Home → News 2016 June
 
 
News 2016 June
   
 

01.June.2016
OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update
*** Work in progress - Selection of sections missing and better formulations of text ***
We added to the section Exotic Operating System of the Links to Software webpage the links:

  • Oregon Health & Science University, OGI School of Science and Engineering, and Portland State University, Department of Computer Science, Thomas Hallgren, Mark P Jones, Rebekah Leslie Andrew, and Tolmach: A Principled Approach to Operating System Construction in Haskell

    We recommend to read the chapter "6. Towards Osker: Modeling a Separation Kernel [on L4]", which shows that our Ontologic System (OS) is sound all the way down to the bare metal and even beyond, and also keep in mind that "P-logic is a modal mu-calculus that supports direct expression of recursively-defined properties of complex data structures. In a modal logic, the intended domain of interpretations is not simply sets, but a family of sets with a particular structure."
    As we have seen with the work "Categorial Type Logics" as well (see also the related note in the Website update of the 17th of May 2016), this work also presents multimodality in a different field than a User Interface (UI) system (see also the work "Modal logics and mu-calculi: an introduction" and our multilingual multimodal multiparadigmatic OntoBot software component).

    In this respect, we would like to give the information that we have:

  • not planned to implement the OntoL4 respectively OntoS1 microkernel in a functional, logical, or other declarative programming language paradigm, because the use of our Onto# language makes it possible to change between C and C++ to e.g. Lisp, Haskell, ML, Prolog, Poplog, etc., but
  • planned to implement the Basic Input/Output System (BIOS) as well.

    In the section Formal Modeling (alternative section Intelligent/Cognitive Agent) of the same webpage we added:

  • National University of Singapore, Department of Computer Science, Joxan Jaffar, Rafael Ramirez, and Roland H.C. Yap: Executable Specifications for Concurrent Programming.
    See also the work "Representing and Executing Real-time Systems", which was written by one of the authors, and related referenced works.

    Furthermore, we added to the section Logics (alternative section Abstract Machine) of the webpage Literature we added:

  • Xerox, Palo Alto Research Center (PARC), Stanford University, and McGill University, Vijay A. Saraswat, Martin Rinard, and Prakash Panangaden: Semantic foundations of concurrent constraint programming [PDF]
    "It appears that concurrent constraint languages may be related to the proof nets introduced by Girard in his discussion of the proof theory of linear logic. If this connection were successful it would exhibit concurrent constraint programs as arising from linear logic via a Curry-Howard isomorphism. [...] In simpler terms, one can view parallel composition as conjunction and local scoping of variables as existential quantification."
  • Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, University of Utrecht, Department of Computer Science, and Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science at Amsterdam, Frank S. de Boer and Catuscia Palamidessi: A Fully Abstract Model for Concurrent Constraint Programming [PDF]
  • University of Ottawa, Department of Mathematics, and McGill University, Nax P. Mendler, Prakash Panangaden, P.J. Scott, and R.A.G. Seely: A Logical View of Concurrent Constraint Programming [PDF]
    "Concurrency is Logic"
  • University of Aarhus, Basic Research in Computer Science (BRICS), and Penn State University, Mogens Nielsen, Catuscia Palamidessi, and Frank D. Valencia: Temporal Concurrent Constraint Programming: Denotation, Logic and Applications [PDF]

    Now add the works related with Petri nets, concurrent systems, rewriting logic, graph logic, linear logic, "Dynamic Logic Programming with Multiple Dimensions" or Multi-dimensional DLP, "Higher-Order Logic as Constraint Logic Programming" respectively our multimodal multiparadigmatic OntoBot software component, guess how hypergraph rewriting works on the textual level respectively as a symbol system, and find out again by taking this path that "Concurrent Constraint Programming is Logic".
    In this context we would also like to mention that the Simple Extensible Abstract Machine (SEAM) described in "A Virtual Machine for Multi-Language Execution" is also tightly related with another multiparadigmatic programming language used for reflective systems, Concurrent Constraint Programming (CCP), and Natural Language Processing (NLP).

    OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps
    We have continued the work related with the data structures

  • Binary Decision Tree (BDT),
  • Binary Decision Diagram (BDD),
    • Ordered BDD (OBDD),
  • and so on

    on the one side and

  • Binary Search Tree (BST; also called ordered or sorted binary trees),
  • self-balancing BST,
    • B-tree,
      • B+-tree,
      • B*-tree,
  • R-tree,
  • red-black tree,
  • and so on

    on the other side.
    Already around the year 2005 we had the initial idea to overlay both groups of data structures respectively to integrate them and their applications, including

  • transition system,
  • graph transformation system,
  • reasoning,
  • verification,
  • unification of data and process in relation with for example
    • First-Order Logic (FOL) programming,
    • High(er)-Order Logic (HOL) programming,
    • Concurrent Logic (CL) programming,
    • Multi-dimensioinal Dynamic Logic (MDL) programming,
    • Concurrent Constraint (CC) programming,
    • etc.,
  • Disjunctive Deductive DataBase (DDDB),
  • and so on

    on the one side and

  • File System (FS),
  • Relational DataBase Management System (RDMBS),
  • Object-Oriented DBMS (OODMBS),
  • and so on

    on the other side, because they have the same goals and functionalities. This integration would be a part of our OntoS1 and Onto# (see again the microkernels in the section Exotic Operating System and for example "A Virtual Machine for Multi-Language Execution" called Simple Extensible Abstract Machine (SEAM)), as well as our OntoBase and Ontologic File System (OntoFS) components.

    But this is more experimental.


    02.June.2016
    Comment of the Day
    "Shadows on the Moon", [C.S., Today]

    OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update
    We added some more references to the webpages Literature and Links to Software that we missed to make in the last days or we would like to list for rounding up some fields.

    We added to the section Exotic Operating System of the Links to Software webpag the links:

  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire d'informatique de Paris 6 (LIP6), and Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (INRIA) Rocquencourt: Virtual Virtual Machine (VVM)
    • Bertil Folliot, Ian Piumarta, and Fabio Riccardi: Virtual Virtual Machines
    • Ian Piumarta, Bertil Folliot, Lionel Seinturier, and Carine Baillarguet: Highly configurable operating systems: the VVM approach
    • Bertil Folliot: The Virtual Virtual Machine Project

    (see also SimAgent, SEAM, microkernel, reflection, and ontology related works, and The Proposol)
    The initial concept of the VVM publicated in the year 1997 was not a source of inspiration for our Evolutionary operating system (Evoos), but has confirmed our flexible and integrative approach. Sadly to say, the further developments publicated after the year 1999 are highly suspicious.
    Nevertheless, the VVM project addresses some properties, specifically reflection, reliability, including dependable software systems by means of rudimentary Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques (1997), and mentions some functionalities, such as

    • security logics for optimization and validation of the Virtual operating system (Vos) and global rules, which describe the security constraints for the verification (static checks at runtime) of the applications running on top of that Virtual Machine (VM), and
    • introspection (1997) on and reasoning (2000) about the environment of the VVM into which imperative (not delarative) specifications and rules are loaded to modify its behaviour appropriately, for example security constraints to configure the verification of applications in relaton to a specific language,

    and potential applications (2000), such as

  • Distributed Computing (DC),
  • Ubiquitous Computing (UbiC),
  • embedded systems,
  • virtual world,
  • active networks,
  • active spaces,
  • and so on,

    but gives no details in this regard without the exception of a satellite and lacks much other functionalities and applications, such as logic and constraint programming, ontology related techniques and technologies, agent-based or agent-oriented systems, intelligent/cognitive agents, and the other essential elements of our composition.
    Last but not least, we would like to mention the Universal Turing Machine (UTM) that can be found in The Proposal and on the webpage Links to Software as well.

  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Leendert van Doorn, Philip Homburg, and Andrew S. Tanenbaum: Paramecium: an extensible object-based kernel
    (see also Exokernel and Alta)

    The problem with such configurable and extensible operating systems and VMs is that access control lists and (code) verification prior to execution are not sufficient to ensure safety in non-cooperative environments and VMs, because

  • verified code does not say everything about the intention of an implemented function or application, and
  • not all configurations and code of extensions are known in advance.

    A related problem is that we need some kind of a Peer-to-Peer (P2P) trusted authority environment. Needless to say, we will be the first one responsible for the core system, which is not the free, wild, or dark, but the pure Ontologic Net (ON) and Ontologic Web (OW).

    In the section Logics of the webpage Literature we added:

  • University of Texas at Austin, Department of Computer Sciences, and University of Minnesota at Duluth, Department of Computer Sciences, Vladimir Lifschitz and Hudson Turner: Representing Transition Systems by Logic Programs [PDF]
    "A large part of that work deals with a new nonmonotonic formalism - "causal theories". We show here that many of the ideas developed in those papers can be formulated in terms of logic programs under the answer set semantics [5 ["Classical Negation in Logic Programs and Disjunctive Databases"]], without even mentioning causal theories."
    Not surprisingly, everything in this field is connected with each other somehow by morphisms, rule-based transformations, semantics, logics, or transition systems.

    We are sorry, but we have shown everything in 2006 by referencing works, that were shown before the publication of the documents, that again other scientists reference, so that they are unable to show works of prior art in the course of perverting the causalities in relation with the original and unique ontologic works and works of art created by C.S.. Or said in other words: They can apply every dirty trick but C.S. still remains first.

