By the way:

• Clarification of the 31st of March 2025, and
• Clarification of the 23rd of April 2025.

02.May.2025

20:20 UTC+2
SOPR decided to end 3% European war discount

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) concluded that that the 3% European war discount is not reasonable anymore and decided to end it.

20:20 UTC+2
SOPR summarizes part of License Model (LM)

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) has a License Model (LM), including a Transaction Fee Model (TFM), and asks for a

• list (to be publicized), or
• individual examination and assessment.

The utilization of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies with their set of foundational and essential facilities, technologies, goods, and services is inclusive.

License Model (LM)
Our SOPR has introduced 5 licensee classes of its License Model (LM) for Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS), including required Ontologic System Components (OSC):

License Model (LM) With No Discounts Granted (WNDG)

Class	BasicOAOS	MidOAOS	SuperOAOS	difference	Δ old vs. new LM
1	0.60	2.80	5.00	2.20	+0.00
2	5.45	8.35	11.25	2.90	+0.25
3	10.30	13.90	17.50	3.60	+0.50
4	15.15	19.45	23.75	4.30	+0.75
5	20.00	25.00	30.00	5.00	+1.00
Δ	3.60	4.30	5.00	0.70

Plus progression of up to 10% maximal

Our SOPR has introduced 2 licensee class of its License Model (LM) for HardWare (HW) and other tangible goods utilized in and based on our OS with its Ontoverse (Ov) and New Reality (NR), including required Ontoscope Components (OsC):

• Ontoscope handheld
• Ontoscope head-mounted
• Ontoscope wearable
• Ontoscope with Legs
• Ontoscope with Wheels
• Ontoscope with Wings
• Ontoscope with Rotors
• Ontoscope with Floats

• Bionic, Cybernetic, Ontonic (BCO) Integrated Circuit (IC), including
  • Neural Net Core (NNC) and Neural Net Processor (NNP)
  • Neural Net on a Chip (NNoC)
  • Neural Net in a Package (NNiP)
  • Neural Net Central Processing Unit (Neural Net CPU or NNCPU)
  • Artificial Intelligence Core (AIC) and Artificial Intelligence Processor (AIP)
  • Artificial Intelligence on a Chip (AIoC)
  • Artificial Intelligence in a Package (AIiP)
  • Artificial Intelligence Central Processing Unit (Artificial Intelligence CPU or AICPU)
  • SuperComputing Core (SC²) and Chip/Processor
  • SuperComputer on a Chip (SCoC)
  • SuperComputer in a Package (SCiP)
• BCO Facility for SuperComputing (SC or SupC) (BCOSC) and SuperNetworking (SN or SupN) (BCOSN) (e.g. Artificial Intelligence (AI) SuperComputing (SC or SupC) (AISC), Machine Learning (ML) SuperComputing (SC or SupC) (MLSC), Computational Intelligence (CI) SuperComputing (SC or SupC) (CISC), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) SuperComputing (SC or SupC) (ANNSC), etc., including
  • BCO Data Center (DC) (BCODC)

Class	BasicGood	MidGood	SuperGood	difference	Δ old vs. new LM
1	7.10	8.10	9.10	1.00	+0.10
2	14.20	16.20	18.20	2.00	+100%

Plus progression of up to 1% maximal

All values in %
All percent values With No Discounts Granted (WNDG) if not said otherwise.
All other terms and conditions do apply.

License Model (LM) With All Discounts Granted (WNDG)

Class	BasicOAOS	MidOAOS	SuperOAOS	difference	Δ old vs. new LM
1	1.60	3.80	6.00	2.20	+1.00
2	5.45	8.35	11.25	2.90	+2.25
3	9.30	12.90	16.50	3.60	+3.50
4	13.15	17.45	21.75	4.30	+4.75
5	17.00	22.00	27.00	5.00	+6.00
Δ	2.60	3.30	4.00	0.70

Plus progression of up to 10% maximal

All values in %
All percent values With All Discounts Granted (WADG) if not said otherwise.
All other terms and conditions do apply.

A digital or multimedia artist is classified as a licensee providing a BasicOAOS in the licensee class 3 non-industrial sectors with ICT.
An analog artist with Non-Fungible Token (NFT) is classified as a digital or multimedia artist.

Transaction Fee Model (TFM)
Our SOPR has introduced 4 fee classes of its Transaction Fee Model (TFM) for the transaction and custody/safekeeping of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) in our digital and virtual ledgers:

All TFM classes are

• authorization of the participating entities and
• content of the object of safekeeping,

and

• records,
• raw signals and data,
• data, and
• works of art

by our Ontologic System (OS).

Transaction Fee Model (TFM) With All Discounts Granted (WADG)

Class	billing basis	first year	following year	minimal fee	Δ old vs. new TFM
1	transaction volume	0.25%	(see fee class 3)	0.25 USD	+0.00
2	64 KiloByte (KB)	0.01 USD	0.01 USD	0.16 USD	+0.00
3	64 KiloByte (KB)	0.01 USD	0.01 USD	0.16 USD	+0.00
4	licensee class 3 BasicOAOS	10.30%	0.25%	10.30 USD	+0.00

No progression

All values in %
All percent values With All Discounts Granted (WADG) if not said otherwise.
All other terms and conditions do apply.

22:56 UTC+2
Bitcoin 'R' Us

The integration of the fields of Grid Computing (GC or GridC) and Volunteer Computing (VC or VolC) and also blockchain technique and certain consensus protocols (e.g. Proof of (computational) Work (PoW) (e.g. Bitcoin)), and related Digital Ledger Technology (DLT) are based on our Ontologic System (OS) with its integrating Ontologic System Architecture (OSA), as is the case with the DLT based on a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) (e.g. multi-rooted DAG, homogeneous multichain, or similar data structures), and much more.

22:56 UTC+2
Stablecoin could be official digital money

We quote an online encyclopedia about the subject stablecoin: "A stablecoin is a type of cryptocurrency where the value of the digital asset is supposed to be pegged to a reference asset, which is either fiat money, exchange-traded commodities (such as precious metals or industrial metals), or another cryptocurrency.[1] [...]"

Comment
A stablecoin pegged to a fiat money is nothing else than the digital version of said fiat money controlled by a monetary authority. If a stablecoin is pegged to a basket of several fiat moneys, then it is nothing else than a basket of digital versions of said fiat moneys controlled by respective monetary authorities.

03.May.2025

05:09 and 12:21 UTC+2
SOPR closing OS at end of July in EU

The demand for sharing digitial rights, digital interests, and digitial properties (e.g. digital signal and data rights, collections of data respectively databases, digital estates (e.g. screen space, speaker field), digital assets) by the

of the member states of the European Union (hereafter EU) constitutes a blatant violation of national and international laws, regulations, and acts, as well as agreements, conventions, and charters, specifically the

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) decided to withdraw the opening of our Ontologic System (hereafter OS) and allowing and licensing the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our Ontologic System (OS) in the member states of the European Union (EU) begining on the 1st of August 2025, if the European Commission (EC) of the European Union (EU) has not began the formal procedure for the revision of the Digital Services Act (DSA) and Digital Market Act (DMA) regarding the legal principle of presumption of innocence, and the right on property (e.g. copyright, digitial assets).

The European Union (EU) should not protect and support the principles of

There is no double standard or double state or dual state or reason of state. If the rule of law is not respected and practised, then there is no basis for the existence of the EU.
And it is completely irrelevant which actions were taken in the past, if the result is that one or more other entities than C.S. and our corporation control the original and unique works of art created by C.S..

We ask the governments of the U.S.America, the P.R.China, and other countries to take action against such capricious acts.

