeutsche Zeitung reported under the title Das Auschwitz-Pamphlet[56][57] that Aiwanger had allegedly written the flyer in the 1987/88 school year as an eleventh grade student at Burkhart-Gymnasium==Grammar School or High School in Mallersdorf-Pfaffenberg, which was then circulated in the school restroom. According to two people, "at that time, according to their own statements, entrusted with the matter [...]", Aiwanger was called to account by the school's disciplinary committee. According to witnesses at the time, Aiwanger did not deny his authorship and openly held extreme right-wing views at the time.[58][55] [We have witnesses in addition to the evidences.]
The reporting was triggered by the fact that the German teacher on the disciplinary committee at the time had contacted various media outlets, including Der Spiegel and SZ, and handed over a copy of the flyer after Aiwanger had been indirectly addressed in a speech by the school principal on the topic of democracy at the 2023 graduation ceremony.
According to research by the Süddeutsche Zeitung, Aiwanger is said to have asked one of his teachers via his party colleague Jutta Widmann in 2008 whether he or the grammar school posed a "danger" to Aiwanger, which was denied.[61][62] The CSU and the Free Voters are said to have been aware of the accusations against Aiwanger and his political past by 2008 at the latest.[63] [So, so, interesting.]

Aiwanger's reaction
Via a party press spokesperson, Aiwanger "firmly rejected all reputationally damaging allegations about his school days over 35 years ago". He had "neither produced nor distributed" the leaflet[59][64].
Aiwanger distanced himself "completely from the paper" in an interview with Der Spiegel on August 26. At the same time, he confirmed that he had carried "one or a few copies" of the "disgusting and inhuman" paper in his school bag. He no longer knew whether he had passed on individual copies. He knew the author, whom he did not want to "blow the whistle on."[65] Shortly afterwards, Aiwanger's older brother claimed to have been the author of the leaflet: Angry at having to repeat eleventh grade, he wanted to "really get the goat of openly left-wing radical teachers" with the "highly exaggerated form of satire."[66][67] [Note that his brother was not on the school anymore at this time (Tthrown out or finished otherwise).]
On August 30, Aiwanger spoke in front of cameras for the first time: he had "not been an anti-Semite since adulthood - the last few decades - not an extremist, but a philanthropist."[68][69]
In an interview with the Jüdische Allgemeine, he clarified that the phrase "since adulthood" was misleading, as he had not been anti-Semitic in his youth either. With regard to the authorship of "the vile paper", he could not apologize because it was not him. Aiwanger committed himself to "protecting and promoting Jewish life" and to cooperating with Israel. It was also important to him to "strengthen the teaching of Jewish life and Jewish history [...] in school curricula". Aiwanger renewed his accusations against the Süddeutsche Zeitung regarding a targeted campaign and the violation of "journalistic due diligence". In addition, many parents now feared "that misconduct [...] by their children at school [...] could end up in the media years later"[70].

Reactions of third parties
[Federal] State government
On August 29, Markus Söder summoned his deputy head of government Aiwanger to a special meeting in order to be able to explain himself "personally and comprehensively" to the coalition representatives about the allegations. After the meeting, Söder announced that he would stick with Aiwanger, but demanded that he answer a 25-point list of questions[71][72].
On September 3, 2023, Söder announced that he would not dismiss Aiwanger as deputy prime minister. As there was no clear evidence that Hubert Aiwanger had written the flyer and the event had taken place 35 years ago, dismissal was not proportionate. Aiwanger stated that he was not the author of the flyer and that he had made mistakes in his youth; he had apologized for this and distanced himself from it, and nothing similar had happened since then.[73] On the same day, the Bavarian state government published the 25 questions put to Aiwanger and his answers to them.[74]
From the CSU, Erwin Huber criticized Aiwanger's behaviour, which had similarities with Trumpism: first deny, threaten, and then make himself a victim. His apologies were too half-hearted,[75][76] he said. [It is just a giant and unbelievable affront.]

Opposition politician
The Greens, SPD and FDP requested a special session of the state parliament, which was in summer recess, as an interim committee[77].
Politicians from the SPD and the Greens criticized Söder's decision to leave Aiwanger in office. Florian von Brunn (SPD) stated that it was a "negative high point in the history of post-war Germany" that Söder accepted "an active right-wing populist and former right-wing extremist activist" as a deputy in the government[78] (According to the Bavarian SPD, von Brunn was informed of the SZ's research in advance by the secretary general of the Bavarian SPD and acquaintance of the German teacher, Ruth Müller, to the newspaper Die Welt[79]).
As a result of the behaviour of the SPD party leadership, which had demanded Aiwanger's resignation before all the details were known, both SPD city councillors in Aiwanger's hometown of Rottenburg an der Laaber resigned from their party to join the Free Voters' parliamentary group[80].

Representatives of Jewish communities
Josef Schuster, President of the Central Council of Jews, called for the leaflet not to be simply dismissed as a youthful sin, as it trampled on the historical reappraisal of National Socialism, which is so important for Germany.[81][82] He felt that Aiwanger lacked the "insight and willingness" "for an honest debate". Following Aiwanger's statement in an interview with Die Welt that the Shoah was being "misused for party political purposes", Schuster accused him of a "victim-perpetrator reversal". [83][84] In addition, he was irritated that Aiwanger could not remember anything or nothing specific about 14 of the 25 questions Söder had asked him and wondered how this could be in an event that had led to Aiwanger "having to go to the directorate, where he was threatened with the police and ended up having to write a criminal report". [85] A meeting between Schuster and Aiwanger took place at the end of September 2023; Aiwanger called it an "open and constructive discussion" in which he explained why he criticized "the form and timing of reporting by certain media". Schuster described the discussion as "factual", but he saw "Hubert Aiwanger's direct handling of the accusations made against him [...] as problematic", which he had also communicated to him.
Charlotte Knobloch, President of the Jewish Community of Munich and Upper Bavaria, expressed her horror at the pamphlet "from the circle of State Minister Aiwanger"; it reminded her "in tone of the worst inflammatory writings of the Nazi era".[87] She did not consider the leaflet affair to be over with Söder's decision. Aiwanger must now "restore trust and make it clear that his actions are democratic and legally sound."[88] She did not accept his apology to her. Nevertheless, she showed understanding for Söder's decision to leave Aiwanger in office: A dismissal "would have been the even bigger disaster" because Aiwanger could have profited from it in the election campaign.[89]