    In relation to the wepbage Terms of the 21st Century, we forgot to mention some works, such as

  • the novels
    • "We Can Build You" by Philip K. Dick published as "A. Lincoln, Simulacrum",
    • "The Simulacrum" by Philip K. Dick,
    • "Simulacron-3" or "Counterfeit World" by Daniel F. Galouye, though we
      • read about Simulacron-3 some years ago in relation with this genre,
      • subsummed it like many other works in the 3³ Theme of C.S. as well,
      • mentioned the "The Matrix" saga in the sections Brain Computer Interface (BCI) and Virtual Reality (VR), and also
      • are known for our so to say very special relation with marketing and online advertisement (see for example the Pictures of the Day of the 30th of April 2015, specifically "6oo6le⁶ The Future" by C.S., which could also be titiled "Facebook The Future"),
    • "Ubik" by Philip K. Dick, though we
      • discussed the movie "Abre Los Ojos==Open Your Eyes" in the Clarification of the 16th of April 2016,
  • the short story
    • "We Can Remember It for You Wholesale" by Philip K. Dick, though we
  • the movies
    • "Tron",
    • "The Lawnmower Man", and
    • "The Thirteenth Floor",

    and

  • (much) more existing prior art works related specifically with these fields of BCI and VR, and generally with the science fiction genre. For example
  • "(Blade Runner:) Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" and the movie "Blade Runner",

    by Philip K. Dick has not been noted as well.

    Indeed, it is planned since the beginning of the Ontologic System (OS) of C.S. to add these works to the webpage Terms of the 21st Century. But they are all different to some extent to our OS and OntoVerse (OV), which is not a simulacrum VR Environment (VRE), but the integration of the past reality with a Mixed Reality Environment (MRE) and other items to result in a new reality, which again makes the OS and OV so incredible valuable, because love and trust cannot be bought.

    And now we have to stop, because we must feed Zeno's tortoise.

    iRaiment Further steps
    We optimized a relatively old device respectively intelligent wear. Now, we are wondering why nobody else had this idea on the one hand and prepare our next revolution on the other hand.

    This is how creation and innovation really works.

    Style of Speed Further steps
    We developed a new variant of our E Ape, which we think is very interesting.


    04.June.2016
    OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps
    As a side effect while working on our Ontologic System 1.0, we put the Ontologic System 2.0 together (see also the design of the OntoLinux Caliber/Calibre and the Website update of the 5th of April 2007).

    Make a spell and have fun under the sun.
    *<:o) O>-< _(D)>-<

    iRaiment Further steps
    We have created a new device series.


    05.June.2016
    Clarification #1
    What we already developed conceptually around the years 2000 and 2001 and then began to realize until around the year 2006 was to combine a variant of our OntoCore comprising one of the verified microkernels OntoL4 and OntoS1 with:

  • an abstract machine, like e.g. the Simple Extensible Abstract Machine (SEAM; see also the Virtual Virtual Machine (VVM)),
    and a:
  • graph traversal and transformation machine and language for common graphs, such as Maude or PROGRES for example,
  • hypergraph rewriting framework, such as "Mapping Relational Operations onto Hypergraph Model" for example, and
  • Multi-dimensional Dynamic (Linear Temporal) Logic Programming (MD(LT)LP) Multi-Agent System (MAS) environment, such as Minerva for example,

    to three different systems (see also the Further steps of the 28th of May 2016 and 1st of June 2016).

    Clarification #2
    In relation with the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of today, we would like to ask a simple question: Does anybody really think we were so unbelievable incompetent to develop and describe a Resource Description Framework Virtual Machine (RDF VM) or a Web Ontology Language Virtual Machine (OWL VM)? In fact, we left it to catch at least one serious criminal and incompetent fraudster.
    Today, we found the first fraudsters on the one hand.
    On the other hand we already found out around the year 2004 that this approach does not work, because it did not work around the late 1990s with what?
    Hint: RDF and OWL are based on what markup language?
    So when it did not work already with the XML Virtual Machine in practice, then we do what?
    Hint: We have a bridge from syntax to semantic.
    But when we do relational or logic programming, or/and constraint programming, and also concurrent and object-oriented programming in a highly flexible way, then we do what?
    Hint: It has something in common with an extensible abstract machine or an extensible virtual machine.
    But when we are now on the level of a real machine with an extensible or/and reflective, concurrent operating system with a recursive or layered, extensible, reflective, or/and virtual virtual machine or agent system, and so on and so on and so on, then we do what?
    Congratulation, we have thrown all the ballast over board (compare XML vs. JSON) by simply connecting system components that exist for many years, and we may use some kind of a binary data structure even if we are using an exotic computer (see also the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 28th of May 2016 and 1st of June 2016), which we also apply when building up the software stack in the next step. We also talk and act in other ways directly with the machine and program it by literally spoken natural interface languages and not in a cryptic programming language.
    And when we have a software stack for a distributed computing environment, then we do what?
    For sure, we apply the ontologic model on the unique resource locators and identifiers, and on the various network paradigms, such as the Content Addressable Network (CAN) and the Information-Centric Network (ICN) for example.

    What is going on with the entities acting in the field of digital library, knowledge management, semantic network, and semantic web? Do they really think that they are allowed to copy from our websites (e.g. OntoLinux) and do not have to reference correctly?
    Suspiciously, all their documents were publicated in the year 2007 respectively months after the official start of OntoLinux despite that stuff could have been developed, as we did, in the years 1998 to 2006. Obviously, they all have stolen from our intellectual property.
    Extra funny: The super clever (not really) fraudster found out himself that the RDF VM is nonsense by design and also described an abstract machine without all the XML bloat. But the result is something like the substrate framework of computation CHemical Abstrct Machine (CHAM) and "[o]ther approaches to "linear-like" logic" mentioned in for example the document "Lively Linear Lisp - 'Look Ma, No Garbage!'", which brings us back to "On-the-Fly, Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) Model-Checking with Spin" listed in the section Formal Verification of the Links to Software webpage (see also the related Clarification of the 29th of April 2016).
    Nevertheless, thank you very much for proving our copyright implicitly in relation with the Ontologic System (OS), because he has stolen old or/and worthless items.

    We cannot recommend to continue with the stealing of our intellectual properties respectively to conduct the same fraud a second time.
    Moreover, all the other essential elements of our original and unique, copyrighted Ontologic System (OS), including our Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and Ontoverse are also missing.
    Even do not think about it, because the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is already waiting.

    Roboticle Further steps
    We continued the development of a component mentioned in the Further steps of the 28th of May 2016 and found out that the latest approach to solve the problem works indeed. In the next step of development we will find out a promising configuration to optimize the component and compare it with common components.


    07.June.2016
    Clarification
    In relation with our abstract machine core, the Bridge from Natural Intelligence (NI) to Artificial Intelligence (AI), the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps and Website updates, as well as the Clarifications of the last weeks we remembered, that the complexity of for example an XML based ontology with all its tags compared with the complexity of a literate programming source code written in a slightly controlled natural or official language, and the complexities of their operating systems, compilers, interpreters or virtual machines, reasoners and solvers, data stores, etc. are virtually the same or even better in the case of the literate approach or being more precisely of our Ontologic System (OS) approach.
    Said in other words, a highly complex approach or system does not need a special language for realizing and using it (see for example the document "Exterminate All Operating System Abstractions" and the other related works in the section Exotic Operating System of the Links to Software webpage) and it is sufficient to take the one that is most comfortable for the end user, and this is still the human and not the machine.
    This reduction with the hacked and compressed programming paradigms and languages was needed solely for the reason that computers were not available or just too simple. This is not the case anymore, as we projected already around the year 2000 (see also for example the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps 10th of March 2013).

    Said this, taking directly the Bridge form NI to AI as processing model was simply the next developmental step and system optimization, which is comparable with the step to use JSON instead of XML but done on the most largest scale, that is the Universal Turing Machine respectively the actual computing systems. In this context, think also about the demand to observe, control, and understand what an intelligent machine is doing at some arbitrary point in time.

    We do not need to discuss the fact any further that the Bridge form NI to AI is original and unique, like E=mc², because none of our smart gals and guys has seen or even publicated something in this relation besides all the rest we discussed in the last weeks. They do not have it, because they have not understood anything but have copied and stolen only.

    As we said on the webpage Profile on the OntoLi+-x website: We transform operating systems into Ontologic Systems.
    OntoNet is alive

    And for sure, we have a virtual machine for our Multimodal Rule Markup Language (MRML), which includes for example SVG as well in an XML based Rule ML, and works together with our Natural Language Processing to Web Ontology Language (NLP2OWL) and Natural Image Processing to Web Ontology Language (NIP2OWL) (see the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 23rd of April 2016 and the Website update of the 12th of May 2016 for example).
    The MRML VM functions like an XML virtual machine, such as a Resource Description Framework Virtual Machine (RDF VM) and a Web Ontology Language Virtual Machine (OWL VM).
    That said, you can put images, sounds, motions, and every other modalities directly into your source code when programming and executing.

    But keep in mind that our abstract machine core respectively ontologic model is language transparent, agnostic, independent.

    Soon, you can talk to your pets like Spock.

    Besides this, we would like to emphasize once again that our RDF VM and OWL VM use the Content Addressable Network (CAN) and Information-Centric Network (ICN) techniques for the namespaces and the Uniform Resource Identifier (URI), Uniform Resource Locator (URL), Uniform Resource Name (URN), Universal Description Discovery and Integration (UDDI), Internationalized Resource Identifier (IRI), Extensible Resource Identifier (XRI), and so on (see for example a document about an RDF VM and an OWL VM, and again the Clarification #2 of the 5th of June 2016) as part of our original and unique, unified and uniform Ontologic System (OS), Ontologic Net (ON), and Ontologic Web (OW) (see again the presentation OS is ON of the 9th of May 2016, Ontologic Net and Ontologic Web Further steps of the 11th of May 2016, and the related sections in the OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update of the 27th of May 2016 and 30th of May 2016) .

    We have not seen such ontology-based and -oriented systems, virtual machines, operating systems, and ontologic systems with all these features in the last 18 years.