See also the notes

By the way:

05:14 and 12:21 UTC+2
SOPR closing OS at end of July in NATO

The contract of the member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (hereafter NATO) with the company Palantir Technologies constitutes a blatant violation of national and international laws, regulations, and acts, as well as agreements, conventions, and charters, specifically the

of C.S. and our corporation.

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) decided to withdraw the opening of our Ontologic System (hereafter OS) and allowing and licensing the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our Ontologic System (OS) in the member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) begining on the 1st of August 2025, if the Headquarters Supreme Allied Commander Transformation (HQ SACT), Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE), and other responsible headquarters of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) have not began the formal procedure for either the

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) should not protect and support the principles of

There is no double standard or double state or dual state or reason of state. If the rule of law is not respected and practised, then there is no basis for the existence of the NATO.
And it is completely irrelevant which actions were taken in the past, if the result is that one or more other entities than C.S. and our corporation control the original and unique works of art created by C.S..

See also the notes

By the way:

05:27 UTC+2
SOPR considering withdrawal of JVP discount

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is considering the discount of 10% for a Joint Venture Partner (JVP), because of the lack of truly convincing reasons.

05:59 UTC+2
SOPR considering 80% of profit with OsC HW

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is considering the exclusive exploitation (e.g. commericalization (e.g. monetization) of our original and unique Ontoscope (Os), also wrongly and illegally called Android Smartphone, Smarttablet, Smartwatch, etc., Apple iPhone, iPad, Watch, Artificial Intelligence phone (AI phone), smartglasses, AI glasses, smartcar, AI car, and so on.
One specific consideration is the establishment of Joint Ventures (JVs) for the manufacturing of Ontoscope Components (OsC) HardWare (HW) with a ratio of company shares 80%:20% to our benefit worldwide.

Actually, we already demand the network equipment, and already discussed to also demand the battery modules, and also consider the Chinese win-win policy outside the mainland of the P.R.China.

See also the notes

23:12 UTC+2
Style of Speed Further steps

We have a powertrain for our models

which has extremely interesting properties in relation to More Power - More Speed - More Fun.
The next step would already by some work on the final design and then put these cars together.

We also have overworked the V12 engine of the model Revuelto, which improves its qualities and quantities significantly. The factory will be wondering why they have not done the same before.

And we have designed a specific electric motor using components out of our shelves, which delivers outstanding performance and excellent efficiency, and reduces the complexity of manufacturing.

04.May.2025

10:35 UTC+2
TSPs still in LaLaLand

Telecommunication Service Provider (TSP) are still acting in prohibitive ways.
But there is no democratization of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation, specifically in relation to the original and uniqu sui generis ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) in the oeuvre of C.S. worldwide.

Furthermore, other entities do not have said rights and properties of us at all, as wrongly and illegally communicated and claimed by them.

We also recall that such fraudulent collaborations of TSPs with such entities are in fact serious criminal conspiracies, wire fraud, investment fraud, and so on.

See also the notes

and the other publications cited therein.

05.May.2025

11:56 UTC+2
Investors, banks, and Co. have not been forgotten

The court-proof evidences are mounting in case of

• Goldman Sachs,
• JPMorgan Chase & Co.,
• etc.,

• Berkshire Hathaway,
• BlackRock,
• Blackstone,
• etc.,

• Andreessen Horrowitz,
• Thrive Capital,
• etc.,

Even if Warren Buffet retires, the demand for the payment of damage compensations remain effective.

13:31 UTC+2
SOPR considering 53% win-win

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is considering to increase the minimum ratio of company shares in case of the golden power regulation from 51% to 53%.
But truly relevant is the result of our Unified Examination and Assessment (UEA) procedure.

22:32 UTC+2
A(G(Waymo)) and Amazon courier service

Other entities from all sectors can become clients of the joint courier service platform of the subsidiary Waymo of the company Alphabet (Google) and the company Amazon.

06.May.2025

23:02 and 34:24 UTC+2
Uber still in LaLaLand

What the company Uber is trying once again will not work once again and it does not matter how many partnerships it closes with copycats and freeloaders in certain other countries in Asia and elsewhere.

What the company Uber is trying once again will not work once again and it does not matter how many partnerships it closes with copycats and freeloaders from countries in Asia and elsewhere.
The partnerships with the companies Alphabet→Google→Waymo, and Porsche SE/Volkswagen are not what we want in the actual way and requires renegotiation, as is the case with the partnrtships of the companies Amazon with Toyota and Waymo with Toyota.

23:32 UTC+2
AI does not interfere with online ad biz, appstore

We do not think and also have not observed that developments in the field of SoftBionics (SB) (e.g. Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Computational Intelligence (CI), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Computer Vision (CV), Computer Audition (CA), Evolutionary Computing (EC), Agent-Based System (ABS), etc.), specifically as illegal plagiarisms and fakes of our

interfere with the businesses of

Quite contrary, we will also get back the complete control over our Ontoscope (Os) in all versions and variants, such as Android Smartphone, Apple iPhone, and so on, and also our other properties, including our digitial rights, digital interests, and digitial properties (e.g. digital signal and data rights, collections of data respectively databases, digital estates, digital assets), like for example

and so on.
All those illegal things will be thrown out of our Ov and wiped out on our Os.

07.May.2025

10:46 UTC+2
SOPR assessing damages more precisely

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) noticed once again and also would like to share this information with all entities concerned that so far we have only taken the internal, direct damages for the estimation of damage compensations and ratios of company shares, but not the external damages as well. If we also take the external damages, then many ratios of company shares reach or even exceed 100%.

21:27 and 23:23 UTC+2
Do not believe fabricated news of lying press

The story about the companies Alphabet (Google) and Apple, and the field of Bionics (e.g. Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Computational Intelligence (CI), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Computer Vision (CV), Computer Audition (CA), Evolutionary Computing (EC), Agent-Based System (ABS), etc.), and our Ontologic roBot (OB or OntoBot), Ontologic Search (OntoSearch) and Ontologic Find (OntoFind), Boot to Web (B2W) with (web) browser engine, and Ontoscope (Os), and so on is a completely or at least significantly different one.

The illegal plagiarisms and fakes Copilot of Microsoft, and ChatGPT of OpenAI, and also Gemini of Alphabet (Google) are the ones used most frequently, while the other illegal plagiarisms and fakes of the companies Anthropic, DeepSeek, Perplexity AI, etc. are irrelevant, specifically in relation to online advertisement.
We also already said that OpenAI and ChatGPT will become irrelevant as well.
Siri updated with ChatGPT of Apple and Alexa+ of Amazon are also illegal plagiarisms and fakes, as is the case with all the illegal plagiarisms and fakes of our Ontoscope (Os), which are wrongly and illegally called smartphone, smarttablet, smartwatch, smartcar, AI phone, and so on.

Even a Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art (POSITA) is able to comprehend directly that all performances and reproductions, and also sales of these items

which constitutes at least a crystal clear infringement of the moral rights respectively Lanham (Trademark) rights of C.S..

Furthermore, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet (Google) have an existential interest to resolve all legal issues and in the course of this Apple, Meta (Facebook), and much more companies in the U.S.America, the European Union (EU), and other areas will also come to the same conclusion, motivation, and action, if they are not already there.

And if the partnership of Alphabet (Google) and Apple would break apart on the basis of our OS and Os, and Apple is having and following a different strategy, then nobody needs to be a genius to guess how the journey accelerates.

See also the notes

and the other publications cited therein.