Scientists
Defense lawyer Udo Vetter stated that the former German teacher had violated the Bavarian service regulations for teachers.[90] The German Teachers' Association explained: Teachers "are subject to a duty of confidentiality towards uninvolved third parties, with the exception of parents and law enforcement authorities. This is no different in the case of the Aiwanger brothers." "Pupils enjoy [...] personal protection."[91] The service regulations for teachers at state schools in Bavaria literally state: 'Teachers must maintain confidentiality about matters that have become known to them in the course of their work, even after their employment has ended.'[92] [This is not quite right, because the "accusations against Aiwanger and his political past by 2008" were already known to the public through other events (see once again the last sentence of the section Pamphlet or Flyer or Leaflet affair above).]
The historian and anti-Semitism researcher Wolfgang Benz called the text a pamphlet; it was "[n]eonazi because of its mockery of all victims of National Socialism". The terminology was "commonplace on the far right" in the 1980s. However, he was "a little reluctant to call it an anti-Semitic hate paper now", as "there was no explicit incitement against Jews". The connotations with the murder of Jews were intolerable.
Historian Michael Brenner described the pamphlet as anti-Semitic and said: "Jews were murdered as Jews in Auschwitz. This pamphlet mocks Jewish victims and others. It is anti-Semitic, but goes beyond that in its contempt for humanity. Anti-Semitism plus, so to speak."[94]
The historian Michael Wolffsohn found Aiwanger's apology "convincing in tone and content"; the presumption of innocence applies. With regard to the debate, he also criticized the fact that Jews in Germany were being misused for such political games: "And those who are virtually defending us today are defending the dead Jews when it comes to Auschwitz. But when it comes to the interests and feelings of living Jews, then we are just objects."[95]
Jörg Skriebeleit, the director of the Flossenbürg concentration camp memorial, described the language of the leaflet as "not coincidental" and as part of the "right-wing extremist discourse". In addition, the leaflet, whose vocabulary came from "the Holocaust denial scene", used terms that "would not be used in a youth prank", such as "Auschwitz and subcamps". Anti-Semitism is clearly recognizable, although the words "Jewish" or "Jew" are not used; even the "chimney in Auschwitz" is a symbol of anti-Semitism. It was a "general mockery of all the victims of the Holocaust"[96].
Gideon Botsch sees neo-Nazi propaganda in the leaflet and believes that the language used is an expression of "a truly murderous anti-Semitism of extermination". In debates such as the Aiwanger case, it is often overlooked "that such statements directly affect people, endanger them and direct hatred towards them."[97]
The German scholar and linguist Werner Holly said that although Aiwanger had expressed remorse with his statements, he had also mentioned a condition, namely that he might have hurt feelings. According to Holly, however, this is problematic from a linguistic point of view: remorse refers to a personal deed, but Aiwanger remains unclear. Doubts as to whether there was remorse were therefore justified[98].
Political scientist Ursula Münch found Aiwanger's choice of words, that he saw himself as the victim of a witch hunt, inappropriate: "You have to be able to deal with research in an election campaign in politics.
Israeli historian Moshe Zimmermann described the publication as a campaign and "not the best way to fight anti-Semitism". The public solidarity with Aiwanger was to be expected. "Only one side [had] made a mistake", namely the Süddeutsche Zeitung with the 'accusation of anti-Semitism', not Aiwanger, whose actions as a youth had 'already been forgotten'.

Further accusations
On the evening of August 29, the TV magazine report München of Bayerischer Rundfunk (BR) published an interview with a former classmate. According to him, Aiwanger occasionally gave the Hitler salute when "entering the crowded classroom" and "often imitated Hitler speeches" in front of pupils. He also told "jokes about Jews and the Auschwitz concentration camp". He had been "dismissed by many classmates as a weirdo" who had been in an adolescent phase.[101][102] The following day, BR published further statements from another classmate who had graduated from high school together with Aiwanger in 1990. According to this, Aiwanger had made an "anti-Jewish joke" in the 10th grade during a class trip to a concentration camp memorial in the GDR in May 1987, which the former classmate still remembers today. Aiwanger's political attitude during his time at school was "characterized by National Socialist ideas", which was also confirmed by other classmates. He had also repeatedly made derogatory remarks about Turks ("Kanaks"), dark-skinned people ("Negroes") and homosexuals ("faggots").[103] Aiwanger said that he could not remember ever giving a Hitler salute.[104] He was also said to have attacked a teacher with acid.[105][106] He said that he had not rehearsed Hitler speeches in front of the mirror. Regarding the accusation that he had told anti-Jewish jokes, he said that he could not fully deny this from his memory.

Background to the flyer
The flyer[108] is listed as a "negative example" of the handling of the culture of remembrance in a contribution to the Federal President's 1988/89 history competition "Unser Ort - Heimat für Fremde?" (Our place - home for foreigners?). According to this, it circulated in the school toilets, among other places, but was discovered relatively quickly by the school administration and confiscated. The author of the work "Letzte Heimat Steinrain? On the history of the Jewish cemetery near Mallersdorf-Pfaffenberg", a pupil in Aiwanger's year, had never seen the leaflet before.[109] A German teacher, who had apparently taken part in the school disciplinary proceedings against Aiwanger, had suggested that he include it.
The former pupil stated that the SPD-affiliated German teacher had visited him in late June / early July 2023 to confirm Aiwanger's authorship in writing, saying: "It's time we toppled this brown sock now". However, the student was not aware of the author of the flyer[110].

Investigation against a teacher
The Regensburg public prosecutor's office opened an investigation into the former teacher at Aiwanger's former school, who had accused Aiwanger in the Süddeutsche Zeitung newspaper, for the possible violation of official secrets (Section 353b StGB) and the violation of private secrets (Section 203 StGB). It was to be investigated whether the man had made himself liable to prosecution through a possible "unauthorized disclosure". The Bavarian state prosecutor's office, as the responsible disciplinary authority, stated that retired civil servants only had a limited range of duties, which did, however, include the duty of confidentiality. The Regensburg public prosecutor's office closed the investigation against the teacher in July 2024. There was no evidence against him. The Süddeutsche Zeitung could also have become aware of the flyer from a student's homework from the 1988/1989 school year, which dealt with right-wing tendencies and also contained a reprint of the flyer. The newspaper did not name an informant, citing editorial secrecy and source protection[111].

Further developments
One year after the leaflet became known, Bayerischer Rundfunk asked Aiwanger and representatives of the Jewish community whether Aiwanger had subsequently made contact with the Jewish community. Aiwanger was advised from many sides to regain lost trust. Aiwanger himself claims that there are "always contacts in the Jewish communities". However, the Jewish communities in Bavaria contradict this, saying that he "has not contacted them" - the relationship with Aiwanger is considered strained. Aiwanger has not yet made an official visit to the concentration camp memorials in Dachau and Flossenbürg, nor has he been asked to do so. Karl Freller, Director of the Bavarian Memorials Foundation, could imagine a visit by Aiwanger, even in a private setting. The Dachau Concentration Camp Memorial had rejected a visit by Aiwanger in September 2023 because they did not want to "turn the memorial into a stage"; the Federal Government Commissioner for Anti-Semitism, Felix Klein, suggested that Aiwanger visit the Dachau Concentration Camp Memorial shortly beforehand. In July 2024, Aiwanger was to travel to Israel at the invitation of the Consulate General of the State of Israel to visit the Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial - in addition to a meeting with Israeli Industry and Economy Minister Nir Barkat and company visits. This visit was postponed indefinitely due to the Gaza-Israel war[112]. According to Jasmin Riedl, a political scientist at the University of the Federal Armed Forces in Munich, the affair "damaged Aiwanger's reputation with the Jewish community". For Aiwanger, the scandal surrounding the flyer was "of no great significance overall". This is because "from his perspective and language, the fact that he did not write the flyer himself, he did nothing wrong." For Aiwanger, the affair was over when Söder made it clear in early September 2023 that Aiwanger could remain in office - for him, that was the end of the matter[113].
During the weeks of reporting, the German teacher received several anonymous threatening letters and phone calls with hate messages, including death threats and calls for suicide. A reporter from the Bild newspaper photographed him without permission and published the picture, whereupon he became the focus of public attention - he became a hate figure[114]."

