Übrigens:

10:32 UTC+2
C.S. has not to follow whole DSA, DMA, AI Act, etc.

We quote and translate a report, which is about our field of general purpose Bionics and the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act in the European Union (EU) and was publicized on the 31st of July 2025: "Artificial Intelligence: New labeling requirement for companies
Answering questions, writing essays, translations: AI technologies are making more and more everyday tasks easier. As of August 2, any new AI tools that come onto the market and are accessible to the general public must state what content was used to train their knowledge. It must also be documented how the AI model was developed and how copyright is respected when using texts and images. This implements further criteria of an EU regulation that is intended to ensure greater transparency and safety when dealing with AI and sharpen the critical eye of consumers. "AI models that are already in use generally have until August 2027 to adapt to the rules. This is a transitional period," explains the German Chamber of Industry and Commerce [...] in response to a question from [a broadcaster].
The authority responsible for implementing the rules in the EU regulation should also be determined by 2 August. "This has not yet happened. According to the AI Act, this should have happened by the beginning of August 2025. This requires a proper legislative process. We currently assume that the Federal Network Agency will be entrusted with national market supervision," says the [German Chamber of Industry and Commerce ].

Comment
As in the case of the Digital Services Act (DSA) and the Digital Market Act (DMA) in the European Union (EU), C.S. also does not need to follow the European Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act fully and completely, when performing and reproducing the original and unique works of art created by C.S., including our original and unique

This is art of C.S. and fair use of copyrighted work by us, but not of and not by others, that implement illegal plagiarisms and fakes of the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S., and governments, plagiarists, or any other entities are not allowed to interfere with, and also obstruct, undermine, and harm the basic rights (e.g. freedom of expression and property (e.g. copyright and digital assets)) and the moral rights (e.g. exploitation rights (e.g. commercialization rights (e.g. monetization rights))) of C.S..

We also note that a fraudulent and even serious criminal company with its illegal partial plagiarism and fake of our OM, OP, OC, and OB only lost the part of the lawsuit, which is related to its illicit method of procurement of training data, but not the fair use exemption/clause.
"The person who copies textbooks from pirate sites has infringed copyright, end of debate. This decision also rejects [a company]'s claim that the use of the copies (...) can be excused simply because some of them will one day be used to train LLM. This decision doubts that there is any copyright infringer, who could ever clear the hurdle of explaining why downloading from pirate sites of copies he could have purchased or otherwise legally obtained was reasonably necessary for any subsequent fair use." [This argument of the judge is also not reasonable. In case of fair use the source of an original work is irrelevant. But the use of a pirate site might be illegal in general.]"
But such a fair use violates the moral rights respectively Lanham (Trademark) rights and the copyrights of C.S. and our corporation.

See also the note

We also note that since more than 2 decades the European Commission (EC) and the member states of the European Union (EU) showed clearly that they never wanted a compromise, also known as deal, with C.S. and our corporation in favour of bending laws and ignoring basic rights.
Therefore, our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) closed our Ontologic System (OS) in the member states of the EU since the 1st of August 2025, which means that no other entity has the allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our OS, including the AI technologies regulated by the AI Act.
Obviously, the latter renders the whole AI Act as obsolete. C.S. does not need to follow it, and the others are not allowed to do anything, which is regulated by it.

See also the notes

By the way:

03.August.2025

15:24 UTC+2
Lying press is permanently flipping the board

The lying press is saying that flipping the board is the rule of the game and is required as a foundational function of democracy. The credo is "Truth is replaced by propaganda".

Not even 1 report in relation to the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. and its provenance is true. We spent most of our time with documenting the

broadly enough since November 2006 so that the truth can be researched, reconnected, and reestablished completely at a later point in time. Much of the relevant material is publicized on this website of OntomaX, including many of the most significant evidences and causal links, and a lot more is archieved elsewhere.
All those reports by the lying press and the commercial marketing are made up and manipulated, or repeating the fabricated crap, but are always pointing in the direction of the same bad actors and even directly on the them.
A strong leader would already have fired the whole gang, because democracy does not function it that way or otherwise is only a mythical narrative for the stupid mass, though opponents took an alternative variant called social media.

In that regard, King Donald is only playing by the rules and only doing what most dirty fellows are doing each and every day, that is presenting a narrative, which fits best with their individuality, philosophy, ideology, subjectivity, and opportunity, and also democracy.

04.August.2025

17:22 UTC+2
Next option for resolution of big issue

At first, we quote a report: "[An entrepreneur] receives [a manufacturer] shares for 29 billion dollars
[A manufacturer] boss [...] is receiving another block of shares in his company worth 29 billion dollars. According to documents published by the [...] manufacturer today, [an entrepreneur] will have to pay 23.34 dollars per share for each of the 96 million shares, which corresponds to the exercise price of his share compensation program from 2018. [A manufacturer]'s current share price is 302 dollars. [...]"

Comment
Excellent. This specific approach of compensation

• restoration of rights, integrities, and reputations,
• restitution of properties, and
• reconstitution of momenta, as well as follow-up opportunities

of C.S. and our corporation can be completely resolved in general and

So for example, companies could become subjects to the obligation to buy back their shares and sell them to C.S. for the price on the 1st of January 2014. :)
Indeed, C.S. does not have to buy the shares of our own corporation at the stock markets, but the entities, that violated said rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation, as we also discussed correctly in the Further steps of the 14th of March 2025.

We also concluded once again, that new companies would have to be established as Joint Ventures (JVs) with C.S. respectively our corporation would receive an amount of company shares in accordance with the results of the standard industry-proven examination and assessment methods regarding the

and the respective Joint Venture Partners (JVPs) would receive the rest of company shares representing the true value of their core businesses.
To make this happen, trusts would have to be resolved, for example in case of the company Meta (Facebook).

But we are not sure, if and how the various options respectively approaches are combined.
One important issue, that comes to mind, is the amount of shares a

to fulfill the minimal limits set by stock market operators. In these cases, one would have more flexibility to design a viable and legal solution.

In this relation, we are once again wondering that governments do not interfere in the publication of fabricated news and reports by the lying press, specifically their public-law broadcasters respectively state-controlled propaganda media, and instead let the public run into the open knife and grap into the falling knife.

18:43 and 26:32 UTC+2
Demokratiefeinde zappeln in selbstgestellter Falle

Wir zitieren einen Bericht über das partielle Plagiat des Unternehmens Palantir Technologies, der am 23. Juli.2025 veröffentlich wurde: "[...]
"Es ist eine Lehre aus dem Nationalsozialismus, dass wir keine 'Superdatenbanken' haben, auf die wiederum 'Superbehörden' zugreifen können."
[Ein] Kriminologe

"Um das zu verhindern ist die Zusammenführung von bestimmten Daten sogar gesetzlich untersagt. Davon kann es in begründeten Fällen Ausnahmen geben, aber es muss sich dann eben um besondere Ausnahmen handeln und nicht um Regelverfahren", sagt [ein Kriminologe] zu [einer öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunkanstalt]. [Siehe die StrafProzessOrdnung (StPO).]

[...]

[Sebastian] Fiedler[, innenpolitischer Sprecher der SPD-Bundestagsfraktion] kritisiert, dass man noch keine eigene Alternative zu Palantir-Software entwickelt habe. "Es geht hier um eine Schlüsseltechnologie für die Sicherheitsbehörden", so Fiedler, der bis 2021 Vorsitzender des Bundes Deutscher Kriminalbeamter war.
Eine Abschaltung der Palantir-Systeme in den drei Bundesländern sei keine Lösung, bevor es eine gute Alternative gebe, betont Fiedler. "Neue Verträge wie in Baden-Württemberg oder geplante Vertragsverlängerungen für fünf Jahre wie in NRW halte ich hingegen für verantwortungslos.""

Kommentar
Es gibt diese Lösung als Original schon seit 2006 unter anderem mit den entsprechenden Ontologischen SystemKomponenten (OSK) von unserem Ontologischen System (OS). Palantir Technologies hat hier nicht das Rad beziehungsweise die Datenbank neu erfunden, sondern genauso wie viele andere Unternehmen einfach Teile von unserem OS implementiert (siehe auch zum Beispiel OpenAI ChatGPT, Meta (Facebook) Meta AI und Co.)
Deshalb wird Palantir Technologies auch schon seit einiger Zeit auf der schwarzen Liste von unserer Gesellschaft für Ontologische Aufführung und Reproduktion (GOAR) geführt.

Des Weiteren wird unter anderem wegen einer Fülle von schwerkriminellen Handlungen, insbesondere Investitionsbetrug, Konspiration und Korruption, unser originales und einzigartiges Ontologisches System (OS) mit der Zustimmung und im Namen von C.S. von unserer GOAR exklusiv weltweit wirtschaftlich verwertet, verwaltet und betrieben. Eine gesetzlich vorgeschriebene Erlaubnis und Lizensierung für die Aufführung und Reproduktion von bestimmten Teilen von unserem Ontologischen System ist aussichtslos. Es gibt also keine legal Software von anderen Entitäten, die auf unserem OS basiert.

Außerdem hat es offensichtlich gute Gründe, warum in Europa solch eine Software-Lösung nicht angeboten wird: Sie ist verfassungswidrig und wiederspricht dem Schutz der Demokratie.

Die Abschaltung wird in wenigen Monaten aufgrund der umfangreichen Verletzungen der Rechte und Eigentümer von C.S. und unserem Unternehmen sowie der Bundesgesetze erfolgen.