08.May.2025

17:37 and 21:08 UTC+2
Palantir and xAI are 3 lost causes

Palantir Technologies 1
X.AI Corporation 2
Palantir and xAI 3

Because we do have the impression once again that we speak the same language, we go directly to the substance.
That strategy will not work. The fields of

and also their integration, specifically for the finance industry (see for example "MIX: Modular Integration of Connectionist and Symbolic Processing in Knowledge-Based Systems" also discussed on this website of OntomaX), are prior art to a considerable extent, and also the fields of

But a lot of integration of this and other prior art is in the legal scope of our work of art by the creation of our original and unique sui generis work of art titled Ontologic System and OS with its Ontologic System Architecture (OSA), Ontologic System Components (OSC), Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services (OAOS), Ontoverse (Ov), and Ontoscope (Os), and also

• DLT based on Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) (e.g. multi-rooted DAG, homogeneous multichain, or similar data structures), and
• Byzantine Chain Replication (BCR) protocol or method,

Therefore, the

and also the

must be adhered to.

Utilizing an own partial Ontoverse (Ov), such as what is wrongly and illegally called a

constitutes the same legal issue as in the cases of Microsoft Azure, Amazon Amazon Web Services, Oracle Cloud, and Co..
Partnering with an Telecommunication Service Provider (TSP), Internet Service Provider (ISP), Cloud Service Provider (CSP) (e.g. Oracle) is a conspiracy in this context.

Sign, pay, comply.
They also already got our honest and generous offers.

09.May.2025

19:10 UTC+2
SOPR approaching TMS, ATMS, etc. test phase

It has been communicated more than sufficiently that our Ontoverse (Ov) is realized as the coherent federation of infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), our Society for Superstructure Utilization and Management (SSUM), and our other Societies with their set of facilities, technologies, goods, and services, including our

• Ubiquitous Computing (UC or UbiC) and Internet of Things (IoT),
• Networked Embedded System (NES), and
• Cyber-Physical System (CPS),
  • Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT),
  • Industry 5.0 (Industry 4.0 with Metaverse (Mv), Mixed Reality (MR), and eXtended Mixed Reality (XMR) or eXtended Reality (XR) of our Ontoverse (Ov)), and
  • Industry 6.0 (Industry 5.0 and Bionics, Cybernetics, Robotics, and Ontonics (BCRO)),
• etc.,

• Airspace System of the Next Generation, including
  • Air Traffic Management (ATM), including
    • Air Traffic Services (ATS), including
      • Air Traffic Control (ATC) services,
      • Air Traffic Advisary (ATA) service, and
      • Flight Information Services (FIS,
    • Airspace Management (ASM), and
    • Air Traffic Flow Management (AFTM),
  • Communication, Navigation, and Surveillance (CNS),
    • L-band Digital Aeronautical Communications System (LDACS) ("first truly integrated CNS system recognised by [International Civil Aviation Organization (]ICAO[)]"),
  • Air Navigation Services (ANS), including
    • ATS,
    • CNS,
    • METerological service (MET), and
    • Aeronautical Information Service (AIS),
  • Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) or Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Traffic Management (UTM) System (UASTMS or UTMS),
    • Urban Air Mobility Management System (UAMMS),
• Space Traffic Management System (STMS), including
  • Uncrewed Spacecraft System (USS) or Unmanned SpaceCraft (USC) Traffic Management System (USCTMS),

See also the

There is only one Ontologic System (OS) and therefore only one Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), and only one Society for Superstructure Utilization and Management (SSUM), and only one coherent federation of exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR, our SSUM, and our other Societies with their set of foundational and essential facilities, technologies, goods, and serivces with certification of Impact Level IL5 and IL6, if required, including only one so-called

• fiber-optic communication and mobile communication systems,
• satellite communication systems,

and of course

in this and other areas of the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse (Ov) provided by our corporation with its subsidiaries, Joint Venture Partners (JVPs), and Licensing Partners (LPs), but not any corrupt governments, and AI kiddies and grifters. :)

See also the note

and the other publications cited therein.

Everything has been publicized and discussed.
It is very complex. And ©.

Our SOPR would also like to recall that we have not publicized everything, recommend to avoid any collaboration with blacklisted and unqualified entities, revise and withdraw all illegal regulations and contracts, and make clear that that every reflection is an evidence.

It is always better to collaborate with us.

Are there any questions?

By the way:

• List of damages summary of the 19th of January 2025,
• SOPR demands complete legal actions of the 22nd of January 2025,
• SOPR summarizes part of License Model (LM) of the 2nd of May 2025,

  and the other publications cited therein.

• Palantir, NATO-Palantir contract highly complex of the 30th of April 2025 and
• SOPR closing OS at end of July in NATO of the 3rd of May 2025.

20:22 UTC+2
Image of the Day

We created some collages in relation to our Ontologic System (OS) with its Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), Ontologic roBot (OB), and other Ontologic System Components (OSC).

The following is a temporary collage of some of said collages focusing on a part of the Superstructure and the Traffic Management System (TMS or TrMS) of the Next Generation and Intelligent TMS (ITMS) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), Society for Superstructure Utilization and Management (SSUM), and our other Societies.

© ..., and C.S.

See also the

and the note

12.May.2025

10:04 UTC+2
SOPR recalls contracts in Ov only valid with us

We would like to recall for the unknowing, unteachable, or unconscious entities, specifically in government, science, media, and industry, that in the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse (Ov) contracts related to the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. are only valid, if they have been concluded with our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR).
Other entities are just not in the position to circumvent or substitute C.S. and our corporation, including our SOPR, specifically in relation to what is wrongly and illegally called U.S.American technologies, which in fact belong to said original and unique AWs and further IPs.
Therefore, we would also like to give the recommendation to every entitiy concernded to not build Castles in the Cloud™ or even kingdoms on legal matter, which is just void.

13.May.2025

11:01 and 11:21 UTC+2
Other BRICS Plus follow India not P.R.China

The member states of the Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, and also Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates BRICS Plus/Outreach format (BRICS Plus) should not think that they could do without the protection of original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs), including the copyright and the patent right.
Do not try that experiment with failure by design inherent to the system, because it will only lead to the domination of the BRICS Plus by the P.R.China, or the P.R.China and the R.India, or scientifical and industrial anarchy, and the stop of activities, specifically investments.

The member states of the BRICS Plus should not think that they could follow the so-called China shock economical development. In fact, the next development step has already began, which is to make production at the point of sale so cheap that manufacturing in their countries and shipping their products to the most interesting markets is more expensive, or does not justify the dependencies and risks, or both. And this holds for the whole engineering industry as well, including the automotive industry and the hardware industry, the energy industry, and the other industries.
See also the note SOPR considering 80% of profit with OsC HW of the 3rd of May 2025.

If the BRICS Pay payment system infringes the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation, specifically if it is just an illegal plagiarism and fake of the Ontologic Bank Financial Information and Communications (OBFIC or OntoBankFinIC), so to say the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications of the Next Generation (SWIFT NG), of the Ontologic Bank (OntoBank) of the Ontologic Financial System (OFinS) of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies, then it will result in considerable damage compensations and transaction fees.

11:11 and 17:11 UTC+2
Ontonics Further steps

Since around 6 years or longer we have solar cell technologies, which cost around 22.2% in relation to the current production price of solar cells manufactured in for example the P.R.China, Taiwan, S.R.Vietnam, Malaysia, R.Korea). That makes even manufacturing and shipping more expensive, does not justify the dependencies or risks or both, which is the next development step of mass production after the so-called China shock.
Now, we are short before the start of their production and sale worldwide.

And we have several other things to continue with the realization of our domination of the worldwide energy market. :)
But these specific photovoltaic technologies, which already easily beat old solar, wind, fusion, and fission energy and correspondingly is already sold out for years in favour of the activities and collaborations of our SOPR, are only the beginning.

