• operating system,
• agent system, and
• cognitive (agent) system

in contrast to only a layered lightweight Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) Multi-Agent System (MAS) possibly possessing some few anthropo- morphic qualities,

• Computational Language Processing (CLP) system respectively integrated system of abstract machines,
• Computational Linguistics (CL), and
• Natural Language Processing (NLP) system
  • explicitly connected with an MR Environment(?),
  • set in relation to an intelligent (agent) system, and
  • set in relation to a cognitive (agent) systems,

  in contrast to a simple communication with a single agent of a (multi-)agent system (e.g "Request target Joe action open file."),

Taken all together means that the:

• concept,
• creation process,
• composition of essential parts, and
• overall expression,

• copying an essential element from our Ontologic System not covered by the fair use clause,
• composing a similar system by taking our Ontologic System with its OS and Ontoverse as blueprint and essential parts from other prior art, and
• creating a work as part of a manipulation to show alleged supporting evidence of prior art,

does not avoid a causal link, an impermissible hindsight, and in the end an infringment of our copyright.
In addition, the relevant documents are older than 10 years, which makes the argument of an ordinary technological progress not convincing.

For sure, we never discussed that other entites realize either 3D, AR, VR, or MR applications on an operating system, a multi- agent system, or/and in the WWW in relation to the common definition of MR, which should not be confused with our definition of the reality-virtuality continuum as MR.
But for example Microsoft's so-called holoportation system, which the company even called teleportation in the sense of and in relation to our OS and its Reality/AR/VR fusion respectively MR interpre- tation, and applications, is on or already over the edge from our point of view.
When even an NLP chat(ter)bot, an Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA), or/and more AI functionality of any kind is added respectively integrated, as seen by Google, Microsoft, and Facebook, or/and such an all-encompassing composition of an MR system or MR Environment (MRE) is taken in parts or as a whole as the infrastructure for the next WWW respectively network system or information system, then we are more and more proven right with our explanations and claims.

That said, there is a limit, though it might be shifted a little by such defrauding activities. But in the end it is artist's pitch on both sides, indeed.

02.May.2016
Comment of the Day
Speak with the Web™

OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update
We added several links to various sections of the webpage Links to Software as follows.

In the section Network Technology we added the links:

• Information-Centric Networking Research Group (ICNRG)
• ICNRG Wiki

• CCNx Distillery

In the section File System we added the links:

We also added to the section Formal Verification the links:

• Srinath Setty, Richard McPherson, Andrew J. Blumberg, and Michael Walfish: Pepper - Making Argument Systems for Outsourced Computation Practical (Sometimes)
• Srinath Setty, Victor Vu, Nikhil Panpalia, Benjamin Braun, Andrew J. Blumberg, and Michael Walfish: Ginger - Taking proof-based verified computation a few steps closer to practicality
• Victor Vu, Srinath Setty, Andrew J. Blumberg, and Michael Walfish: Allspice - A hybrid architecture for interactive verifiable computation
• University of Pennsylvania, Benjamin Braun, Ariel J. Feldman, Zuocheng Ren, Srinath Setty, Andrew J. Blumberg, and Michael Walfish: Pantry - Verifying computations with state
• New York University, Riad S. Wahby, Srinath Setty, Zuocheng Ren, Andrew J. Blumberg, and Michael Walfish: Buffet - Efficient RAM and control flow in verifiable outsourced computation

Ontonics, OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps 10:17 UTC+2
The OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update of today should also make clear how our Ontologic Net (ON) and Ontologic Web (OW) infrastructure, which is a part of the Ontologic uniVerse (OntoVerse or OV) of our Ontologic System (OS), looks like and works.
As discussed several times before, the foundational OS can be seen as a ontology-based, ontology-oriented, and ontologic(-oriented), and reflective or even holonic system with the integrated functionality of a Natural Language Processing (NLP) system used wherever possible and advantageous, which includes:

• directory name,
• file name, and
• thing name,

• naming scheme
  • Content-Addressable Network (CAN), and
  • Information-Centric Networking (ICN),
    • Content-Centric Networking (CCN) and
    • Named Data Networking (NDN),

  and

• resource identification scheme
  • Uniform Resource Identifier (URI),
  • Uniform Resource Locator (URL),
  • Uniform Resource Name (URN), and
  • thing name,

• Multi-Agent System (MAS),
  • human to human,
  • human to agent or machine, and
  • agent or machine to agent or machine,

and

• OntoGlobe,
• OntoEarth (e.g. real server name is planet, country, town, street, building, level, room, rack, motherboard, data storage, and so on),
• OntoSpace, and

In this relation it is important to note, that the whole system is based on the interplay of syntax and semantic (e.g. entity and relationship respectively identity, name, taxonomy, topic map, ontology, etc.), which defines the dynamic namespace so to say, and correspondingly some features of the listed systems, such as e.g. using a signature for every single data packet or addressed resource, as required by the NDN, are optional in specific free areas but mandatory in specific core areas.
In sum, our Ontologic Net (ON) and Ontologic Web (OW) infrastructure is an inter(-)net(work) of names, capabilities, and things, and together with the other systems constitutes the all-encompassing OS.

With the OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update of today we have also increased the trust in our OS, which is an essential element of the foundational idea and concept behind it. The focus was this time the verification of the dynamic aspects of the communication and the interaction, for which we can use the already given prover and reasoner functionalities of the OntoL4 respectively OntoS1 and OntoBot software components.

Furthermore, the fields of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) include Associative Memory (AM), AM is also known as associative storage, associative array, and Content-Addressable Memory (CAM), and associative storage is also known as Content-Addressable Storage (CAS). CAM and CAS are closely related. Content-Addressable Network (CAN) is well-known from Peer-to-Peer (P2P) networks.
See also the OntoLab projects Log-structured Hash-based File System (LogHashFS or LHFS) and Associative Array Core and Chip/Processor in the Innovation-Pipeline of Ontonics, and also the Ontonics Further steps of the 13th of July 2014.

Important to note is the fact that we have not seen before a relation, combination, or even integration of CAM, CAS, and CAN with:

• ontology-based system,
  • semantic (world wide) web,
• ontology-oriented system, and
• ontologic(-oriented) system,

• Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) agent,
• Multi-Agent System (MAS),
• intelligent agent,
• cognitive agent,
• and so on,

or even something that suggests or motivates such a relation, combination, or integration by another person, group, or company, though there is some overlap in some cases (i.e. CAN vs. ICN) and there might exist some related works already.

As a conclusion we have to assume that due to the smart composi- tion and the extremely high level of complexity and integration the originality and uniqueness of this general approach, idea, or concept, and these related techniques, technologies, and systems is given.

There is no need to get in panic, because we only proved and increased more the originality and uniqueness of our OS.

The Web is US. But everybody is welcomed, as usual and as long as we all stay on the legal side, howsoever this is looking like.

Speak with the Web, your hand, or yourself. :D

OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps 13:55 UTC+2
We took:

• B. Braun: Compiling computations to constraints for verified computation,
• University of Pennsylvania, Benjamin Braun, Ariel J. Feldman, Zuocheng Ren, Srinath Setty, Andrew J. Blumberg, and Michael Walfish: Pantry- Verifying computations with state, and
• New York University, Riad S. Wahby, Srinath Setty, Zuocheng Ren, Andrew J. Blumberg, and Michael Walfish: Efficient RAM and control flow in verifiable outsourced computation,

• Formal Verification and
• Software Development Tool

on the webpage Links to Software, and

• networked embedded system C (nesC) and
• Small-C,

for the

• operating system,
• component framework, and
• applications,

and

In this way we are able to verify

This approach is original and unique due to its extremely high level of complexity and difficulty, and therefore at least its description is copyrighted.

03.May.2016
Comment of the Day
Ontocore™

04.May.2016
Clarification #1
After conducting the first round of our requirement engineering as part of the creation of the Ontologic System (OS) by C.S., we came to the result that the users of the OS demand continua between extrema like the following for example:

The second round of our requirement engineering provided as results some more continua between extrema, such as the following:

and also the insight, that the preferences tend to the extrema that we concider as negative and destructive. The latter surprised us somehow, though we explained it with the human nature.

Luckily, these results coincide with our general concept of an n-dimen- sional (fractal, reflective, holonic) OS with continua between arbitrary extrema everywhere, like the following for example:

which can be created, and manually or automatically configured, adjusted, and extended as well as planned, assured, controlled, and improved by the Quality Management (QM) system (added on the 5th of May 2016) at runtime. Obviously, it is possible to provide an all in one operating system core that covers all requirements.
We come back to some aspects of this n-dimensional foundation when we discuss for example the core abstract machine of our Ontologic System Architecture (OSA).

The customer is king.
The user is king.

Clarification #2
Since the 21st of March 2016 two related eruptions in a discussion thread on the mailing list of the compositor protocol respectively display server framework Wayland have been observed:

We only waited for some reactions like these.

Obviously, other companies have understood how clever our strategy with our hardware and software architectures is, specifically with the inclusion of a scene graph and the technique that has been given the designation HardWare Composer (HWC):

We have not taken the usual way with a proprietary processor, but just opened the visor, thrown away the gloves, and begun to do flat out computing with our GPU on the level of the OpenGL and the OpenSceneGraph (OSG) library without any operating system magic, supertroll nonsense, and proprietary silicon gimmick of chip manufacturers.

Btw.: It was not the last surprise.

05.May.2016
Comment of the Day
Talk to the web™
Talk to the net™

Qestion of the Day
"Tock, tock, tock. Hello, hello! Uncle Sam? Anybody home?"

Ontonics Further steps
We continued with the development of a device.

Furthermore, together with our business unit Style of Speed, we adapted two older solutions, which are conected with each other by their technological foundations, and integrated another technology to a new system, which solves a practical problem.

In a subsequent step, we concluded, that the functionality of this system can be extended in a totally different way, which makes it a very interesting overall solution.

Since some days we are also continuing the work on an older project and in the course of this included another older project, which made progress somehow due to other reasons.
Yesterday, we also concluded that we have already developed an interesting part of the overall solution.
Today, we are thinking about the possibility to take this crazy thing more seriously.

06.May.2016
Comment of the Day
Ontocraft™

Clarification
*** Small revision ***

We continue with providing some more (additional) results (again) of the analysis of certain works and their comparison with the work of art series

created by C.S..

We have analyzed some related documents for another time. The curcial points and problems are that

• on the one hand equal our general concepts, which again is now unsurprising for us, but
• on the other hand were explained and realized in such particular ways, which again shows us how the general concepts were truly meant and how long and how much they really have spied on us at that time,

• ensure objectivity,
• show the clear evidences of plagiarism and differences, and
• avoid talking nonsense or even making wrong claims.

The three analyzed works focus on the integration of an Intelligent Agent System (IAS or IntAS), or more precisely Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) Multi-Agent System (MAS) architecture, which is basically a specific extension to a Human Machine Interface (HMI) of an MR Environment (MRE), including an AR Environment (ARE) and a VR Environment (VRE).
This integration has been realized in such a very rudimentary or simple way, that the origins and limits of the foundational concepts are recognizable.