We also quote and translate the English version of the webpage quoted above: "[...]
Twitter jokes
In January[13 [Witz komm raus, du bist getwittert==Joke come out, you are tweeted. 24th of January 2012] and February[14 [Aiwangers letzter Tweet==Aiwanger's last Tweet. 9 February 2012]] 2012, Aiwanger was criticised for tweeting jokes and, as a result of criticism from within his party [(Free Voters)], he deleted his Twitter account on February 9, 2012. He reopened his account in February 2016.[15]
[...]"

Comment
The whole situation is totally capricious.
The bitter truth is that politicians only deal with anti-semitic and anti-zionist issues in such ways that they serve their very own, purely opportunistic goals.

In the meantime, M. Söder got a new nickname in F.R.Germany made out of Söder and Adolf (that one from Austria): Södolf.

And we also have a lot of evidences that members of the CDU/CSU clique have good connections with members of the FPÖ clique.

A so-called political firewall to the right-wing never existed.

We stopped being ashamed of these people many years ago.

By the way:

08.February.2025

Comment of the Day

"A prison cell has no basement window.", [C.S., Yesterday]

10.February.2025

11:00 and 22:33 UTC+1
Our OS is for all, no AI race at all since 1999 and 2006

It is absolutely irrelevant, who is implementing essential parts of our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) publicized in 1999 and our Ontologic System (OS) publicized in 2006 without authorization, because the result is always a plagiarism and fake and will not change how our SOPR will exploit the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation exclusively with the consent and on behalf of C.S..
Sign, pay, comply, and get respectively use it anyway legally as a member and licensing partner of our SOPR under the FRANDAC Terms of Service (ToS) with its License Model (LM).

See also the related messages, notes, explanations, clarifications, investigations, and claims, specifically

and the other publications cited therein.

21:37 UTC+1
Success story continues and no end in sight

We got the next confirmation that our original and unique work of art titled Ontologic System and created by C.S. is a revolutionary, transformative, and which ever superlative exists masterpiece never seen before in the history of civilization and therefore a sui generis work of art protected by the rights (e.g. moral rights respectively Lanham (Trademark) rights, competition rights) and properties (e.g. copyrights) of C.S. and our corporation worldwide.

After we created what is wrongly and illegal called Industry of the 4th generation (Industry 4.0 or I 4.0) (Industry 3.0 with ontology and digital twin) and Industry of the 5th generation (Industry 5.0 or I 5.0) (Industry 4.0 with eXtended Reality (XR), etc.) among all the many other parts of our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and our Ontologic System (OS), we got the confirmation that we also created the Industry of the 6th generation (Industry 6.0 or I 6.0) (Industry 5.0 with Cognitive System (CS or CogS), Ontologic Model (OM) (e.g. Large Language Model (LLM)), Ontologic Computing (OC) (e.g. transformative, generative, and creative Bionics, prompt engineering, forming, shaping, configuring respectively cognitive processing, educating, teaching, learning, etc.) as part of what is wrongly and illegally called cognitive industrial revolution based on our bionic, cybernetic, and ontonic reflection, augmentation, and extension, our superpower agency or superagency, our Ontoscope (Os), also known as Pocket God and also wrongly and illegally called Android Smartphone, Apple iPhone, etc., Copilot+ PC, etc., and much more.

We quote an interview, which was broadcasted on the 2nd of February 2025: "[R.H.:] [...] this is much more than a Sputnik moment, because this is not just like ...
[Moderator:] It's much bigger.
[R.H.:] ... Yes. It's like what is the global industrial, a cognitive industrial future look like."

Comment
Holy chromoly. As we said in the past, we always knew to be very good and now everybody can understand how we felt around 2003 or 2004, when we looked at our creation and realized ourselves for the first time that it is something totally new beyond fire, writing, printing, steam engine, electricity, atomicity, relativity, transistor, MS-DOS (Uhhh, sorry for that flat wit==flacher Witz. :D), and so on.

And our SOPR is neutral, which means no ideology, bias, dominance, politics, and so on.

See also the

By the way:

22:48 UTC+1
SOPR considering penalty of 300% for F.R.

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is considering a penalty of 300% (triple damages) or up to 81% of the revenue in case of the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) licensee class according to the Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) Terms of Service (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of our SOPR, because the governments with their federal agencies, research institutes, industries, and other domestic entities are not respecting the

which are already the compromise, and the

which are our voluntary offer and goodwill, which we do not have to show, but can withdraw at any time, as discussed again and again and more than only crystal clearly.

See also the notes

and the other publications cited therein.

Contracts of AWS, Anthropic, Palantir, DoD, and Co. void.
Contracts of Microsoft, OpenAI, SAP, and Co. void, too.
Contrats de Ceci et Cela, Mistral, et Cie. nulles, aussi.

Neither

will help anybody in this relation.

They will not get away with that this time.

Pride goes before a fall. They are all very well advised not to lean so far out of the window.

11.February.2025

11:52 and 19:10 UTC+1
No sale or waiver of exclusive rights and properties, but exclusive exploitation

We do not sell or even waive exclusive rights and properties, but exploit them exclusively.
And this holds for the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies with their set of foundational and essential facilities, technologies, goods, and services, for all designated takeover damages, and so on.
If an entity wants to invest in our protected works of art, then they have to invest in the OntoLab Vision Fund and Blitz Fund investment program series of our HighTech Office Ontonics.

Contracts of unauthorized entities are void.
At first come the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation and then come the others.

See also the notes

and the other publications cited therein.

Kein Verkauf von oder Verzicht auf Exklusivrechten und -eigentum, sondern exklusive Verwertung
Wir verkaufen keine exklusiven Rechte und Eigentümer oder verzichten gar darauf, sondern verwerten sie exklusiv.

16:47, 18:52, and 20:24 UTC+1
Damages 20 years retroactively

The white, yellow, or red line drawn by us and discussed, presented, manifested, and eventually fixed by presenting more and more examples may not and must not always be precise for the assessment, evaluation, and determination of the higher of apporitioned compensation, profit, and value and taking it as a guideline.

Actions such as blackmailing, wire fraud, investment fraud, conspiracy, corruption, etc., etc., etc. constitute serious criminal actions, therefore criminal moral right respectively Lanham (Trademark) right and copyright infringement and thus no statute of limitation of 3 years.
We will fully and completely participate in this performance, specifically the rally at the stock markets, which is happing since at least 2014, because

We will get back and the others will give back.

Therefore, we demand the payment of damage compensations, the higher of apportioned compensation, profit, and value, 20 years retroactively, which means since 2005, but a look at the

shows that they began to increase significantly from around 2014 on.
And about our coherent Ontologic Model (OM), Ontologic Programming (OP), Ontologic Computing (OC), Bridge from Natural Intelligence (NI) to Artificial Intelligence (AI) (Bridge from NI to AI), Ontologic roBot (OntoBot), what is wrongly and illegally called Conversational Artificial Intelligence (CAI or ConAI), (Information) Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), microService (mS), Cloud-native Computing (CnC), etc., Ontoscope (Os), and so on we even do not need to talk about. anymore.