We also designed a scalled down version of a highly interesting technology.
Even better a Proof of Concept (PoC) prototype is already being built, which shows our lead is still considerable and uncontested.

Since some years, we are also working on a very specific resource-efficient electric motor.

Sadly to say, this will destroy instantly the whole economy of hydrocarbons respectively fossil fuels (e.g. petroleum, coal, and natural gas), which is the global hydrocarbon industry and its relationship to the world markets.

17:00 UTC+2
At least we do know what good manners are

"It is customary with us in the legal scope of ... our Ontoverse, also known as Ontoland, to ask in advance.", [C.S. after Ralf Hütter of the music band Kraftwerk vs. Moses Pelham in relation to a 2 second sample of the song "Metall auf Metall" of the album T.E.E., 2019]

Wenigstens wissen wir, was gute Manieren sind
"Bei uns im rechtlichen Geltungsbereich ... von unserem Ontoversum, auch bekannt als Ontoland, ist es üblich, dass man vorher fragt.", [C.S. frei nach Ralf Hütter von der Musikgruppe Kraftwerk vs. Moses Pelham im Zusammenhang mit einem 2 Sekunden Musterstück von dem Lied "Metall auf Metall" von dem Album T.E.E., 2019]

14.May.2025

18:25 and 18:42 UTC+2
Ontonics Further steps

In relation to a specific technology, we looked a little around and somehow concluded that the basic design of the electric motor, which we just only revealed in the Further steps of yesterday, required an improvement.
While looking for a means, we saw that another property also required an improvement. And a little surprisingly, a means for the latter improvement is also a means for the first improvement, which is even significantly better than expected in the beginning, and even improves another property as a side effect, and also results in an improved design and manufacturing process.
It will be very interesting to see the first functional prototyp running.
Creation and invention in action turns once again a silly idea into another revolution.

For sure, we do not build giga factories, but realize giga industries and in relation to at least 3 of our many revolutionary technologies, goods, and services, which are undisclosed for understandable reasons, we have already prepared our next move around 10 months ago, which is quite big, mildly said.
In this context, we are ready to sign. But at first, we have to observe which entities have learned their lesson to get the treat. :)

20:30 UTC+2
Humain blacklisted

This case is self-explanatory.

And this blacklisting is just for the usual reasons and also the formal reasons, such as

We do not know how its business model should work at all. For example, the companies Nvidia, AMD, Qualcomm, and Co. are selling all countries the same illegal infrastructures with their set of illegal facilities, technologies, goods, and services, specifically illegal plagiarisms and fakes of said original and unique AWs and further IPs created by C.S.. And more significant deficits exist, but we will not discuss them at this point.

We will not discuss the matter any longer, because every entity concerned does know everything relevant.

Sign, pay, comply.

See also the notes

and the other publications cited therein.

By the way:

15.May.2025

Comment of the Day

"A clown does not kill.", [*<:o) ©™, Today]

08:30 UTC+2
Overrated stock trick does not work

For sure, we noted that bad actors are still trying to withhold our money respectively capital, to frustrate our next actions, and to play on time.
One dirty trick is to keep the damage compensations as low as possible.
Another dirty trick is to push the values of the stocks of certain companies to unreasonably, ridiculously high values so that at least in the very next future we cannot take them over even not with the very high collected royalties.

But the courts were already more clever and decided that the damage compensations have to be the higher of apportioned compensation, profit, and value (see the case Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions Inc. v. McDonald's Corp., 562 F.2d 1157 (1977) and the Comment of the Day of the 28th of January 2024).

See also the notes

08:38 UTC+2
SOPR concluded no further measures required for U.S.A., F.R.G., and Co.

United States of America (U.S.A.)
Federal Republic of Germany (F.R.G.)

As not expected otherwise and also discussed several years ago, old and new governments with their ministries of internal affairs and justice refuse to adhere to official and unofficial agreements, and old and new bad actors of their cliques exploit that.
How long the last independent courts and upright judges are able to resist is a question, which will be answered in the next years.
The lying press never was a support or even the fourth column of democracy.

See also the notes

and etc..

09:08 UTC+2
List of damages and penalties

At least the dirty 15 are already over 102% of their market capitalization, at least

Some estimations and preliminary decisions in relation to the payment of damage compensations, the higher of apportioned compensation, profit, and value, and also penalties:

See also the related messages, notes, explanations, clarifications, investigations, and claims, specifically

and also the related messages, notes, explanations, clarifications, investigations, and claims, specifically

and the other publications cited therein.

12:56 UTC+2
FEP 2025 schwerer Eingriff in Eigentumsrecht

Flächenentwicklungsplan (FEP)

Wenn es überhaupt rechtlich möglich ist, dann ist ein

mit einem Eigentüer zu schließen.

Außerdem ist zu beachten, dass entsprechende Bereiche der Felder KyberPhysikalische System==Cyber-Physical System (CPS) sowie ontologisches Netzwerk (in englisch Ontologic Net (ON) und ontologisches Gewebe (in englisch Ontologic Web (OW)) im rechtlichen Raum von ... dem Ontoversum (in englisch Ontoverse (Ov)) sind und unter Umständen zu den exklusiven und verpflichtenden Infrastrukturen von unserer Gesellschaft für Ontologische Aufführung und Reproduktion (GOAR) (in englisch Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR)) und unseren weiteren Gesellschaften gehören.

Siehe auch die Notizen, Anmerkungen oder Hinweise

und die anderen darin referenzierten Publikationen.

20:24 and 22:52 UTC+2
Ontonics Further steps

We took a quick look at the informations given by the government of the country United Arab Emirates.
Honestly, we do not get the 1 trillion U.S. Dollar in investments in the U.S.America together.

Furthermore, we read the document or white paper titled "Pioneering Prosperity [] The Strategic UAE-US Economic Alliance" and publicized on the 20th of June 2024 in its Version 2.
Obviously, (some of) its latest activities and investments, which are summarized in the chapters "Technology and Innovation" and "A Regional Tech Hub", are based on infringements of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation, specifically

We already discussed the matter a few times in the past and the legal situation in general and our decision in particular have not changed.
See for example the notes

and the other publications cited therein.

We also note that contracts for the purchase of aircrafts always result in significant discounts and less deliveries.
And the latest contract of purchase has the side effect that the stock prices of the aircraft manufacturer increases and our negotiation power decreases, so that ultimately we have to pay more for the takeover and have to care more for our alternative options, for example in the P.R.China. :o

We also would like to recall once again that we told every entity concerned that they have to invest in our investment programs

which both are created, designed, and managed by our OntoLab, The Lab of Visions™, and our Hightech Office Ontonics, The Hightech Competence™, whereby an Investment Partner (InP) is invited to take part in the management under a special contract.

16.May.2025

12:20 UTC+2
Clarification

According to the

claiming for the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. is prohibited.

And to call our original and unique Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) "the world's leading American tech stack" is just another blunt impudence, as we have seen before with the Ontoscope (Os) variant Apple iPhone.

09:04 and 12:04 UTC+2
Comment of the Day

"At home they build on desert sand. Abroad they build on quicksand.", [C.S., Today]

Please note that foreign properties will be confiscated as damage compensations and other legal actions will be taken by court orders, if required.

11:21 UTC+2
SOPR produces Os at best locations

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) produces our original and unique Ontoscope (Os) in the handheld, head-mounted, and wearable versions at the best locations, which are in Asia at this time, while the versions with wheels, wings, rotors, and floats are produced at other locations as well.