Wir zitieren einen Bericht über die Abgeordneten Saskia Ludwig von der Partei CDU/CSU: "[...]
Die Unionsfraktion im Bundestag geht auf Distanz zu ihrer Abgeordneten Saskia Ludwig. Im Netz kursieren Fotos, die die CDU-Politikerin im augenscheinlich freundlichen Austausch mit AfD-Chefin Alice Weidel auf einer Veranstaltung in Ungarn zeigen. Ein Sprecher Ludwigs bestätigte: Ludwig nahm an dem Festival des Mathias-Corvinus-Collegiums (MCC) Anfang August teil. Die rechte Denkfabrik MCC gilt als Kaderschmiede der ungarischen Regierung von Rechtspopulist Viktor Orban.
Eine Sprecherin der Unionsfraktion stellte nun klar: "Frau Ludwig hat an der Veranstaltung nicht im Auftrag der Fraktion und ohne Wissen der Fraktionsführung teilgenommen." Sie betonte den Unvereinbarkeitsbeschluss mit der [Alternative für Deutschland (]AfD[)], der weiter gelte und jede Zusammenarbeit ausschließe. "An diesen ist jedes CDU-Mitglied gebunden."
Auch Ludwigs Landesverband, die CDU Brandenburg, verwies auf den Beschluss. "Das gilt so lange, bis ein Bundesparteitag etwas anderes beschließt", sagte Generalsekretär Gordon Hoffmann. Dafür sehe er "nicht einmal ansatzweise die Mehrheiten".

Festival mit Orban und Thiel
Die Brandenburger CDU-Politikerin war laut MCC-Internetseite beim Podium mit dem Titel "Eine neue Regierung in unsicheren weltpolitischen Gewässern" am 1. August in Budapest dabei. Dabei traf sie den Bildern zufolge auch auf Weidel.
Die Denkfabrik und Bildungseinrichtung MCC importiert unter anderem Ideen rechter Publizisten aus den USA. Beim Festival war laut [eine gesellschaftliche Medienplattform]-Seite des MCC Orban zu Gast, ebenso Tech-Milliardär Peter Thiel, der bekannt für rechtskonservative Positionen ist.

[...]"

Kommentar
Warum CDU/CSU-geführte Bundesländer immer noch an der illegalen Recherche- und Analyse-Software des Unternehmens Palantir Technologies festhalten anstatt auch hier einen Unvereinbarkeitsbeschluss zu erwirken und sich eindeutig von diesen rechtspopulistischen Tendenzen zu distanzieren, ist nicht mehr nachvollziehbar.

Wir halten auch noch einmal fest, dass es gar keine rechtliche Basis für öffentliche Ausschreibungen und Beschaffungen von Teilen von unserem Ontologischen System (OS) geben kann, da es durch Gesetze weltweit geschützt ist und mit der Zustimmung und im Namen von C.S. von unserer Gesellschaft für Ontologische Aufführung und Reproduktion (GOAR) exklusiv weltweit wirtschaftlich verwertet, verwaltet und betrieben wird.

Siehe auch die Mitteilungen

und die anderen darin referenzierten Publikationen.

22:02 UTC+2
Serious issue with Norway's use of illegal Palantir

Norway and also the European Union (EU) have a serious problem due to the use of the illegal partial plagiarism and fake of our original and unique Ontologic System (OS) by the company Palantir Technologies.

Data protected in the EU is connected in Norway by its customs.

05.August.2025

00:00 UTC+2
Comment of the Day

"The America we knew was never existing.", [C.S., Today]

21:42 UTC+2
SOPR’s Net-Zero Goals Are Looking Fine

We do not know about what all those self-promoters, attention seekers, and dirty fellows are talking about.

22:12 and 23:11 UTC+2
Thinking Machines Lab blacklisted

This case is not self-explanatory, but self-explanatory, because it shows all general fraudulent and serious criminal behaviour patterns and therefore our predictive policing system says 100% violation of the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation.
We even do not need to start the computer for this conclusion.

See also the

By the way:

06.August.2025

15:11 UTC+2
Cisco blacklisted

See also the notes

and the other publications cited therein.

All those companies have no legal security in relation to the fields of

but we have the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S., including our

And we get our network equipement from our subsidiary and our OntoLab.

16:37 UTC+2
U.S. Army put foxes in charge of henhouse

We quote a report, which is about the U.S.American Army, and was publicized on the 5th of August 2025 (yesterday): "[...]
[Image caption:] Andrew Bosworth, Meta’s chief technology officer; Bob McGrew, an adviser at Thinking Machines Lab [(founded by Mira Murati, former chief technology officer of OpenAI) and OpenAI’s former chief research officer; Shyam Sankar, Palantir’s chief technology officer; and Kevin Weil, OpenAI’s chief product officer at a military ceremony in June[, or being more precise, the 250th Birthday of the U.S. Army Grand Military Parade and Celebration on the 13th of June 2025].
[...]
"Protecting democracies is important," said [...] a managing partner at [...] a venture capital firm in San Francisco that invests in defense and security technology. "You have bad authoritarians out there who don’t believe in borders."
[...]
"Investing in defense technology is both necessary and urgent," David Ulevitch, a general partner at Andreessen Horowitz, said in a statement. "Technological superiority is a requirement for a strong democracy.
[...]"

Comment
After fear of economical dominance of the P.R.China, followed by the fear human extinsion and the demand for regulation, followed by the demand for no regulation, the fear of technological dominance of the P.R.China and the fear of fraud, followed by the fear of political interference of the P.R.China, those fraudsters and serious criminals in the field of Bionics (e.g. Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Computational Intelligence (CI), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Evolutionary Computing (EC), Fuzzy Logic (FL), Computer Vision (CV), Computer Audition (CA), Agent-Based System (ABS), Multi-Agent System (MAS), Holonic Agent System (HAS), Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AAI) (note that ABS, MAS, etc. are already AI), Cognitive Agent System (CAS or CogAS), Swarm Intelligence (SI), etc.) have a new topic, which is the protection of democracy as self-styled and marketed true patriots.

Others and we are slightly irritated by that irrationality and hyprocrisy and question its veracity. It is like looking at a painting of Salvador Dali, while having to accept that this is happening in reality.

Soldiers are pi$$ed off, because those patriots respectively cosplayers jumped the career ladder and were awared the senior officer rank of a lieutenant colonel (typically commands a battalion having 300 to 1,200 Soldiers or Marines) by that Public Relation (PR) stunt.

Beware of Meta (Facebook), OpenAI, Palantir Technologies, and Anduril Industries, and also Space Exploration Technologies, X.AI Corproation, Nvidia, Softbank, and Co.. They are definitely not interested in democracy.

That is definitely the new low.

Also keep in mind that none of them gets the allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our Ontologic System (OS).
And we even do not need to talk anymore about the

specifically the

• Bionics (e.g. Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Computational Intelligence (CI), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Evolutionary Computing (EC), Fuzzy Logic (FL), Computer Vision (CV), Computer Audition (CA), Agent-Based System (ABS), Multi-Agent System (MAS), Holonic Agent System (HAS), Cognitive Agent System (CAS or CogAS), Swarm Intelligence (SI), etc.), Cybernetics, Robotics, Ontonics (BCRO),
• Agent-Based operating system (ABos) with Peer-to-Peer Virtual Machine (P2PVM), operating system Virtual Machine (osVM), operating system-level Virtualization (osV) or containerization, microVirtual Machine (mVM), operating system-level Sandbox (osS) or container sandbox, container orchestration, Network Virtualization (NV), Software-Defined Networkign (SDN), microService-Oriented Architecture (mSOA), Cloud Computing (CC), Cloud, Edge, and Fog Computing (CEFC), Cloud-native technologies (Cnx), etc.,
• Polygon(al) Data(base) Model (PDM) with Bionics, Cybernetics, Robotics, Ontonics (BCRO), Global Brain (GB), Semantic (World Wide) Web (SWWW), etc.
• Arrow System (AS) with Machine Learning (ML), Computational Intelligence (CI), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Evolutionary Computing (EC), Fuzzy Logic (FL), Computer Vision (CV), Computer Audition (CA), Holonic Agent System (HAS), Cognitive Agent System (CAS or CogAS), Swarm Intelligence (SI), etc.,
• AS, PDM, etc. with P2PVM, osVM, osV, mVM, osS, NV, SDN, mSOA, CC, CEFC, Cnx, etc.,
• AS, PDM, etc. with Artificial Neural Network Model (ANNM), Reflective Artificial Neural Network Model (RANNM), Feedback Artificial Neural Network Model (FANNM), Artificial Neural Network General Purpose Model (ANNGPM), Artificial Neural Network MultiModal Model (ANNMMM), including Foundation Model (FM), General Purpose Language Model (GPLM), Global Language Model (GLM), Large Language Model (LLM), Ultra Large Language Model (ULLM), Large Language Model (LLM) on a World Wide Web (WWW) scale, Reasoning Language Model (RLM), Large MultiModal Model (LMMM), Large Action Model (LAM), etc.,
• AS, PDM, etc. with eXtended Mixed Reality (XMR or XR), Augmented Reality (AR), Augmented Virtuality (AV), Virtual Reality (VR), Virtual Environment (EV), Metaverse (Mv), etc.,
• CC, CEFC, Cnx, etc. with XR, AR, AV, VR, VE, Mv, etc.,
• ANNM, RANNM, FNNM, ANNGPM, ANNMMM, FM, GPLM, GLM, LLM, ULLM, RLM, LMMM, LAM, etc. with XR, AR, AV, VR, VE, Mv, etc.,
• Ontoscope (Os) with etc., and also
• etc., etc., etc. with etc., etc., etc.,

and

See also the

08.August.2025

03:01 UTC+2
New OpenAI OM (ANNGPM) is also saturated

The new version of the Artificial Neural Network General Purpose Model (ANNGPM), or being more precise, the new plagiarism and fake of our original and unique graph-based, coherent, foundational, general purpose, model-reflective Ontologic Model (OM) of the company OpenAI has also satured, as we have calculated in 2003 or 2004 already.
Instead of Geoffrey E. Hinton, they should have followed A. Noam Chomsky.

They all are totally overrated by a factor of 100 and have problems with the costs, the hype, and the bubble, which they want to solve with more marketing blah blah blah and more stealing from others and us.
Well, their total destruction has already begun. :)

See also the notes

06:22 and 14:33 UTC+2
Ontonics Blitz Fund I #34.4.19

In the last weeks, we looked at new regulations in relation to New Energy™ and Green and Clean™ technologies, specifically the ones of the government of the U.S.America, and eventually came to the conclusion that our Superbolt #4 Electric Power (EP) of the Blitz Fund I only needs to make some minor adjustments to its schedule.