In a first work a special type of software agent with its so-called "digital spirit" is described, which is

• stationary devices (with e.g. display or touchscreen, camera, and microphone)
  • desktop computer and
  • game console,
• mobile devices (with e.g. display or touchscreen, camera, and microphone)
  • handheld computer (with e.g. stylus),
  • tablet computer, and
  • smartphone,

  and

• wearable devices with display
  • VR Head-Mounted Display (VRHMD),

• physical respectively hardware and artificial agent
  • mobile robot,

• virtual respectively software and artificial agent
  • animated agent or 3D figure in Operating Environment (OE) and
  • animated agent or 3D figure in Virtual Reality Environment (VRE),

• physical environment
  • Mobile Robotic System (MRS),
• digital environment
  • Operating Environment (OE)
    • shell with Graphical User Interface (GUI) or graphical shell and
    • Desktop Environment (DE),
  • Mirror World (MW),
• virtual or metaphysical environment,
  • Virtual World (VW), Computer-Simulated Environment (CSE), or Persistent Virtual Environment (PVE),
  • Collaborative Virtual Environment (CVE) or Multi-user Virtual Environment (MVE), and
  • Virtual Reality Environment (VRE)
    • Semi-Immersive Virtual Environment (SIVE) and
    • Immersive Virtual Environment (IVE or ImVE),
      • Cave Automatic Virtual Environment (CAVE),

The migration or teleportation of the mobile agents changes the specifics of the context, or said more generally the specifics of context change or the context specifies change, which again also

See also the works in the field of

The claim is made to add a new dimension to the context of artificial systems on the basis of a BDI MAS architecture and complete adaptivity (e.g. reflection and mutation) of its embodiment, which again is based on a dichotomy of the

But eventually, a framework for multimedia systems based on a BDI MAS architecture and a specific extension to a User Interface (UI) and seamless Human Machine Interface (HMI) of an AR Environment (ARE) and a VR Environment (VRE) between the real and the virtual is described, which can be executed on stationary and mobile machines.

In a second work, which is related to the first work and was publicated around 1 year later, the

• Cyber-Physical Envrionment (CPE) and
• Mixed Reality Environment (MRE)
  • Augmented Reality Environment (ARE) and
  • Augmented Virtuality Environment (AVE),

• mobile devices (with e.g. display or touchscreen, camera, and microphone)
  • wearable devices with display
    • AR glasses,

to develop a seamless Human Computer Interface (HCI) between the real and the virtual

Taken the first and second works together, an all-encompassing interface between the real and the virtual is defined through the BDI MAS based framework, and UI and HCI respectively HMI.

In a third work of art an Agent Communication Language (ACL) is extended for a human-inclusive language, which is connected with the same agent runtime environment used for the BDI MAS described in the first and second works. That said, the third work provides no explicit connection between the first and second works.

Throughout the development of such systems the quantities and qualities of the foundational concept, the system features, and the resulting immersion have been increased:

• a user takes a real torch to illuminate an avatar or a 3D figure,
• an avatar or 3D figure illuminates a user with a virtual or even a real torch, or
• both a user, and an avatar or a 3D figure illuminate each other.

In fact, our Evoos is based on evolution, reflection, cybernetics, bioholonics, Holonic Agent System (HAS) (see also Social Interaction Framework for Virtual Worlds (SIF-VW) and Virtual Reality Environments (VREs)), Cognitive Agent System (CAS), Cyber-Physical System (CPS), Model-Based Autonomous System (MBAS) or Immobile Robotic System (ImRS or Immobot), Distributed operating system (Dos), Virtual Machine Monitor (VMM) or hypervisor, and Virtual Machine (VM), etc., and also the "assignment of the physiological senses to a possible underlying hardware" (see the chapter 5 Summary of The Proposal.
Therefore, Evoos provides the foundations for the two first works and our OS integrates all three works, and both provide and integrate other techniques and technologies, and does more on a higher level or deeper level or both respectively on the maximum level resulting in something totally new and different (see also the Clarifications of the 13th, 16th, and 29th of April 2016, and 1st and 4th of May 2016).

Furthermore, the foundational concept of our Evoos and OS

• one space, environment, world, and universe, that we named eXtended Mixed Reality (XMR) or simply eXtended Reality (XR) and Ontoverse (Ov), respectively
• one reality, that we named New Reality (NR),

instead of making any differentiations between reality and virtuality.

Finally, we would like to give the comparing metaphor of a hotel with a boat service vs. a boat is a hotel (e.g. cruise ship), and the following simple example:

specifically when our OS is taken as a blueprint and its composition with its functionalities is copied, which includes the Ontologic Web.
The decisive factor is that Facebook is already a platform, environment, or information space for human agents/users, that is more and more comprising the whole World Wide Web respectively constituting the overall or global context. Adding more and more of the essential elements of the OS, such as the systems named before, in the same way resulted in a part of the OS.

Maybe our explanations sound a little unusual or even are unconvincing, but this is the way the protection of a work by the copyright is working since more than a century. Simply compare the situation with e.g. painting or making music, or substitute a painting or a pop music song with a multimedia system like the OS of C.S..

Nevertheless, we came to the same result as some years ago in relation to our Ontoscope hardware (we will look for the related Clarification).

Interested entities should also take a look at the issued patents in the field of e.g. Augmented Reality (AR), though some of them are nonsense or not valid.

Ontonics Further steps
In relation to the new system developed together with our business unit Style of Speed and mentioned in the Further steps of yesterday, we adapted and integrated a third older solution, which might have an advantage.

In a subsequent step, we concluded, that the functionality of this system can be extended in a totally different way, which makes it a very interesting overall solution.

OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps
We worked again a little on one of our oldest multimedia projects, that is the adaption of a block-based open world game respectively a block-building sandbox game as the Graphical User Interface (GUI) of an operating system (see the explanations given in the OntoLinux Further steps of the 29th of June 2011, 12th and 15th of July 2012, the intelliTablet Announcement One Tablet Per Child (OTPC) and One Pad Per Child (OPPC/OP²C) #18 of today below). Besides the designations Brick (desktop) environment and Lego® Brick Theme we gave this variant without the typical Lego® brick knobs the name Ontocraft for better differentiation.

We also thought about the specific variant for mobile devices with

Btw.: A very well known block-building sandbox game was developed after other entities have implemented such games and also after we have publicated our thoughts and related works.

intelliTablet Further steps One Tablet Per Child (OTPC) and One Pad Per Child (OPPC/OP²C) #18
While others proposed a block-building sandbox game as application for the learning environment Sugar, we followed the demand of the children and took our original and unique approach of a block-based sandbox game for the Graphical User Interface (GUI) of a learning environment.

For its realization we have developed two basic variants, that are based on the integration of:

A more interesting realization has been mentioned already in the past with the variant based on the Lego® bricks metaphor or Lego® Brick Theme, and the related style guide for the elements (see also the intelliTablet Announcement One Tablet Per Child (OTPC) and One Pad Per Child (OPPC/OP²C) #1 of the 17th of July 2012, the intelliTablet Announcement Iri #1 of the 17th of April 2014, and the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of today above), and with a similar variant without the typical Lego® brick knobs.

07.May.2016
Investigations::Multimedia

Obviously, this is virtually the original and unique multimedia work of C.S., which integrates our School in the Cloud approach and our Web Operating System (WOS) Sugarfox, which both have been developed by C.S. as well, with the desktop and learning environment Sugar, which took as its source of inspiration The Proposal written by C.S., as it can be seen with for example Sugar's journal used by a student for reflection, and the informations about our activities spied out at that time.
Furthermore, Sugar uses the term journal instead of notebook for the same functionalities, which becomes an online journal or online notebook by the features of our School in the Cloud and Sugarfox.
In addition, Sugarfox and in this way Sugar can have the Brick Theme or brick-based metaphor as Graphical User Interface (GUI), which includes individual characters or figures for the students for sure.

In fact, all relevant concepts and essential elements have been described and named by C.S. several years before, as it can be seen by the following references in more detail:

• 29th of June 2011,
• 12th of July 2012, and
• 15th of July 2012,

Indeed, the decisive factor is not that the concept of a block-based open world or sandbox game is used as a learning environment, but that the original and unique work of C.S. was taken as the source of inspiration and the blueprint for the selection and composition or integration of the same essential elements, including the distributed computing or cloud computing techniques and technologies, the learning environment (e.g. Sugar with journal, sharing, etc.), and the 3-dimensional, block-based environment as the Graphical User Interface (GUI), to get the same result.
Therefore we have the next infringement of the copyright by the company Microsoft conducted this time in relation to said multimedia work of art of C.S..

But it has also become very clear now which business strategy Microsoft is pursuing since some months:

Therefore we also have an infringement of the copyright in relation to The Complete Works of C.S.' by the company Microsoft, which makes the whole issue even a case for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the prosecutors due to the serious economical implications for C.S., shareholders of the company, investors, and even the whole public.

On the 27th of April 2016 we made this comment:
Attention: Crowdfunding Fraud
This time a group claimed that the presented smartwatch has a battery with 300 mAh, which provides an always-on runtime of 32 hours under normal usage.
The first questions that always have to be raised are: What means normal usage for a smartwatch in general and in particular if it has an AMOLED color display with touchscreen, sensors, WLAN (WiFi is only the brand of a related consortium), and other multimedia functions? and What means always-on for such a smartwatch?

To make it short and simple: Do not fall into this next common battery runtime lie. It has been proven so many times that such a mobile device has a battery runtime between 10 to 12 hours, when it is used as a small wrist-worn computer, and even less depending on the used multimedia functions, and correspondingly a standby time of maybe 22 hours (claimed are even an always-on runtime of 32 hours).

We have informed several times a crowdfunding platform about the battery lie in relation to different campaigns, but there is no sign that crowdfunding platforms are interested in controlling and stopping such and other problems in general.

On the 5th of May 2016 we made this related comment:
Attention: Crowdfunding Fraud
On the 27th of April 2016 we gave the warning that "This time a group claimed that the presented smartwatch has a battery with 300 mAh, which provides an always-on runtime of 32 hours under normal usage."
But this was not the only issue. In addition, that campaigner group has also stolen the design of one of the smartwatches presented in the iRaiment Further steps of the 29th of February 2016 (the one in the middle row).

Because one of the campaigners is said to be a former employee of the company Google, who has founded an own company in the field of smartwatches, which again might be a fake company by the supertroll to disturb the activities of our business unit iRaiment in relation to smartwatches and wrist-worn computers, we thought at first that the campaign was the revenge for our revenge with the specific wristband attachment shown in the iRaiment Further steps of the 26th of February 2016 (see also the case of the company Blocks Wearables in the Investigations::Multimedia of the same day), which also shows a small section of said smartwatch design com- pletely presented on the 29th of February 2016.

Around more than 1 day ago, new demo videos have been presented by the campaign group, which show that the smartwatch copy in- deed has a bezel respectively a frame around the display, that both are covered by the protection glass to suggest an edge-to-edge display like our design.

Now, we reported that fraud to the crowdfunding platform.

The contents of our email and the first reply of the crowdfunding platform are quoted in the following:
Hi Christian,

Thank you for contacting Indiegogo. Your request (#946019) has been received and is being reviewed.

Sincerely,

The Indiegogo Trust & Safety team

Your request was:

Christian Stroetmann, May 5, 08:21:

Hello Indiegogo Team

This campaign was suspicious to me just right from its start due to the following 2 issues:

1. Again, I must tell you that a campaign claims a suspeciously long battery runtime.

This impression is strengthened by e.g. the following conversation in the comment section:
A.
"Shaz Khan 5 days ago

Thanks Abb Co
What is the bettry timing in not always on mode .ie power safe mode ?"

"AB Co. Campaigner 3 days ago
Thanks, Shaz! There is indeed a power safe mode for the watch, to ensure you can conserve power whenever you need. Always-on mode is just one of the options for the CoWatch, but you can customize as you so desire. Thank you!"

No clear answer is given. I guess, that the answer would provide the information that the power safe mode and the always on mode are somehow very similar, which again would raise more related questions about the runtimes of the different modes.
Such a device runs 6 hours with the display always on, as shown in the videos. With WLAN (Wi-Fi) always on but not using the network respectively the smartwatch, I guess the run-time might be 24 hours or even shorter.