This is not up for any debate due to the exclusive moral rights respectively Lanham (Trademark) rights and copyrights of C.S.. :)

It is merely up to a government, if it wants that variants of our original and unique Ontoscope (Os), such as Android Smartphone, Apple iPhone, and so on, are sold in its country or not, though any inference with, and also obstruction, undermining, and harm of said worldwide rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation will have very serious consequences.

See also the note

15:43 UTC+2
SOPR decided license only with OntoLab BCOICs

We already discussed this regulative measure of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) in the past.
Our SORP decided to give the allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our Ontologic System (OS) only if Bionic, Cybernetic, Ontonic (BCO) Integrated Circuits (ICs) of the

series of our OntoLab are utilized for a related facility, technology, good, and service, like for example

• BCO Data Center (DC) (BCODC), what is wrongly called
• Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enabled data center,
• AI infrastructure,
• AI supercomputer,
• AI supercomputer infrastructure,
• AI cluster,
• AI cluster infrastructure,
• AI cloud,
• Intelligent Cloud, Edge, and Fog Computing (ICEFC),
• intelligent cloud infrastructure,
• etc.,

• Ontologic Net (ON),
• Ontologic Web (OW), and
• Ontologic uniVerse (OV), including
  • eXtended Mixed Reality Environment (XMRE) or simply eXtended Reality Environment (XRE), including
    • Virtual Reality Environment (VRE), what is wrongly and illegally called
    • Metaverse (Mv),
    • etc.,
  • Multiverse,
  • etc.,

And no, this regulation is not an abuse of market power, a monopolization under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, or any other violation of the competition law, but also legal exploitation of exclusive rights and properties, because we were also first in this specific case in said legal scope. The whole thing is part of the oeuvre of sui generis works of art created by C.S..
And yes, this regulation even does not allow the utilization of similar ICs in said legal scope by other

See also the

and the notes

17.May.2025

08:36 UTC+2
SOPR reminds U.A.E., K.S.A., et al. are eligible LPs

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) is neutral and therefore countries, like for example the United Arab Emirates (U.A.E.), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (K.S.A.), State of Qatar, State of Israel, and other Arabic countries, have the same status like for example the Peoples Republic of China (P.R.C.), the Republic of India (R.I.), et alii, and are eligible to become Licensing Partners (LPs) of our SOPR and enjoy the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. under the

which include the

Please note that due to the worldwide exclusive rights and properties of C.S. and our coporation, national security, sovereignty, and other concerns and reasons U.S.American, European, and all other entities are not allowed to perform and reproduce certain parts of said original and unique AWs and further IPs and substitute our SOPR and our other Societies in foreign jurisdictions such as the countries listed in the beginning. :)

18.May.2025

15:19, 16:20, and 20:00 UTC+2
Governments must stop debate of © revision

We quote a report, which is about votes of the British government: "[...]
On Monday, the House of Lords voted by a 147 majority to amend the Data (Use and Access) Bill to add transparency requirements, which aim to ensure copyright holders have to give permission for their work to be used.
But on Wednesday MPs in the House of Commons voted to reject this change, meaning the bill will continue to go back and forth between the two Houses until they reach an agreement on it.
[...]
A government spokesperson said it wants the UK's creative industries and AI companies to "flourish, which is why we're consulting on a package of measures that we hope will work for both sectors".
The spokesperson said it was "vital" the government worked through responses to a consultation on proposals to allow developers to use creators' content unless rights holders elected to "opt out".
They added that it was "equally important that we put in the groundwork now as we consider the next steps".
"That is why we have committed to publishing a report and economic impact assessment - exploring the broad range of issues and options on all sides of the debate.""

Comment
The whole matter is only total bull$#!+ and there is absolutely no discussion, debate, or blah blah blah required, because the societies already do have a very precise white, yellow, or red line. What politicians and kleptomaniacs are trying to do would by a crystal clear violation of the constitutions, the basic laws, the basic rights, the moral rights, the Lanham (Trademark) rights, the copyrights, the competition rights, and so on.
An artist already has the worldwide exclusive moral rights respectively Lanham (Trademark) rights (e.g. citation with attribution, exploitation (e.g. commercialization (e.g. monetization))) in the moment of the publication of an original and unique work of art. No creator needs to opt out of anything or do anything else. The media is irrelevant, if real, analog, digital, or virtual does not matter, because it is always a performance and reproduction of an original and unique, personal expression of idea.
Therefore, even that amendment of whatsoever is nonsense. Another entity has always to ask a creator of a work of art, when using said old expression of idea, if no exclusion of the copyright applies, such as fair use, when creating a new expression of idea.
This expression of idea of

is already part of our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and our Ontologic System (OS) created by C.S., who already exploited this fair use exclusion even in a more general way. All others with what is wrongly and illegally called LLM, genAI, chatbot, Conversational Artificial Intelligence (CAI), agentic Artificial Intelligence, etc. with or without social, reasoning, or search capabilities, therefore infringe the rights and properties (e.g. copyright) of the other artists and C.S..

It is already a blunt and outrageous impudence that certain governments are even considering and discussing a change of the national and international laws, regulations, and acts, as well as agreements, conventions, and charters, such as the moral rights respectively Lanham (Trademark) rights and copyrights, at all.
That discussion about a crystal clear violation of basic rights has to stop immediately.

Please note that even with such a criminal expropriation of property by a government the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation are still valid and remain effective.

In this relation, we would also like to give the reminder once again that the utilization of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies with their set of foundatinal and essential facilities, technologies, goods, and services, including our

also protects the rights and properties of other artists in compliance with the

Therefore, we encourage once again all artists, who are performing and reproducing legally, to become exclusive members of our SOPR so that third entities are unable to circumvent the rights and properties of all of us.

See also the related messages, notes, explanations, clarifications, investigations, and claims, specifically

and the other publications cited therein.

19.May.2025

12:10 UTC+2
U.K. EU passport e-gates only with €, ©, and ™

Fish and pommes frites always welcome.

13:58 and 20:30 UTC+2
SOPR already separated civilian and military use

We quote a report, which is about a Defense Space Architecture (DSA): "[...]
The one "entirely new" aspect would be the command and control and integration layer of the architecture, this person said.
[...]
[Space Exploration Technologies (Space ExiT) or] SpaceX is among the companies vying for a role in developing Golden Dome and has briefed Trump officials on a possible collaboration with two other contractors: Anduril [Industries] and Palantir [Technologies], two sources familiar with the conversations told [a news media]. All three companies have made pitches directly to Defense Secretary [...].
[...]
Musk's ownership of SpaceX, combined with his proximity to Trump, has rankled Democrats who have urged the Defense Department's inspector general to investigate the tech [business man]'s involvement in the process of awarding contracts related to Golden Dome.
But some defense officials, industry experts and congressional sources have defended SpaceX's possible involvement in Golden Dome, with one source pointing out the company has already demonstrated expertise developing the sensor layer capability that the missile defense system will need.
[...]
The contract process is expected to be competitive, though, and carried out through the Defense Innovation Unit.
[...]
For now, lawmakers have committed to making a "down payment on Golden Dome" as part of its reconciliation bill, the congressional official said, earmarking $25 billion in next year's defense budget for satellites, space-based sensors and interceptors, and launch infrastructure.
[...]
But that funding would only be a drop in the bucket compared with the estimated total cost of developing, implementing and maintaining the system Trump has described, defense officials and industry experts say.
[...]"

Comment
We do not need to discuss that this endeavour

• parts of our Ontologic System(OS) with its Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) and Ontologic System Components (OSC), and
• facilities, technologies, goods, and services of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), Society for Superstructure Utilization and Management (SSUM), and our other Societies.

Furthermore, one can see once again the attempt to steal said parts of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies under the disguise of national security and military necessity with the goal to later also use them for civilian economy, specifically private businesses.