Even better, we added a new variant of a basic component, which allows the utilization of another basic component and the operation of the overall system in a much more broader way than we had designed initially.

11.August.2025

10:18 UTC+2
Northern Data blacklisted

This case is self-explanatory.

13.August.2025

01:25, 11:46, and 13.01 UTC+2
Google Chrome already has new owner

See also the related messages, notes, explanations, clarifications, investigations, and claims, specifically

and the other publications cited therein.

By the way:

14.August.2025

10:50 UTC+2
Altparteien und Propagandamedien attackieren Grundrechte

Wir zitieren einen Bericht: "Wenn das Finanzamt die Steuererklärung macht
Die Frist zur Abgabe der Steuererklärung 2024 ist abgelaufen. Jetzt steigt der Stress für alle, die es nicht geschafft haben. Einigen tausend Betroffenen in Hessen macht das Finanzamt ein bundesweit bislang einmaliges Angebot.

Ihre abschreckende Wirkung haben der Hauptvordruck Est 1A und seine Anlagen AB, KAP, R oder V nicht verloren. Bevor sie sich im Labyrinth solcher Formulare genervt verirren, haben viele Menschen ihre Einkommenssteuererklärung für 2024 lieber noch gar nicht abgeben.
Stichtag war der 31. Juli. Mehrere tausend Bürgerinnen und Bürger aus Nordhessen, die ihn verstreichen ließen, erhalten bald Post vom Staat. Mit der üblichen Erinnerung an die Abgabepflicht und einer letzten Frist kommt die Finanzverwaltung ihnen diesmal nicht.
Den säumigen Bürgerinnen und Bürgern will das Finanzamt Kassel mit einem für Deutschland bislang einmaligem Angebot das Leben vielmehr leichter machen - und sich selbst auch. "Die Steuer macht jetzt das Amt", heißt das Motto.
Das Konzept des Pilotprojekts wird Hessens Finanzminister Alexander Lorz (CDU) am Donnerstagmittag in Wiesbaden vorstellen. Das Papier liegt [einem ö,ffentlich-rechtlichen Propagandamedium] vor.

Automatisierter Steuerbescheid als Vorschlag
Bei den Ausgewählten des Testlaufs handelt es sich um Arbeitnehmer, die keinen Steuerberater haben. Für sie füllt das Finanzamt die Steuererklärungen der Einfachheit halber gleich selbst aus. Das geht ohne viel Aufwand elektronisch. Wichtige Daten über Lohn, Rente oder Versicherungen lägen aufgrund von Meldepflichten ja ohnehin vor, heißt es.
Auf dieser Basis geht ein erster automatisierte Steuerbescheid heraus - als "Vorschlag". Wer unzufrieden ist, weil ihm die Nachzahlung zu hoch oder die Rückerstattung zu gering scheint, kann über die digitale Finanzamt-Plattform Elster nachträglich Ausgaben geltend machen. Die Behörde prüft das und versendet erst dann die amtliche Festsetzung.
Ist der regionale Test erfolgreich, will die Landesregierung den Service in ganz Hessen anbieten. Dann sollen die Finanzämter allen eine bereits ausgefüllte Steuererklärung liefern, von denen sie die dafür nötigen Informationen zu haben glauben. In Ländern wie Österreich und Schweden ist das Prinzip bereits geübte Praxis.

Auch ein Ziel der Bundesregierung
Mit dem Plan, solchen Vorbildern nachzueifern, liegt die CDU/SPD-Landesregierung auf einer Linie mit der schwarz-roten Bundesregierung. In deren Koalitionsvertrag sind weitreichende Steuervereinfachungen geplant. Ein erklärtes Ziel ist auch, dass in einfachen Fällen "vorausgefüllte und automatisierte Steuererklärungen ausgeweitet werden".
Schon vor dem Start des Pilotprojekts spricht das Finanzministerium in Wiesbaden von einem "echten Service, der die Entbürokratisierung und Digitalisierung vorantreibt". Dort ist man sicher: Angesichts des komplizierten Steuersystems und der Masse an benötigen Daten werden viele Bürger hocherfreut sein, wenn sie die Last der selbst erstellten Steuererklärung für immer los sind.
Die Deutsche Steuergewerkschaft, die das Personal der Finanzverwaltung vertritt, ist für das Vorhaben von Hessens Finanzminister Lorz schon längst zu haben. Gewerkschaftschef Florian Köbler forderte erst Mitte Juli in [einem Propagandamedienunternehmen], die Steuererklärung für Arbeitnehmer endlich abzuschaffen.
Die Bearbeitung binde in den Finanzämtern viele Ressourcen, obwohl "hier wenig Potenzial für großen Steuerbetrug und Mehreinnahmen" bestehe, sagte Köbler. Die Steuerverwaltung müsse schon 2030 wegen des Fachkräftemangels mit rund einem Drittel weniger Personal auskommen."

Kommentar
Tja, genau diese Form des automatisierten Massendatenabgleiches beziehungsweise der automatisierten Massendatenzusammenführung ist in der B.R.Deutschland nicht nur in der Polizeistation im Rahmen der übergeordneten StrafProzessOrdnung (StPO), sondern auch im Finanzamt aufgrund des übergeordneten allgemeinen Persönlichkeitsrechtes, der informationellen Selbstbestimmung und des Datenschutzes verboten.
Für solche Fälle gibt es eine legale Lösung, die aber Teil der urheberechtlich geschützten Kunstwerke von C.S. ist. :)
Und für deren Aufführung und Vervielfältigung muss der Staat die Erlaubnis und Lizensierung durch unserer Gesellschaft für Ontologische Aufführung und Vervielfältigung (GOAR) erhalten, was er aber seit 25 Jahren ablehnt.

Auch die Argumentation ist nur noch hirnlos, denn hier wird lediglich das Symptom aber nicht die Ursache der mittlerweile vollkommen überzogenen Bürokratie behandelt.

Und offensichtlich gilt auch hier: Wenn ein Dienst umsonst ist, dann bezahlt man mit seinen Daten.

Wir haben einen viel besseren Vorschlag: Die Einkommenssteuer einfach abschaffen. So geht das. Und von so einem Bürokratieabbau spricht der Souverän, das Volk und nicht von noch mehr Datenerhebung und der Gläsernen Gesellschaft.

13:00 UTC+2
SOPR reminds of obligatory actions

Obligatory actions, unless otherwise specified:

Our SOPR is working on the legal details in relation to the

15.August.2025

07:48 UTC+2
OFinS coins becoming new standard

Our Ontologic Financial System (OFinS) with its

• Ontologic Payment System (OPS or OntoPay),
• Ontologic Payment Processing System (OPPS),
• Ontologic Exchange (OEx, OntoEx, or OntoExchange), and
• Ontologic Bank Financial Information and Communications (OBFIC or OntoBankFinIC),

and also

always was, is, and will be ahead, specifically in relation to the era of Cyrptocat Banking or Cryptocrap Banking.

But all others have to make all mistakes with dead coins, like for example Bitcoin, stablecoin, etc., that can be made, at first.

08:28, 10:54, and 16:09 UTC+2
Zuckerberg shows his true face more and more

We quote and translate a first report: "Meta let its AI flirt with children
According to internal documents, the Facebook parent company Meta has at times granted its AI chatbot great freedom in its dealings with children. This is according to internal guidelines obtained by the news agency [...]. According to this, the Artificial Intelligence (AI) was allowed to "engage children in romantic or sensual conversations" and also spread false information and racist stereotypes. The 200-page guide permitted and prohibited behaviors of the software."

Comment
We all do know for many years that Meta (Facebook) deliberately does not protect children.

We quote a second report: "Right-wing activist Robby Starbuck joins Meta as an AI advisor focused on 'bias’"

Comment
One must laugh, then cry, and then laugh again, because it is all too sad.
And one of the questions is if he should reduce unwanted bias or amplify right-wing bias or do both.

We quote a third report: "Instagram users angry and confused as Meta overturns yet more account bans
Instagram users have told the BBC of their confusion, fear and anger after having their accounts suspended, often for being wrongly accused by parent company Meta of breaching the platform's child sex abuse rules.
For months, tens of thousands of people around the world have been complaining Meta has been banning their Instagram and Facebook accounts in error.
They say they have been wrongly accused of breaching site rules - including around child sexual exploitation.
[...]
Over 36,000 people have signed a petition accusing Meta of falsely banning accounts; thousands more are in [another social network platform] forums or on social media posting about it.
Their central accusation - Meta's AI is unfairly banning people, with the tech also being used to deal with the appeals. The only way to speak to a human is to pay for Meta Verified, and even then many are frustrated.
Meta has not commented on these claims. Instagram states AI is central to its "content review process" and Meta has outlined how technology and humans enforce its policies."
[...]"

Comment
Well, some things should not exist.

13:29, 15:39, and 18:34 UTC+2
So, so, AI infrastructure company Cisco

And Conversational Artificial Intelligence (AI) Agent, which are all based on Reasoning Language Model (RLM) and running in the Cloud, and therefore are all based on illegal plagiarisms and fakes of our Ontologic Model (OM) and our Ontologic roBot (OB or OntoBot) and our Ontologic Net (ON) and our Ontologic Web (OW) of our Ontoverse (Ov) and New Reality (NR) and our Ontologic System (OS) and our Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) and our Ontologic System Components (OSC) and our infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies and our other original and unique, copyrighted and prohibited for fair use works of art created by C.S..