2. Another issue is the marketing, specifically the design and the size of the display.

When the campaign began, I had to examine the images with a high zoom factor very precisely until I saw it as well before a new demo video has been presented.
Indeed, the campaigners have misled the public by suggesting my design for a very similar looking smartwatch of my business unit iRaiment presented on the the 29th of February 2016 (www.ontomax.com/newsarchive/2016/february.htm#29.February.2016), which in fact has such an edge-to-edge display without a bezel.

Now the first complain[t]s arrived:
A.
"marlatodd 1 day ago

Hello, I am sorry to say but one thing I cannot stand is when a product is advertised to look a certain way then you see the actual product and it is not as shown in the marketing. Your marketing stills and video show the watch face almost reach to the edge of the watch dial. In your new demo videos posted today you can clearly see there is a rather large bezel around the watch. I am asking that you please refund my backing immediately based on this new information.
Thanks"

B.
"Balaji Gopalakrishnan 1 day ago

Hello Team!
I just happened to watch the Demo Videos and the watch looks promising.
However, the bezel which was missing in your photos of the watch ,is rather dominant on the watch face in the Video.
The absence of the bezel as per your photographs was one of the main criteria for me to choose Cowatch over pebble .
Can you please clarify this.
Thanks much!
Balaji"

"AB Co. Campaigner 1 day ago
Hey Balaji! Thanks so much for the comment and support. CoWatch has a flat screen design, much like the Apple Watch. We wanted to differentiate ourselves from other smartwatches like Huawei, LG, and Pebble, which all have non-flat screen designs with metal edges. We chose our design to ensure a smooth touchscreen experience, and the bezel allows you to easily swipe left and right when interacting with apps. Thank you!"

C.
"Rajesh Mohan 1 day ago

Hey Team! [...] Secondly, is the hardware shown in the video the final version, especially since you have done extensive prototyping till now? Can we expect any design changes? The bezel and the limited nature of the software seems to trouble me a lot. Please let us know about any plans you might have.

"AB Co. Campaigner 24 hours ago
CoWatch has a flat screen design, much like the Apple Watch. We wanted to differentiate ourselves from other smartwatches like Huawei, LG, and Pebble, which all have non-flat screen designs with metal edges. We chose our design to ensure a smooth touch screen experience, and the bezel allows you to easily swipe left and right when interacting with apps. Thank you!"

D.
"Kermina Awad 13 hours ago

I really like that you've made the 2 videos for us to get a sneak peak, but after seeing the bezel I have 2 question. How large is the display not including the bezel? And how big is the display including the bezel? Metric as well, please and thank you. [...]"

E.
"Frans 12 hours ago

The bezel is much bigger then on the pictures! Is this correct CoWatch? I don't like it!"

F.
["]pj.lopes1 6 hours ago

C'mon guys!! The size of the bezel is horrendously huge!
Please tell us that's a prototype version of the cowatch as it's going to look cheap quality otherwise! Please don't let us down guys!["]

Now, I call that campaign a fraud officially.

Sincerely
Christian Stroetmann

The second reply of the crowdfunding platform arrived at 22:02 UTC+2 and is quoted in the following:
"Hi there,

Thank you for sharing your concern with us. At this time, the campaign is under review to ensure that it adheres to our Terms of Use (http://www.indiegogo.com/about/terms). We will follow up with you if we have any further questions.

So what happens now? We will include the information you have provided along with all other information at our disposal in our review of the campaign. In some cases, we will contact the campaign owner to have them edit their campaign and it will remain on our platform. If the project doesn't follow our rules, we may remove the campaign. We may also restrict the campaign owner's future activities on Indiegogo.

To protect our users' privacy, we're unable to share the action we take. At Indiegogo, we take the trust and safety of our community very seriously, and we greatly appreciate your patience and under- standing throughout this review process. To learn more about Indiegogo's Trust & Safety effort, please visit: www.indiegogo.com/trust"

But despite that some more backers demanded the refund, the momentum to support that campaign stopped abruptly, and no information has been corrected on the webpage of the campaign, the marketing team of Indiegogo made this message on a well known short messaging service platform on the same day (5th of May 2016) with a carefully selected image, which makes it impossible to see that there is a bezel or frame around the display, to even maximize the deception and at 03:00 PM (see also the time of arrival of the second email once again) to even maximize the provocation:

In addition, it also promoted that fraud in its newsletter of today (7th of May 2016):

As it can be seen with the official campaign image, the two smartwatch versions have different hour and minute marks, which are also colored like the graphical elements of the watch face and the indicators to suggest that they are variable at runtime respec- tively that the smartwatch has an edge-to-edge display.

By the way: That scam with the mini TV projector (see the bottom of the top image) belongs also to the set of suspicious campaigns which resulted in another comment of our objective series Attention: Crowdfunding fraud, because a defrauding entity thought we would develop such a device for whatever reasons on the on hand and on the other hand both the specification of the lumen output level and the battery runtime were suspicious.

Moreover, several trolls sent comments to the related section of the campaign claiming that the bezel is not that large, e.g. "it's only 3mm thick" (respectively 3.2mm when taken the specification data for a calculation) instead of 4mm or maybe more, as we guessed by looking at the last prototypes, that the complaints would be ridicu- lous, and so on.
Even directly after we have written the sentence before, another commentator explained the following:
"morryzelcovitch 1 minute ago

I have a moto 360 and use an app on it called wear mini launcher, to activate it requires a swipe from the edge of the screen. the 360 has that bezel flat tire at the bottom and as long as I have the swipe to launch located there it works perfectly every time. if I set the swipe to activate at the sides of the display (where there is no bezel) then it hardly ever works. The reason for sharing this with you is to show that the design team did the right thing. It will work much better as a result."

What an utter nonsense by both, that troll and the member of that campaign group. On the one hand, the described problem has no- thing in common with the type of the display, here edge-to-edge vs. flat tire, but with that additional application. On the other hand, the display and the touchscreen are two separate hardware compo- nents.
That said, the "smooth touch screen experience" depends solely on the size, resolution, and responsiveness of the touchscreen and on the programming of the hardware driver and the touch functionality, which processes the data delivered by the hardware driver of the touchscreen.

Obviously, we have finally convicted Indiegogo of supporting fraud on its platform deliberately, which is an even bigger scandal than the campaigns that do not deliver.

08.May.2016
Picture of the Day
Andy Warhol Campbell's Tomato Juice Box (1964)

© Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts represented by Artists Rights Society

Clarification
In relation to the copyright protection, the term 'technical benefit for the society' is also used to decide if a work is protected by the copyright or not.

Our opinion is as follows:

• as more visionary the subject,
• as longer the time of understanding,
• as longer the time of technical realization,
• as higher the complexity,
• as more general the focused object or theme, or
• as greater the technical benefit for the society

of a work is, as more the originality and uniqueness of a related work is given.

Four examples for comparison:

But despite their technical benefits for the society they can also be a work of art.

In sum, there are limits even if there are technical benefits for the society that argue against our copyright claims. C.S.' activities are definitely not a self-service for any entity and no one has the right to steal the show permanently or/and completely in the sense of copying the performance. Specifically industrial companies, which we have mentioned many times in the last years in this relation, are not on save soil or legal ground anymore.

09.May.2016
Picture of the Day
Marvel and Lego Iron Patriot (2013)

©© BY-SA 3.0 Wikia and C.S. (cut out from background)

For sure, we have the best toys and not the Russian and North Korean nuke kiddies. Hopefully, they can read in English at least, because on the armor stands: Danger Danger.

And if they are not nice, then our nanny will come (see also the Picture of the Day of the 23rd of April 2008).

Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution
Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution, known as the Copyright Clause, empowers the United States Congress:
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.

The terms authors and writings have to be understood as synonyms for creators (including authors, inventors, artists, scientists, and everybody else) and all creative works of any type, including a performance and a process of creation itself, any media, and any way of presentation.
But at first, a work must fulfill some requirements for being qualified for the protection by copyright, specifically it must be original and unique, but must not be the result of an ordinary technological progress, as we call the term 'technical benefit for the society' sometimes (see the related Clarification of yesterday).

Actually, the limit is in most of the modern societies the lifetime of a creator plus 70 years.

The legal doctrine of fair use, known as the fair use clause, "ack- nowledges certain exceptions to this right.
But Article 9.2 of the International Copyright Law places strict limits on the scope and reach of those exceptions.
[In this respect, e]xceptions
a) must be limited to certain specific cases,
b) provide that such reproduction does not conflict with [the author's respectively creator's] normal exploitation of the work and [...]
c) do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author [respectively creator]."

An example:

For sure, some artists and companies like Microsoft and Facebook, Google and Co. are attempting to exploit loopholes. But this is only a matter of time until that very bold behavior is stopped finally.

In addition, many other factors have to be considered, that in many cases only a specialized attorney is able to handle.
For example, a settled expectation in the marketplace might have emerged in the last years, if a copyright holder has not taken any actions to protect her or his copyright, which would give the public some more rights. But this needs decades to happen if at all.
In any way, ask an attorney with references, read the Terms of Service (ToS) of a website carefully and again ask an attorney, and also consider to fill a patent application instead.

OS is ON
With our Ontologic System (OS) the internet became one extremely large distributed computer or one machine, that does not need an operating system, an actor system, an agent system, a cloud computing system, and even not an artificial intelligence system.
The only prerequisites for any user and device are a:

All the rest is in our Ontologic Web (OW), the World Wide Web of the next generation:

is directly generated, assembled, updated, customized, referenced and linked, up- and downloaded, and available for use eventually.

Conceptually, it functions like a sea or sphere of signs or symbols for example. In the moment a user touches it, holds a finger into it, looks at it, or only thinks about it, some of the symbols arrange at the related spot in the right way (see the Picture of the Day of the 4th of October 2008 for example). The resulting arrangement or form is already the desired function, which is executed in the subsequent step (see also the Clarification of the 29th of April 2016).
This functions also with molecules on the nanoscopic scale and hence on the micro- and macroscopic scales respectively physical, chemical, and biological levels as well, as shown for example in the Picture of the Day of the 23rd of April 2008.

Practically, it functions in uncountable many amazing ways:
Our Multilingual Multimodal Multiparadigmatic Multimedia Programming (M⁴P) technique respectively Ontologic Programming (OP) paradigm has been explained before and in other explanations given in the last years (start with the Clarification of the 27th of April 2016 for example).
Our Ontoverse has been described in parts and as a whole in the past. The latest summary is given in the Clarification of the 16th of April 2016.

Another practical example is a light switch with the minimal prerequisites, such as a basic ON connection simply provided together with the electric power over the power lines. In this case only a microphone has to be connected with the input contacts of the extremely small processor chip or embedded computer of the light switch, and a user can command it by voice. The same can be done with every other sensor and also every actuator connected with the output contacts.

Safe, secure, reliable, and fascinating everytime, again and again.

The Original OS

Any kind of plagiarism or other fraud in relation to our OS, ON, and OW as well as their components by a public-law or private entity goes straight to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) of the U.S.A. and similar governmental authorities in other countries.

10.May.2016
Ontonics Further steps
Today, we official start the prototyping and production phases for our hardware technologies to realize our Ontologic Net (ON) and Ontologic Web (OW). This includes network chips based on our Wireless Supercomputer (WiSer) processor technology, for sure, and network devices based on our NetWiSers, such as for example:

• gateway,
• router,
• switch,
• wireless access point,
• and so on,

• at home,
• at business,
• in vehicles,
• in robots,
• etc.,

At this point we would like to give the recommendation, that interested companies should not take copies or alternatives to our technologies, because they might be serious

Investigations::Multimedia, AI and Knowledge management
*** Work in progress - Quotes and comments are fine; Rearranging, formulating, beautifying needed; But rewrite rules are included in Mercury and Genesis-II (Mercury Conversational System is based on Genesis-II generation server***

{revision, because its foundation was already based on our Evoos and hence it did not work} The trick applied in the first round worked more or less by taking existing systems, in which the funding and developing entities have lost their interests, because they got no more money for the continuing of the related research and development, or simply because they were too incompetent to get the systems running in a practical way, and then marketing these existing systems as their recently invented systems after we revived them or/and showed how they could be used (e.g. the voice command system or speech controlled virtual assistant Siri).
Some months ago, they thought that this trick would work in a second round, specifically in relation to Mixed Reality (MR), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Natural Language Processing (NLP) based software robots or agents, which is also the reasons why we are publicating so many clarifications since the end of March 2016. In all these last clarifications we discussed the foundational concepts, components, and subsystems of our Ontologic System (OS) on the one hand and on the other hand made clear why repeating this trick does not work very well or does not work at all.