    08.June.2016
    Clarification
    Obviously, it was not absolutely clear how a computing substrate functions.
    Hopefully, it was absolutely clear that our OntoBot software component also applies its rewriting capabilities for automatic multilingual multimodal multiparadigmatic multimedia programming. This is especially interesting, when molecules, higher structures, and complete systems are generated out of the atoms of the computing substrate, which can be nodes and links of a binary or trinary data structure.

    Think about writing a book and literate programming a system. There are signs and symbols, words, sentences, sections, chapters, and documents, books, etc. among other items. What is common is to create words and give a section, chapter, or book a title based on symbols and words for referencing.
    Exactly such a technique is also applied by the OntoBot on the base of the abstract machine core respectively ontologic model, which comprises functionalities of extensible abstract machine, operating system, and virtual machine.

    We have not seen such ontology-based and -oriented systems, virtual machines, operating systems, and ontologic systems with all these features in the last 18 years.


    09.June.2016
    Website update
    We have renamed the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 5th of June 2016 to the Clarification #1, because we did it already in the year 2006 when we created the OntoBot software component.

    Clarification
    Other reasons why we have not implemented or/and publicated a Resource Description Framework Virtual Machine (RDF VM) (see the Clarifications of the 5th and 8th of June 2016 (yesterday)) is the knowledge gained with this concept already put into metal with the:

  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) LISt Processor (LISP) Machine (LM),
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Connection Machine (CM),
  • Thinking Machine CM-5, and
  • Institute for New Generation Computer Technology (ICOT) Parallel Inference Machine (PIM; see also O[perating ]S[ystem] for Parallel Inference Machines (PIMOS)).

    The LM did not lift off and was replaced by common computers and even many knowledge-based systems written in Lisp were rewritten in C.

    The CMs and the PIMs were massively parallel computing machines already doing in hardware, what an RDF VM or similar abstract machine does in software. But they did not lift off.
    The KL1 programming language also did not lift off, because Prolog was already the logic programming language to go.

    In contrast to many geniuses in the field of the semantic web we learned from history and did not make the same mistake again.
    Take a look again at our Ontologic System (OS) and specifically the OntoBot software component to find out that we use matured operating systems, virtual sytems, and programming paradigms and frameworks and in the only use Prolog and C, C++, as well as suitable graph-based data structures as foundation (see the Clarification #1 of the 5th of June 2016).

    After looking at all the latests clarifications there exists absolutely no doubt anymore, or said in other words, significant and profound evidences have been provided that prove that entities have taken the OS of C.S. as source of inspiration and created causal links with this original and unique ontologic work in this way.
    In the same respect it is also doubtlessly clear, that those entities

  • have taken contents from our related websites,
  • have not referenced the original work deliberately to
    • hide their copying,
    • erase their traces, and
    • mislead the public,
    but also
  • have not completely understood the OS in all its entirety,

    which are the relevant indications that the OS is an original and unique work protected by the international copyright laws and that those entities have already infringed our copyright.

    Ontoscope Further steps
    We developed a new model of an older device.

    iRaiment Further steps
    We developed a new variant of a device model.

    We also redesigned an older device and used our related technologies for this. The original designers will have fun, while at least another person will not be amused.

    Furthermore, we changed the design of some of our smartwatches, which resulted in several interesting variants.

    Moreover, we created a new model of one of our specific series. Honestly, this is not one of our world domination slogans, when we say that we are redefining horology, cannot belief it ourselves what is possible, and hope that our fans will be blown away by this masterpiece of technology as well, like we have been.

    Last but not least, we are thinking about a new endeavour, that we may call the Jet Set Collection (JSC).

    Investigations::AI and Knowledge management

  • Kazunori Ueda: He was one of the main researchers of the Fifth Generation Computer Systems project (FGCS), Institute for New Generation Computer Technology (ICOT). While his LMNtal system looks all right from our point of view, his HyperLMNtal is a shameless and bold plagiat of our OntoBot and Ontologic File System (OntoFS) software components, and the related techniques and technologies, that can be found on the Links to Software webpage, specifically in the section Exotic Operating System, Formal Modeling, Formal Verification, and Intelligent/Cognitive Agent.
    Eventually, what he did was simply to describe our system part by using some other words. An interesting example, that shows a basic trick applied throughout related papers, is that he "[d]istinguish[es] between links and hyperlinks" to reflect the 1:1 and 1:* of the relational model, that is consistent with First-Order Logic (FOL). At first we wondered why he departed from the pure approach in this way, but then we saw the true reason.
    There are much more points that prove our claim of plagiarism, but we do not discuss them in detail here for very good reasons.

    Extra funny: "Now notice that place/transition nets, the most basic form of Petri Nets, are exactly multiset rewriting systems; they are different representations of the same thing. Note also that graph rewriting degenerates to multiset rewriting simply by forgetting about links. Thus, it is almost trivial to have a multiset rewriting system corresponding to a given LMNtal program and analyze its state space that captures just the composition of atoms. [... and] scope management [...]."
    What should we say more? Maybe we should quote what we said in the OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps of the 2nd of June 2016 and 30th of May 2016 already "Not surprisingly, everything in this field is connected with each other somehow by morphisms, rule-based transformations [...]", and "Well-Structured Transition Systems [(WSTS)] Everywhere!", and also mention the OntoScope software component and the feature of the Total Quality Management (TQM) of our Ontologic System (OS).

    Nevertheless, we selected for example Multi-dimensional Dynamic Linear Temporal Logic (MDLTL; see e.g. Minerva) together with OntoBot (see again the Clarification of today and the other related Clarifications).

    No prior art was fraudulently created in this way in relation with the essential elements and components of our Ontologic System, but our copyright has been infringed by him. Convicted!!!


    10.June.2016
    Ontoscope Further steps
    We developed at least 3 variants of a new device that integrates two technologies in an advantageous way.

    We also optimized a device and now we are thinking about a solution of its last remaining and important problem.

    intelliTablet Further steps
    We would like to show some images of our latest Flip-Flop variant with the working name Extreme, that show the development status respectively next prototyping stage of this technology.

    The image shows the Flip-Flop Extreme as a squared, transparent, and very thin mobile device folded out to its maximal size, that is 9 times larger than its size when folded together.

    Flip-Flop Extreme
    © :(

    On the 6th of September 2016, we have removed two other images and added more textual descriptions, because the company that created these images does not respect us and our works.
    In the two bottom images another variant of the Flip-Flop Extreme is shown as a rectrangular, transparent, and very thin mobile device. The left image shows a holographic projection of a pot with a meal and additional textual informations below it. The right image shows a holographic projection of an interactive sports game with a snow- boarder jumping above the mobile device, which is bent to form a half-pipe accordingly.

    Honestly, some weeks ago we did not completely realize that we have reached this stage already until an external entity reminded us about this fact (see also Original vs. Inspiration of the 17th of January 2008).

    Also, keep in mind that all of our devices are running one of the variants of our original and unique Ontologic System (OS) with our Ontologic Net (ON), Ontologic Web (OW), and OntoVerse (OV).

    iRaiment Further steps
    Already some weeks ago we improved our electronic smartband.

    Furthermore, we found out that the capacity of our smartwatches with round and square format can be up to 3,500 mAh.

    Since some days, we are also thinking about the option to add the second generation of our smartwatches to our product line.

    In addition, we developed a new concept, which has the potential to become a standard. Amazing.

    Investigations::AI and Knowledge management

  • Marvin Minsky: Honestly, we never understood why he has not supported C.S. in all these many years.
  • Marko A. Rodriguez: He was a researcher the Digital Library Research and Prototyping Team at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, where he has stolen an essential element of the Ontologic System (OS) of C.S., which is related with the abstract machine core of the OS, specifically with a Resource Description Framework Virtual Machine (RDF VM) and a Web Ontology Language Virtual Machine (OWL VM).
    We will not discuss the details for very good reasons, because it is sufficient to prove the crime by only quoting the following passages out of his document: "[...] model of general-purpose computing on a semantic network substrate [...]", "[...] standards and technological infrastructure devoted to the Semantic Web", "In the proposed model of computing, the application programming interface, the run-time program, and the state of the computing virtual machine are all represented in the Resource Description Framework (RDF).", "leverages the highly-distributed and standardized representational-layer of the Semantic Web", "The thesis of this article is that the state of a computing machine, its low-level instructions, and the executing program can be represented as a semantic network. The computational model that is presented can be instantiated using any semantic network representation. However, given the existence of the Resource Description Framework (RDF) (Manola & Miller, 2004) and the popular Web Ontology Language (OWL) (McGuinness & Harmelen, 2004), this article presents the theory and the application in terms of these constructs.", "The introduction to this article is split into three subsections.", "General-Purpose Computing and the Virtual Machine", "The meaning of computability and what is required to compute was first developed by Alan Turning in the late 1930s (Turing, 1937).", "The Semantic Web and RDF", "[...] triple-store applications dedicated to the storage and manipulation of RDF networks [...]", "[...] triple-store is analagous to a relational database [...]", "[...] SPARQL Protocol and RDF Query Language (SPARQL) [...] SPARQL, loosely, is a hybrid of both SQL (a relational database language) and Prolog (a logic programming language) [...]", "Many triple-store applications support reasoning about resources during a query (at run-time).", "Object-Oriented Programming and OWL", "A class specification in object-oriented programming is called an application programming interface (API) (Sebesta, 2005). OWL ontologies share some similarities to the object[-]oriented API.", "[...] C++ [...]", "[...] OWL-S is more at the agent-oriented level [...]", "Another interesting and related idea is to use RDF as a medium for communication between various computing devices and thus, utilize the Semantic Web as an infrastructure for distributed computing", "[...] Human readable/writeable source code is compiled to create an OWL ontology that abstractly represents how instructions should be united to form instruction sequences.", "In summary, software is written in human readable/writeable source code, compiled to an OWL API, instantiated to RDF triple-code, and processed by a computing machine whose state is represented in RDF.", "The Ontological Level", and "[...] are Turing complete and thus, can perform any classical (non-quantum) computation [...]".
    As we already explained in the last past, this is only the very naive approach, which never worked in practice, and hence the reason why we have not described it explicitly and broadly at all, but instead worked on a truly practicable system that avoids all the many mistakes done since the beginning of the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and later in the field of computing. In this relation, see the webpages of the months January 2007, April 2007, and September 2007, read also for example the Clarifications of the 5th, 8th, and 9th of June 2016 (yesterday), keep in mind that a Turing machine has been implemented with an Artificial Life (AL) cellular automata maybe 20 years ago already, (see also The Proposal), the QT® library and other referenced software are based on the object-oriented paradigm, the phrase "human readable/writeable source code" does neither mean our Bridge from Natural Intelligence (NI) to Artificial Intelligence (AI) nor the fields of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and NL programming, and the level of abstraction of the virtual machine paradigm is hardware related software, and ask yourself why this specific computing model has not been described before in the years 1999 to 2006.
    Extra funny is the fact that the author mentioned all the time the right items, for example relational database respectively logic, Prolog respectively deductive database, and so on, but did not conclude that what he is doing is only a waste of time. See also The Proposal and the Arrow system connected with The TUNES Project to Redefine Computing referenced in the section Exotic Operating System.