But as it is always the case with the moral rights respectively Lanham (Trademark) rights, the copyrights, and also the competition rights, every case is individually.
Howsoever, there are only minor details to clearify and decide, if at all.

The shareholders of a company affected by the payment of damage compensations (see also the uncompleted list of damages) can jointly decide to

ToS with LM of SOPR, exclusive and mandatory infrastructures,
300% (triple damages) penalty, if a sovereign territory (union of federal states, single sovereign state, federal state of a union of states, or economical zone of sovereign states) refuses to comply with all legal matters worldwide. Everybody pays a fair share. :)

Revision of ToS permanently, revision of LM in 10 years or earlier, if required

19:15 UTC+1
International frameworks include ™ and ©

The international frameworks demand the compliance with the

which are already the compromise, and the

which

as discussed again and again and more than only crystal clearly.

22:00 UTC+1
Clarification

*** Work in progress ***
We quote a report, which is about a sale of an auction house: "Thousands call on [an auction house] to cancel AI art auction in open letter
Nearly 4,000 people have signed an open letter calling on [an auction house] to cancel an upcoming sale dedicated solely to art created with artificial intelligence (AI) - the first of its kind for a major auction house - over concerns that the programs used to create some generative digital pieces are trained on copyrighted work and exploit human artists.
[...] Augmented Intelligence sale [...] The more than 20 lots in the sale span five decades, and roughly one quarter are digitally native works like non-fungible tokens (NFTs), according to [an auction house]. Examples of other works in the auction include light boxes and screens, as well as sculptures, paintings and prints. [...]
At publishing, the letter calling on [an auction house] to halt the auction had 3,936 signatures attached. The authors largely take issue with the AI models used to create some of the works in the sale, which they say were trained on copyrighted works without their creators' authorization.
"These models, and the companies behind them, exploit human artists, using their work without permission or payment to build commercial AI products that compete with them," the letter reads. "Your support of these models, and the people who use them, rewards and further incentivizes AI companies' mass theft of human artists' work."
The use of artists' copyrighted work to train generative AI models that power [partial plagiarisms and fakes of our Ontologic System (OS)] have resulted in lawsuits against the technology companies creating implementing the software. Artists say their work has been used by the AI programs to train models without their permission or financial compensation. The technology companies defend themselves by citing fair use, which allows for the use of some copyrighted material without permission in some cases.
[...]
[...] In a statement, a spokesperson for the auction house told [a newspaper about arts]: "The artists represented in this sale all have strong, existing multidisciplinary art practices, some recognized in leading museum collections. The works in this auction are using artificial intelligence to enhance their bodies of work."
[...] an artist whose practice sometimes incorporates AI and whose work is included in [an auction house] sale (and a contributor to [a newspaper about arts]), says the idea that AI-generated art is theft is based on a misunderstanding of the data sets used in such work.
"Most AI-generated images result from the combination of millions - literally millions - of images, which means no single artist can claim that an image of a meadow, a heroic knight, a cat or a flower was based on their specific creation," he wrote in a statement. "AI-generated images mimic human inspiration in many ways - they're just more efficient at parsing through information."
As AI technology advances and becomes more integrated into day-to-day life, laws regarding copyright and fair use are struggling to keep up. Last month, the US Copyright Office ruled that artists can copyright work they created using AI tools, but that "purely AI-generated material" remains ineligible for protections."

Comment
First of all, we note, that images do not mimick a mental process of a human, but these illegal Artificial Neural Network Models (ANNMs) and software based on them

Furthermore, the argument about the combination of millions of images is not quite right, because the matter is more complex.

The recent (most potentially next illegal) event in relation to the monetization of images, which were produced by utilizing Ontologic System Architecture (OSA), our coherent Ontologic Model (OM), including Foundational Model (FM), Capabiltiy and Operational Model (COM), Artificial Neural Network Model (ANNM), Foundation Model (FM), Large Language Model (LLM), our Ontologic Programming (OP) paradigm, and our Ontologic Computing (OC) paradigm, also called Ontologic Computing Model (OCM), including transformative, generative, and creative Bionics, such as generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI), showed the 2 main aspects of

and raised the question, if the latter is allowed by other entities or infringes the rights and properties of C.S. (see also the Clarification of the 30th of May 2023).

1. Are others allowed to utilize a copyrighted work of art for training an OM, FM, COM, LLM, etc. under fair use?
The emphasize here is on the reproduction of certain parts of our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and our Ontologic System (OS).

No, not for constructing, building, implementing, specifically training, fine-tuning, prompt engineering, forming, shaping, configuring respectively cognitive processing, educating, teaching, learning, etc. an OM, FM, COM, LLM, etc., because this is already our fair use for creating a transformative, derivative, new expression of idea, which is also part of a bigger new expression of idea, and all the others just do not have our moral right and copyright, including our fair use right.

1.1 Are others allowed to utilize a copyrighted work of art for training an OM, FM, COM, LLM, etc.?
No. As we said before

protected due to our small differencies and every other LLMs protected due to other legal reasons.

Collecting data legally and training an ANNLanguage Model (ANNLM) and then utilizing it is legal in general, because it is a bottom-up approach.
But taking as much as possible data and pretraining an ANNLM at first, then fine-tuning, prompt engineering, forming, shaping, configuring respectively cognitive processing, educating, teaching, learning, etc. said pretrained ANNLM, and then utilizing it is not legal, because it is a top-down approach, which integrates all in one with a single ontology or Ontologic Model (OM) and also provides what is called god view, which again is one of the small differences to all others and characteristic for our OS with its OSA, OM, OP, OC, OB, etc..

See for example the note

Also note, that C.S. does not need to present said new expression of idea as an implementation of an OM, FM, COM, LLM, specifically a trained Artificial Neural Network Model (ANNM), to enjoy the exclusive copyright and the protection by the copyright law.
The whole basic thing is the creation of C.S.. As we said, they just came many years, in same cases even 2 decades too late to the party.

2. Are others allowed to utilize AI tools?
The emphasize here is on the performance of certain parts of our Evoos and our OS.

Several aspects have to be considered, including

• painting by hand on real canvas or virtual media (e.g. computer screen),
• photography on real media (e.g. plate or film) or virtual media (e.g. computer memory),
• composing and playing music on real instrument or virtual media (e.g. computer soundcard).

In general, a mechanical activity is not considered an artistic activity and therefore is not protected by the copyright law, which holds for the production of pure generative AI artworks.
The U.S.American Copyright Office argued and ruled correctly that "purely AI-generated material" remains ineligible for protections.
This aspect of mechanical activity is also relevant when it comes to the selection, composition, and combination of million of images, because training an ANNM, specifically an LLM is considered a mechanical activity. Therefore, the fair use is not applicable at all, because there is no act of creation and thus no copyright issue. This is also the reason why it is illegal for others without authorization, but not for C.S..

In general, any action is illegal, if it results in a

But the copyright is not an exclusive right, that can stifle further creations, inventions, and developments.

So the second main aspect has the 2 subaspects of

2.1 Are others allowed to utilize AI tools?
Yes and No.

2.1.1 For example, AI tools in desktop publishing software for painting by hand on a computer screen.

2.1.2 But limitations exist in case of Ontologic System Components (OSC) and Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS).