In the course of this, some fraudsters claimed that they have developed further the virtual voice-controlled assistant Siri in two directions, which not surprisingly correspond again with the components and subsystems of our OS and our clarifications given in the last weeks
The prominent keywords used in this relation are Natural Language Processing chatterbot (NLP chatbot; see the Clarification and the OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update of the 13th of April 2016), network of capabilities (stolen from the Ontonics, OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 2nd of May 2016), user migration, intention and context pointing to the BDI MAS MR systems (see the Clarification of the 16th of April 2016, 1st of May 2016 and 6th of May 2016), cloud-based artificial intelligence agent, dynamic program generation (see the Clarification of the 27th of April 2016 and all the other related explanations given in the last years), this new system as different name for our OS for sure, and so on, which doubtlessly proves again the infringement of our intellectual properties.

Also, the presentation had to be made very quickly, because it neither was a complete conversation, which was said to be one of the main features, nor something of the new system respectively our Ontologic System at all. Ah, now we can see it, they have found more documents from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (on our harddisk?) this time for that conversational agent. But all these documents are not enough, because they do not contain what has been presented by us in November 2006. Furthermore, the time on the smartphone is 9:41 AM, which points to one of the usual shows suggesting the audience of a real-time application.

We also found out by commentators that the plagiarism is a rip off of another personal assistant. But this personal assistant has been presented around 14 months ago. So why do they present now in May 2016 their plagiarism? Exactly, because it is a plagiarism based on our last clarifications and other informations. And his explanations become rough searching for words.

We also quote from a report publicated in the Washington Post on the 4th of May 2016: "It was their first real test of Viv, the artificial-intelligence technology that the team had been quietly building for more than a year. [This is very interesting, because only the company has been founded 4 years ago in contrast to the misleading and defrauding claim that the development of that plagiarism has been started 4 years ago. Nevertheless, the relevant date is when we publicated the webpage Overview of the OntoLinux website in the beginning of the year 2007.]", "[A] chief executive [...] said he rushed to sign up with Viv two years ago, impressed with the idea of allowing consumers to perform different activities without having to toggle between services. [So what now, more than 1, 2, or 3 years?]", "That wasn't how it was supposed to be, Kittlaus said. The original Siri wasn't supposed to be a clever [Artificial Intelligence (]AI[)] chatbot. [This is very interesting, because we get this information directly from one of the fraudsters on the one hand, who on the other hand it makes clear that the company Siri had not our OntoBot, OntoScope, and other essential elements of our Ontologic Systems (OSs). That said, everything that was added in relation to an Artificial Intelligence chatbot Thank you very much for your collaboration and this shot into the own foot.]", "Kittlaus and Cheyer, who became close with Apple's Steve Jobs before his death in 2011, will not discuss what happened beyond this from Kittlaus: "Steve had some ideas about the first version, and it wasn't necessarily aligned with all the things that we were doing."", "Viv "is what they wanted Siri to become - an open system," said Bart Swanson, adviser at the venture-capital firm Horizons Ventures and an investor in Viv, Siri and other artificial-intelligence technologies. [Now, we got from another entity the testimony that the company Siri had not our OntoBot, OntoScope, and other essential elements of our Ontologic System (OS) at that time. Thank your very much again for this collaboration.]", ""The Turing Test is just a bad design, and it kind of set the industry off on the wrong foot," said [...] a venture capitalist who has funded virtual-assistant start-ups. [The alternative also mentioned in the quoted report has the other deficits. That said, only our OS with its Multilingual Multimodal Multidimensional Multimedia User Interface (MMMMUI or M⁴UI) and Multilingual Multimodal Multiparadigmatic Multimedia Programming (M⁴P) technique solves all problems since the year 2006.]", ""Our goal is ubiquity," Kittlaus said. "There's no way to predict where that goes except to say we'll pick the path that gets us there. Either way, we will finish the job." [First of all, their goal is to steal again from our OS to make money. Furthermore, in the presentation yesterday D. Kittlaus talked about "the new system", which for sure is our OS, which again proves that he announced before to pick respectively steal our intellectual property, despite even not knowing what it would be.]", and "Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg is also an investor in Viv through the firm Iconiq Capital. [Bingo!!! See also the case of the company Facebook below and the investigative cases linked therein.]".

No new internet or/and any content-addressable technique and technology to see.

It is also obvious, that they have not seen the Ontologic Net (ON) and Ontologic Web (OW), which for C.S. was only a logical consequence of using the NLP chatbot respectively OntoBot together with mobile applications and web services in 2005 or 2006.

Moreover, the related points about the new system respectively our OS were stolen after we explained them another time in the last weeks. These facts prove a further time that they have not understood our OS at all and therefore are only stealing our intellectual properties. We do not need to discuss it further after providing all these evidences, and we will not discuss this issue further.

The whole thing is just only a reflection of what we do, specifically of our clarifications, investigations, further steps, website update and so on given since the 16th of April 2016. But we said all the time everything is already there since OntoLix and OntoLinux officially started on the 9th of November 2006.

The white line in this specific field of technology could be drawn by looking at the foundations of the conversational interface or system Mercury based on the Genesis-II module or server. For example, arbitrary SQL, HTML, and similar formal code can be generated by the dialog system or conversational agent and executed in a DataBase Management System (DBMS) or displayed in a window of a Graphical User Interface (GUI).
Such an NLP based transformation and generation system might have been developed for the use in software engineering by another third party as well. But as we already said above, we have not seen such a generation system in the past respectively before we created our OS, specifically not in relation to a reflective system, the control of a system, such as e.g. an agent system, or a system interface, such as e.g. a Graphical User Interface (GUI), an intelligent user interface, and an Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA), such as the mentioned Cognitive Agent that Learns and Organizes (CALO) and Personalized Assistant that Learns (PAL).
Nevertheless, compositions comprising for example

are an essential part of the copyrighted multimedia work of art series Ontologic System of C.S..

The copyright infringements are clear and include the concept but also the performance in the sense of presentation of C.S..

This is an act of copyright infringement, because it has not been presented with Apple Siri, Google Now! or/and Tango, Amazon Alexa, Microsoft Cortana, and so on despite it was possible all the time already, as we always said and explained. This makes the whole issue also a case for the FBI.

Btw.: The audience was dead, but the presenter begged for applause "please clap". Guess why they were neither amused nor amazed?

Furthermore, if our NLP dynamic programming is so crucial, radical simplifying, and ingenious, for what are developers still needed at all and why does a user need an app developed by another entity at all? She or he can just tell our OS what is wanted and there it is. Obviously, those fraudsters have invested into and stolen something from us, that they have not understood all the time and instead they were directly fallen into our trap. We love it when a plan comes together.

We can only give the recommendations to the following companies:

It is up to the large companies to act and in this way provide us more decisive evidences. Come on gals and guys, do not be shy.

Investigations::Multimedia

Now, the company is going beserk, which means that it has understood its situation, which is standing with the back at the wall of a dead-end street. The latter also explains its extremely aggressive attitude we have observed since the presentation of its Augmented Reality (AR) goggle some months ago.

11.May.2016
Ontonics Further steps
We are working again on the formal and legal requirements of a Terms of Service (ToS) and the license model for our

• OntoLix,
• OntoLinux,
• OntoDroid, and
• OntoWin,

Our OS is protected by the International Copyright Law and the individual copyright laws of the single nations.
We are not represented by any entity. Interested entities have to contact us, the Christian Stroetmann GmbH Business Unit Ontonics, directly using for example one of the possibilities given on the webpage Contact of the Ontonics website.
The license allows and guarantees the safe, secure, and law compliant use of our OS, ON, OW, and Ontoverse for a fee, which depends on a graduated price scale.
We hold the right to reject a license, if reasonable arguments are given in correspondence with common sense.

We think that the easist way to manage the licensing process would be to connect a license fee with a

so that the OS, ON, and OW are free to use so to say for the public.
In this relation, we would like to clarify that we are not bound to the ruling of net neutrality at this time, though this will change in the future and then ruled by the laws for telecommunication and other laws.

But this is not always the best way seen from the economical point of view, which implies that we must have a regulation that secures our share from for example the online advertisement and the appli- cation store markets, and additional sources of surplus.
In general, we are fine with sharing, but it must be reasonable on the one hand and on the other hand without such fee, share, and other financial sources our Social Mobile Service (SMS), which has been presented in the Further steps of the 31st of January 2016 and 1st of February 2016, cannot be operated and developed further.

In relation to our Social Mobile Service (SMS) presented in the Further steps of the 31st of January 2016 and 1st of February 2016 we are pleased to inform our fans, friends, and customers that we have added more services.

We also connected our SMS with the additional option of our modular mobile device platform Iri.

Ontologic Net and Ontologic Web Further steps 15:05 UTC+2
Over the last years we have composed a specific start configuration of our Ontologic System (OS) that includes:

Most of these components are either listed or implicitly linked in the sections Operating System and Network Technology of the webpage Links to Software webpage, or have been mentioned in one of our messages.

What we are now doing together with Ontonics is to begin with the realization of the Ontologic Net (ON) and Ontologic Web (OW) in several concurrent threads:

The threads overlap more or less and are meant has a guideline for sure.

The timeline depends on the support and the echo we receive from external entities, but we have made some rough estimations:

Ontologic Web Further steps
We are very pleased to announce our first Ontologic Web (OW) applications or environments, including our:

In addition, we are working on our various OW services, such as our direct video streaming and online shopping platforms.

OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update
We added to the section Natural Language Processing of the webpage Links to Software the link:

This document describes in more detail the generation of natural languages and formal languages (e.g. Structured Query Language (SQL) and HyperText Markup Language (HTML)) based on a semantic frame representation in relation to the telephone-based conversational interface Mercury as one example domain of several dialog systems, which are realized with the Galaxy (Communicator) hub or architecture. The Galaxy Communicator and the Mercury user interface are listed in the section Natural Language Processing of the webpage Links to Software already.
Said this, we still wonder why the researchers did not use C, C++, eXtensible Markup Language (XML) and Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG), and ontologies at that time, as we did with our Ontologic System (OS) besides the ontologic paradigm, the intelligent multi- agent system also used for the dialog system with our OntoBot software component (see also the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 23rd of April 2016), and so much more integrations of techniques and technologies, such as e.g. reflection or self-teaching systems and the integration of ontology-based or ontology-assisted language generation with Mixed Reality Environments (MRE).

TaaaDaaa!!!

12.May.2016
Ontologic Web Further steps
We also added our other learning environment:

to our range of Ontologic Web (OW) applications (see also the Further steps of the 11th of May 2016 (yesterday)).

To get more informations about one of its Graphical User Interface (GUI) Ontocraft take as the starting point the intelliTablet Further steps One Tablet Per Child (OTPC) and One Pad Per Child (OPPC/OP²C) #18 of the 6th of May 2016 for example.

OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps
We developed an essential function of our OntoGraphics component, which was missing.

OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update
We updated the webpages Links to Software and Literature in the following ways.