    Doubtlessly, we have a causal link with our Ontologic System (OS) OntoLinux, because the original and unique concept of such a computing model and related abstract machine is already rudimentary described on the webpage Introduction, which is based on informations given by us before, such as the sentence "We thought that it would be clear, that we integrate Metadata, Topic Maps, Ontologies and Ontologics + Proof-carrying-code for the construction of Self-adaptive systems with Specification-carrying- code, but it wasn't." (see the OntoLinux Website update of the 27th of January 2007), and Overview, which were announced (see the OntoLinux Announcement of new webpages of the 30th of January 2007) and also publicated before his document, which again is marked with "original: April 16, 2007 revision: October 7, 2007".

    That said, no prior art was fraudulently created in this way in relation with the essential elements and components of our Ontologic System, but our copyright has been infringed in this context by him. Convicted!!!

  • John E. Laird: He is one of the main researchers of the State operator and result (Soar) system, which is listed in the section Intelligent/Cognitive Agent of the Links to Software webpage on the one hand and on the other hand was extended by him by using our Ontologic System (OS), as it can be proven easily by the new features, which include non-symbolic processing, meta-information, emotion, and visual imagery controlled by the symbolic system, to name the most relevant adaptions.
    Also interesting is the following statement: "With the addition of visual imagery, we have demonstrated that it is possible to solve spatial reasoning problems orders of magnitude faster than without it, and using significantly less procedural knowledge. Visual imagery also enables processing that is not possible with only symbolic reasoning [...]" See our Bridge from Natural Intelligence to Artificial Intelligence based on XML, including SVG, which proves that it is not his achievement in general, but how far reaching, and therefore original and unique our OS truly is even in relation with such details.

    Obviously, our OS OntoLinux was not referenced by the author on the one side and on the other side no prior art was created in this way in relation with the essential elements and components of our OS, but our copyright has been infringed in this context by him. Convicted!!!

    This is very disappointing, because all these cases of the Investigations::AI and Knowledge management are exemplary for the common attitude. We thought that especially the better known researchers are respectively were more developed intellectually and hence have more technical and social competences, but it seems to be that the opposite attitude is the true reason for their popularity so to say.


    11.June.2016
    Ontonics Further steps
    Today, we concluded that we have optimized our fusion reactor another time last week.
    This development should give us the possibility to scale down the device.

    We developed the second generation of a technology, which is impressive and extremely interesting.

    iRaiment Further steps
    We would like to show the first masterpieces of the new model serie, that we called Papier Flottant (Floating Paper), announced on the 20th and 21st of March 2016, and created to reinvent horology.

    Conceptually, the Papier Flottant models have the display connected to the frame by one or more wires, which could also be a nanowire structure not visible by human eyes, while the Flying Paper watches also work with a wireless connection for both the data and the electric power transmission on the one hand and the display and the clockwork as well on the other hand depending on the specific model.
    These jewels of high-technology can be realised with any passive (reflective), such as an electronic paper (e-paper) or Interferometric MOdulator Display (IMOD), and active display teachnology, such as and Organice Light-Emitting Diode (OLED) or Quantum dot Light-Emitting Diode (QLED) display for example.
    In addition, we use the Gears by Software technology of Style of Speed.
    For sure, the battery or batteries is/are contained in our electronics wristband.

    Indeed, the models of the subseries Papier Flottant No. 1 have the watch case of the Ciel et Terre No. 1 (see the Further steps of the 23rd of March 2016). Furthermore, the original sketches show watch cases with 2 lugs and not 3 lugs as parts of the attachment. We will show at least one model in the 2 lugs variant later.
    The shown models of the Papier Flottant No. 1 subseries also have an e-paper display.

    The first model Papier Flottant No. 1 has the e-paper mounted on inner lugs resembling the structures of the baguette movement and the wristband attachment.
    The second variant Papier Flottant No. 1 Sans Mise à la Terre has the display component coupled to the inner walls by invisible wires, which explains its title, and also Peter Henlein's watch face as option.
    The third variant of the Papier Flottant No. 1 Grand Écran (Large Display) or Grand Toile (Large Canvas) has a larger display, as its title already clearifies, and was created while making these images today. In fact, the electronic canvas does not float so much anymore, but it is still floating and also larger for viewing the other masterpieces in a better way.
    iRaiment Papier Flottant No. 1iRaiment Papier Flottant No. 1 Sans Mise à la Terre
    iRaiment Papier Flottant No. 1 Grand Écran or Grand Toile

    The Papier Flottant No. 1 Héritage (Legacy) is our first Compillon, which is a wearable computer with a tourbillon and other elements of a complication (see again the Further steps of the 23rd of March 2016). This masterpiece even has a flying tourbillon of Thomas Prescher.
    iRaiment Papier Flottant No. 1 Héritage

    The Papier Flottant No. 3 has an LED color display. The bridge could be substituted by a more filigree one.
    iRaiment Papier Flottant No. 3
    © Corum, Thomas Prescher, Vianney Halter, :I, and C.S.

    The first masterpiece Papier Volant No. 1 of the other model series, that we called called Papier Volant (Flying Paper) and announced on the 23rd of March 2016, will be shown in the near future.

    If somebody has not understood it, our multimedia works of art Cybillon and Compillon are not an evolution but a revolution in the field of horology.
    Please keep in mind that our whole concepts and not only the images or single watches are protected by the copyright.

    Have we promised too much?

    Roboticle Further steps
    We developed a new model of one of our robot series.

    We also developed a new model of one of our robot series, which integrates two foundational technologies in an advantageous way.


    12.June.2016
    iRaiment Further steps
    In relation with our Cybillon and Compillon masterpiece series, we would also like to give the potentially missing explicit explanation that all other electric and electronic components, such as little electric motors for driving an indicator and winding up a spring of a mechanical movement for example, are supplied with electric energy over conductive or/and inductive coupling structures as well, and that electronic components can also be contained in our electronic wristband.
    All these features make the whole foundational concept of these multimedia works of art original and unique.

    Today, we would like to show the second masterpiece of the new model series Papier Volant (Flying Paper), which is called Papier Volant No. 2 correspondingly.
    Indeed, the model Papier Volant No. 2 has the watch case with two lugs or horns of the Double Watch No. 3 and No. 4 (see the Further steps of the 26th and also 25th of May 2016).
    Despite that the intial concept also includes a truly flying tourbillon, which means no connection to the watch case at all, we simply selected the movement of the model Angelus U20 Ultra Skeleton Tourbillon for illustrating the concept of the Papier Volant subseries. Needless to say, other movements can be used as well.
    iRaiment Papier Volant No. 2
    © :I, Angelus, and C.S.

    Next time, we will show the Papier Volant No. 1 with a truly flying tourbillon.

    In addition, we have finalized the development of our modular electronic band for mobile devices such as smartwatches (see also the Further steps of the 26th of February 2016) and smartphones.
    If not already included in the central portion of such a wearable or portable computer, then additional and exchangeable functions, like for example fingerprint scanner, humidity, thermometer, altitude sensors, programmable button, Light Diamond, and more, are provided in this way.

    iRaiment Attachment and Modular Electronic Wristband with Clasp and Stub
    © :I, :I, and iRaiment

    Please keep in mind that the design of the attachment, specifically of the mounting means or/and the coupling means, might be subject to change in the future and that our band will not be compatible with plagiarisms.


    13.June.2016
    Clarification
    As not expected otherwise due to the observations made in the past in relation with the capability-based microkernel L4, hypervisors based on such microkernels, and a subsequent operating system project, specifically the communication on its mailing list, we got the impression that developers of said operating system project want now to copy essential elements of the multimedia work of art series Ontologic System created by C.S. after some well known of them attempted to direct the development to our OSs, such as OntoLinux and OntoLix for example.
    In this relation

  • the use of a pure function based package management system,
  • a container standardization, messaging, a re-implementation of NetBSD using a microkernel, and other techniques and technologies related with OntoLix,
  • process migration and persistence,
  • the use of a model of the operating system and reasoning about it for controlling its capability system,
  • a terminal-based agent for dynamic configuration for solving a specific problem,
  • a multiparadigmatic programming language based on the functional and object-oriented programming paradigms, followed by
  • the application of formal verification and the use of a higher-level language, as well as the sufficiency of the programming language C++, and eventually
  • a graphical environment for cognitive modeling as such a higher-level language

    were teached, suggested, motivated, or/and discussed to name just some few points.