But our SOPR already included regulations in its Terms of Service (ToS), which separate the military and civilian performance and reproduction of certain parts of our OS, and prohibited the military use.
Consequently, in the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse (Ov) a company is either a

but not both.
What our corporation does is irrelevant in this regard and shows once again, what it means, whren we say: It is always better to collaborate with us. And it is always best to be part of us and become a subsidiary of us.
Nonetheless, our SOPR and our other Societies must be neutral.

We already showed that the company Palantir Technologies will not be able to pay the damage compensations, the higher of apportioned compensation, profit, and value, and will not be sustainable due to the royalties being due.
We also noted that it functions like some kind of a sink and interface between the military and civilian areas.
As a subsidiary of our corporation, Palantir could therefore act and function as a proxy and link between military and civilian facilities, technologies, goods, and services of our other subsidiaries, specifically our SORP and our other Societies.

The company Space Exploration Technologies (Space ExiT) has to decide if it is either a civilian or a military company, but not both.
We also have at least 5 own satellite constellations of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies, which are the standards by creation and design of our OS anyway.
And we also note that the sensor lay capability is just only a standard space industry capability.

The company Anduril Industries is somehow the next lost cause due to the same screwed mindset of its founder.
See also the note Palantir and xAI 3 lost causes of the 8th of May 2025.

Ultimately, the companies Space Exploration Technologies (Space ExiT), Palantir Technologies, and Anduril Industries will not do that due to artistical, social, legal, technological, and economical reasons. None of them has the all the competencies required alone or in collaboration.
And the U.S.America has to comply with the Terms of Service (ToS) with its License Model (LM) of our SOPR anyway no matter which procedures are followed and contracts are granted.

One always meets twice in life.

Stealing is not developing. And one can only steal, market, and sell, if another one has created, invented, or made before.
Thus, every entity concerned has the next serious copyright warning.

See also the

Please note that the publications of these older collages are only done due to espionage.

14:14 and 21:29 UTC+2
Image of the Day

We created some collages in relation to our Ontologic System (OS) with its Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), Ontologic roBot (OB), and other Ontologic System Components (OSC).

The following is a temporary collage of some of said collages focusing on a part of the Superstructure and the Traffic Management System (TMS or TrMS) of the Next Generation and Intelligent TMS of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), Society for Superstructure Utilization and Management (SSUM), and our other Societies.

© ..., and C.S.

See also the messages

and also the

And find once again our Ontoverse (Ov) and New Reality (NR), including Ontological twin (Onton) and Cyber-Physical System (CPS).

It's not a trick. It's a kind of magic. It's Ontologics.
And a miracle to believe in.

22.May.2025

01:40 and 14:10 UTC+2
Comment of the Day

"Garbage In, Garbage Out (GIGO)", [C.S., Today]

In fact, GIGO is not a new method in the fields of computing and systems theory.
Indeed, it is included in our Ontologics with its Ontologic Model (OM), Ontologic Programming (OP), and Ontologic Computing (OC), but only as a legacy of for example the field of Artificial Neural Network (ANN), which failed in the mid 1990s and mid 2020s, and for creative Bionics, as also explained by us multiple times in the last 3 years.

GIGO is also one of the reasons why the approaches of

• purely subsymbolic, connectionist (neural), probabilistic, and statistic model, system, etc., including
  • pure Artificial Neural Network Model (ANNM), including
    • pure Foundation Model (FM),
    • pure Large Language Model (LLM),
    • pure Large MultiModal Model (LMMM), and
    • pure Large Action Model (LAM),

failed afterwards and C.S. created the Ontologic System (OS) with its Ontologic System Basic Properties (OSBP), Ontologic System Architecture (OSA), Zero Ontology, Null Ontology, Ontologic Zero, or Ontologic Null, and much more.

15:40 UTC+2
Sign, Pay, Comply, or Sign, Transfer

15:55 UTC+2
Ontonics Superstructure #29

A specific part of our Superstructure is quickly being accepted as the International Defense Space Architectur (IDSA), including a missile defense system.
For example, the U.S.America government has already "officially selected an architecture for the state of the art system, that will deploy next generation technologies across the land, sea, and space" and the government of the country Canada has already begun talks and discussions about joining this system and we are only waiting for the other member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) to follow them.

In this relation, we have to give the reminder to avoid any misunderstanding and misconception that the cost of Research and Development (R&D), and construction are not relevant, but the cost of operation and maintenance must be taken into account, specifically the royalties and damage compensations collected by our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) according to its Terms of Service (ToS) with its License Model (LM).

See also the note

If a country, union of states, economic zone, trade union, or zone of other interests builds its own missile defense system or even National Defense Space Architecture (NDSA), then facilities, technologies, goods, and services, and also interfaces still exist to other parts of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR, our SSUM, and our other Societies, which also are not for free.

This leads the discussion to the

See also the notes

and the

17:11 UTC+2
Apple Dark Matter™

Pssst.
It's not a trick. It's a kind of magic.
And it's a top secret.

21:15 UTC+2
Stargate blacklisted

This case is self-explanatory.

We also quote the document titled "Pioneering Prosperity [] The Strategic UAE-US Economic Alliance" and publicized on the 20th of June 2024 in its Version 2 June 2024: "[...]
Technology and Innovation
The UAE and the US are at the forefront of technological innovation. Collaborations between Emirati and American companies are driving advancements in AI, cloud computing, and supercomputing. For instance, G42's partnership with Microsoft Azure has enhanced AI capabilities, and the development of the Condor Galaxy supercomputer exemplifies the cutting-edge tech initiatives in place.

[...]"]

Comment
Microsoft is also a major investor or even shareholder of the company OpenAI and also tightly connected with the company Nvidia on the one hand and the project or company called Stargate on the other hand, which is what is wrongly called Artificial Intelligence-enabled data center, Artificial Intelligence (AI) infrastructure, AI supercomputer, AI supercomputer infrastructure, AI cluster, AI cluster infrastructure, AI cloud, Intelligent Cloud, Edge, and Fog Computing (ICEFC), intelligent cloud infrastructure, etc., and also an illegal part of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies.

Microsoft also belongs to the group of companies and individuals, that asked the U.S.American administration to "rescind and replace the "AI Diffusion" rule", a [...] regulation [of the previous administration] capping sales of the most advanced chips that was set to take effect on May 15", or simply said to withdraw the export ban, so that G42 could buy processors of Nvidia, AMD, and other semiconducture manufacturers.

See also the notes

and the other publications cited therein.

23.May.2025

14:53 and 16:34 UTC+2
Ontonics Further steps

We extended an older technology of us, which belongs to the original and unique works of art and new foundations created by C.S., which again define the new standard.

24.May.2025

25:06 UTC+2
Style of Speed Further steps

We already looked at a working principle of one of our many technologies throughout the years. We also continued to develop and improve this technology further (see for example the Further steps of the 6th of November 2024 and 19th of March 2025). But somehow, while thinking around without a specific direction, we concluded that a specific variant can exploit a waste and turn it into a gain.

25.May.2025

19:15 and 20:20 UTC+2
DSA much more expensive, if done without us

We quote a report, which is about a Defense Space Architecture (DSA): "[...]
"I'm 34 years in this business. I've never seen an early estimate that was too high. It's the nature of the business," Gen[eral] Chance Saltzman, the chief of space operations for US Space Force, said last week when asked about the [Congressional Budget Office (]CBO[)'s cost estimate during an event hosted by [a media company].
[...]"]

Comment
The so-called National Defense Space Architectur (NDSA), including a missile defense system, will be much more expensive than estimated by the

due to several reasons such as the following ones:

Therefore, our initial rough estimate shot from the hip is 2.8 trillion U.S. Dollar over 20 years.