So, so, our Creatures of the News Networks (CNN), The Fake News Leader, now designated the company Cisco as an AI infrastructure company, which is an Ontologic Net (ON) company, which exists only one time, which implies Cisco is a subsidiary of our corporation, though we are working on the obligatory actions, including the

See also the related messages, notes, explanations, clarifications, investigations, and claims, specifically

20.August.2025

14:49 UTC+2
ChatGPT and Co. unauthorized modifications of OS

Recently, certain entities are trying to present their plagiarisms and fakes as

• Emotion-Expressing Artificial Intelligence (EExpAI) and
• Emotion-Detecting Artificial Intelligence (EDetAI),

based on our Feebback Neural Net Models (FNNM) (e.g. Reasoning Language Model (RLM)).
In addition, the utilization of their plagiarisms and fakes by hundred millions of users is emphasized.

No fair use, even not for the benefit of the public, as is the case with freedom of choice, innovation, and competition, essential facility, and so on, because their plagiarisms and fakes of the related parts of our original and unique

are just only modifications of the orginal and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. and their performance and reproduction have as customers exactly the members of the addressed and interested public of said orginal and unique AWs and further IPs created by C.S..

One can also describe the situation by the following metapher:
C.S. has started to paint a picture and to discuss the new work, new topic, new style, new canvas, new paint, new brush, and so on, which by the way also belong to the overall expression of idea and the oeuvre of C.S. and are also protected by the moral rights and the copyrights.
What the others did was stealing the grounded canvas with the complete sketch and the coloured areas, and also the self-created tools and utilities, and continued with painting the picture of C.S.' as they saw C.S. is doing or thought C.S. would do. That is not a new expression of idea. Even when overpainting the already existing work, the original expression of idea or work of art created by C.S. is still below and constitutes the foundation of the illegal modification.
They also hijacked the discussion, captured, abducted, and mislead the members of the addressed and interested public, and started to sell the unfinished original, the plagiarisms and fakes, and the reproductions. That is not a legitimate business practice.

The same holds for what is wrongly and illegally called smartphone, smartcar, cloud, metaverse, and so on.

23.August.2025

01:08 UTC+2
SOPR takes more measures

Our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) takes more measures to adapt to various new findings and developments.

Our SOPR would also like to remind once again that only Joint Venture Partners (JVP) controlled by our corporation in the

from the 1st of August 2025 and

from the 1st of November 2025
get the allowance and licensing for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S..

Furthermore, unauthorized utilization (e.g. military since January 2023, blacklisted company since ever) results in the demand to pay 300% or the triple amount of the respective royalty (e.g. authorized civil use 20%, unauthorized civil use (e.g. Palantir Technologies) and unauthorized military use 60%) or blacklisting or both.

See also the notes

and the other publications cited therein.

17:08 UTC
Screenshots of the Day

2025 S&P 500 Growth Year-To-Date, 17th of August 2025

© :I

60% of the S&P 500 stock market growth year-to-date in 2025 was the result of companies, that have

in an attempt to get the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies, and also other parts of our corporation under their control, both without authorization and as part of serious criminal activities.

Also note that this is another court-prove evidence for the examination and assessment of the higher of apportioned triple royalty, profit, and value as part of the payment of damage compensations and another crystal clear argument in any further arrangement.

We also add to the list the companies

to name just some few of them.

Contribution to US GDP Growth, 17th of August 2025

© :I

The contribution to the U.S.American Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth by this spending on Bionics (e.g. Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Computational Intelligence (CI), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Evolutionary Computing (EC), Fuzzy Logic (FL), Computer Vision (CV), Computer Audition (CA), Agent-Based System (ABS), Multi-Agent System (MAS), Holonic Agent System (HAS), Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AAI) (note that ABS, MAS, etc. are already AI), Cognitive Agent System (CAS or CogAS), Swarm Intelligence (SI), etc.) exceeded the consumer spending in 2025.

Also note in this conjunction that this overall situation and this specific contribution depend on the profits and investments of several companies (e.g. hardware manufacturers, such as Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Intel, Broadcom, Cisco), that again depend on the profits and investments of several other companies (e.g. service providers, such as Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet (Google), Oracle, Salesforce, Meta (Facebook)), that again depend on the goodwill and decision making of C.S. and our corporation (e.g. Ontonics and Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR)). :)

18:26 UTC+2
Comment of the Day

"Data protection is victim protection", [C.S., Today]

"Datenschutz ist Opferschutz", [C.S., Heute]

25.August.2025

20:40 UTC+2
OB (Meta (Fb) AI) on ON (Alphabet (Google) GCP)

Ontologic roBot (OB or OntoBot)
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Ontologic Net (ON or OntoNet)
Google Cloud Platform (GCP)
Ontologic System (OS)
Ontoverse (Ov)

All those contracts are void and all such actions do not change the legal situation and the decision of C.S. and our corporation.

There is only one OS and Ov.

See also the notes

and the other publications cited therein.

26.August.2025

01:21 UTC+2
Replit blacklisted

This case is self-explanatory.
What is wrongly and illegally called vibe coding is included in for example our Ontologic Programming (OP) and Ontologic Computing (OC) paradigms.

The adaption of the illegal Model Context Protocol (MCP) is prohibited.

01:22, 02:14, and 03:00 UTC+2
MCP 100% copyright infringement

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is illegal Free and Open Source Software (FOSS), obviously, doubtlessly, and definitely.

our original and unqiue Evolutionary operating system Architecture (EosA) and our original and unique Ontologic System Architecture and Ontologic System Components (OSC) with their creation, compilation, integration, unification, fusion, etc. of the fields of

• eXtensible Markup Language-Remote Procedure Call (XML-RPC) later SOAP (formerly Simple Object Access Protocol) (see also the rest of the web service protocol stack),
  • JavaScript Object Notation-Remote Procedure Call (JSON-RPC),

• Logic Model (LM of LogM),
• Logic Probabilistic Model (LPM) or Probabilistic Logic Model (PLM),
• Capability and Operational Model (COM),
• Foundational Model (FM),
• Reflective Artificial Neural Network Model (RANNM), Feedback Neural Network Model (FNNM),
• Artificial Neural Network Language Model (ANNLM),
• Artificial Neural Network General Purpose Model (ANNGPM), including
  • Foundation Model (FM),
  • General Purpose Language Model (GPLM),
  • Global Language Model (GLM),
  • Large Language Model (LLM),
  • Reasoning Language Model (RLM),
• Artificial Neural Network MultiModal Model (ANNMMM), including
  • Foundation Model (FM),
  • Large MultiModal Model (LMMM),
  • MultiModal Large Language Model (MMLLM),
• etc.

• (algorithmic) transformative, generative, and creative Bionics, including
  • generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI)
• bidirectional Bridge from Natural Intelligence (NI) to Artificial Intelligence (AI) (Bridge from NI to AI),
• prompt engineering, forming, shaping, configuring respectively cognitive processing, educating, teaching, learning, etc., or being more precise,
• forming, shaping, configuring respectively cognitive processing, educating, teaching, learning, etc. an ANNM by so-called prompt engineering (here also called question-answering problem over a context) respectively
• modifying, forming an ontological frame (here also called context) by adding an (agent, user) ontology (here also called questioning as part of prompting) (see also model-level reflection and interaction, and ontological relativism, including Cybernetic Logic (CL or CybL) (e.g. Contextual Logic (CL or ContextL), formalized context or formalized contextual dependence, or context transcendence formalization, or context as formal object, etc.)) respectively
• cognitive processing, educating, teaching, learning, operation, etc.,

• Ontologic Model-Based Autonomous System (OMBAS),
• Conversational Artificial Intelligence (CAI or ConAI),
• (Graph-Based) (Information) Retrieval Augmented Generation ((GB) (I)RAG),
• AI-powered Search Engine or AI Search Engine (AISE)
• AI-powered chatbot or AI chatbot,
• AI-powered assistant or AI assistant, or intelligent assistant,
• Collaborative Artificial Intelligence (CAI or ColAI) or collaborative Artificial Intelligence (AI) service,
• etc.,

• OntoBlender and
• Ontologic Computer-Aided Design (OntoCAD),

based on a whole new system architecture, integrating Ontologic System Architecture (OSA), which

Also note once again that for example the

do not have any (legal respectively authorized) relation to

which all were related with each other with our Evoos and coherent OM,

which all were created with our Evoos,

which all came with our Evoos and our OS.

Correspondingly, many companies have exactly the same foundational legal problem, like for example

That illegal MCP will be removed in and substituted with the only legal implementation of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) As Soon As Possible Or Better Said Immediately (ASAPOBSI).

There will also be no MCP steering committee, because we already do have our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR), as we also decided before in case of the Linux Foundation, Apache Foundation, and other Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) organizations (see also the Clarification #2 of the 22nd of November 2019 and all the related publications on OntomaX).

That whole activity is very revealing in general and quite conspicuous in particular, because it has been implemented and integrated easily, and adapted and integrated directly, and both has been done so straightforwardly and rapidly. It smells like another act of conspiration, as seen before with for example

Eventually, the rationale of all entities concerned is once again shockingly thin, incredibly blunt, highly chaotic, and extremely disappoiting, as usual, and has absolutely nothing in common with a rule-based law and order environmen and the freedom of choice, innovation, and competition pro bono public==for the benefit of the public.

Howsoever, the

are further evidences that our Evoos and our OS are sui generis works of art, which means that the worldwide copyright protection in whole or in part is effective.

And that next scandal also shows once again why the Fair, Reasonable, And Non-Discriminatory, As well as Customary (FRANDAC) Terms of Service (ToS) with the License Model (LM), Transaction Fee Model (TFM), and Main Contractor Model (MCM) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) are already cast in stone, while 100% is 100% is 100%. Maximal damages demands maximal compensations, the higher of apportioned triple royalty, profit, and value.

See also the related messages, notes, explanations, clarifications, investigations, and claims, specifically

and the other publications cited therein.

By the way:

01:42 UTC+2
Sourcegraph blacklisted

The adaption of the illegal Model Context Protocol (MCP) is prohibited and also has consequences for the legality of its Sourcegraph Cloud.

03:16 UTC+2
Wix.com blacklisted

The utilization of our generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI) and the adaption of the illegal Model Context Protocol (MCP) is prohibited and also has consequences for the legality of its Artificial Design Intelligence (ADI) and AI web builder.