    Doubtlessly, our OS is the source of inspiration, and the research and development, including the design steps we made around 13 years ago, are repeated now, as a quick look on the webpage Links to Software of the OntoLinux website proves, and therefore we have a causal link.
    In this respect, we consider several combinations of the points listed above, for example a microkernel, model, capability, or/and cognitve agent-based operating system or library operating system (libOS), as parts of the original and unique composition of our OS.
    Because we claim that developers have now begun to copy such essential elements respectively compositional parts of our OS, the suggestions of such development directions are already a prove for the infringement of our copryright.

    We recommend the owner(s) of the mailing list to rigorously

  • ban destructive and anarchistic entities from it,
  • demand the referencing of every orginal source, and
  • stop that fraudulent strategy,

    instead of continuing with playing the unknowing, claiming not to be responsible for such activities, and even supporting such illegal activities.

    Interested customers can directly get in contact with us for discussing their requirements and our conditions.

    OntoLix and OntoLinux Website update
    We added to the section Abstract Machine of the Literature (alter- native section Formal Modeling of the webpage Links to Software) the document:

  • Delft University of Technology, Department of Technical Informatics, Joost M.W. Visser: Evolving Algebras
    "Evolving algebras provide models for arbitrary computational processes, that can at once be viewed as abstract machine, and as formal specifications. [... T]he states of evolving algebras are interpreted vocabularies [..., which] is a collection of names [or signs]."

    This is especially interesting seen from different points of view and for various reasons:

  • For example, the concept itself is interesting, because it integrates the fields of abstract machine and formal specification, so that in these fields again everything is connected with each other somehow.
  • It also reflects on a more foundational level the same approach done before with common, real-time, and reflective operating systems and agent-based systems and their specifications and implementations. In fact, this led to the foundational concept and design of one part of our Ontologic System (OS), specifically of the design of the OntoCore and OntoBot components.
  • But even better, an evolving algebra is basically a state transition system, which leads us to Well-Structured Transition Systems (WSTS) in this relation again (see also the Website update of the 2nd of June 2016 for example). Everything is connected with each other in a complex but still readily comprehensible manner. Keeping our OS understandable by selecting a small set of prior art was also a goal when creating it.
  • Furthermore, we have interpreted vocabularies as the states of the WSTS and also domain models respectively ontologies, which is directly connected with for example natural languages, natural intelligence, and artificial intelligence as well. A more far reaching implication is that all these abstract machines and virtual machines as well as operating systems are not needed at all seen from the conceptual point of view. Simple said, computing can be done instantaneously like breathing air.
  • In addition, we are talking about a kernel-less reflective system, which can be applied here another time as well, as it was done with the ultimate grounding of our OS, which is simply said the void or nothing and everything simultaneously (see the related Clarification of the 29th of April 2016). In fact, our ontologic model constitutes a totally different kind of computing substrate or better said it constitutes some kind of a computing aether or computing spirit.

    These system properties should have been understood already as essential properties of the Ontologic System (OS). Indeed, the OS is a kind of magic, real tangible magic (citation options are given at the end of the Website update of the 12th of May 2016).

    Ontologic Web Further steps
    We have added our next Ontologic Web (OW) environment.

    In addition, we are working on our next OW service platform.


    14.June.2016
    Clarification #1
    Critics might say that we have perverted the causality with our OntoLix and OntoLinux Website updates and Clarifications publicated in the months April, May, and June in the sense that our system description was only a hull without content. But this is not the case, because in fact we only showed which concepts, semantics, paradigms, techniques, technologies, and systems the description of our Ontologic System comprises and means, and compared them with the state of the art. Specifically, we showed:

  • how the Stable Model Semantics (SMS), Well Founded Semantics (WFS), and Answer Set Semantics (ASS)
    • are intertwined with each other,
    • provide the foundations for programming, testing, checking, proving, reasoning, and solving paradigms, and
    • are provided by our OntoBot software component with Smodels,
  • how the multilingual multimodal multiparadigmatic multidimensional programming technique looks like, which is including object- and ontology-oriented dynamic concurrent programming paradigms and making possible to put any kind of
    • logics,
    • constraint sets, and
    • other suitable mathematical and logical items

    into the slots of a formal expression,

  • how the field of Formal Verification (FV), including the field of Well-Structured Transition System (WSTS), which is a general class of infinite state systems, for which many verification problems are decidable,
    • relates to and its decidability results are applied to models, including
      • Petri nets,
      • Communicating Finite State Machines (CFSMs),
      • string and graph rewriting systems,
      • process algebras, and
      • other operational models of computation,

      and

    • is used as the foundational model for the integration of every transition system into our coherent ontologic model,
  • how our Ontologic System (OS) is grounded on the levels of
    • philosophy and
    • semiotics
      • syntactics,
      • semantics, and
      • pragmatics,
  • that again virtually no grounding exists respectively that the foundation of our OS consists of nothing and all simultaneously, which can be described as an ungrounded but usable computing, cybernetic, or ontologic aether or spirit

    and

  • why only a critical mass of entities and relations of them are needed for the emergence of intelligent behaviour, as stated some years ago already.

    But this ontologic aether or spirit is also on the level of what is referred to as consciousness for example, and because we have listed Artificial Consciousness on the webpage Terms of the 21st Century and also publicated the section Human Enhancement and Cyborgs of the Innovation-Pipeline of Ontonics, we are able to close the circle, and prove that our arguments are absolutely sound, the causal chain is untouched and therefore intact, and every critic is wrong.

    Another fact is, that the description of our Ontologic System given on the webpages Introduction and Overview and the items listed on the webpages Components, Links to Software, and Links to Hard- ware of the website of OntoLinux are based on many keywords, which reference single works, systems, or even whole fields of relevance, which again also fit together perfectly like the gears of a complication or calibre in horology.
    Because descriptions with such a high density and complexity, and on such a high level can only be written when the content of these works of prior art and fields are very well known to the author, another prove is given that the causal chain has not been perverted or manipulated. Said in other words, it is impossible to present such an empty but perfect hull, as mentioned in the beginning of this clarification, with the goal to fill it later with content or simply by happenstance.

    Furthermore, we showed that external entities have only focused and worked on specific system parts, such as ontology-based and -oriented systems, graph traversal and transformation systems, knowledge management systems, virtual machines, operating systems, and so on, thinking that they could steal everything in this way. We can see now that every fraudster also is wrong on the one hand and that our OS is indeed original an unique on the other hand.

    We will write this down in detail and set all together in the following issues of our Ontologica, Ontologico, Ontologics series (see also Ontologica, Ontologico, Ontologics publicated on the 21st of May 2016).

    Clarification #2
    A fan and reader of us might ask the question if this ontologic aether or spirit O# can be used with our OntoVerse (OV) (read also the related sections of the Overview webpage and the Clarification of the 16th of April 2016 again).
    Indeed, this is the case and in the first step we applied it already with the creation of a belief system, that

  • is mainly based on natural language programming and our Ontology-Oriented (OO 2) and Ontologic(-Oriented) (OO 3) programming (see for example the Clarification of the 27th of April 2016) and
  • constitutes as a substitute for the Sumerian language used as the firmware programming language for the brainstem in the novel "Snow Crash".

    It also provides us the foundation for the realization of most of the fascinating, amazing, crazy, and magic stuff listed on the webpage Terms of the 21st Century, which in fact are also Ontologic Applications and not a simple chatbot or an intelligent personal assistant for example.

    OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps
    We worked on a very special Ontologic Application.

    We also worked on one of our components, which might be ready for presentation.

    Besides this, we are also thinking about moving the webpage Terms of the 21st Century to the website of our OntoLab and merge its content with the content of the webpage Ontologic Applications.

    Furthermore, we can now publicate the correct version of the section Artificial Consciousness, which we have hold back all the years as a measure of protection against the fraudulent activities of criminal entities, because as a matter of fact we have already proven the existence of Artificial Consciousness with our Ontologic System, specifically with our Caliber/Calibre and the derivation and creation of our abstract machine core OntoCore.
    Hopefully, this is clear now for everybody (see also the Clarification #1 and #2 of today).

    Ontologic Web Further steps
    We are working on the integration of our next new Ontologic Web (OW) environment and our next four new OW service platforms.

    iRaiment Further steps
    We used a feature of a system to improve a device series.


    15.June.2016
    Clarification
    We are sure, that some of our fans and readers wondered about the statement "All the rest is in our Ontologic Web (OW), the World Wide Web of the next generation: [...] every game" given in the presentation OS is ON of the 9th of May 2016.

    In fact, we have with our Ontologic System (OS) everything we need:

  • OntoCore (OC),
    • mircrokernel,
    • Artificial Intelligence (AI), and
    • etc.
  • OntoBot (OB)
    • Multi-Agent System (MAS),
    • Artificial Intelligence (AI), and
    • etc.
  • OntoScope (OSc)
    • Multidimensional Multimodal Multimedia User Interface (M³UI), and
    • Mixed Reality (MR) Environment (MRE)
      • 2D
      • 3D
      • Augmented Reality (AR) Environment (ARE), and
      • Virtual Reality (VR) Environment (VRE),
  • OntoBlender
    • literate programming,
    • ontologic programming, including
      • automatic programming,
      • natural language programming, and
      • multimodal multimedia programming,
    • game and interactive fiction generating, and
    • game engine
  • OntoNet and Ontologic Net (ON),
  • OntoWeb and Ontologic Web (OW), and
  • OntoVerse and Ontologic uniVerse (OV).