The cost estimate of the U.S.American government could be based on the assumption that the International Defense Space Architecture (NDSA) of the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), Society for Superstructure Utilization and Management (SSUM), and our other Societies is utilized.

Last but not least, none of the named contractors, operators, and other entities will able to get the job done for artistical, social, legal, technological, and economical reasons.

See also the related messages, notes, explanations, clarifications, investigations, and claims, specifically

and the other publications cited therein.

Another point to mention are the statements of self-proclaimed but rather incompetent experts and journalists about the non-existence of the command and control system of such a DSA, the proposed NDSA, and the International Defense Space Architecture (NDSA) and Superstructure of our SOPR, SSUM, and our other Societies.
Well, we do not know why certain things are discussed in public instead of taking much better options.

27.May.2025

20:43 UTC+2
SOPR has options in case of golden share

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) has viable options to protect and enforce the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation, specifically in relation to the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S., in case an

such as

The trick with the argument about national security, sovereignty, emergency, and other concerns and reasons, and certain dirty tricks have their limits.

We will not discuss basic rights and worldwide rights.

28.May.2025

16:08 UTC+2
Others should join Alphabet and Apple in TX, UT

At least the companies Microsoft, Amazon, and Samsung with their software stores and marketplaces, also known as application stores or app stores, and app marketplaces, should directly join the companies Alphabet (Google) and Apple and (formally)

in the states of Utah (UT) and Texas (TX), both in the United States of America (U.S.A.).
The exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies already have an IDentity and Access Management System (IDAMS), which is also used for

and will be realized worldwide anyway.
A centralized (federated) clearinghouse for verifying the ages of users and related and similar activities is just a minor extension of or only an addition to our IDAMS.

See also the note

23:30, 25:10, and UTC+2
Nvidia 99.999999999% plus penalties

We do have rules.
And we will continue with making everybody happy.

Howsoever, Data Centers (DCs) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies will use the Neural Net Core (NNC), Neural Net Processor (NNP), Neural Net Central Processing Unit (Neural Net CPU or NNCPU), etc. of our OntoLab, The Lab of Visions.
Therefore, the only question is if the company Nvidia will manufacture them in some few months after signing the set of legal documents of our SOPR or in some few years after complying with the ruling of the courts, and in both cases becoming our subsidiary.

See also the note

And we have the opinion that we should say an open word about some (recent) statements of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Nvidia in relation to the U.S.American export controls, which he has called a "failure". "China's [Artificial Intelligence (]AI[)] moves on with or without us," he said. "The question is not whether China will have AI - it already does - the question is whether one of the world's largest AI markets will run on American platforms."

No, it is so wrong that we even have to use the term bull$#!+, like we used it before for that total bull$#!+ about the democratization of the worldwide exclusive rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation.
First of all, we have seen it before with for example automobiles, mobile devices, and our Ontologic System (OS) with its Ontoverse (Ov) and Ontoscope (Os) in all versions and variants, such as the Android Smartphone and the Apple iPhone, and also with wheels, wings, rotors, and floats.
An army of P.R.Chinese scientists is already looking at every detail of Nvidia products, even in the nanoscale with high-performance tools, and copying Nvidia products and in some very few years Nvidia and every U.S.American platform will be subsituted with some copycats and their P.R.Chinese platforms.
This development is called the China shock and has already been discussed the first time at our kitchen table around 25 years ago.

Secondly, if the companies Alphabet (Google), Microsoft, OpenAI, Meta (Facebook), and lot of others were not so incomprehensibly incompetent and would not have started the mess with all their illegal plagiarisms and fakes of our Ontologic System (OS), including the AI crap, then the situation would be completely different.
All these Chinese Cloud, Chinese Android, Chinese AI, and so on are solely based on illegal Free and Open Source Software (FOSS), which is based on our OS, Ov, and Os, and was and still is only given away to damage the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation, as Nvidia always did and is still doing so as well.
That all has nothing in common with democracy, philanthropy, harmony, or whatsoever.

Thirdly, it does not matter at all if the P.R.China makes progress in the field of AI or is home to 50% of all AI researchers. What should they do? AI is logics, mathematics, and informatics, and is as limited as these fields. One does not make much money with them in general, only when having a breakthrough. Furthermore, their possible applications are also very diverse, but ultimately also limited, because one needs expressions of idea, inventions, technologies, goods, and services, and also manufacturers, markets, and customers.
In fact, the big money is made with the creations of C.S., but not with data centers, clouds, bionic models, chatbots, AI-powered search engines, AI chips, and all the other illegal plagiarisms and fakes, and also other infringements of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation, as is the case with Nvidia and its hardware, which only became valuable by stealing our exclusive creation, citation with attribution, reputation, and exploitation in form of our software in the first place and also in form of our hardware based on our software, specifically calculated or computed Ontologic Models (OMs), such as Foundational Models (FMs), Large Language Models (LLMs), and so on. Implementing and manufacturing our original and unique works of art is no art, but ordinary work subject to price decline like a bulk good.
Got it?

We also recall what we told the government of the F.R.Germany and other member states of the European Union (EU) in the note F.R.Germany has only 1 chance left of the 15th of May 2025: "We can only repeat that the Federal Republic of Germany has only 1 chance left, which is the support of C.S. and our corporation[, specifically the protection of the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S., and the membership in our SOPR and our other Societies].

[...]

About the legal situation we do not talk anymore.

And we also already explained that a

are the keys to harmony, continuity, stability, security, and prosperity, and also sustainability, and independency.

[...]".

They all alone or in collaboration created a giant heap of $#!+, which cannot be described in words anymore.

29.May.2025

14:50 UTC+2
F.R.Germany still in LaLaLand

As not expected otherwise.

But there will be no so-called government cloud and digitalization of the bureaucraty without our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR).

And we also repeat once again that no situation exists, including irreparable damages, like in the classic act of capriciousness according to the oftenly quoted story of the salesman (horse trader) Hans Kohlhase of Cölln (now part of Berlin, F.R.Germany) (see also the related novel titled "Michael Kohlhaas" and written by Heinrich von Kleist).
The latest suggestion was a legal case about a building ground of a little town, which was sold for 660.000 Euro to a general construction company, and after 3 or 4 years encumbered with an unreasonably high mortgage of 33 million Euro instead of beginning the construction of the building or conducting the repurchase of the ground to the little town in compliance with the purchase contract, which was then allowed to be entered in the land register by the CDU/CSU clique, so that the owner would only follow the legal clause in the purchase contract to sell it back to the little town, if it also pays the mortgage.

Well, C.S. and our corporation still have the rights and properties, including the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S., and nothing was signed and nothing was sold by us, but only stolen from us and sold at the stock markets.
We already showed how easily the whole crime can be cleared and legal peace can be restored.
And in the cases of for example the companies Enron and Worldcom, which collapsed and went into insolvency in the year 2000, nobody was even thinking about all the shareholders.

Therefore, all legally required actions have to be done at first, and then allowing and licensing the performance and reproduction of certain parts of said original and unique AWs and further IPs. We neither do pervert the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation nor the causality and the sequence of processing in this relation.
And so long, we are also preparing other legal actions, including a prosecution.