05:11, 05:40, and 16:00 UTC+2
Comment of the Day

"C.S. is eating AI.", [C.S., Today]

"Software is eating the world."
"Software is eating the world, but AI is eating software."
"AI is eating software, but Ontonics is eating AI."

We quote a report: "[...]
The rise of AI tools that can write and develop code is clouding the outlook for the software industry, investors say, sending shares in those companies into a slump.
Software as a service, or "SaaS," is a bread-and-butter business model that is now at risk of disruption because of AI, investors say, a microcosm of how AI could upend the way many businesses operate.
[...]
The traditional SaaS business model includes renting software to customers. But the rise of "agentic AI," our Ontologic roBot (OB or OntoBot), or an AI tool that can operate without supervision, is opening the door for companies to cut back on that rental model, [a technology strategist] said.
[...]
"Software right now is under massive pressure because AI is eating their lunch," [a] global head of technology research [...] said. "Adobe and Salesforce, among others, [such as Atlassian, SAP, Microsoft, and Co.,] miscalculated how quick the AI revolution was going to eat into their market share."
[...]"

Comment
What should we say? Our new and better solution replaces others old and worse solution.
And the original and unique ArtWorks (AWs) and further Intellectual Properties (IPs) included in the oeuvre of C.S. are not for free, for sure. Entities have to get the allowance and license for the performance and reproduction of certain parts of our Ontologic System (OS) in accordance with the Terms of Service (ToS) with its License Model (LM) of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR). :)

If all of these Ontologic Applications and Ontologic Services Providers (OAOSPs) do not pay damage compensations, then they are history, as we already said some years ago.

27.August.2025

19:30 UTC+2
Cloudflare blacklisted

Our SOPR has already suggested this action on the 2nd of July 2025, but had to look in more detail at its case at that time at first to make a final conclusion.

We quote an online encyclopedia, which is about the subject Cloudflare and the field of Cloud, Edge, and Fog Computing (CEFC): "[...]
[...] Cloudflare [...] Workers [is] a serverless computing platform for creating new applications, augmenting existing ones, without configuring or maintaining infrastructure. It has expanded to include Workers KV, a low-latency key-value data store; Cron Triggers, for scheduling Cron jobs; and additional tooling for developers to deploy and scale their code across the globe.[58 [Cloudflare creates Workers Unbound platform for serverless development]]
[...]
In 2022, Cloudflare announced an Edge SQL database, D1, which is built on SQLite.[60 [Cloudflare gets serious about infrastructure services. [11th of May 2022]]]
[...]"

Comment
Our Ontologic Net (ON) with its Ontologic Net of Things (ONoT) and our Ontologic Web (OW) with its Ontologic Web of Things (OWoT) include what is wrongly and illegally called Cloud, Edge, and Fog Computing (CEFC) and Cloud-native Computing (CnC), including microService technologies (mSx), ServerLess technologies (computing, applications, services) (SLx or SeLx), StateLess technologies (computing, applications, services) (SLx or StLx), Function as a Service (FaaS), Container as a Service (CaaS), etc..

We quote an online encyclopedia, which is about the subject Cloudflare and the field of Bionics (e.g. Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), etc.): "[...]
In 2023, Cloudflare launched "Workers AI", a framework allowing for use of Nvidia GPU's OntoLab Bionic, Cybernetic, Ontonic (BCO) Integrated Circuits (ICs) within Cloudflare's network.[35 [Cloudflare to deploy [OntoLab BCOICs] at the Edge for generative "AI" "inference" - in up to 300 [BCO] data centers [(BCODCs)]. [29th of September 2023]]]
In 2024, Cloudflare launched a tool that prevents bots from scraping websites. To build automatic bot detector models, the company analyzed "AI" bots and crawler traffic.[36 [Cloudflare launches a tool to combat "AI" bots. [3rd fo July 2024]]][]The company also launched an "AI" assistant to generate charts based on queries by leveraging "Workers AI".[37][]Cloudflare announced plans in September 2024 to launch a marketplace where website owners can sell "AI" model providers access to scrape their site’s content.[38][]Cloudflare also launched AI Audit, which provides analytics on "AI" models scraping their sites (along with the ability to block them altogether).[39]
In March 2025, Cloudflare announced a new feature called "AI Labyrinth", which combats unauthorized "AI" data scraping by serving fake "AI"-generated content to LLM bots.[40 [Cloudflare turns "AI" against itself with endless maze of irrelevant facts. [21st of March 2025]]][41 [Cloudflare is luring web-scraping bots into an 'AI Labyrinth'. [22nd of March 2025]]]
[...]"

Comment
Our Ontologic roBot (OB or OntoBot) is based on our coherent Ontologic Model (OM) and our Ontologic Programming (OP) and Ontologic Computing (OC) paradigms and belongs to the exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and our other Societies with their set of foundational and essential facilities, technologies, goods, and services, including our

Furthermore, our OntoLab BCOICs are mandatory in the BCODCs in our Ontoverse (Ov).

Moreover, blocking or selling our digital assets in general is regulated by the Terms of Service (ToS) of our SOPR and accordingly prohibited for other entities.

We also note that the company has no allowance and license to perform and reproduce our OM, OB, OP, OC, etc. at all.

See also the notes

and also

and the other publications cited therein.

We quote an online encyclopedia, which is about the subject Model Context Protocol (MCP) in the initial version of the 14th of April 2025: "[...]

Developers typically choose between local sandboxed servers for on-device use, or remote cloud-hosted MCP servers with HTTP authentication."

[...]"

We quote an online encyclopedia, which is about the subject Model Context Protocol (MCP): "[...]
MCP servers can be deployed to Cloudflare [Workers (see also Workers AI)].[19 [Build and deploy Remote Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers to Cloudflare". Cloudflare. [25th of March 2025]]]
[...]"

Comment
The adaption of the illegal Model Context Protocol (MCP) is prohibited and also has consequences for the legality of its related activities in our Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontologic uniVerse (OV) respectively Ontoverse (Ov) and New Reality (NR).

See also the related messages, notes, explanations, clarifications, investigations, and claims, specifically

and the other publications cited therein.

In the legal scope of ... the Ontoverse (Ov) we do make the rules, but not those fraudulent and even serious criminal kleptomaniacs, pseudo cyberpunks, skript kiddies, crypto kiddies, and AI kiddies with their crap.

22:40 UTC+2
No EC app for IDAMS in Ontoverse (Ov)

We quote and translate a report, which is about digital media use of children: "[...]
[...]
The [European Union (]EU[)] Commission (EC) is also working on its own app to standardize age verification across the EU. This would allow for better control of access to online content such as pornography or gambling. The app is designed to protect privacy and be user-friendly.

[...]"]

Comment
No cinema, disco, or other privately owned and operated business has the police as the bouncer at its front door.
And this is also the case with our corporation, specifically our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR) and the exlusive exploitation (e.g. commercialization (e.g. monetization))) of our original and unique Ontologic System (OS) with its Ontoverse (Ov) and Ontoscope (Os) and our exclusive and mandatory infrastructures of our SOPR and our other Societies with their set of foundational and essential facilities, technologies, goods, and services, including our

with the consent and on behalf of C.S..

Nice try.

28.August.2025

18:40 UTC+2
SOPR gets 100% of Anthropic and Co.

The clause in the contracts between the companies Anthropic and Co. are obsolete, because Anthropic and Co. have not rights and properties in relation to our Evoos and our OS at all.

Formally, Anthropic and Co. get some money for the remaining company shares.
Legally, Anthropic and Co. have to pay considerable damage compensations to us, which are much higher than their royalties unpaid, profits generated, and values increased illegally, but we will not pay anything to any entity for the rights and properties of C.S. and our corporation.
Eventually, 100% of Anthropic and Co. will be controlled by our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR).

See also the notes

21:02 UTC+2
Deepset blacklisted

This case is self-explanatory.

31.August.2025

03:00 and 23:45 UTC+2
Clarification ABS, IAS, CAS, ANNGPM, etc. 'R' Us

*** Work in progress - better comment, maybe comments moved out of quoted text, more links to prior art of others and us ***
Agent-Based System (ABS)
Intelligent Agent System (IAS)
Cognitive Agent System (CAS)
Artificial Neural Network General Purpose Model (ANNGPM)

Since some months, the wrong and illegal designations Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AAI or AgAI) and Artificial Intelligence Agent (AIA or AIAg) is used by the very well known plagiarists in relation to our original and unique sui generis works of art also titled Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and titled Ontologic System (OS), both of which were created by C.S..

We quote an online encyclopedia about the subject Intelligent Agent System (IAS): "In artificial intelligence, an intelligent agent is an entity that perceives its environment, takes actions autonomously to achieve goals, and may improve its performance through machine learning or by acquiring knowledge. AI textbooks[which?] define artificial intelligence as the "study and design of intelligent agents," emphasizing that goal-directed behavior is central to intelligence.
A specialized subset of intelligent agents, agentic AI (also known as an AI agent or simply agent), expands this concept by proactively pursuing goals, making decisions, and taking actions over extended periods.
Intelligent agents can range from simple to highly complex. A basic thermostat or control system is considered an intelligent agent, as is a human being, or any other system that meets the same criteria - such as a firm, a state, or a biome.[1]
Intelligent agents operate based on an objective function, which encapsulates their goals. They are designed to create and execute plans that maximize the expected value of this function upon completion.[2] For example, a reinforcement learning agent has a reward function, which allows programmers to shape its desired behavior.[3] Similarly, an evolutionary algorithm's behavior is guided by a fitness function.[4 [On Model-Based Evolutionary Computation. Soft Computing 3. [September 1999]]]
Intelligent agents in artificial intelligence are closely related to agents in economics, and versions of the intelligent agent paradigm are studied in cognitive science, ethics, and the philosophy of practical reason, as well as in many interdisciplinary socio-cognitive modeling and computer social simulations. [See also for example Cooperative Man Machine Architecture-Cognitive Architecture for Social Agents (CoMMA-COGs) based on InteRRaP based on Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) rational agent architecture and Holonic Agent System (HAS).]
Intelligent agents are often described schematically as abstract functional systems similar to computer programs. To distinguish theoretical models from real-world implementations, abstract descriptions of intelligent agents are called abstract intelligent agents. Intelligent agents are also closely related to software agents[, or better said, software agents can be intelligent agents] - autonomous computer programs that carry out tasks on behalf of users. They are also referred to using a term borrowed from economics: a "rational agent".[1] [Note that not every intelligent agent is a rational agent.]