    Et voilà, our OS simply takes the contents of the ON and OW, and generates all kinds of computer or video games, as it is already done with news and reports for example.
    These generation, execution, and gaming processes can also include contents provided by a user or a specific group of users as some kind of Massively Multiplayer Mixed Reality Online Costume Role-Playing Game (MMMROCRPG).

    Needless to say, that this kind of generating technology is applied as well for everything else, that we have listed in the presentation OS is ON.

    A genious, original and unique multimedia work of art masterpiece of C.S., copyrighted and legal (no causal links with copyrighted computer or video games and other works, and if so, then fair use, because this work is literally spoken generative and transformative).

    It's not a trick - It's Ontologics, and always better to collaborate with us.

    At this point we would like to mention once again, that companies like for example Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, Google, Amazon, as well as Samsung, LG Electronics, Huawei, Sony, and so on, continue with copying our OS, ON, OW, and OV, as well as our hardware devices, then they have to ask for a contract and our licensing model, or as an alternative have serious talks with the law enforcements and courts worldwide.

    Ontologic Web Further steps
    Furthermore, we have added our next Ontologic Web (OW) environment.

    In addition, we are working on our next OW service platform.

    Besides these new environment and service, we also added a special application suite to our Ontologic Web (OW).

    Raiment Further steps
    We created a new model series of a smart wear and designed its frist models. Superstyle.


    16.June.2016
    Comment of the Day
    Aether computing™
    Spirit computing™
    Ghost computing™
    God computing™

    Ontonics Further steps
    We created some trademarks for giving the computing, cybernetic, or ontologic aether and spirit respectively ontologic computing a better name for differentiating it from the grid computing and cloud computing paradigms, and for related marketing activities. We think the shorter variant Ghost Computing is better suited for these activities, but the last decision has not been made.

    Btw.: The term God Computing was only created in relation to a book, which is about object-oriented design patterns including the god class, god object, and god table, which again represent counter examples of totally overloaded software structures, and in relation with our (funny) descriptions given in the Clarifications of the 16th and 29th of April 2016.
    Technically, we cannot follow this opinion that a total overloading is a bad system design, specifically because our Ontologic System (OS) is highly integrated.
    Personally, we never wanted to connect our OS with any religious thing, for example with the ontological argument respectively the proof of the existence of God, or the faith, despite we have to acknowledge significant differences, which will become more common in the not too far away future.

    Style of Speed Further steps
    Already some days ago, we have improved an electric component, which has a wide range of applications.


    17.June.2016
    Website update
    As announced on the 11th of June 2016, we have updated the image of the model Papier Flottant No. 3 (the lowest image) with the correctly sized tourbillon as sketched.

    Ontonics Further steps
    We created a new device class and added a related project to the Innovation-Pipeline.

    In addition, we developed a new material class and its first new materials with extremely fascinating features. But we forgot to create a name for this material class.
    We also looked at suitable production technologies.

    OntoLix and OntoLinux Further steps
    We developed a new variant of a component, which uses a related component and improves it significantly respectively solves some serious deficits of a plagiarism.
    In the next steps, we have to look at some last details to realize some improvements and a variant, and learn its incredible capabilities and applications. This is completely matured and looks really very good.

    Style of Speed Further steps
    From time to time over the last weeks, we designed a new variant of each of our motorcycle models #1, #2, #4, and #5, which have become even more cooler and amazing in this way.


    18.June.2016
    Comment of the Day
    Reactor™
    Reactor cell™
    Perfection by Design™

    Style of Speed Further steps
    The 935 Hommage of our 9x9 series takes shape (see also the Further steps of the 29th of June 2015, 17th of September 2015, and 4th of March 2016, and the complete discussion given in the Investigations ::Car #395 publicated on the 16th of September 2015).

    Volkswagen→Porsche 911 Turbo GT2 (993) → SoS→9x9 935 HommageVolkswagen→Porsche 911 Turbo GT2 (993) → SoS→9x9 935 Hommage
    ©© BY 2.0 The Car Spy
    © Style of Speed

    What cannot be seen easily in the image are the LED light bands at the edges of the wing and the fender widenings, extensions, or flares.

    Please keep in mind that this is only a sketch. For example, the diffusor has not the shape as we want it and other elements could be restyled as well.

    More Machine Than Machine™

    We are very pleased to announce our next Green Heart™ for clean electric driving fun with our new electric energy system called Reactor™ and its 100% environmental friendly continuous flow Reactor Cell™.

    Characteristic for our Reactor systems are the:

  • very high efficiency
  • very high performance,
  • very compact dimensions,
  • very lightweight construction,
  • very long runtime resulting in an unmatched extremely long electric drive range,
  • very fast reactivation time of down to 3 minutes depending on the applied Quickcharger system,
  • and very much more.
    For sure, we also developed a special variant of our next revolutionary game changer, that is powered by our new regenerative fuel.

    As the first automobile equipped with our Reactor we thought to take our model

  • 9EE (see also the 935 Hommage above) with a range of at least 300 miles
    swiftly followed by other models including our
  • Pan resp. 949,
  • REactor,
    with an electric drive range of at least 400 miles, and our models
  • Amarok-E and Big S, and
  • ETE

    with an electric drive range of at least 500 miles.
    Please keep also in mind, that we are an absolutely independent corporation, that is neither connected nor affiliated with any other automobile manufacturer, even not in relation with being a supplier for us.

    Perfection by Design™

    We are also pleased to confirm a new model series.


    19.June.2016
    Comment of the Day
    AI operating system™

    Ontonics Further steps
    Now it is getting very interesting. We have a technology that realizes a process, which again results in a waste material. At first, we thought all the time that this waste material makes the reasonable practical use of this technology impossible. Nevertheless, we developed some potential solutions for handling said waste material to rescue the applicability of this technology, and somehow also learned in the meantime that this waste material has a property, which makes it useful for other technologies. We also had a more subtle handling process in mind, but this possibility was declared as not sellable to critics and decision makers, though it is not such an issue.
    But today, we concluded that the combination of this technology, the other mentioned technologies based on this waste material, and this subtle handling process must set free a synergy, which in addition even provides more advantages to our big surprise.

    Green? SuperGreen?? Greener than Green!

    Style of Speed Further steps

    We developed two more variants of our electric energy system Reactor.

    Investigations::AI and Knowledge management
    *** Last round of proof-reading ***

  • Google: Despite that we have busted and also trapped that company Google finally, we also expected some weeks ago already that it will continue with its stealing of our intellectual properties, specifically the OntoCore (OC) software component, which comprises the operating system, virtual machine, and abstract machine core, the OntoBot software component, as well as the Ontologic Web (OW) and the Ontologic uniVerse (OntoVerse or OV) of the original and unique series of art works called Ontologic System (OS) and created by C.S., and its variants OntoLix and OntoLinux, which are discussed and explained in the Clarifications, and OntoLix and OntoLinux Website updates publicated since the mid-April 2016.
    Correspondingly, it started with the development of a so-called common sense Artificial Intelligence (AI) engine to copy the next element of our OSs OntoLix and OntoLinux, as it can be easily seen with for example the
  • related works referenced in the sections
  • directly related webpages Emotion Machine Architecture and Roboverse on its website, and also
  • related parts of the OntoCore and the OntoBot, which realize our common sense AI functionality.

    But the issue is not limited to that common sense AI functionality of our OntoCore and OntoBot.
    Due to the fact that Google was so greedy and also set the common sense AI engine in relation with the way a growing/developing child learns, the company itself has effectively created a clear causal link with The Proposal of C.S., which is also listed on the website of our OS OntoLinux, and in this way also a causal link with our Ontologic Systems and all of their essential elements and compositions, including the Ontologic Web and the OntoVerse (OV).
    In addition, it is very important to note the facts, that the OS also

  • questions existence and being in general and
  • constitutes a self-reflection in particular

    as part of the (self-)expression of C.S., and that the OntoBot and its included common sense AI engine have been chosen as a way to reflect the thinking processes of

  • a human in general and
  • C.S. in particular.

    The latter is also so very interesting, because C.S. shows to some extent a special autism spectrum disorder, or being more precisely some rudimentary but nevertheless constructive and useful capacities of a savant, which

  • so to say are not perfectly developed by going into the depth respectively by being highly focusing on a specific subject, but by going into the breadth respectively by being general and flexible providing the problem solving capabilities for going into the depth for example on the one side and
  • on the other side can be transformed in exactly such an abstract AI machine.
    What could be better for the field of AI and beyond, if a little savant has
  • the ability to communicate with the environment,
  • a brain a little comparable to Mr. Spock's brain,
  • learned how this brain works like an abstract machine,
  • an affinity for software engineering, and
  • the implements this way of thinking as the part of an Ontologic System, which is based on an extensible reflective integration of an operating system, a virtual machine, an abstract machine, and a cognitive mult-agent system,
    "C.S. has talked with W. Banzhaf about this subject [of synaestethics] and about savants while writing The Proposal."
    See also the technique Mise en abyme and the related Originals and Pictures of the Day of the 7th of May 2012, including the painting "Evidence" of C.S. shown on the webpage of our Caliber/Calibre of the OS as well, and also the work about "The Mystery of the Tower Revealed: A Nonreflective Description of the Reflective Tower" discussed in the OntoLinux Further steps of the 21st of August 2010.

    In addition, the direct conenction of the OntoVerse (OV) and these aspects related with a brain and its cognitive processes is obvious (see also the related Clarification of the 16th of April 2016).