17:56, 18:54, 19:41, 20:15, and 21:10 UTC+2
Illegal contracts do not provide legal certainty

For example the license agreement between a media company and an Information and Communication Technology (ICT) company, that implements an illegal plagiarism and fake of a part of our original and unique Ontologic System (OS) by using the (in parts fabricated) website contents of said media company, will become void immediately after our takeover of the majority of company shares of said ICT company, because C.S. is allowed to use said content under the fair use exclusion of the copyright law as the one and only original creator.
In this context, a media company has also to note that terms of service or bylaws, which limit the access to copyrighted news services, as required for our original and unique transformative and new expression of idea, would violate the Sherman Act (see for example the legal case Associated Press v. United States, 326 U.S. 1 (1945)). :þ ©™

Honestly, we have no clue what the company Amazon is trying here with its illegal Alexa 2.0 and next rather stupid act, as we have seen before with for example the company OpenAI.
Showing goodwill and avoiding additional evidences and damage compensations works differently. And a trick only works once, if at all.

In case of a media company, we also have now an evidence of monetary benefit in addition to the evidences of infringements of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation, and we will add the triple of its royalties to our royalites in such a case of conspiracy and other illegal activities.
And about the so-called quality journalism nobody is talking anymore since quite some time.

In the meantime, we get more and more the impression that the media companies and also other entities concerned are beginning to truly understand what we are telling them about the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation, and also the violations of said rights and properties of them since several years and that our explanations and claims truly have substance, significance, and relevance, such as two of the minimum legally required actions of proper referencing respectively citation with attribution and prohibition of interfering with, and also obstructing, undermining, and harm the reputation, integrity, and exclusive exploitation (e.g. commercialization (e.g. monetization)) of our OS. :þ ©™
Howsoever, they all will soon have to sign, pay, comply anyway. Even several governments are interested in resolving this issue, because the legal situation is crystal clear and time is up for many entities concerned.

See also the note

and the other publications cited therein.

By the way:

22:15 and 24:09 UTC+2
SOPR considering reciprocal digital tax actions

Despite better wisdom information, the F.R.Germany has begun the formal process to enact a Digital Service Tax (DST) law, like other countries, such as

and also

We also quote and translate a document of the Scientific Services of the F.R.German Bundestag (federal parliament), which was publicized on the 6th of April 2020: "Digital taxes in the European Union [(EU)]
[...]

3. Current Status of the Introduction of a Digital Tax at EU Level
In 2018, the EU Commission presented a proposal for the introduction of a digital tax. After the directive failed to gain approval in [Economic and Financial Affairs Council (]ECOFIN[)]==Rat [fü]Wirtschaft und Finanzen, Germany and France proposed modifying it so that only income from online advertising would be subject to the digital tax of 3%. However, this proposal also failed to receive the necessary approval from all EU member states.
Therefore, the Commission would first like to await the further negotiation process at [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (]OECD[)] level on the introduction of international minimum taxation and the redistribution of taxing rights within the framework of the so-called two-pillar model [...].
With the international agreement in principle of now 132 states and jurisdictions of the Inclusive Framework on [Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (]BEPS[)], which is set out in the "Statement on a Two-Pillar Solution to Address the Tax Challenges Arising From the Digitalization of the Economy" of the 1st of July 20215, and the subsequent approval by the [Group of 20 (]G20[)] finance ministers and central bank governors at their meeting on the 9th/10th of July 2021 in Venice, the G20 and OECD timetable for an agreement by mid-2021 was met. [The G20 has 19 countries and the European Union (EU) and the African Union (AU) as members).]
"Finally, the statement in the context of Pillar 1 contains a statement [or declaration] on the withdrawal of unilateral measures that individual countries have since introduced to tax large IT groups (primarily including digital services taxes). The states still want to define the details - particularly with regard to determining the relevant date - in more detail. Even if only the "rollback" obligation is explicitly mentioned, a mirror-image "standstill" rule applies: Such special taxes are not to be introduced again in future. These commitments are an essential basis for Pillar 1. Many countries were only prepared to redistribute taxing rights if, in return, the proliferation of uncoordinated unilateral special taxes, that has arisen in recent years, is curtailed, thereby strengthening the stability of the international tax system."

4 Legal Framework for a National Digital Tax in Germany
In the legal assessment of the introduction of a national digital tax, particular attention must be paid to the financial constitutional requirements of the German Basic Law[==GrundGesetz (GG)].
Prof. Ferdinand Kirchhof [Die Digitalsteuer - Was kommt? Kommt sie? Von wem kommt sie?==The Digital Tax - What will come? Will it come? From whom will it come? 2020] sheds light on the [European] Union and constitutional issues in connection with a digital tax in an essay from 2020, Annex 4.
In his essay, Kirchhof explained that a national tax introduction would only be conceivable if the European Union had no competence to set taxes under EU law. The value added tax is harmonized under EU law and is therefore largely beyond the autonomous control of national legislators. Kirchhof therefore only affirms national tax legislation competence for a digital tax in the form of a corporation tax [or corporate income tax]. [(line break added)]
Kirchhof explains that the EU's original plan to create a turnover [or sales] tax has been abandoned. "This means that the federal government has the right to legislate for them in accordance with Art[icle] 105 Para[graph] 2 [of the Basic Law]. [(line break added)]
Articles 106 and 108 [of the Basic Law] regulate the earnings and administration sovereignty according to tax types which, according to constitutional case law, are enumerated there and are not allowed to be extended. A digital service tax must fit into this catalog. As a corporation tax, it finds a basis there in Art. 106 Para. 3 [of the Basic Law]. A new type of tax would therefore not be invented contrary to the principle of enumeration. [(line break added)]
Its revenue would be shared equally between the federal government and the federal states as joint tax in accordance with Art. 106 Para. 3 [of the Basic Law]. The federal states would have to collect it in accordance with Art. 108 Para. 2 and 3 GG by way of commissioned administration, unless Art. 108 Para. 4 and 4a [of the Basic Law] allows a deviation by federal law. In terms of competences, German constitutional law is therefore on safe ground."

Comment
Exactly, the common approach of true tax experts is to tax profits, but not revenues.
Interestingly, if a digital tax is levied on the turnover, sales, or revenue, then it constitutes an increase of the sales tax or Value Added Tax (VAT), which is in the jurisdiction of the European Union, but not in the jurisdiction of a member state. Consequently, the Digital Service Tax (DST) in its actual form of the EU member states listed above seems to be unconstitutional.
Therefore, we recommend that all DSTs in the EU will be abolished and the taxes collected will be restituted, for sure immediately.
We also demand the European Commission (EC) to end all illegal DSTs in the EU and conduct all other legally required actions, for sure also immediately.

A lot of serious annoyance for additional 0.1 to 0.9% of the overall tax revenues, but no overall gain.

Our SOPR is already working for this development since several years, because they always change the rules of the game, move the goal posts, redraws the white lines whenever we have success.
In the end it will be a zero-sum game.

Our SOPR has viable options, such as the

See also the note

31.May.2025

23:00 UTC+2
Further steps

We are short before finishing our clarifications in relation to resilience, Byzantine technologies (Bx), Multiparty Secure Computing (MSC), Verified Computing (VC or VerC), Peer-to-Peer Virtual Machine (P2PVM), Digital Ledger (DL), Digital IDentity (DID), Decentralized Web (DWeb), Web3, etc., and so on.
There are only some minor, but highly complex details left wtih Bx (Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT), Byzantine Quorum System (BQS), Byzantine-Resilient Replication (BRR)), MSC, threshold cryptography, and P2PVM with blockchain technique.

Then we will finish our clarifications in relation to operating system Virtual Machine (osVM), operating system-level Virtualization (osV) or containerization, microVirtual Machine (mVM), Peer-to-Peer Virtual Machine (P2PVM), etc., microServices technologies (mSx), Cloud-native technologie (Cnx), and so on.
There are only some minor, but highly complex details left with VMs.

As we said, we need this to draw the white, yellow, or red line as precise as possible and to build our case as enforceable as possible.