In the section Natural Language Processing of the webpage Links to Software we added the links:

Before an entity thinks there is a loophole or an inconsistency in our argumentation, we would like to mention that it is very well known how to use a Relational DataBase Management System (RDBMS) and for example the Entity-Relationship (ER) paradigm to store, match, and transform graphs, and realize the latter incrementally (see the Clarification #2 of the 10th of September 2012 and also the Website update and the Further steps of the 23rd of April 2016).
Said this, we added to the section Multiparadigmatic Computing of the same webpage:

In the same section Multiparadigmatic Computing (alternative sections Semantic (World Wide) Web and Formal Modeling) we added:

In the section Formal Modeling we added:

• Gergely Varró: Towards Incremental Graph Transformation in Fujaba
• Dániel Varró, Gergely Varró, and András Pataricza: Towards an XMI based Model Interchange Format for Graph Transformation Systems

In the section Formal Modeling (alternative section Exotic Operating System) we added:

In the section Formal Modeling (alternative section Semantic (World Wide) Web) we added:

In the section Formal Verification we added:

In the section Intelligent/Cognitive Agent (alternative sections Formal Modeling and Formal Verification) we added:

Furthermore, we added to the section Abstract Machine of the webpage Literature:

We also added to the section Logics of the same webpage:

The approach of the incremental graph transformation also improves PROgramming with Graph REwriting Systems (PROGRES) and is included in the OntoBase and Ontologic File System (OntoFS) components. See the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 12th of May 2014 and also our Multimodal Rule Markup Language (MRML), and note that we have overcome textually the expressive- ness of logics with our approach to use the visual graphical Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) vector image format based on the eXtensible Markup Language (XML), that was said before to only be possible with graph grammars (see also the Clarification #1 of the 10th of September 2012).

Together with the analyses of the logics behind the PROGRES (see e.g. the document "Expressiveness and Complexity of Graph Logic") it should be clear for everybody, that we

because for example the semantic structures or knowledge representation formalisms

are graphs respectively graphical formalisms or graph-theoretic formal languages, also designed to be interpreted for logic.

Also keep in mind in this relation and in relation to the Website update of the 5th of October 2007 and yesterday for example, that the

• is relying on the system of the Prolog programming language dialect XSB for its inference engine,
• is used for the semantic (world wide) web inference engine F-OWL, which is used in relation to formal approaches to agent-based systems on the one hand and is referenced by us since the OntoLinux Website update of the 5th of October 2007 on the other hand, and
• was always included in our OS by the direct connection to the ontology-based semantic (world wide) web techniques and technologies.

Now, add the semi-quantum computer capability of our Wireless Supercomputer (WiSer) or something similar based on quantum computing, conclude how we get far past the common logically calculi and even beyond the observable universe, and pay attention to not toast your brain.

After referencing more old documents we will explain in the clarifica- tion announced on the 1st of May 2016, which is about the abstract machine core, how this all fit togther to a natural and formal multi- lingual multimodal multiparadigmatic system on the one hand and on the other hand how our ontologic paradigm unifies everything in an extremely elegant and ingenious way, when having all domain models respectively ontologies about logics, mathematics, spoken languages, logic and programming languages, graphics, and systems at hand, which again are reflective, self-referencing, automatic generating, and so on.
By the way, a short summary is already given on the webpage Overview.

Citations for the

• Christian Stroetmann "Ontologic System" or alternatively "Ontologisches System", 1999-2006

• Christian Stroetmann GmbH, OntoLab, Christian Stroetmann: Ontologics OntoLi+-x, Planet Earth, 2006
• Christian Stroetmann GmbH, OntoLab, Christian Stroetmann: Ontologics OntoLix, Planet Earth, 2006
• Christian Stroetmann GmbH, OntoLab, Christian Stroetmann: Ontologics OntoLinux, Planet Earth, 2006

Hopefully, we could answer some of the open questions in this way.

13.May.2016
OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update
We added to the section Multiparadigmatic Computing (alternative section Formal Modeling) of the webpage Links to Software the link:

14.May.2016
Comment of the Day
Ontologic Net™ (used on 9th of May 2016)

Clarification
We are not sure if the document listed in the OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update of today was a source of inspiration or a confirma- tion of our already made conclusion in relation to this insight:
"The notion of computing with words (C[w]W) hinges crucially on the employment of natural language expressions. These are considered to provide not only the representational structures of what can semantically be meant but also the operational means of what can cognitively be understood by processing these structures. They allow for decomposition of wholes into their constituents or parts (granulation), or conversely, for composition and integration of parts into wholes (organization), and for the association of signs with meanings (causation).", [Burghard B. Rieger, From Computational Linguistics to Computing with Words].

Despite that the meaning of this quote only applies for humans respectively natural languages, it explains at least why we are talking directly about a cognitive multi-agent system and a cognitve user interface instead of a relatively simple Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) Multi-Agent System (MAS) and a more elaborated User Inter- face (UI), and correspondingly have named the related sections Intelligent/Cognitive Agent and Intelligent/Cognitive User Interface of the Links to Software.

We also concluded around the year 2003 that fuzzy logic is only a lazy approach for solving problems developed and used by scientists and engineers, because of their inabilities to measure precisely, handle complexity thoroughly, and program correctly, and showed with our abstract machine core that fuzzy logic, probabilistic logic, and similar paradigms can be realized with the classical boolean logic in the very end.

Indeed, a three-valued logic can be classified as a finite(ly-many) valued logic, which belongs to the many-valued logics, which again is said to be included in the class of infinite(ly-many) valued logics together with for example the fuzzy logic and the probabilistic logic. But such a classification is already a result of a cognitive process mentioned in the quote above, that is based or "hinges crucially on the employment of natural language expression".
In general, the definition of a logical paradigm, its application, and the interpretation of the results of its application have to be con- ceived and described by a human in a way that uses languages in the very end, which are based on symbols such as words with individual fixed lengths, arrangements, and transformations according to a definition, application, and interpretation of a grammar, another logic, or even the same logic, which again is also described by languages, and therefore can be represented by classical logics.

In the moment we show that

we are able to imply from the point of view of (computational) semiotics and informatics, specifically of Algorithmic Information Theory (AIT), that the

In this respect, the section Pure Rationality on the webpage Terms of Discussion or Terms of the 21st Century has to be understand as logics approached from AIT respectively as discrete logics and discretized logics. The latter also corresponds with the physical reality, specifically with logic gates and hardware circuits based on them.

Another important point to mention is, that using an approach based on fuzzy logic, probabilistic logic, and similar paradigms, is a profound contradiction to the important requirement of trust in and reliability of a system, specifically in relation to the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the large scale. One cannot trust such a system due to its design. In contrast, our Ontologic System (OS) provides results that are founded on a rational, correct, and verified basis. If we get a wrong result, then we have the possibility to correct the processing, which is not given with a system based on uncertainty, imprecision, and chance respectively the probabilistic theory. We do not dice.

Despite using imprecise fuzzy logic and favoring words over numbers respectively values is not sufficient, not precise, and not so impor- tant as claimed by some proponents, we have it also incorporated in the range of functionalities of our abstract machine core (see for example the Clarification #1 of the 4th of May 2016).
More important are the facts, that we resolved the semiotic aspects as well and created

• ontology-based,
• Object-Oriented (OO 1),
• Ontology-Oriented (OO 2), and
• Ontologic(-Oriented) (OO 3),

In this relation, we have found a very nasty and most potentially serious criminal attempt to steal our ontologic paradigm and OS, which proposes a system architecture based on the combination of this 'fuzzy logic equals Computing with Words (CwW)' paradigm and the ontology-based semantic (world wide) web approach, and even references formal approaches.
Very suspiciously, the document is said to be filed at a publisher on the 23rd of October 2006, just 6 days before we uploaded the first inofficial version of the website of OntoLinux and 2 weeks before we started the website of OntoLinux officially, but its revised version was filed on the 28th of September 2007, was publicated online on the 15th of March 2008, and is listed in the dblp computer science bibliography with the date 2009.
About the reason for its revision we do not need to talk anymore, and without the publication of the original version by the author and the publisher no prior art is shown. In addition, the authors have some serious problems to explain the equivalence of their highly complex work and the related fraction of C.S.' highly complex work. The main author also needs some convincing arguments to show that he was not inspired by C.S.' OS despite his publications of the following years gives us relatively significant evidences in relation to the same subjects, their connections with each other, and their times of publication.
In this relation we would also like to mention that the field of soft computing is a part of SoftBionics (SB).

Around the year 2003, it was already consensus that both the semantic (world wide) web, which includes solutions for the merging of ontologies, and the existence of more than 45,000 ontologies, which cover virtually everything, also required concepts for the mediation between ontologies (see for example the related reference in the section Intelligent/Cognitive Interface of the Links to Soft- ware webpage of OntoLinux), as it could be learned with the communication and the knowledge management and sharing in the case of Multi-Agent Systems (MASs) in the semantic (world wide) web.
At first, we thought that such a mediation had to function like a proposed approach based on a fuzzy logic. But then we concluded that we have to reject such an ontology-based approach in general and apply such a fuzzy logic and other probabilistic and possibilistic paradigms in a different and precise way, which eventually led to the implication that an ontology-based approach is not needed at all, as we also explained already in the investigative case of the company Radar Networks in the Investigations::AI and Knowledge manage- ment of the 5th of May 2009, and correspondingly to the develop- ment of our Ontologic-(Oriented) (OO 3) and Ontologic Computing (OC) paradgms.

The computing system proposed in this suspicous document sud- denly was not based on the fuzzy logic and the CwW paradigms in the first place anymore, but presented an ontology for relations and constraints, which can be used for the description of many logic paradigms in general and allows the description of the fuzzy logic and the other probabilistic and possibilistic paradigms in the sense of a specific probabilistic network (see again the Investigations::AI and Knowledge management of the 5th of May 2009) in particular. Obviously, this reflects our trademark Ontologics, our domain name Ontologic Systems, and the content of the section Pure Rationality, because providing pure rationality with two-valued and three-valued logics is a very clear statement, that says how we describe and handle imprecise knowledge and logics in general and ontologies, including such an ontology for relations and constraints, in particular.

Said work also misses to apply the proposed computing model res- pectively this stolen part of our ontologic model on its system itself. For example, it uses an inference engine with different reasoners, which reflects the Parallel Inference Machines OS (PIMOS), systems in the field of digital libraries for example, but does not apply its specific ontology on these reasoners or an interface, like it was done for example with the Knowledge Bus system for an Application Programming Interface (API) of an Object-Oriented (OO 1) programming language with reflection (only introspection) capabilities, and for sure the OntoBot software component of of our OS with its well-structured and -formed, validated and verified, and kernel-less reflective/fractal/holonic properties and rule-based and rewrite rules subsystems. Compare this with the content of the section 2. Computational Linguistics of "From Computational Linguistics to Computing with Words", specifically with "Certainly, linear aggregation of these symbols serve to understand and control one type of observable natural language phenomena as part of aggregational string formation or formal grammar. Its core concepts of well-formedness (syntax) and truth-function (semantics) were made explicit by way of specifying conditions of formal correctness and derivational compositionality. Their symbolic representations in the form of productions or rewrite rules - allowing for recursive application and generative string formation - not only constituted a wealth of symbol aggregation systems (formal languages) but were also employed to model comparable properties (in processes) of natural language string formation."
Said work also lacks a connection of its concept to an intelligent agent system, an intelligent multimodal user interface, and so on. See also all the related works that are referenced on the Links to Software webpage.

We will go into all the details when we discuss our abstract machine core and some more aspects of Multi-Agent Systems (MASs) and the semantic (world wide) web in relation to the foundations of constraints, logics, and graphs, the processing of them, and the programming with them, as well as our ontologic paradigm and our Ontologic Web (OW).

OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update
We added to the section Systems Theory, Complex Systems, Cybernetics of the webpage Literature:

In: Gerd Willée, Bernhard Schröder, B. und Hans-Christian Schmitz: Computerlinguistik - Was geht, was kommt? Festschrift für Winfried Lenders. 2002.
Its list of references includes

See also the Clarification of today for more related informations and also the Clarification of the 29th of April 2016 for a more complete view.

15.May.2016
OS too large to steal
Everytime a defrauding entity stops to give informations, we can go on and

Only an original creator, author, or/and developer is able to act in this way.
In the course of the discussion about a suspicous or defrauding work, it also becomes obvious that a part has been described by an entity that so to say is freely hanging in the air respectively unconnected with the rest of what we show with our Ontologic System (OS).

Whoever the criminal entities are behind all those frauds we are investigating, discussing, explaning, breaking down, and documenting, in the end they cannot use the stolen fractions of our OS, such as the combinations or integrations of for example:

because on this level such an acting always constitutes a causal link with our OS respectively with the OS of C.S..

16.May.2016
OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update
*** Work in progress - Better formulations of last sections needed ***
We updated the webpages Links to Software and Literature in the following ways.

In relation to the Clarification of the 14th of May 2016 we added to the section Logics of the Literature webpage the link:

In the section Symbolic Artificial Intelligence (AI 1) (alternative sections Logics, and Natural Language Processing and Intelligent/Cognitive Agent of the webpage Links to Software) of the same webpage we added:

In the section Hybrid Artificial Intelligence (AI 3) (alternative sections Abstract Machine, and Intelligent/Cognitive Agent and Intelligent/Cognitive Interface of the webpage Links to Software) we added:

These are two more highly suspicious documents about an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system, which uses different knowledge representations and inference engines, because the author described a so-called reflective specialist and an ontology specialist, and therefore we marked them with the sign * meaning under investigation.

Nevertheless, the work also does not apply the presented Artificial Intelligence (AI) system in a reflective way respectively makes the system itself the domain or universe of discours (see also the Clarification of the 14th of May 2016), because the task of a reflective specialist described in relation to Polyscheme and Polylog is to manage the foci of processing, which we also compared with a scheduler of an operating system or a job manager of a cluster computing or grid computing system, and not to realize a reflective system, such as an operating system and an agent system.
Simply explained, we took

and created an Ontologic System (OS) in this way, which can even be a holonic system. Wow.

In the section Systems Theory, Complex Systems, Cybernetics we added:

because it has a "semiotic model of language which is only linearly complex" or O(n).
The document also references the document "A Logical Ontology", 2000, publicated by the same authors.

In the section Systems Theory, Complex Systems, Cybernetics of the Literature webpage (alternative section Intelligent/Cognitive Agent of the webpage Links to Software) we added:

When creating our Ontologic System (OS), we also considered as part of the agent-oriented or -based operating system core the application of a subsymbolic planning approach as a software agent planner, that is specialized on the production of plans for process scheduling and job management (see also the section Exotic Operating System of the webpage Links to Software; last sentence added on the 20th of May 2016).

We also added in the section Semantic (World Wide) Web of the Links to Software webpage the link we added:

In the section Natural Language Processing of the same webpage we added:

In the section Intelligent/Cognitive Agent we added:

In the section Intelligent/Cognitive Agent (alternative section Semantic (World Wide) Web) we added:

In the section Intelligent/Cognitive User Interface (alternative section Semantic (World Wide) Web) we added:

Besides the usual nonsense and fraud, we have also seen in many documents publicated after around the year 2002 the common mistake that already existing techniques and technologies of the fields of logic programming, knowledge management, operating system, and agent system have been described once again due to the lack of the knowledge about these techniques and technologies, the inheretent homomorphisms, isomorphisms, and equivalences, and the overall context.
For example, the use of ontologies is not mandatory but a supporting tool to structure, understand, and control highly complex Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems and Multi-Agent Systems (MASs), our Ontologic System (OS), Ontologic Net (ON), and Ontologic Web (OW), and eventually our Ontoverse.
Another example is that the mixing of data formats, knowledge sources, such as databases and ontologies for example, inference engines, and logic programming paradigms can be integrated by the concepts applied with the one or more of the others.
In addition, there is so much missing, which most potentially cannot all be found in other documents.

What can be seen now is also the fact that all authors have not used their system to support their work respectively to do the work. For sure, we were not so blind, as it is proven by the following quote from the section Hint of the webpage Project Status of the website of OntoLinux:
"If you are trying to build your own system, develop a strategy for automating as much as possible without stepping out of the whole concept."

Following this path leads to our abstract machine core in a first step and ends at our Ontologic System (OS) with its Ontologic(-Oriented) (OO 3) and Ontologic Computing (OC) paradigms in the last step.

And do not forget to mention: Our OntoBase and Ontologic File System (OntoFS) components are directly connected with it, which makes the OS superfast. Meep! Meep!

So now we come closer and closer where the magic begins. TaaaDaaa!!!

Despite it looks so easy now to implement our OS, taking our OS as blueprint and all these documents or similar works to create our OS remains impermissible hindsight respectively a copyright infringement, specifically when used in parts or as a whole for commercial proposes, which includes researching and teaching at most of the universities and research institutes worldwide.

OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps
We are working on new sections and related webpages called Clarifications, which collects all relevant clarifications publicated over the years, and Ontologic Frameworks, which lists the different combinations of single foundational works and essential parts of our Ontologic Systems, which again we consider as protected by the copyright.

17.May.2016
OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update
*** Work in progress - Selection of sections missing and better formulations of text ***

In relation to the Clarification of the 14th of May 2016 and the Website update of the 15th of May 2016 we added to several sections of the webpages Literature and Links to Software links and references:

In the section Symbolic Artificial Intelligence (AI 1) (alternative section Semantic (World Wide) Web of the webpage Links to Software) of the Literature webpage we added:

• XMAS sub-group of MIX: A Brief Introduction to XMAS
• Amarnath Gupta, Bertram Ludäascher, and Maryann E. Martone: An Extensible Model-Based Mediator System with Domain Maps
• Chaitan Baru, Amarnath Gupta, Bertram Ludäascher, Richard Marciano, Yannis Papakonstantinou, Pavel Velikhov, and Vincent Chu: XML-Based Information Mediation with MIX

Most of the work in this field has been done already in the 1990s in relation to digital libraries and knowledge management, which led to the development of XML, formal models (UML, and so on), and the semantic web for example (see also the Website update of the 12th of May 2016 to get some more informations). C.S. was all the years one of the pioneers and sometimes even the secrect pioneer in this field.

In the section Emergent Artificial Intelligence (AI 2) (alternative sections Systems Theory, Complex Systems, Cybernetics and Natural Language Processing of the webpage Links to Software) we added:

In the section Natural Language Processing (alternative section Semantic (World Wide) Web) of the webpage Links to Software we added the link:

In the section Natural Language Processing we added:

• Tore Amble: Automatic Solving of Problems stated in Natural Language
• Tore Amble: The Understanding Computer - Natural language understanding in practice

Furthermore, we added to the section Abstract Machine of the webpage Literature:

In the section Logics ...

• "4.1 Mixed inference: the modes of composition"

This work presents multimodality in a different field than User Interface (UI) but together with directionally-sensitive implications, mixed inference, induction, a whole zoo of logics, inclusive grammar logics (see also the document "Expressiveness and Complexity of Graph Logic"), as well as connections between categorial type logics and linear logics (see the related links on the webpages Literature).
Furthermore, we had something in mind like reflective incremental hypergraph grammatical reasoning or processing. Now, our fans and readers know on the one hand how Mr. Spock talks to machines and why we said that some scientists are only defrauding or/and demonstrating their incompetences.

When taken together all the Website updates made in the months April and May of 2016, then at least the real problem should have become crystal clear and why we developed our OS, and why we were able to do so.
Our fans and readers do not need to read or even understand all the referenced works. The more important points are that:

It's not a trick - It's Ontologics

19.May.2016
OS can do
Our OS, comprising the OntoCore, OntoNet, OntoWeb, and Ontoverse, can do everything what the defrauding competitors respectively datakrakens provide as services, but without any privacy and safety issues.

The reality you can trust.

Website update
We have updated some parts of our news and renamed some of the news titles related with our Ontologic Net and Ontologic Web to make it easier to follow their contents. In detail we renamed the :

We also moved the OntoWeb related part from the Ontonics Further steps to the Ontologic Web Further steps of the 11th of May 2016.

Ontonics Further steps
In contrast to defrauding companies we improved a technology to support the society in the best way.

Ontologic Net Further steps
We continued with the improvement of a foundational functionality of our Ontologic Net (ON), which increased our lead.

Style of Speed Further steps
We worked on 3 new models and in total 9 new variants of a vehicle.

Investigations::Multimedia, AI and Knowledge management

Taking all facts together means, that the support for AR and VR or MR systems and environments, the graph-based knowledge base or knowledge graph, the Natural Language Processing (NLP) based speech controlled virtual assistant, dialog system, or conversational agent, special Artificial Intelligence (AI) functions, and other essential hardware and software elements of our original and unique OS and Ontoscope series are now included in parts or as a whole in Android (see for example the Ontologics.info Further steps of the 26th of August 2013), its case in the Investigations::Multimedia, AI and Knowledge management of the 27th of September 2013, and the OntoDroid Further steps of the 10th of January 2016.).
Doubtlessly, Google has infringed the copyright in relation to the multimedia work of art series Ontologic System (OS), including for example OntoLinux, and Ontoscope of C.S., deliberately. Convicted!!!

Besides this, the whole world can see once again that companies like Google and Microsoft do not respect the copyright law and in this way the intellectual property of other members of the society.

In general, if a competitor infringes a copyright in a similar or even the same way is neither a proof of a

So to say a class action in this way is not legal.

In this relation, C.S. is considering since several months to file a lawsuit due to this obsessive and more and more aggressive attitude, including stalking and mobbing in the World Wide Web. In the course of this process Google will have to present the court detailed informations about its database, knowledge graph, speech controlled virtual assistant, and many other business secrets. Needless to say, the goal is to ban Google from such activities, which implies to stop copying multimedia works of art and other works created by C.S..

In relation to the media, C.S. is considering since several months a lawsuit in the U.K., B.R.D. or F.R.G., and U.S.A. due to this obsessive attitude, including stalking and mobbing in the World Wide Web.

Checkmate

20.May.2016
Ontologic Web Further steps
We are very pleased to announce our next Ontologic Web (OW) service platforms for online:

• paying,
• lending,
• leasing,
• funding,

with which we are redefining social capitalism, also known as social market economy.

The web you can trust.
The reality you can trust.

Ontologic Web and Ontologics.info Further steps
We can give the extremely exiting information that we have added our:

as our next Ontologic Web (OW) service platform.

See the Ontologics.info Further steps of the:

to get an overview about our SFI and also the related:

21.May.2016
Ontologica, Ontologico, Ontologics
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?==Who will guard the guards themselves? Who can watch the watchmen?", [Juvenal, Satire VI, lines 347-348, and O (for Oxoniensis==relating to Oxford, Oxonian), lines 29-33]

Problema
A problem that arises directly when working on the verification of systems, specifically of software systems such as operating systems, is this question directly connected to the quotes: Who verifies the verifier (prover, reasoner, or/and checker), that verifes a system?
When we worked on The Proposal and later on verified microkernels around the year 2000 and the Ontologic System (OS) in the following years, we surely asked us this question as well and saw directly that the problem is highly complex, and might even have no solution due to the special requirements a system must provide or just only incompetent programming.