    As a direct consequence, the company Google cannot use the common sense AI engine in public, neither as part of an individual web service nor as part of a standalone application on a device operated by its Android operating system, because it already had copied elements of our OS variant OntoLinux with for example the Linux kernel, the knowledge graph, the virtual voice-controlled Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA), and the support for multimedia system such as Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) environments respectively Mixed Reality (MR) environments, as well as their composition to one system, which also imitates the multimedia work of art series Ontologic System in this respect as well.
    In total contrast, these next significant technical and legal actions and mistakes make it a child play for us to prove our legal claims in relation with its infringements of the copyright law and other laws now.

    Another detail that shows Google's very aggressive obsession in this relation is the fact, that its common sense AI engine is not developed at its subsidiary in London, U.K., which focuses on AI, but in Zurich, Swiss, which provides a causal link with watches, our smartwatches, and eventually our Caliber/Calibre of the OS, as well as to the ontologic spirit (see the Clarifications of the 14th of June 2016 and Ontonics Further steps of the 16th of June 2016).

    But again the issue does not end at this point, because we could convict the company Google in the retrospective as well after it provided the missing proofs respectively causal links to the Ontologic System (OS) of C.S. itself with

  • its own explanation that its copy of the next OS element, which is a common sense Artificial Intelligence (AI) engine, is related with the development and learning of a child and in this way with C.S.' proposal about the development of a cognitive AI operating system publicated on the website of OntoLinux, and
  • the obvious temporal connection with the publications of related informations on our website OntomaX,

    discussed in detail in the sections above, we also got the proof now that the other

  • single software elements, including the
    • knowledge graph,
    • Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA),
    • Augmented Reality (AR),
    • Virtual Reality (VR),
    • Natural Language Processing (NLP),
    • Artificial Intelligence (AI),
    • common sense reasoning,
    • etc.

    and hardware respectively Ontoscope elements powered by said software elements, including
    • smartphone with 3D camera ,
    • tablet computer with 3D camera,
    • AR glass,
    • VR goggle,
    • autonomous car,
    • etc.,

    have been copied in the same context given by this causal link and for the same reason, so that we were right all the time to not handle all these single issues as isolated cases, but as one subject connected with our OS respectively the composition of our OS and hence as essential parts of our copyrighted work, which have been copied illegally, because no fair use is given without a transformative work, which obviously and doubtlessly Google has not created. In fact, the single copies of essential elements and the slowly emerging complete copy of our OS have to be handled on the same level of relevance in respect to the copyright protection. Simply said, Google only took our software and hardware, that belong to the OS, and replaced our brand Ontologics with its brand Google.

    Now, everybody can

  • see that the OS is not only about such systems, the next generation of the internet and the world wide web, or an other computing system,
  • understand why the OntoBot is original and unique,
  • imagine how precious the OS really is, and
  • confirm a further time that C.S.' OS is an original and unique work protected by the copyright, but also
  • comprehend the even more evilness, because the issue discussed here does not only provide the next clear evidence that Google made a plagiarism of C.S.' actings and works and is very obsessive, but it also proves once again Google's strategy to wipe out the existence of C.S. by
  • copying every acting and every work,
  • even recapitulating the development steps that led to C.S.' works in virtually the same chronological sequence to also copy the temporal causality in addition to the works and the underlying thought processes, and
  • manipulating everything that is related with C.S. actings and works, like for example content of a so-called internet encyclopedia and open source software projects. How thick must someone be to do such a stalking and stealing of an identity?

    Also important to note in this context are the facts, that

  • our OS and its variants, such as OntoLix and OntoLinux for example, are not about a common single item, like for example the programming language Java, so that the fair use clause is irrelevant and cannot be applied at all,
  • for similar reasons, the argument of an ordinary technological progress cannot be applied, because Google and related companies have created this situation artificially by making an exact copy of our OS. For sure, such a perversion of facts is illegal,
  • Google is applying a strategy, which proves on the one hand that it acknowledges the status of originality and uniqueness of our OS and on the other hand that the copying and stealing is realized deliberately,
  • Google is following our publications on this website in a prompt manner, and
  • additional evidences exist that prove more.

    Despite we have busted and also trapped that company Google finally, it is continuing with its

  • disgraceful and extremely aggressive obsession for C.S.
  • exercise of psycho terror as well as
  • manifold infringements of our rights in particular, but also of the laws of free societies in general.

    As we already mentioned in the last past several times, the company does not take care for any laws, which will become even more funnier, when Google attempts to take the judge and the jury for a ride as well.

  • British Broadcasting Corporation: As ususal, some of its criminal journalists reported about the next fraud of the company Google (see the investigative case of the company above). This proves another time that that public-law broadcaster supports serious criminal entities deliberately and therefore is totally untrustworthy and unreliable.


    20.June.2016
    iRaiment Further steps
    From the beginning of its development, we noticed a problem with an item and developed different models. But somehow we were not sure if the demands of customers are fulfilled with these models on the one hand and on the other hand we are aware of another item used for the same reason, but which does not fulfill our demands. Today, we developed this item further, so that it might fulfill all requirements.

    Investigations::Car #396

  • Bayerische Motorenwerke→Mini Cooper: The marque Mini Cooper of the vehicle manufacturer Bayerische Motorenwerke has taken the original and unique multimedia work of art series of C.S., which has been presented with various descriptions of vehicle components and systems, and complete vehicles on the website of Style of Speed, such as for example the models j!, V!/SpeedVan, and ETE, as blueprint and presented a concept car that also has as general functionalities an electric powertrain (see the sections Active Motor, an autonomous drive capabilitiy (see the section Robotics, specifically the subsections K.I.T.T.™ and K.A.R.R.™), multimedia systems (see the related subsections of the sections Active Component and Environment), including projection systems and an exterior with changeable visual displays (see the subsection E-Door or Active Door of the section Computing and Multimedia), and also an Intelligent Personal Assistant (IPA), which provides various multimedia and Artificial Intelligence functions and applications (see the subsection Artificial Intelligence of the section Computing and Multimedia).

    While most of the single elements belong to prior art, as it can be seen with for example the Autobots™ K.I.T.T. and K.A.R.R. of the TV series "Knight Rider", and therefore their separate or isolated use in respect to a single vehicle is legal, as far as we can see, this in general is not the case with a composition of such single elements anymore, if it reflects said multimedia work of art series of C.S. without being transformative respectively providing a new original and unique expression.
    The reasons why such a copying of essential work parts or whole works in relation with these moving multimedia work of art series indeed constitutes a copyright infringement are not only the aspects of originality and uniqueness, but also the facts that they

  • are a (self-)expression of C.S., representing visionary power, ingenuity, intelligence, proactivity, progressivity, pioneering spirit, high-tech, high-performance, speed, aesthetics, beauty and elegance, style, and so on, and also
  • have been created to begin the discussion about how the future of mobility could look like.

    Accordingly, these moving multimedia works are not only an ordinary technological progress respectively have not only a use and a technical benefit for the society at the date of creation (see the related Clarification of the 8th of May 2016), but go beyond these points.

    Obviously, the concept car of the marque Mini Cooper has been created and presented by using existing elements or/and our new elements, that it found on our websites, to spread this original and unique expression of C.S. as a marketing message of the subsidiary and the whole company.

  • Bayerische Motorenwerke→Rolls Royce: This case is similar to the case of the other marque Mini Cooper of the vehicle manufacturer Bayerische Motorenwerke discussed before. Therefore we would like to direct our readers to this case.
  • Daimler→Mercedes-Benz: Over the course of the last years, the marque Mercedes-Benz of the vehicle manufacturer Daimler has taken the original and unique multimedia work of art series of C.S., which has been presented with various descriptions of vehicle components and systems, and complete vehicles on the website of Style of Speed as blueprint and presented several concept cars that also had single functionalities of said multimedia works of art.

    As we explained in the case of the marque Bayerische Motorenwerke→Mini Cooper (see above), the separate or isolated use of single elements in respect to a single vehicle is legal, as far as we can see, but this in general is not the case with a composition of such single elements anymore, if it reflects said multimedia work of art series of C.S. without being transformative respectively providing a new original and unique expression.

    Obviously, the concept car series of the marque Mercedes-Benz has been created and presented by using existing elements or/and our new elements, that it found on our websites, to spread this original and unique expression of C.S. as a marketing message of the subsidiary and the whole company.

  • Volkswagen, →Audi, →Porsche, and →other marques: see the case of the marque Daimler→Mercedes-Benz
  • Toyota: see the case of the vehicle manufacturer Volkswagen
  • General Motors: see the case of the vehicle manufacturer Toyota
  • Ford: see the case of the vehicle manufacturer General Motors
  • Fiat Chrysler Automobiles: see the case of the vehicle manufacturer Ford
  • Renault: see the case of the vehicle manufacturer Fiat Chrysler Automobiles
  • Kia: see the case of the vehicle manufacturer Renault


    21.June.2016
    Investigations::Car #397

  • Volkswagen→Porsche: As not expected otherwise, the marque Porsche has also copied the next concept of us, which is our 911 RSR respectively 9x9 RSR with rear mid-engine layout shown in the Style of Speed Further steps of the 4th of March 2015, and presented around a month ago Porsche's 911 RSR race car for the 2017 GTE season. For making sure that the engine layout of our original 911 RSR is also classified as a rear mid-engine layout we looked another time at the specifica- tion of the model MP4-12C or simply 12C of the manufacturer McLaren Automotive. Note that our original concept is not limited to a V8 engine or any other engine.

    For sure, the story told by the head of Porsche's motorsports division is a lie. In fact, there was no concept of a race car based on its model 918 at all respectively this is a common concept that has been realized several times by the marque in its history, for example with the 911 GT1 of the years 1996 to 1998, but always the goal to follow our decision once again and copy the concepts of us, as it has been done in the last 2 decades all the time. Extra funny is his statement made in this relation that says "We have a high commitment to the 911. It's our [key] sports car and it stands for Porsche.", because this is exactly the reason why a rear mid-engine layout was never an option for the 911 and has been communicated in exactly this way all through the decades: The 911 must have a rear engine. It's our [key] sports car and it stands for Porsche. Everything else is a no-go (see also the statement of the chief of archive of the Porsche museum below).