2.2 Are others allowed to utilize genAI in AI tools?
Yes and No.

2.2.1 In fact, older generative AI techniques, or better said generative Bionic techniques for creating artworks do exist, but they all are not based on our OM, FM, COM, LLM, etc., our Ontologic Programming (OP), and our Ontologic Computing (OC), transformative, generative, and creative Bionics, bidirectional Bridge from Natural Intelligence (NI) to Artificial Intelligence (AI) (Bridge from NI to AI), prompt engineering, Ontologic roBot (OntoBot), Conversational Artificial Intelligence (CAI or ConAI), (Information) Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), etc., and as far as we know (and remember) they are even not based on an Artificial Neural Network Model (ANNM), whereby exceptions prove/confirm the rule, and definitely not on these large ANNMs. Oh.

2.2.2 So once again: Are others allowed to utilize OM, FM, LLM, etc. already trained?
Computer says "No", for sure, because this depends once again on our Ontologic System (OS) with its OM, FM, LLM, etc., Ontologic Programming (OP), Ontologic Computing (OC), transformative, generative, and creative Bionics, bidirectional Bridge from Natural Intelligence NI to Artificial Intelligence (AI) (Bridge from NI to AI), prompt engineering, forming, or teaching, Ontologic roBot (OntoBot), Conversational Artificial Intelligence (CAI or ConAI), etc. which constitutes a

of C.S., which again is already the bigger transformative, derivative, new expression of idea, and unauthorized utilization is considered a mimicking of C.S. and a mimicking of the performance of C.S. (e.g. cybernetic self-reflection, and so on), which again confuses the interested public about the true origin and interferes with the exclusive exploitation rights.
The unauthorized production of pure generative AI artworks is a copyright infringement, because others

Others have to get an allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our Ontologic System (OS), including certain Ontologic System Components (OSC) and Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS), from our SOPR.
This is also the reason why our SOPR asks or collects a royalty from the revenue generated with the sale of NFTs and genAI artworks.

By the way:

12.February.2025

11:11 and 23:22 UTC+1
3, 4, 5 too few - 15 suggests SOPR approach

For sure, the takeover of just only 3, 4, or 5 companies are much too few as damage compensations and 15 or more companies suggests and supports the realization respectively implementation of the approach of our SOPR, which is based on the

The basic freedoms and the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation are not negotiable and all the others have acted in the wrong ways. And we have already said in the past that there is no reason not to demand that the list of damages is completed and processed.

Needless to recall, a subsidiary of our corporation enjoys lower internally collected, accounted, and offset royalties, if no reason against this exists.

We also would like to make crystal clear that the private trust or foundation trick to protect companies from the execution of a range of legally requiered actions does not work, because if they refuse to hand over the majority of company shares to our SOPR, then our SOPR refuses the allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our OS.
Bad luck for Mark Zuckerberg and Co.. Either payment of the higher of apportioned compensation, profit, and value, or Meta (Facebook) 'R' Us. :)

14:39 and 18:07 UTC+1
Musk is not quite right and true about OpenAI

We quote a report: "[...]
Musk, an OpenAI cofounder who eventually left the company, has long feuded with Altman and has filed a number of legal complaints against OpenAI and Altman, claiming that the AI company and its leadership have misrepresented OpenAI as a philanthropy.
OpenAI is operated by a nonprofit organization that controls an entity called OpenAI LP, a for-profit company that exists within the larger company's structure. That for-profit company took OpenAI from effectively worthless to a valuation of around $100 billion in just a few years - and Altman is largely credited as the mastermind of that plan and the key to the company's success.
Musk claims that OpenAI has broken with its founding charter by seeking to make a profit with its AI tools.
[...]"

Comment
We have several main issues in case of the organization and company OpenAI, which are

Implementing plagiarisms and fakes of original and unique works of art, and mimicking the true creator are not considered own expressions of idea, and acts for the benefit of the public.

Indeed, the company OpenAI and its leadership have misrepresented OpenAI as a philanthropy, because the OpenAI LP FPO does exactly that, what the OpenAI NPO did before. Separating intention and implementation does not work.

The investors do know the situation, specifically Microsoft, because the (former) main scientist of Microsoft belongs to the first or even the founding members of OpenAI besides Sam Altman, Elon Musk, et al.. This is an evidence, which shows an act of conspiracy.

13.February.2025

08:70 and 12:04 UTC+1
They lost it completely

MacMoron lost it completely. What not?
von der Liar lost it completely. What not?
Who not? What not?

All the time, Macron is talking about higher values, democracy, égalité social equality, human rights, freedom, etc.. But all the time he collaborates with serious criminals and an autocratic regimes, that give a damn on all of that.
This collaboration or even corruption equals the illegal Stargate project with the same main private investor, United Emirates of Arabia with its MGX wealth fund, solely established to infringe the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation.
These camelboys are system enemies of the U.S.America, the U.K., Canada, et al., the European Union, and also the zionists, specifically jewish zionists, and have absolutely no problem to collaborate with the P.R.China, Russia, and other countries as long as they have a benefit.
And we said crystal clear that nobody has to interfere with the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies, and mimick C.S. and our corporation.
We also provided them very good alternative investment options, which they want to invest in with the money stolen from the rest of the world with their OPEC+ cartel on the one hand and which for sure we have not revealed in detail on the other hand.

And we did all those exotic, neglected, and shunned things, such as Bionics, Cybernetics, Ontologics, etc., etc., etc., that only very few also wanted to do, and created original and unique, visionary and unbelievable, unforeseeable and unexpected, personal and copyrighted, and prohibited for fair dealing and fair use works of art. And now everybody wants to move the goal posts once again and make demands, which we do not have to fulfill, because we play by the rules. Computer says "No".
Sign, pay, comply. The rights and properties have to be acknowledged and respected, the damage compensations have to be payed, the illegal materials have to be transfered, the contracts have to be signed, the royalties have to be payed, the Terms of Service (Tos) have to be complied with. This is the law and the law is already the compromise.

They are allowed to take part in establishing our New World Order (NWO), but our NWO has basic rules, which are not negotiable.
And in the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse (Ov) one of these rules is that C.S. is the supervisor.

For our fans and readers, who do not followed the development of the last weeks, we would like to recall that the Stargate project is nothing else than an essential part of our Ontologic System (OS) with its

which belong to the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies and correspondingly wrongly and illegally called and marketed as Artificial Intelligence (AI) infrastructure, AI supercomputer, AI supercomputer infrastructure, AI cluster, AI cluster infrastructure, AI cloud, Intelligent Cloud, Edge, and Fog Computing (ICEFC), intelligent cloud infrastructure, and so on. It is not the Global Brain of the first generation (GB 1.0), Cloud Computing of the first generation (CC 1.0), Grid Computing (GC or GridC), and Cloud Computing of the second generation (CC 2.0).