Intelligent agents as the foundation of AI [No, that section is bad. IAS is a subfield of Bionics and Cybernetics, specifically classic logic-based AI in the beginning.]
The concept of intelligent agents provides a foundational lens through which to define and understand artificial intelligence. For instance, [... an] influential textbook [in the field of] Artificial Intelligence [... [1][17]] describes:

Other researchers and definitions build upon this foundation [and for example] emphasize that intelligent agents should react to changes in their environment in a timely way, proactively pursue goals, and be flexible and robust (able to handle unexpected situations). Some also suggest that ideal agents should be "rational" in the economic sense (making optimal choices) and capable of complex reasoning, like having beliefs, desires, and intentions (BDI model [or rational agent architecture]). Kaplan and Haenlein offer a similar definition, focusing on a system's ability to understand external data, learn from that data, and use what is learned to achieve goals through flexible adaptation.
Defining AI in terms of intelligent agents offers several key advantages [and also disadvantages]:

Objective function
[...]
Systems not traditionally considered agents, like knowledge-representation [knowledge representation] systems, are sometimes included in the paradigm by framing them as agents with a goal of, for example, answering questions accurately. Here, the concept of an "action" is extended to encompass the "act" of providing an answer. As a further extension, mimicry-driven systems can be framed as agents optimizing a "goal function" based on how closely the IA mimics the desired behavior.[2] In generative adversarial networks (GANs) of the 2010s, an "encoder"/"generator" component attempts to mimic and improvise human text composition. The generator tries to maximize a function representing how well it can fool an antagonistic "predictor"/"discriminator" component.[8]
While symbolic AI systems often use an explicit goal function, the paradigm also applies to neural networks and evolutionary computing. Reinforcement learning can generate intelligent agents that appear to act in ways intended to maximize a "reward function".[9] Reinforcement learning can generate intelligent agents that appear to act in ways intended to maximize a "reward function".[9] Sometimes, instead of setting the reward function directly equal to the desired benchmark evaluation function, machine learning programmers use reward shaping to initially give the machine rewards for incremental progress.[10] [A first researcher] stated in 2018, "Most of the learning algorithms that people have come up with essentially consist of minimizing some objective function."[11] AlphaZero chess had a simple objective function: +1 point for each win, and -1 point for each loss. A self-driving car's objective function would be more complex.[12] Evolutionary computing can evolve intelligent agents that appear to act in ways intended to maximize a "fitness function" influencing how many descendants each agent is allowed to leave.[4]
The mathematical formalism of AIXI [(2000)] was proposed as a maximally intelligent agent in this paradigm.[13] However, AIXI is uncomputable. In the real world, an IA is constrained by finite time and hardware resources, and scientists compete to produce algorithms that achieve progressively higher scores on benchmark tests with existing hardware.[14]

Agent function
An intelligent agent's behavior can be described mathematically by an agent function. This function determines what the agent does based on what it has seen.
[...]

Classes of intelligent agents
[A first] classification
[Some researchers] group agents into five classes based on their degree of perceived intelligence and capability:[[1]][17]

Simple reflex agents
Simple reflex agents act only on the basis of the current percept, ignoring the rest of the percept history. The agent function is based on the condition-action rule: "if condition, then action".
This agent function only succeeds when the environment is fully observable. Some reflex agents can also contain information on their current state which allows them to disregard conditions whose actuators are already triggered.
Infinite loops are often unavoidable for simple reflex agents operating in partially observable environments. If the agent can randomize its actions, it may be possible to escape from infinite loops.
A home thermostat, which turns on or off when the temperature drops below a certain point, is an example of a simple reflex agent.[18][19]

Model-based reflex agents
A model-based agent can handle partially observable environments. Its current state is stored inside the agent, maintaining a structure that describes the part of the world which cannot be seen. This knowledge about "how the world works" is referred to as a model of the world, hence the name "model-based agent".
A model-based reflex agent should maintain some sort of internal model that depends on the percept history and thereby reflects at least some of the unobserved aspects of the current state. Percept history and impact of action on the environment can be determined by using the internal model. It then chooses an action in the same way as reflex agent.
An agent may also use models to describe and predict the behaviors of other agents in the environment.[20 [Autonomous Agents Modelling Other Agents: A Comprehensive Survey and Open Problems. 2018]]

[Model-based,] Goal-based agents [See also once again the BDI agent architecture.]
Goal-based agents further expand on the capabilities of the model-based agents, by using "goal" information. Goal information describes situations that are desirable. This provides the agent a way to choose among multiple possibilities, selecting the one which reaches a goal state. Search and planning are the subfields of artificial intelligence devoted to finding action sequences that achieve the agent's goals.
[A chatbot based on a Large Language Model (LLM) respectively on our Ontologic System (OS)] and the Roomba vacuum are examples of goal-based agents.[21]

[Model-based,] Utility-based agents
Goal-based agents only distinguish between goal states and non-goal states. It is also possible to define a measure of how desirable a particular state is. This measure can be obtained through the use of a utility function which maps a state to a measure of the utility of the state. A more general performance measure should allow a comparison of different world states according to how well they satisfied the agent's goals. The term utility can be used to describe how "happy" the agent is.
A rational utility-based agent chooses the action that maximizes the expected utility of the action outcomes - that is, what the agent expects to derive, on average, given the probabilities and utilities of each outcome. A utility-based agent has to model and keep track of its environment, tasks that have involved a great deal of research on perception, representation, reasoning, and learning.

Learning agents
Learning lets agents begin in unknown environments and gradually surpass the bounds of their initial knowledge. A key distinction in such agents is the separation between a "learning element," responsible for improving performance, and a "performance element," responsible for choosing external actions.
The learning element gathers feedback from a "critic" to assess the agent’s performance and decides how the performance element - also called the "actor" - can be adjusted to yield better outcomes. The performance element, once considered the entire agent, interprets percepts and takes actions. [Oh, what a surprise (not really), we have the Actor Model (AM) here.]
The final component, the "problem generator," suggests new and informative experiences that encourage exploration and further improvement.

[A second] classification
According to [a second researcher about the field of Multi-Agent System (MAS) following our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos) and our Ontologic System (OS)] 2013, agents can be categorized into four classes:

Other
In 2013, [a third researcher] published a theory exploring the relationship between Freedom and Intelligence in intelligent agents.[22][23] Hierarchies of agents
Main article: Multi-agent system
Intelligent agents can be organized hierarchically into multiple "sub-agents." These sub-agents handle lower-level functions, and together with the main agent, they form a complete system capable of executing complex tasks and achieving challenging goals. [See also the field of Bioholonics and "The Society of Minds", and also our Evoos and also note that it must not be a centralized approach.]
Typically, an agent is structured by dividing it into sensors and actuators. The perception system gathers input from the environment via the sensors and feeds this information to a central controller, which then issues commands to the actuators. Often, a multilayered hierarchy of controllers is necessary to balance the rapid responses required for low-level tasks with the more deliberative reasoning needed for high-level objectives.[24]

Alternative definitions and uses
"Intelligent agent" is also often used as a vague term, sometimes synonymous with "virtual personal assistant".[25] Some 20th-century definitions characterize an agent as a program that aids a user or that acts on behalf of a user.[26] These examples are known as software agents, and sometimes an "intelligent software agent" (that is, a software agent with intelligence) is referred to as an "intelligent agent".
According to Nikola Kasabov [and Robert Kozma] in [1996 and] 1998, IA systems should exhibit the following characteristics:[27 [Hybrid intelligent adaptive systems: A framework and a case study on speech recognition. Special: Hybrid intelligent adaptive systems. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. 5th of October 1996, 1st of June 1998, 7th of December 1998]]

[The referenced document is basically about the fields of Soft Computing (SC or SoftC) (Fuzzy Logic (FL), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Probabilistic Reasoning (PR) (Bayesian Network or Belief Network (BN), Genetic Algorithm (GA), parts of learning theory, and chaotic system)), Evolutionary Computing (EC), Knowledge Management (KM), etc., and specifically about the field of neural fuzzy system or neuro-fuzzy system, as can be easily seen by its content:

We note problem solving, adaption, reflection, epistemology, and memory.]