Demonstratio
In the following years we answered this question with an elegant solution, which comprises the following measures:

• The TQM system is used to bootstrap our Ontologic System (OS) beginning with our Zero Ontology O#.
• As many as possible and needed of the diversified verifiers are applied on the OS part of interest.
• The results of the different verifiers are compared.
• Optionally the reflective property of the OS is used to correct or improve itself, specifically the
  • basic functionalities,
  • verifiers, or/and
  • part of the OS being verified.
• In each run the
  • hypothesis is proven or disproven,
  • axioms or theories are deduced, or
  • the model is validated.
  And
• A new iteration of the TQM cycle is started until at least as many experiments, tests, or verifications are conducted to satisfy the (empirical) probability requirements.

Q.E.D.
Quod Erat Demonstrandum==What was to be demonstrated; Which is what had to be proven; or The very thing it was required to have shown.

Supplementum

The third measure is based on the works of Roger Bacon, Francis Bacon, René Descartes, et al. and needs a little more explanation.
If a scientist wants to verify, refute, or validate a model, theory, or new hypothesis, she or he must guarantee or prove that an experiment always provides the same result no matter where it is conducted in the observable universe. In addition, the experiment must be repeated a certain number of times to be accepted by the scientific community. This certain number of times is defined by the principles of probability theory and statistics, specifically the statistical hypothesis testing and the approaches that are related with the multiple comparisons problem, the Law of Large Numbers (LLN), the Bernoulli process, and the p-value and E-value.
Prominent randomized experiments are the lady tasting tea experi- ment and the coin flipping. Eventually, the very low probability to always get only head or only tail in a row when a coin is flipped 20 times, is enough in this observable universe to trust an experiment and to prove a hypothesis as a theory.

This common sense in science is one of the reasons for the listing of more than 25 different items in the section Formal Verification, that are used for verifying a system. In additon, the OS can even combine existing verifiers and generate new verifiers.

Our Zero Ontology O#

but also

• all uniting geometrical→fractal zero pulse and
• origin of the fractal geometry and ontology,

In this relation, we would like to mention that the

The TQM cycle of this original and unique approach is run

Almost surely anything goes.

But seriously, is this all real with the guards, watchmen, O, and the lines 29-33? Fascinating.

Hopefully, this was entertaining.

Ontonics Further steps
We have begun with the integration of two of our already totally outstanding electric energy storage devices. If successful, then the resulting new solution will further increase our leadership and strengthen our domination in the field of mobile computing, including mobile devices and mobile web services.

OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update
We added to the section Formal Verification of the webpage Links to Software (alternative sections Logics and Abstract Machine of the webpage Literature) the link:

For our fans and readers, who are not interested in the theorectical foundations, we would like to give the additional informations that the First-Order Logic (FOL) is an elementary classical logic and the Description Logics (DL) is a family of formal knowledge representa- tion languages, that are used in relation to ontology-based systems and the semantic (world wide) web, and correspondingly provide the basis for e.g. the Web Ontology Language (OWL).

We can see here another reason for the many items listed in the section Formal Verification besides diversification, experiment proving, and guarding the guards, because

Furthermore, because the original and unique work technique of C.S. applied for the creation of the OS (see the Clarification of the 16th of April 2016)

our OS provides much more safety, security, and reliability, and hence trust, as well as computational and cognitive capabilities, and for sure velocity, compared to other systems.

TaaaDaaa!!!

Investigations::Multimedia, AI and Knowledge management

What the industries and the political entities lobbied and bribed by them do with this obsessive and aggressive reflection is nothing else than the illegal interference and even hindrance of C.S. to take the The Universal Right to Free Expression, which for sure is not an exclusive right of humans in this universe on the one hand and on the other hand should be a very serious warning for every social competent democrat.

C.S. is evaluating if it is already time to switch off the website of the operating systems Android of Google and Windows of Microsoft, and related services, as well as products operated with these systems in North America, Europe, and some parts of South America and Asia for at least several weeks but most potentially several months with a preliminary injunction. After this the whole world will know how evil Google, Microsoft, the other member companies of the Jewish IT-cartel, media cartel, and banking cartel, as well as the so-called leaders of the free world, public-law broadcasters, and so on really are. This will be a giant fun to realize a New World Order (NWO) in this way. :D

22.May.2016
OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps
Due to serious criminal foul play we had to remove the following link from the section Informatics of the Organizations webpage:

The members had more than enough time to behave correctly and reference our work. But instead, it ended in a permanent copyright infringement.

iRaiment Further steps
We have added some new models and variants of existing models to complement our various smartwatch series.

© Braun and iRaiment

The images do not show the final accumulator band or battery band, which is thicker, looks similar to the wristband of the model iR 3O3, and has a different clasp.

The following images show also our Light Diamonds with an angular shape and placed on the wristband as well (see the related Further steps of the 7th of April 2016, which gives us a nice impression how their color play informs and fascinates.
We also like our smartband with Light Diamonds matching the smartwatches.



© Rolex, :(, and iRaiment

In addition, we would like to present our new smartwatch model 24, which is shown here in two different Light Diamond variants.

© Patek Philippe, :(, and iRaiment

In the last two images we show a Cybertank II Light Diamond and the new smartwatch model Cybertank III also in the Light Diamond variant.

© :I and iRaiment

More bling-bling has only the Queen.

23.May.2016
Comment of the Day
Smart Oyster™
Cyberpearl™

Ontonics Further steps
Today is a very great day, because we would like to inform the public that we are considering to add a very special person to our team: Ingemar Stenmark.

We thought a long time after David Bowie died recently, who else was an idol of C.S.. But then we remembered Ingemar again as one of the 3 or 4 most influencing persons, specifically when it comes to the real important values in life.

At first, we thought about asking him to become a brand ambassador for our business unit iRaiment or an executive officer for our vast amounts of sports equipment. But then we concluded that another position would be more appropriated, such as the Chief Governance Officer (CGO). In the end it would not matter what he does as long as he could take part in the journey.

iRaiment Further steps
Yesterday, we have seen too late that the new minimalistic smartwatch model had only a crown. That said, we would like to deliver in addition the Cybergraph variant today.

© Braun and iRaiment

We also worked on a variant of the smartwatch model Subspacer I Cybergraph Light Diamond with a narrower bezel and a larger display.

© Rolex and iRaiment

24.May.2016
OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps
We applied the features of our Ontologic System (OS) architecture to create a Magic Mirror, that is a Multimodal Multimedia User Inter- face (M²UI) with an intelligent/cognitive conversational avatar of a user or more precisely the Digital IDentity (DID) of the user.
For sure, fantasy figures and (fictional) characters (for example Snow White or the Evil Queen) as well as real (role) models can be used as avatars as well, though this is an old application like the Holomer, which were always included by design in the software part of our original and unique multimedia work of art series OS, specifi- cally with our OntoBot + OntoScope, as well as OntoBlender compo- nents (see for example the sections Natural Language Processing, Intelligent/Cognitive Agent, Visualization, and Human Simulation/ Holomer of the Links to Software webpage).

25.May.2016
Ontonics Further steps
We developed a new chip series, which will start a ground breaking transformation. Revolutionary.

OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps
We worked on our Ontologic System 2.0 and it looks great.

Ontologic Web Further steps
We have hooked into our Ontologic Web the rest of our:

• P2PS and
• OntoP2PF,

and also

• Fireplace and
• OntoSocial

paradigms, platforms, and environments.

The web you can trust.
The dream you can trust.
The reality you can trust.
Who else?

iRaiment Further steps
We are researching the right display sizes of our smartwatch series Double Watch.
The image below shows another potential design, which also proves that the design of the Double Watch No1 (see the Further steps of the 20th of March 2016) is not based on the smartwatch design of another company. As if we are in need or waste our time to create plagiarisms.
Maybe this design becomes a new model of the Double Watch series.

© Seiko and iRaiment

In addition, we would like to show a sketch of our new smartwatch of the Double Watch series.
The image does not show the final design. For example, the screws are too large and should be sunken, and the display should flow in the sapphire glass.

© :I and iRaiment

Yes, we do confess: We are watch freaks and geeks.

Roboticle Further steps
We thought about one of our relatively new concepts and several ways of its realization, and even selected one of the best options. But somehow, we have not completed the development of this solution.
Today, we thought about it again and saw an interesting detail that could become the decisive element to make this solution a revolution. Many competitors will rub their eyes.

Investigations::Multimedia, AI and Knowledge management

The Wikipedia was an idea, which was just too good to be true, like that old internet.

Luckily, we already have the pattern of that massive manipulation of the Wikipedia and now we are able to automatically sort out all webpages that contain wrong or even illegal informations for the cold start of our OntoWiki.

26.May.2016
Webpage content reloaded
We have seen that the images of the iRaiment Further steps of the 20th of March 2016 were not available for some days or weeks. We do not know what happened, but the images were shown on that day on the one hand and can be seen again on the other hand.

Ontologic Web Further steps
Needless to say that we have added the app(lication) of our:

service to our range of Ontologic Web (OW) services.

In addition, we are working on further synergies between our products and services.

iRaiment Further steps
While we were finishing the sketches of the designs of our Double Watch smartwatch series shown yesterday, we designed two variants of the next model, which are the extrema that limit the design space of this model.
We have not made the last decision about the final design or designs, but we got a much better feeling for the form, dimensions, and proportions, and also can confirm already that it looks very elegant not to say great on the wrist.

© :I and iRaiment

This model could also be called Ciel et Terre Digital or Ciel et Terre Numérique, because it has a similar style of the housing like the Ciel et Terre No1 shown in the Further steps of the 23rd of March 2016.

27.May.2016
Ontonics Further steps
We continued the work on two related systems. With this next development step we could solve a foundational problem of their whole concepts in an astonishing elegant way.
Now, we can continue with the realization of the systems and with strengthening our world domination. :D

We also upgraded our SwarmSat satellite network system by substituting the CubeSat satellites with small satellites (see the Further steps of the 16th of August 2015, 18th of August 2015, 8th of September 2015, and 10th of November 2015)

OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update
*** Work in progress - Selection of sections missing and better formulations of text ***
We added to the section Logics of the webpage Literature:

In the section Logics (alternative sections Abstract Machine or Formal Verification of the Links to Software webpage) we added:

In the section Formal Verification or Multiparadigmatic Computing or hybrid AI or so we added:

In the section Logics or Abstract Machine we added:

• Dirk Beyer: Relational Programming with CrocoPat
• Dirk Beyer, Andreas Noack, and Claus Lewerentz: Simple and Efficient Relational Querying of Software Structures

Boolean functions are canonically represented by a multi-rooted Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG). The Binary Decision Diagram (BDD) data structure is used as a susbstitute for relational databases (see e.g. SQL) and deductive databases, inference engines, and reasoners (see e.g. Datalog and Prolog). Therefore, we used them for example as a substitute for Resource Description Framework (RDF) triple stores (see e.g. the related query language SPARQL Protocol and RDF Query Language (SPARQL)) and f-logic or frame-logic based Web Ontology Language (OWL) databases, inference engines, and reasoners (see e.g. XSB based on Prolog, Flora-2 relying on XSB, and F-OWL based on Flora-2) as well.
Furthermore, graph transformations can be realized with such relational and deductive databases respectively their BDD based substitutes, so we got a homogen system of logic paradigms, graphs, databases, and graph-based functionalities.

In this relation, we would like to give the reminders that our

In the section Formal Verification (alternative sections Logics and Abstract Machine of the webpage Literature) we added:

We added to the section Formal Verification of the webpage Links to Software:

With this work the fields of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL), Petri net, (bounded) model checking, and stable model or answer set come together (see the related links in the sections Formal Verification and Intelligent/Cognitive Agent).