For sure, Macron does know the facts after the many research crap together with Microsoft and Co. (we are not that stupid, but just saved a lot of time by not investigating and documenting all those illegal and even serious criminal acts), crypto crap, cloud, Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act, and all those other scandals, where he was always following the same criminal strategy. So we caught him red-handed with both hands in the croissant jar.
The same holds for the European Commission (EC) led by von der Leyen, who belongs to and represents the F.R.German CDU/CSU clique, guess why Microsoft and SAP are a team since 3 decades, OpenAI is paying Axel Springer for using its data, OpenAI is opening an office in Bayern==Bavaria, and Palantir Technologies is working with Hessen, Bayern, and Nordrhein-Westfalen==North Rhine-Westfalia (see also the note Palantir Technologies around 95% of the 4th of February 2025 mark Germany and Europol), and is tolerated by the F.Rench clique. She came up with a collaboration or even corruption, which also equals the illegal Stargate project, but seems to be even more corruptive, because it is public-private investment.

We already said some years ago that this will not be a never ending story.

But somehow we also have the impression of a cumulation of a collective (joint) reaction of several entities and groups concerned and interested, and it also smells like

We will find out more facts about this matter, because the larger lying newsmedia are holding back relevant informations once again.

They all fall prey to anarchists, chaots, criminals with their marketing blah blah blah about sovereignty, democracy, égalité social equality, human rights, freedom, etc., and of course new jobs, and simultaneously they ignore the

despite our warnings about legal issues, costs, investments, jobs (only transformative, but not generative), and so on.

See also the notes

They even do not listen at all, when we explain something, and only want to hear, what they want to hear with their incompetence, arrogance, and ignorance. They just only see Micky Mice, pipedreams, castles in the air, respectively a lot, that does not exist.
The best example is our warning about the bionics economics, specifically the huge investments, and that they are only burning a lot of money, but cannot win anything, because in the end a causal link with the original and unique works of art created by C.S. cannot be avoided and there is no Return of Investment (RoI).
The latter is also the reason, why we said that nobody can afford this economically besides culturally, artistically, legally, etc..
This is not because the infrastructure is so expensive. It is also just an act of philanthropy.

See also the

And that argument about electric power generated by nuclear energy is total nonsense, which also come from Microsoft and Bill Gates, OpenAI and Sam Altman, and Co..

We would also like to note that they all are trying unsuccessfully to avoid a causal link with our original and unique works of art created by C.S. despite this is not possible anymore since around 2014. (A very easy example is our Ontologic roBot (OntoBot) based on coherent Ontologic Model (OM) as Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) in the Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV) respectively the Ontoverse (Ov), or on the Ontoscope (Os), or what is wrongly and illegally called Chatbot based on Conversational Artificial Intelligence (CAI or ConAI) as a Service (aaS) in the cloud, in the Metaverse (Mv), or on the Android Smartphone and Apple iPhone.
We have even started to create graphics several years ago, which show this visually to all entities concerned.

And no, we do not feel sorry for such entities.

By the way:

14.February.2025

08:05 UTC+1
Comment to the Day

"The law is already the compromise, which dictates peace. The law is dictated peace.", [C.S., Today]

By the way:

• payment of damage compensations, the higher of ...,
• cure of all interference with, and also obstruction, undermining, and harm of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation and other legal deficits,
• resolution of the legal issues, and
• restoration of the legal peace.

13:04 and 14.02 UTC+1
ToS with LM of SOPR include fixed fee if 0 revenue

We would like to recall that the Terms of Service (ToS) with its License Model (LM) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) also regulates the case, if a member and licensing partner of our SOPR does not generate a revenue with the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our Ontologic System (OS), including our

whereby the next development is the move from chatbot to Intelligent Agent System (IAS) and thus even more of our OntoBot, and demands a minimal fixed fee as royalty and also estimates the lost revenue to determine the share of the revenue to compensate any lost royalty.
In most cases, our SOPR will take authorized and unauthorized Licens Models (LMs) for making an initial estimation and determining a minimal fee and then making adjustments.
The refusal to generate revenue will result in the withdrawal of the allowance and license.

Companies, like for example Meta (Facebook), DeepSeek, Baidu, OpenAI, and Co. are already or will be insolvent with providing illegal Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) and illegal plagiarisms and fakes, Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) for free.
All those free materials are considered illegal materials, which have to be transfered to our SOPR.

The investments of the last years are lost and there is no indicator that this will change in the future in case of all those fraudulent and even serious criminal entities.
See also the Clarification Bionics Economics Special of the 27th of January 2025.

All these subject matters have already been discussed and publicized many years ago.

We highly recommend all governments to stop those infringements of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation. Nobody will win something. Quite the contrary is the case, because no revenue also means no profit and no tax, and investments are accounted as costs in the balance sheet, which decreases the profits, which again also decreases the tax either directly by having to pay less or even no taxes or indirectly by offsetting the costs from the profits.
In general, FOSS and free applications and services are an illegal race to the bottom, and are more and more becoming a threat to every federal budget and thus national security and sovereingty. Nobody can live on air and love alone. Oh, what a pity.

We also note that proper referencing respectively citation with attribution, labelling, and branding is required, because the public does not know the true origin of the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) in the oeuvre of C.S..

17:40 UTC+1
SOPR considering more rules for enforced JVs

Joint Venture (JV)

Since some few years the infringements of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation are court-proof, which will lead to substantial and successful legal actions whenever and whereveer required.
Therefore, our position has become even stronger and our leverage has become even longer so that our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is considering if more rules are needed for Joint Ventures, which are still enforced by governments, specifically in relation to our

These rules could be

In this context, we would like to recall that the Terms of Service (ToS) with its License Model (LM) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) also demands reciprocal establishments of JVs as well, for example in case of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and automotive industrial sectors.

If we get no true win-win, then do not construct facilities, build factories, sell technologies, ship goods, and provide services, which are based on the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) in the oeuvre of C.S. or interfere with, and also obstruct, undermine, and harm the exclusive rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation.

15.February.2025

06:43, 09:21, and 12:54 UTC+1
Some thoughts and notes

However the legal dispute between certain entities ends, none of them will get any control over our

• Foundational Model (FM) (),
• Capability and Operational Model (COM),
• Artificial Neural Network MultiModal Model (ANNMMM),
• Foundation Model (FM),
• Large Language Model (LLM),
• integrated (unified and hybrid) subsymbolic and symbolic system,
• etc.,

• Bridge from Natural Intelligence (NI) to Artificial Intelligence (AI) (Bridge from NI to AI),

• transformative, generative, and creative Bionics,
• Bridge from Natural Intelligence (NI) to Artificial Intelligence (AI) (Bridge from NI to AI), and what is wrongly and illegally called
• prompt engineering, forming, shaping, configuring respectively cognitive processing, educating, teaching, learning, etc.,

• Ontologic Model-Based Autonomous System (OMBAS),
• Cognitive System (CS or CogS),
• Conversational Agent System (CAS or ConAS),
• Conversational Artificial Intelligence (CAI or ConAI),
• (Information) Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG),
• etc.,

of our Ontologic System (OS), including

in whole or in part.

In general, we already showed that OpenAI with its ChatGPT, Microsoft with its Copilot, X.AI Corporation with its Grok, and other companies with their illegal plagiarisms and fakes of parts of the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. are across the red line respectively in the black zone respectively in the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse (Ov).
This is even more crystal clear

The arguments in case of the

and so on.

And we made crystal clear that there will be no further plagiarisms and fakes based on for example our integrations with

to recall only some very few, but very well known examples.

The whole basic thing is the creation of C.S. and thus a sui generis work of art of C.S., so forget the dirty tricks. As we said, they just came many years, in same cases even 2 decades too late to the party.
That all needs no further discussion, but the announced legal procedure for example at the courts, if still required.