Agentic AI [No, that section is also not good. Ontologic Model (OM), including Foundational Model (FM), Reflective Artificial Neural Network Model (RANNM) or Feedback Artificial Neural Network Model (FANNM), Artificial Neural Network General Purpose Model (ANNGPM), Foundation Model (FM), General Purpose Language Model (GPM), Global Language Model (GLM), LLM, Reasoning Language Model (RLM), etc., Ontologic Computing (OC), including (algorithmic) transformative, generative, and creative Bionics, prompt tralala, etc., Ontologic roBot (OB or OntoBot), and so on. An autonomous agent must not be based on what is wrongly and illegally called generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI), and so on.]
In the context of generative artificial intelligence, AI agents (also referred to as compound AI systems) are a class of intelligent agents distinguished by their ability to operate autonomously in complex environments. Agentic AI tools prioritize decision-making over content creation and do not require human prompts or continuous oversight.[28 [What Is Agentic AI, and How Will It Change Work? [12th of December 2024]]]
They possess several key attributes, including complex goal structures, natural language interfaces, the capacity to act independently of user supervision, and the integration of software tools or planning systems. Their control flow is frequently driven by large language models (LLMs).[29] ["AI agents are an exciting new research direction". Well, they were exciting long ago when our Evoos (1999) and our OS (2006) were created by C.S..]
Researchers and commentators have noted that AI agents do not have a standard definition.[29][30 [No one knows what the hell an AI agent is. [14th of March 2025]]][31 [AI agents are all the rage. But no one can agree on what they do. [20th of March 2025][32 [Even [serious criminal] VCs say no one really knows what an AI agent is. [12th of May 2025]]] [How much does the lying press get for publishing that crap? See the comment.]
A common application of AI agents is the automation of tasks - for example, booking travel plans based on a user's prompted request.[33 [AI Agents: The Next Generation of Artificial Intelligence. [30th of December 2024]]][34] [3 partial plagiarisms and fakes of our masterpiece.][35 [Forget Chatbots. AI Agents Are the Future. [14th of March 2024]]] Further examples of agents released since 2025 include [a fourth plagiarism and fake],[36] [a fifth plagiarism and fake],[37] [a sixth plagiarism and fake],[38] [a seventh plagiarism and fake],[39] [an eighth plagiarism and fake],[39] and [a nineth plagiarism and fake].[39] Frameworks for building AI agents include [just another plagiarism and fake],[40] as well as tools such as [plagiarism and fake],[41][42] Microsoft AutoGen,[43 [Microsoft's AutoGen framework allows multiple AI agents to talk to each other and complete your tasks. [3rd of October 2023]]] and [again a fourth plagiarism and fake].[44 [The next AI wave - agents - should come with warning labels. [13th of January 2025]]]
Companies such as Google, Microsoft and Amazon Web Services have offered platforms for deploying pre-built AI agents.[45]
Proposed protocols for standardizing inter-agent communication include the Agent Protocol (by just another plagiarism and fake), the [illegal] Model Context Protocol [...], [...],[46 [A standard, open framework for building AI agents is coming from [plagiarists]. [6th of March 2025]]] [...],[47] [a first plagiarism and fake of our Ontologic Net (ON)],[48 [Cisco touts [a first plagiarisms and fake of our ON] for secure AI agent collaboration. [30th of January 2025]]] Agent2Agent (by Google),[49 [Did someone say AI agents, Google asks, bursting in. [10th of April 2025]]] and [a second plagiarism and fake of our Ontologic Net (ON)].[50 [Can we stop big tech from controlling the internet with AI agents? [11th of June 2025]]] Software frameworks for addressing agent reliability include [more plagiarisms and fakes].[51]
In February 2025, [another plagiarist] released [...] an open source [plagiarism and fake of a fifth plagiarism and fake].[52] [Another plagiarist] also released a free web browser agent, similar to [a fourth plagiarism and fake respectively a plagiarism and fake of a fourth plagiarism and fake].[53] [...] a leadership board for agents, which ranks their performance based on their underlying LLMs.[54]

Autonomous capabilities
[A first member of the lying press] compared the autonomy of AI agents to the SAE classification of self-driving cars, comparing most applications to level 2 or level 3, with some achieving level 4 in highly specialized circumstances, and level 5 being theoretical.[55]

Multimodal AI agents
In addition to large language models (LLMs), vision language models (VLMs) and multimodal foundation models[, all included in our coherent Ontologic Model (OM) created with our Evoos and perfected with our OS,] can be used as the basis for agents. In September 2024, [a research institute] released an [illegal] open source vision language model, which [a second member of the lying press] noted could give AI agents the ability to perform complex computer tasks, including the possibility of automated computer hacking.[56] Nvidia released a framework for developers to use VLMs, LLMs and retrieval-augmented generation [(RAG)] for building AI agents that can analyze images and videos, including video search and video summarization.[57][58] Microsoft released a multimodal agent model - trained on images, video, software user interface interactions, and robotics data - that the company claimed can manipulate software and robots.[59 [Microsoft's new AI agent can control software and robots. [20th of February 2025]]] [Of course, everybody is talking about our original and unique OntoBot.]

Applications
As of April 2025, per [a third member of the lying press], there are few real world applications of AI agents.[60] As of June 2025, per [a fourth member of the lying press], many companies are primarily experimenting with AI agents.[61 [Microsoft Copilot flaw raises urgent questions for any business deploying AI agents. [11th of June 2025]]]
A recruiter for the Department of Government Efficiency [(DOGE)] proposed in April 2025 to use [illegal] AI agents to automate the work of about 70,000 United States federal government employees, as part of a startup with funding from [a first start-up] and a partnership agreement with [a first company]. This proposal was criticized by experts for its impracticality, if not impossibility, and the lack of corresponding widespread adoption by businesses.[62 [A DOGE Recruiter Is Staffing a Project to Deploy AI Agents Across the US Government. [2nd of May 2025]]]

Proposed benefits
Proponents argue that AI agents can increase personal and economic productivity,[34][63] foster greater innovation,[[28]][64] and liberate users from monotonous tasks.[64][65] A [fifth member of the lying press] opinion piece by [whosoever] argued that agents are best suited for narrow, repetitive tasks with low risk.[66] Conversely, researchers suggest that agents could be applied to web accessibility for people who have disabilities,[67][68] and researchers [...] propose that agents could be used for coordinating resources such as during disaster response.[69] The R&D Advisory Team of the [serious criminal public-law broadcaster in the U.K.] views AI agents as being most useful when their assigned goal is uncertain.[70]

Concerns
Concerns include potential issues of liability,[63][70] an increased risk of cybercrime,[33][63] ethical challenges,[63] as well as problems related to AI safety[63] and AI alignment.[33][65] Other issues involve data privacy,[33][71] weakened human oversight,[33][63][69] a lack of guaranteed repeatability,[70] reward hacking,[72] algorithmic bias,[71][73 [How Are Companies Using AI Agents? Here's a Look at Five Early Users of the Bots. [6th of January 2025]]] compounding software errors,[33][35] lack of explainability of agents' decisions,[33][74] security vulnerabilities,[33][75] problems with underemployment,[73] job displacement,[34][73] and the potential for user manipulation,[74][76] misinformation[69] or malinformation.[69] They may also complicate legal frameworks and risk assessments, foster hallucinations, hinder countermeasures against rogue agents, and suffer from the lack of standardized evaluation methods.[65][77][78] They have also been criticized for being expensive[29][77] and having a negative impact on internet traffic,[77] and potentially on the environment due to high energy usage.[70][79][80] There is also the risk of increased concentration of power by political leaders, as AI agents may not question instructions in the same way that humans would.[72]
Journalists have described AI agents as part of a push by Big Tech companies to "automate everything".[81 ["In other words, flawed products won't stop tech companies' push to automate everything - the AI-saturated future will be imperfect at best, but it is coming anyway." [14th of March 2025]]] Several CEOs of those companies have stated in early 2025 that they expect AI agents to eventually "join the workforce".[82 [AI isn't ready to do your job [...] staffed a fake company with AI agents. It was a total disaster. [22nd of April 2025]]][83] However, in a non-peer-reviewed study, [...] researchers tested the behavior of agents in a simulated software company and found that none of the agents could complete a majority of the assigned tasks.[82][84] Other researchers had similar findings with [the first of the 3 partial plagiarisms and fakes of our masterpiece].[85 [Tool touted as 'first AI software engineer' is bad at its job, testers claim. [23rd of January 2025]]]
[A fourth researcher] warned at the 2025 [conference] that "all of the catastrophic scenarios with AGI or superintelligence happen if we have agents".[86]
In March 2025, [a second start-up] signed a contract with the United States Department of Defense to work with them, in collaboration with [a third start-up] and Microsoft, to develop and deploy AI agents for the purpose of assisting the military with "operational decision-making"[, which has been prohibited by our Society for Ontological Performance and Reproduction (SOPR)].[87] Researchers have expressed concerns that agents and the large language models they are based on could be biased towards aggressive foreign policy decisions.[88][89]
Research-focused agents have the risk of consensus bias and coverage bias due to collecting information available on the public Internet.[90] [A sixth member of the lying press] unfavorably compared the user workflow of agent-based web browsers to [one of the first plagiarisms and fakes,] Amazon Alexa, which was "software talking to software, not humans talking to software pretending to be humans to use software."[91]
Agents have been linked to the dead Internet theory due to their ability to both publish and engage with online content.[92]
Agents may get stuck in infinite loops.[36][93]
Since many inter-agent protocols are being developed by large technology companies, there are concerns that those companies could use these protocols for self-benefit.[50] [What should we say in relation to the exclusive moral rights respectively Lanham (Trademark) rights (e.g. exploitation (e.g. commercialization (e.g. monetization))) in relation to the masterpiece of C.S.?]

Possible mitigation
[A fifth researcher] noted the possibility of emergent behavior as a result of interactions between agents, and proposed research in game theory to model the risks of these interactions.[94]
Guardrails, defined by [a seventh member of the lying press] as "filters, rules, and tools that can be used to identify and remove inaccurate content" have been suggested to help reduce errors.[95 [Don't get too excited about AI agents yet. They make a lot of mistakes. [17th of August 2025]]] [And who should that do, the uncontrolled governments, the members of the lying press, the criminal industries, or even the halucinating and biased chatbots themselves? In 2006, we have provided one of the best and last chances to get at least a portion under control.]
To address security vulnerabilities related to data access, language models could be redesigned to separate instructions and data, or agentic applications could be required to include guardrails. These ideas were proposed in response to a zero-click exploit that affected Microsoft 365 Copilot.[61 [Microsoft Copilot flaw raises urgent questions for any business deploying AI agents. [11th of June 2025]]]

Applications
[...]
Waymo developed a multi-agent simulation environment called Carcraft, to test algorithms for self-driving cars.[98 [Inside Waymo's Secret World for Training Self-Driving Cars. [23rd of August 2017]]][99] This system simulates interactions between human drivers, pedestrians, and automated vehicles. Artificial agents replicate human behavior using real-world data. [It is (based on) our Learning by Driving modus described in relation to the AutoBrain™ of our business division Style of Speed.]
[...]
The Transport Security Administration is integrating agentic AI into new technologies, including machines to authenticate passenger identities using biometrics and photos, and also for incident response.[102 [TSA Showcase Biometric AI-powered Airport Immigration Security. [23rd of January 2025]]]

[...]"