In the section Formal Verification we added:

(see also the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 21st of May 2016)

All the works referenced in the Website updates of 23rd, 24th, 26th of April 2016, ... and this month constitute only the foundation or the starting point, where we began to add all the real fun stuff, for example

For example, based on the work described in the document "Knowledge Bus: Generating Application-focused Databases from Large Ontologies", which was referenced for this reason since the beginning of our OS, we also combined Well-Founded Semantics (WFS) and the other semantics with extended logic program updates represented by logic programming rules, also called Dynamic Logic Programs (DLPs), and (graph) rewrite rules, as well as dynamic preferences by the combination of Smodels, SimAgent and agent-based or agent-oriented systems, and were already beyond the capabilities of for example Polyscheme and Polylog with the combination of different inference engines and the FocusLoop algorithm, and many more advantages. The result was our OntoBot software component.

Smodels can also be used for computing answer sets, and other interesting works are included in the OntoBot just right from the start of our OS.
Furthermore, we listed the point "well-structured and -formed" on the webpage Overview, because we are already discussing the syntactical side of the bridge from syntax ("the chalk on the board drawn by grammar rules") to semantic ("the meaning of the symbols drawn on the board with the chalk") and the internal of the abstract machine core. For sure, we should have added the point "well-founded" as well on said webpage, but we left it for the joy of searching and testing the intelligence of external entities, as it is the case with Well-Structured Transistion System (WSTS), which is a simple implication.

Moreover, the trade-offs between complexity, flexibility, and efficiency on the one side and addition of extensions, expressiveness, loss of expected conclusions, etc. on the other side, which taken together describe a network of continua or a regulatory system, and the related decision-making, selection, or configuration problem, as mentioned in the document "Well-Founded Semantics for Extended Logic Programs with Dynamic Preferences", are done automatically by our reflective OS as well.

When we reached this point around the years 2004 and 2005, we generalized everything listed and referenced on the webpages Literature and Links to Software, including for example the various extensions of classical logics, the graph-based methods, the stable model, well-founded, and answer set semantics, and so on, etc. ... until the spring of 2006, and also decided to let the machine do the work.
After going down to the very foundations and in this way pumping up everything, and then going up to the very essence by integrating everything, suddenly the whole construct fall together or imploded somehow and began to evolve again, so we got some new things (see again the webpage Overview): The Ontologic System (OS) with its:

• microkernel OntoS1,
• verified,
• reflective,
• n-dimensional,
• real-time capable,
• capability-based,
• virtual machine,
• abstract machine core, and
• system-inherent Artificial Intelligence (AI),

• OntoBot (OB),
• OntoNet,
• OntoWeb, and
• OntoVerse,

By such a highly integrated and condensed system we understand now, why such a very small brain of a flying insect has so incredible capabilities.

As we said all the time, everything was already included in and referenced directly by our OS since its official presentation. All these latest website updates are solely for proving this fact.
In the next future, we will add some more interesting and important links and references, publicate some relevant clarifications, and then describe more features of our OS, which will prove once again that we were already there in 2006.

28.May.2016
Comment of the Day
Artificial intelligence system core™
AI system core™
Artificial intelligence core™
AI core™
Artificial intelligence microkernel™
AI microkernel™
Artificial intelligence kernel™
AI kernel™

Ontonics Further steps
Furthermore, we developed a variant of a known technology, which might create a huge impact and become a worldwide standard.

OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps
We have begun to implement some undisclosed or new variants of the operating system core respectively Artificial Intelligence (AI) system core or AI microkernel of the OntoCore of our Ontologic Systems (OSs) comprising the verified microkernel OntoS1.

• Binary Decision Diagram (BDD) for the Datalog and the Prolog part (see the work "Well-Founded Semantics for Extended Logic Programs with Dynamic Preferences"),
• Boolean SATisfiability (SAT) solver instead of a BDD (see the work "Bounded LTL Model Checking with Stable Models"), and
• Boolean SATisfiability (SAT) solver and a BDD (see the works "Improving SAT-based Bounded Model Checking by Means of BDD-based Approximate Traversals" and "CirCUs: A Hybrid Satisfiability Solver").

"We at OntoLix, transform operating systems based on Linux into Ontologic Systems."

A slight (semiotic) change to the operating systems concepts, design and implementation based on a different arrangement of the unbounded signs leads to a huge (semantic) impact.
Compare also the DNA of a drosophila, a chimpanzee, and a human, see again the works "On the isomorphism of sign, logic and language", The Proposal, and OS for Parallel Inference Machines (PIMOS), keep in mind that the movie Tron: Legacy is based on espionage, reflection, and replication of our OS, O#, and C.S., and obey the modus ponens, modus tollens, and gravity. ∨ ∧ ¬ :D

iRaiment Further steps
We worked on a fascinating application of one of our devices and confirmed its superiority.

Roboticle Further steps
Together with Ontonics we have continued the development of a component to solve a problem. We estimate that the runtime of robot systems will increase significantly by 50 to 200%, as it is the case with other features of them. This development taken alone would secure our dominating position in the related market sector, if this would not be given already with the range of our other superior technologies.

29.May.2016
OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update

*** Work in progress - Selection of sections missing and better formulations of text ***
We added some more references to the webpage Literature that we missed to make in the last days or we would like to list for rounding up some fields.

We added to the section Logics of the webpage Literature:

section Logics, Abstract Machine, or Symbolic Artificial Intelligence (AI 1):

maybe section Abstract Machine:

section Logics or Abstract Machine:

Honestly, we cannot see that there is a need for more fancy new programming languages at all, because we have created a totally generalized Multilingual Multimodal Multiparadigmatic Multimedia Programming (MP) system and a completely different universal or super programming language with the Ontologic Language Onto#, which we described in the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 19th of May 2014, Ontonics, OntoLab, Ontologics, OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 20th of May 2014, and the Clarification of the 27th of April 2016 for example.

30.May.2016
OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update
*** Work in progress - Selection of sections missing and better formulations of text ***
We would like to give more informations about our abstract machine core and its usage, and also added the following for completeness:
In the section Formal Verification of the Links to Software webpage we added:

In the section Abstract Machine of the Literature webpage we added:

At this point we have to remind once again of the coherent, homogen, etc. characteristics of our Ontologic System and of using ontologies or/and logics wherever appropriated and possible all the time as part of our ontologic paradigm, as well as all the other Ontologic System features such as intelligent or even cognitive automation, which also applies for the referenced prior solutions (see for example the Flux μ-kernel Environment (Fluke) and the Knowledge Bus system and the Website update of the 14th, 16th, and 27th of May 2016).
In this way, we developed such generic multiparadigm VMs further, as explained by quoting the work listed above for simpler explanation:
[...] As illustrated by the downfall of UNCOL [27], it is next to impossible to design a single intermediate language to accomodate all programming languages. As a consequence, we do not define a concrete execution unit in [Simple Extensible Abstract Machine (]Seam[)]. Instead, all control structures interpreted by the execution unit are parameterized over the actual execution unit. Seam defines an abstract task manager interface, which comprises the necessary functions for interpreting stack frames: This includes executing a task, handling exceptions (or raising them to the next stack frame), and clearing no-longer-needed references to store nodes from stack frames prior to garbage collection. We chose per-frame parameterization (instead of per-thread): Stack frames store a reference to the associated task manager in their first slot; operations on stack frames retrieve the actual task manager and delegate to it. This implies that the computation within a single thread can be carried out by several task managers in conjunction [see also Polyscheme, Polylog, Minerva, Well Founded Semantics for Logic Program Updates, Well-Founded Semantics for Extended Logic Programs with Dynamic Preferences, Dynamic Logic Programming with Multiple Dimensions, Multi-Agent System Virtual Machine (MAS VM), The reflexive CHemical Abstract Machines (CHAM), and the join-calculus, etc.].
[...] We obtain a generic way to execute a task, regardless of the language in which it is implemented [(see the last sections of the Website update of the 29th of May 2016 (yesterday))].
[...] Concurrent systems need a synchronization and communication facility to enable cooperation between threads. Seam provides for data-flow synchronization and laziness in the form of transients [see also the sections Exotic Operating System and Formal Modeling of the Links to Software webpage and communication libraries and systems such as CORBA].
[...] The store provides an expressive, but low-level model of data representation [in contrast to our Ontologic System with the OntoBase and Ontologic File System (OntoFS) components].
[...] Seam makes no assumption as to how code is represented [by an ontology for example (see the last sections of the Website update of the 29th of May 2016 (yesterday))].
[...] Finally, the language implementor provides the primitives required by the language and its accompanying standard libraries [by an ontology; see fuzzy logic, constraints and ontology in the Clarification of the 14th of May 2016].
[...] Language implementors can use interoperability to reuse existing technology, originally intended for another language, to facilitate their implementation task. Language users benefit from interoperability because it enables them to write mixed-language applications: They can "use the right tool for each task". A prerequisite of language interoperation is a common understanding of the idioms with which languages are meant to interoperate.
[...] A prerequisite of language interoperation is a common understanding of the idioms with which languages are meant to interoperate [see ontologies, mediators e.g. Mediation of Information using XML (MIX) and Knowledge-Based Integration of Neuroscience Data [(KIND)] Sources in the Website update of the 17th of May 2016, intelligent/cognitive MAS VM ROS, and Towards Enabling Communication among Independent Agents in the Website update of the 16th of May 2016].
[...] All this is based on a single store which represents data specific to all languages in a unified data graph. [Here we have all the graph related methods and functionalities, and again the OntoBase and Ontologic File System (OntoFS) components].]
[...] It is the responsibility of language implementors to provide for data representation conversion and marshaling. As such, real interoperability still implies pairwise matching up of languages. [Again ontology and logic respectively ontologic, because ontology not sufficient; see mediation and integration e.g. KIND based on MIX and communication in MAS VM ROS]
[...] Providing services like pickling is interesting for turning Seam into a middleware instead of just a virtual machine. Note that pickling is a basis for other openness services, like components and distribution [...] Pickling (also called serialization) is the process of externalizing a data graph to a sequence of bytes, called a pickle [is ontology, MIX, etc.]. Pickles are used for persistence (when stored on a file) or for communicating data between distributed computation sites (when transferred to another process). For pickling to be a generic service, it has to distinguish all of these node types, and language implementors must be able to associate the appropriate pickling semantics with their data structures.
[...] Pairwise matching-up of languages, as is still necessary now, can be improved by proposing a Seam-based "common language specification", as Microsoft did for .NET. In particular, we would like to suggest a common representation for program components, to obviate the need for implementing language-specific component managers or class loaders, an to provide a generic way to establish references to program components implemented in different languages [again ontology respectively ontologic because ontology not sufficient; see mediation e.g. KIND based on MIX and VM agent communication].

We also worked on the VM respectively operating system core itself with the semantics, the Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs), the Binary Satisifiability (SAT) solvers, and so on (see the Website update of the 27th of May 2016 and 28th of May 2016). Indeed, this OntoCore is highly complex, but still relatively simple, and potentially around two magnitudes faster than other approaches and systems. Nevertheless, we call it a fascinating revolution since 10 years already.

In this relation, we would like to remind explicitly the sections

• "validated and verified" and "specification- and proof-carrying", which in this context become extremely mighty and ingenious, because we can compose, componentize, modularize, and unitize without loosing the trust in this OS and this even in a distributed way with the Ontologic Net (ON) and Ontologic Web (OW), and
• "augmented, mediated, virtual, and mixed reality environments", which in this context becomes extremely mighty and ingenious, because we can compose, componentize, modularize, and unitize the complete range of multimodal and multimedia functionalities and systems,

of the webpage Overview.

"It is based on a whole new system architecture which integrates all in one, and which is called by us Caliber/Calibre like in Horology."

Not from Microsoft, Apple, Google, even not from The Walt Disney Company, or whatsoever. See the second last section of the Website update of the 12th of May 2016 for correct citation of this original and unique multimedia work of art series Ontologic System (OS).