See also the notes

10:25 UTC+1
ByteDance has to pay very high damages

The company ByteDance has to pay very high damage compensations for unauthorized performance and reproduction of Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) based on our Ontologic System Components (OSC), and executed or provided on our Ontoscope (Os) and in our Ontoverse (Ov), and even for illegal plagiarisms and fakes of certain parts that belong to the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Socities, specifically our Ontologic Model (OM) (e.g. Large Language Model (LLM)), our Bridge from Natural Intelligence (NI) to Artificial Intelligence (AI) (Bridge from NI to AI) (e.g. Conversational Artificial Intelligence (CAI or ConAI), our Ontologic roBot (OntoBot), and our Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV).
See also the notes

and the other publications cited therein.

But to get to the point, where the company ByteDance pays the damage compensations, the higher of apportioned compensation, profit, and value, one must first acknowledge the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation and also their violations.
Then ByteDance is allowed to pay (off) its damages with the transfer of the majority of shares or even all shares of TikTok to our SOPR.
And we do not think that the government of the P.R.China blocks the transfer of the secret sauce, the algorithm, because we will get it anyway either in the U.S.America or in the P.R.China.
And we do think that the true secret sauce is the content, because content is king.

But acknowling said rights, properties, and violations has a further extremely large side effect with a big implication and impact, which is a legal chain reaction, which again results the procedure of the completed list of damages, which basically is Silicon Valley, Silicon Alley, and at other locations. But we will be shaking the house of cards in the near future anyway.

16.February.2025

09:27 UTC+1
If irreparable harm, then the higher of ..., no trading of stocks

In the last years, some very clever (not really) entities mentioned that the infringement of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation would have already resulted in irreparable harm and we should get along with that. Of course, we will not, as we made always crystal clear, because our leverage is incredible large and so many possibilities to restore legal peace do exist.

Just for the matter of entertainment, we assume the theory that an irreparable harm would have happened. Then a bad actor still would have to do the following legally required actions:

• royalties unpaid (triple damages),
• all profit generated illegally, or/and
• business value increased illegally,

We increase the bad fun and also assume the theory that a bad actor would argue that the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. are an essential facility and the allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of said AWs and IPs would be required to continue a prior core business, create an own new expression of idea, or make a real invention for example for the benefit of the public or whatsoever, and said bad actor would be allowed to do so for capricious reasons. Then said bad actor still would have to

Ideally, a

is done.

This would also work in case of the private trust or foundation trick to protect companies from the execution of a range of legally requiered. actions

In reality, no carte blanche, jester's license, etc, exists to go on with fraudulent or even serious criminal activities, and every harm can be repaired. It is just a matter of good will and time.

See also the note

17:48 UTC+1
Our OS is not for free in the observable universe

For example, illegal plagiarisms and fakes of parts of our Ontologic System (OS), including Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) made on the planet Earth or elsewhere is not for free in the solar system or elsewhere, as we always made crystal clear (see for example the note ToS with LM of SOPR include fixed fee if 0 revenueof the 14th of February 2025). Only morons are claiming for that nonsense.
Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) will present the bill, enforce the payment of damage compensations and royalties, transfer of all illegal materials, and the other legally required actions in one way or another, and take measures even outside of the limits of the so-called global south.

17.February.2025

Comment of the Day

"Transparency is guarantee.", [C.S., Today]

Voluntary transparency is sufficient guarantee.

And we have not received any complaints so far.

11:14 UTC+1
SOPR considering more countermeasures

Plagiarisms and fakes will not help anybody.
Our SOPR is also working on more measures to enforce all of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation, including direct actions, such as

and indirect actions, which eventually will reach all sovereign territories (unions of states, countries, and states of union of states), economic zones, trade unions, and so on, such as Global North, Europe, Global South, Middle East, and other areas, European Union (EU), Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, and the United Arab Emirates (BRICS+ or BRICS Plus), because of the

One of the latest actions was the destruction of 6 automobiles, which were branded as Volkswagen, manufactured in the P.R.China, and imported into F.R.Germany by a car dealer, on behalf of the company Porsche SE/Volkswagen, which

See also the notes

20.February.2025

18:33, 20:00, and 23:20 UTC+1
Tecnica Group Moon Boot, Porsche 356 ©

Original and unique, visionary and unbelievable, unforeseeable and unexpected, personal and copyrighted, and prohibited for fair dealing and fair use

specifically

which

• ontology (study of the nature of being or existence) and ontological relativism in general and
• theocentricism, Object-Oriented Ontology (OOO), and also existentialism and anthropocentrism in particular,

Sounds exotic and even crazy? Bingo!!!

We also have another assignment of physical and metaphysical aspects and items, which also demonstrates that the free and creative work is independent of technical requirements, rules, or other purposes, which have not determined the design and even if so, then the legal aspect of compilation, integration, unification, design, architecture, component, etc. does apply.

And it has already been performed and reproduced in parts and without authorization by other works of art, such as some novels, the movies "Ready Player One", "Her", and much more.

And it is already iconic, because virtually every industrial company has produced a plagiarism and fake of our Ontologic System (OS) with its Ontoverse (Ov) and Ontoscope (Os), and more than half of the world's population has purchased a plagiarism and fake of our Ontoscope (Os), and even more are utilizing a plagiarism and fake of our Ontologic System (OS).

The main purpose of The Proposal, which is an extremely far reaching collection of topics, genres, and thoughts, was to create a court-proof evidence, because we already knew in 1998 that Microsoft, IBM, and potentially other companies will steal it.
But that the governments of the U.S.America, U.K. Australia, F.R.Germany, F.R., and others together with the other members of their cliques would also be behind that scandal was beyond our imagination at that time.

Stop the infringement of the rights (e.g. moral rights respectively Lanham (Trademark) rights, competition rights) and properties (e.g. copyright) of C.S. and our corporation immediately.

We will fully and completely participate in that rally at the stock markets, because it is our momentum.
A very rough and non-binding estimation of the apportioned values is 70 to 75% of the 19 trillion U.S. Dollar or 13.30 to 14.25 trillion U.S. Dollar only in relation to U.S.American companies, whereby 100% have to be paid immediately either in cash or with company shares.

25.February.2025

18:22 UTC+1
U.K. has been warned multiple times

We quote a report, which is about the acoustical work titled "Is This What We Want": "[...]
Under the new proposals, AI developers will be able to use creators' content on the internet to help develop their models, unless the rights holders elect to "opt out".
[...]
The government is currently consulting on proposals that would allow AI companies to use material that is available online without respecting copyright if they are using it for text or data mining.
Generative AI programmes mine, or learn, from vast amounts of data like text, images, or music online to generate new content which feels like it has been made by a human. [Or a cybernetic reflection of an individual or an Ontologic holon (Onton).]
The proposals would give artists or creators a so-called "rights reservation" - the ability to opt out.
[...]
A spokesman for the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) said in a statement on Tuesday that the UK's "current regime for copyright and AI is holding back the creative industries, media and AI sector from realising their full potential - and that cannot continue".
[...]
Organiser of the silent record [a composer, developer in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI), and violator of the rights and properties (e.g. copyright) of C.S. ...] said the proposals were not only "disastrous for musicians" in the UK but also "totally unnecessary", as the country can be "leaders in AI without throwing our world-leading creative industries under the bus".
[...]
In a letter to The Times, published on Monday, signatories including Sir Paul, Lord Lloyd Webber and Sir Stephen Fry said that changes to the law will allow big tech to raid the creative sectors.
[...]"