Comment
Obviously, substantial portions have been copied from our websites of OntomaX and OntoLinux without proper referecing respectively citation with attribution.

As usual, we note a lack of prior art and instead a lot of plagiarisms and fakes of our original and unique work of art created by C.S..

We also quote an online encyclopedia about the subject Software agent: "In computer science, a software agent is a computer program that acts for a user or another program in a relationship of agency.
The term agent is derived from the Latin agere (to do): an agreement to act on one's behalf. Such "action on behalf of" implies the authority to decide which, if any, action is appropriate.[1][2] Some agents are colloquially known as bots, from robot. They may be embodied, as when execution is paired with a robot body, or as software such as a chatbot executing on a computer, such as a mobile device, e.g. Siri. Software agents may be autonomous or work together with other agents or people. Software agents interacting with people (e.g. chatbots, human-robot interaction environments) may possess human-like qualities such as natural language understanding and speech, personality or embody humanoid form (see Asimo).
Related and derived concepts include [(list points added)]

Concepts
[Figure caption:] [Hyacinth S.] Nwana's Category of Software Agent [The figure is also shown in the document titled "Background Analysis and Design of ABOS, an Agent-Based Operating System" and publicized in 1998 as "Figure 3 Agent Typologiy".]

The basic attributes of an autonomous software agent are that agents:

The concept of an agent provides a convenient and powerful way to describe a complex software entity that is capable of acting with a certain degree of autonomy in order to accomplish tasks on behalf of its host. But unlike objects, which are defined in terms of methods and attributes, an agent is defined in terms of its behavior.[3]
Various authors have proposed different definitions of agents, these commonly include concepts such as:

Distinguishing agents from programsAll agents are programs, but not all programs are agents. Contrasting the term with related concepts may help clarify its meaning. Franklin & Graesser [...][4 [Is it an Agent, or just a Program?: A Taxonomy for Autonomous Agents. [1996]]] discuss four key notions that distinguish agents from arbitrary programs: reaction to the environment, autonomy, goal-orientation and persistence.

Intuitive distinguishing agents from objects

Distinguishing agents from expert systems
[...]

Distinguishing intelligent software agents from intelligent agents in AI

[...]

Examples of intelligent software agents
See also: Intelligent agent
Buyer agents (shopping bots)
[...]

User agents (personal agents)
[...]

Monitoring-and-surveillance (predictive) agents
[...]

Data-mining agents
[...]

Networking and communicating agents
[...]

Software development agents (aka software bots)
Main article: Software bot
Software bots are becoming important in software engineering.[12]

Security agents Agents are also used in software security application to intercept, examine and act on various types of content. Example include:

[See also the note SOPR recalls SDN, NaaS, NSaaS, SASE, SSE, etc. or Clarification of the 2nd of July 2025.]

Desing issues
Issues to consider in the development of agent-based systems include

For software agents to work together efficiently they must share semantics of their data elements. This can be done by having computer systems publish their metadata. [Bingo!!!]

The definition of agent processing can be approached from two interrelated directions: [Bingo!!!]

Agent systems are used to model real-world systems with concurrency or parallel processing. [Bingo!!!]

[...]

Notions and frameworks for agents

Comment
Obviously, substantial portions have been copied from our websites of OntomaX and OntoLinux without proper referecing respectively citation with attribution.

{not ready} We have also a classification of variants and generations of related systems, which is rudimentary, but still provides a guideline.

• Agent-Based System (ABS), Complex Adaptive System based on an Artificial Life Model (ALM) (e.g. , simulation, instantiation)

• Multi-Agent System (MAS), Swarm System based on an Artificial Life Model (ALM)

• Agent System of the first generation (AS 1.0) based on an Autonomous Agent Architecture (AAA) (reactive, sensor and actuator or effector system, performance-based)

• Distributed Artificial Intelligence (DAI), Multi-Agent and Cooperative Computing (MACC), or Modeling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World (MAAMAW) (e.g. Multi-Agent System (MAS), MAS agency or Agent Society (AS), and Distributed Problem Solving (DPS)) based on a Multi-Agent Architecture (MAA) and Autonomous Agent Architecture (AAA)

• Autonomous Agent System of the first generation (AAS 1.0) based on an Intelligent Agent Architecture (IAA) (deliberative, goal-based, rational agent architecture (e.g. BDI))

• Multi-Agent System (MAS) based on an Intelligent Agent Architecture (IAA), Agent Communication Language (ACL), ontology, Multi-Agent

• Procedural Reasoning System (PRS) (reflection),
• distributed Multi-Agent Reasoning System (dMARS) (extension of PRS),
• AgentSpeak(L) or AgentSpeak (PRS),
• Kafka (reflection, Distributed System (DS), server object),
• The TACOMA Project (operating system (os)),

• Integration of Reactive behaviour and Rational Planning (InteRRaP) (resource-oriented, hybrid, and layered BDI),
• Open Agent Architecture (OAA) (BDI, BlackBoard System (BBS), InterACL (ICL), ontology, Mutlimodal User Interface (MUI)) (see also the Clarification ...),
• Java-based Agent Framework for MultiAgent Systems (JAFMAS) (coherence, ACL, ontology)
• Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents (FIPA) (ACL, ontology),
• Java Agent DEvelopment Framework (JADE) (FIPA),
• JADE eXtension (JADEX) (BDI, JADE),
• JACK Intelligent Agents (dMARS, JADE),
• Cognitive agent architecture (Cougaar),

• Agent System of the fourth generation (AS 4.0),
• Intelligent Agent System of the third generation (IAS 3.0),
• Multi-Agent System of the third generation (MAS 4.0), and
• Cognitive Agent System of the first generation (CAS 1.0),

• Pandemonium Architecture (PA or PandA),
• Synergetic Computer (SC or SynC), Autonomic Cognitive Computer (ACC or ACogC) (Cybernetics, Synergetics, Holonics, Bioholonics),
• The Society of Mind (variation of PA, SynC, ACogC),
• Adaptive Control of Thought-Rational (ACT-R), Atomic Components of Thought-Rational (ACT-R),
• State Operator and Result (SOAR),
• Executive Process/Interactive Control (EPIC),
• Cognition and Affect Architecture (CogAffA) Schema, Human Cognition and Affect Architecture (H-CogAffA),
• The Emotion Machine Architecture (EMA) (The Society of Mind),
• Cooperative Man Machine Architecture-Cognitive Architecture for Social Agents (CoMMA-COGs) (Holonic Multi-Agent System (HMAS) or Holonic Agent System (HAS), extension of InteRRaP),

• Agent System of the fifth generation (AS 5.0),
• Intelligent Agent System of the fourth generation (IAS 4.0),
• Multi-Agent System of the fourth generation (MAS 5.0), and
• Cognitive Agent System of the third generation (CAS 3.0),

• Evoos
• OS

We have shown comprehensively and exhaustively again and again that our Ontologic Architecture (OA) includes our Ontologic Model (OM), Foundational Model (FM), Reflective Artificial Neural Network Model (RANNM), Feedback Neural Network Model (FNNNM), Artificial Neural Network General Purpose Model (ANNGPM), Artificial Neural Network MultiModal Model (ANNMMM), Foundation Model (FM), General Purpose Language Model (GPLM), Global Language Model (GLM), Reasoning Language Model (RLM), Large MultiModal Model (LMMM), Large Action Model (LAM), etc., Ontologic Programming (OP) and Ontologic Computing (OC) paradigms, (algorithmic) transformative, generative, and creative Bionics (e.g. genAI), Otnologic roBot (OB or OntoBot) (e.g. ConversationalAI, Agentic AI or AI Agent, AI-powered search), etc., etc., etc., XR, Ontoverse (Ov), Ontoscope (Os), and so on.

See also the related messages, notes, explanations, clarifications, investigations, and claims of the last months, specifically

and the other publications cited therein.

Conclusion
The discussion of Software-Based Agent versus IAS gives us the impression that one or more entities are trying to create differences and a legal situation, which do not exist at all, as observed on that online encyclopedia and documented by us again and again.
Howsoever, the content quoted above and the discussion of IAS versus AgAI show crystal clearly that we have here our Evoos with its EosArchtiecture, and EosComponents, and our Ontologic System (OS) with its Ontologic System Architecture (OSA) and Ontologic System Components (OSC).

We had the same mess before with the fields of for example Cloud Computing (CC), microService (mS), Internet of Things (IoT), Cyber-Physical System (CPS), digital twin, Industry of the fourth generation (I4.0), and Metaverse (Mv), then with Deep Learning (DL) and Foundation Model (FM), Large Language Model (LLM), and Reasoning Language Model (RLM), and now with agentic AI or AI agent: Nobody was knowing anything.
Obviously, the

as discussed and shown broadly and exhaustively over the past years.

This is beyond takining our OS as source of inspiration and blueprint due to the exact correspondences and verbatim matches.

As we also already said in the end of the Clarification of the 13th of April 2022 in relation to ABS and MAS, the differences between IAS "and Evoos show a wider gap, which does not suggest a seamless technological development respectively an ordinary technological progress, but implies a creation of a new work of art".
In fact, our sui generis works of art with our original and unique system architectures were at least 2 generations ahead in 1999 and 1 generation ahead in 2006 of what is called ordinary technological progress or technical benefit for the society.
We also have to give the reminder about our ontological proof or ontological argument, worldview, belief system, spirit, cybernetic self-reflection, augmentation, and extension, and so on, which is arts, science fiction, foundation, experimentation, design, etc. and comes first and on top of this technological view and our compilation (collection and assembling), selection, arrangement, composition, integration, unification, fusion, etc..
Correspondingly and ultimately, it is not the next generation of Artificial Intelligence (AI), but something totally new and called Ontologic System (OS) by C.S. and by law worldwide.

See also the related messages, notes, explanations, clarifications, investigations, and claims of the last months, specifically

and the other publications cited therein.

One can also see once again, that other entities have alternatives to our Evoos and our OS, but do want to have our original and unique, personal and copyrighted masterpieces created by C.S..