Comment
Maybe they should just read the copyright law at least one time, because it is basically about the exclusive rights and their reservation, protection, and exploitation.
"Bei uns ist es üblich, dass man vorher fragt.==It is customary with us to ask in advance.", [Ralf Hütter of the music band Kraftwerk vs. Moses Pelham in relation to a 2 second sample of the song "Metall auf Metall" of the album T.E.E., 2019]
Und seit wann kommt der Brunnen zum Eimer?==And since when does the well come to the bucket?

The fact is that C.S. was creative under the already existing fair use clause of the copyright law and not under such a "totally unnecessary" and ridiculous legal change and has created the

• Foundational Model (FM),
• Capability and Operational Model (COM),
• Foundation Model (FM),
• MultiModal Artificial Neural Network Model (MMANNM),
• Large Language Model (LLM),
• integrated (unified and hybrid) subsymbolic and symbolic system,
• etc.,

• transformative, generative, and creative Bionics,
• Bridge from Natural Intelligence (NI) to Artificial Intelligence (AI) (Bridge from NI to AI), and what is wrongly and illegally called
• prompt engineering, forming, shaping, configuring respectively cognitive processing, educating, teaching, learning, etc.,

• Ontologic Model-Based Autonomous System (OMBAS),
• Cognitive System (CS or CogS),
• Conversational Agent System (CAS or ConAS),
• Conversational Artificial Intelligence (CAI or ConAI),
• (Information) Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG),
• etc.,

as essential parts of our original and unique Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and Ontologic System (OS) and this next nonsense of the British government will not change the simple fact that even with such a bold and capricious legal change and allowance a result is always an illegal performance and reproduction of our OM, FM, COM, LLM, etc., and also OM, OP, OC, OB, and so on, and therefore an illegal plagiarism and fake of the realted parts of our Evoos and our OS.

They all must be glad that C.S. created this around the periode between the years 1998 to 2005 and made it explicit in April and May 2016 and not another entity, specifically those plagiarists, freeloaders, and free riders.

See also the related messages, notes, explanations, clarifications, investigations, and claims, specifically

and the other publications cited therein.

And our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) made crystal clear multiple times in the past that we

and also explained how the only possible compromise and even best solution looks like under the Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) Terms of Service (ToS) with the License Model (LM) of our SOPR: They simply

We also would like to recall once again for all the unknowing, unteachable, or unconscious entities that the MfE is exclusive due to the societal compromise for opening our OS and allowing and licensing the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our OS, including the utilization of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies with their set of foundational and essential facilities, technologies, goods, and services, specifically SoftBionics as a Service (SBaaS) and Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS) based on our one and only OntoBot.

No further discussion is required, because it is that easy.

One can also see here once again the documented fraudulent or even serious criminal method of governments, lying press, and other members of their cliques, and even larger organizations:

Obviously, that virtually impossible legal change would also be an illegal expropriation of C.S..
But unfortunately (not really) and stupidly (really), the limits of the constitution and the basic law by this and other dirty tricks have been reached.
How can one even come to such an utter anti-social, bloody stupid, and arrogant crap at all?
"I am of Earth and for Earth, and proud to be so. Our planet and modern world did not get here by being typical. And a big part of Earth's success has been freedom in the economic realm and everywhere else. Freedom is ethical, it minimizes coercion, and practical, it drives creativity, invention, and prosperity." Thank you very much for this reminder, J.B., specifically in relation to freedom of (self-)expression, art, ownership, and competition.
In fact, we have repeatedly warned against touching the copyright law, which has stood the test of time for 300 years.

And for sure, we do know who is lobbying for this revision of the copyright law. It has become so obvious over the years.

See also the notes

By the way:

27.February.2025

00:27 and 00:37 UTC+1
Alexa+ shows Alexa was, is, will be OntoBot

After other companies already continued with the evolution of what in specific cases is wrongly and illegally called chatbot, virtual assistant, Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA) or Personal Intelligent Assistant (PIA), Artificial Intelligence (AI) assistant, Intelligent Agent System (IAS), Conversational Agent System (CAS), Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbot, Conversational Artificial Intelligence (CAI or ConAI), etc., such as

the company

followed them, as predicted by us.

said chatbot, virtual assistant, Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA) or Personal Intelligent Assistant (PIA), Artificial Intelligence (AI) assistant, Intelligent Agent System (IAS), Conversational Agent System (CAS), Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbot, etc. we

We also showed that these companies are simulating an ordinary technological progress with a seamless development processs, which means that these were, are, and always will be our OntoBot and the other related parts of our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and our Ontologic System (OS), as is the case with Peer-to-Peer Virtual Machine (P2PVM), operating system Virtual Machine (osVM), operating system-level Virtualization (osV) or containerization, microVirtual Machine (mVM), operating system-level Sandbox (osS) or container sandbox, container orchestration, Resource-Oriented technologies (ROx), microService technologies (mSx), ServerLess (SL or SeL) and StateLess (SL or StL), Function as a Service (FaaS), Cloud, Edge, and Fog Computing (CEFC), Cloud-native technologies (Cnx), and also Artificial Intelligence (AI) infrastructure, AI supercomputer, AI supercomputer infrastructure, AI cluster, AI cluster infrastructure, AI cloud, Intelligent Cloud, Edge, and Fog Computing (ICEFC), intelligent cloud infrastructure, Stargate, and so on.

Finally, Amazon has also officially purchased its ticket.

00:27 and 00:47 UTC+1
Nvidia's key figures not whole ecosystem

For sure, the bubble is still going on.
Howsoever, the revenues and profits of Nvidia cannot hide the facts that the

The reason has been explained in connection to the transformation of jobs, which one has to do and invest into. The same holds for the transformation of the rest of the economy in particular and the society in general.
From a societal point of view the question is who will eventually pay for this transformation. The companies listed at the stock markets and their shareholders will not do it, because they want to reinvest, and the governments and their taxpayers will not do it, because they have already too much federal debts.

Furthermore, we will execute the rights and take back the control over the properties of C.S. and our corporation. This has implications regarding the reinvestments of the gains made at the stock markets and the payments of damage compensations, the higher of apportioned compensation, profit, and values, specifically by Nvidia.

Moreover, it is evident that Nvidia has deliberatively and collaboratively with other companies

to

• us from introducing our processors and other hardware to the market in particular and
• freedom of choice, innovation, and competition for the benefit of the public in general,

in order to

See also the notes

Nvidia will not get around the payment of said damages, because we will begin with Microsoft, Alphabet (Google), and Amazon and in the next step we 4 will tell Apple, Nvidia, and Meta (Facebook), and also Salesforce, Oracle, and other U.S.American companies that they also have to pay their fair share, followed by Samsung and other South Korean companies, European companies, Taiwanese companies, and also P.R.Chinese companies.
And the list of damages is already showing the ratios.

28.February.2025

00:13 UTC+1
Comment of the Day

"Exclusivity is timeless.", [C.S., Today]