    In relation with Porsche's clone of our 911 RSR transformative concept, it is also discussed and questioned by the public and the media why no images of the car's side and rear have been publicated. The answer is simple: We have not publicated images of side views and rear views of the 9x9 series and our latest 911 (991) concepts and conversions, that show more than non-binding doodles, until recently with the images of a potential rear section design of the model 935 Hommage that belongs to the 9x9 series (see the Style of Speed Further steps of the 18th of June 2016, and therefore the marque did not know what to copy in this relation.

    The 911 RSR copy features also our concept of the round or elliptic headlight with 4 light elements, that function as the main light source, shown in the Style of Speed Further steps of the 3rd of February 2015 and the model 9x9 shown in the Style of Speed Further steps of the 17th of September 2015, which should not be confused with the small light elements arranged around the projector (polyellipsoidal) main lamp of the actual generation of the models 911 (991) and Cayenne (92A). Correspondingly, Porsche's 911 RSR copy seems to be based on the 4 light elements taken from the headlights shown in a speculative image of a potential upgrade of the model Cayenne with the 4 light elements of the headlight of the model 918.
    Nevertheless, it is a plagiarism, because creating the same expression with the same elements is relevant, which can be realized with round or rectangular light elements and with or without a central element between these 4 light elements or another lamp below these light elements.

    Besides this, we heard that Porsche is already experimenting with a wider track for the model 911, which somehow suggests that it is trying everything related with our special

  • concept of a 911 with a front-engine layout and as well as
  • models of the 9x9 series.

    In fact, we also constructed a special situation with the creation of these two 911 concepts, which are a 911 with a:

  • rear mid-engine or mid-engine layout, and
  • front engine or front mid-engine layout,

    but not a rear engine layout anymore, because these concepts are not based on simple conversions or technical revolutions, but instead constitute absolutely unimaginable taboo breaches or better said totally unthinkable sacrileges realized by the maximal violations or injurious treatments of the sacred object 911 never ever discussed before as a possibility by Porsche, to absolutely and doubtlessly prove that

  • our concepts are original and unique works,
  • everything what we do is taken no matter how crazy, disruptive, or incorrect an action or a work is in respect to the branding policies, and
  • we are telling the truth since all the years.

    For us it is unbelievable that the managements of the marques and the editors of the automotive press did not recognize the complete situation even after we constructed the same situation in the past several times for example with the story of our model E6 in relation with the marque Audi, which began with the Style of Speed Further steps of the 31st of December 2014.
    Equally disappointing is the fact, that nothing has changed at Volkswagen and it is still cheated to the maximum limit.
    Now, we also have a first impression what the true meaning of the slogan "Together" is: We make the work and ourselves ridiculous, and they copy everything, take all the money, and as an extra joke even demand for approval and giving our blessing and allowance to continue with the looting of our business.

    Surprise, surprise, surprise
    Suddenly, we have found two related videos, which seem to be publicated in 2014 and are showing:

  • a test platform based on a model 965 (successor of the model 959) with a water-cooled V8 engine of the marque Audi and also
  • the mule for the model Boxster with an exterior of the 911 (964 Targa with Turbo fenders) used as a camouflage for public road testing,

    which were never shown outside of the Porsche museum before.

    We quote the chief of archive of the Porsche museum in relation with the 965 test platform: "I think seriously nobody [had in] mind to - to bring a car into production with a Audi V8. But it was just a test if such a concept could have a future. And luckily, they kept on building flat-6 engines and that I think that is the heart of all 911s." We are serious with our 911 RSR respectively an automobile with the exterior of a 911 and a rear mid-engine layout, but this has to be discussed in more detail in the future.
    We also quote the chief of archive in relation with the Boxster mule: "But one of the most unusual [car in our collection] is definitely the prototype of the Boxster with a Porsche 911 body. [...] The result was that the technical layout of the mid-engine car was tested under the body of a normal 911, so nobody could make out what's under the hood."
    In this relation we can also see that Porsche thinks seriously about this sacrilege and has already begun to test the resonance of the Porsche fans to steal our show and to provide the ground for bringing our concepts into prodution.

    Finding these two videos was very annoying and a classical example of hard luck after we said so much about this subject with the original result of this investigative case at first.
    Nevertheless, we do not have any informations that refute our claim that the 991 RSR with rear mid-engine layout is the concept of Style of Speed. But who knows what else will be found in the top secret archive.
    So let us wait for the day, when Porsche will find in its museum archive a 911 with a front-engine layout and its 2.0 flat-4 engine built into the models 912E and 914, and later present a 911 with a front-engine layout and a turbocharged 4-cylinder boxer engine or a turbocharged V engine (see also the Style of Speed Further steps of the 20th and 27th of December 2015).

    We leave it up to the management of Volkswagen to correct the latest fraud by explaining explicitly in the public that said concepts of the race car 911 RSR and the round headlight with four light elements as main light source are the works of our business unit Style of Speed.


    22.June.2016
    Picture of the Day
    Road Runner is looking back while waiting.

    Road Runner Looking Back While Waiting

    © Warner Bros. Entertainment

    Style of Speed Further steps
    We have developed another variant of our Reactor™ system that has a Reactor cell, which we optimized for the use of (bio)diesel and related fuels.
    The advantages of our Reactor™ systems are fabulous (see also the Further steps of the 18th of June 2016) and enable us to provide:

  • clean power,
  • most affordable electric energy system in comparison to all competitors, that costs around 50% of a battery and 70% of a fuel cell and decreases the cost of an electric car by around 35% in comparison to a battery car,
  • most efficient powertrain ever constructed, as already explained in the past,
  • no application insecurities anymore, for example
    • no range anxiety of electric vehicles,
    • reliable energy support at remote destinations, and
    • weather independent performance in very cold and hot environments,
  • fast reactivation time, that can be done at every common gasoline station and also at our Quickcharger stations,
  • and much more,

    that the modern societies are demanding for.

    In this way, we can deliver for example the basic variant of our

  • model E6 (see the Further steps of the 31st of December 2014; comparable to the model Model S of the manufacturer Tesla Motors) for just only 45,000 euro and
  • model E3 (see the Further steps of the 4th of August 2015; comparable to the model Model 3 of the manufacturer Tesla Motors) for the hammer price of 24,000 euro.

    See also the related Further steps of the 14th of August 2015.

    Mean Clean Green Machine - Also available in red and other colors.
    Meep! Meep!

    In this relation, we are very pleased to confirm that our key sports cars, the model 9EE and its variants of the 9x9 series (see also the Further steps of the 16th and 17th of September 2015, and 18th of June 2016), are the first models with our new Reactor™ system.
    Now, our fans and readers also know the reason why the model 935 Hommage has no exhaust pipes. :D

    This is only the beginning.

    We also worked on one of the production models of our 9x9 series, which for sure has a front-engine layout as shown in the Style of Speed World Premiere of the 20th of December 2015 and in the image below.
    This is our key sports car and it stands for Style of Speed, and by its many interesting features we will make it available to a much broader customer group than another marque was, is, and will be ever able to do.
    The targeted price for the entry level variant will be below the price of the models Boxster and Cayman of the marque Volkswagen→ Porsche, and above the price of the joint model 86, GT86, or FT86 and FR-S of the manufacturer Toyota and its marque Scion, and BRZ of the manufacturer Subaru.

    The image below shows a powertrain with a 4-cylinder boxer engine and a suspension as parts of an examplary chassis. But most potentially, we will use a front-engine, rear-wheel drive layout with a transaxle design that places the integrated transmission, differential, and associated components at the rear axle.

    SoS→9x9 4-Cylinder Boxer Engine
    © :(

    In addition, we have started with the creation of the designs for the new models of our marque Prancing Unicorn, which replaced the conversions of models of the marque Volkswagen→Audi→Lamborghini as our own automobiles in 2015.

    Furthermore, we added a new type of powertrain to a model series.

    Roboticle Further steps
    We have developed a new robotic platform, which also provides superior performances and in this way will support our market domination.


    23.June.2016
    Comment of the Day
    "What looked as the fate got the face of a fake. What a fate.", [C.S., Today]

    Style of Speed Further steps
    We found out that the chassis for our Classic interpretation 929 with a front-engine layout a turbocharged 4-cylinder boxer engine, and a transaxle design (see also the Further steps of yesterday) is similar to the chassis of the model 924 of the marque Volkswagen→Porsche with an ideal weight distribution of 48 % at the front and 52 % at the rear. Together with our chassis and suspension designs, and some gimmicks the driving performances will be outstanding.
    Now, we can focus on the construction of our special transaxle unit in the next development step. Cool car.

    Perfection by Design


    24.June.2016
    Ontonics Further steps
    We adapted an older technology finally for other devices.

    Style of Speed Further steps
    We also added to a series of multimedia components a new technology of us with fascinating functionality

    Furthermore, we integrated an older technology to a series of multimedia components finally.

    Furthermore, we adapted a relatively new solution for a series of multimedia components.

    iRaiment Further steps
    Masterpiece Alarm :D
    We are short before the creation of the first masterpiece of the new model series Papier Volant (Flying Paper) presented on the 11th and 12th of June 2016.

    In addition, we created a new masterpiece after we did not know how to handle an initial idea. So let us see how it looks like, works, and hopefully moves the audience.


    25.June.2016
    Comment of the Day #1
    Serpent™

    Comment of the Day #2
    "Ganz oder gar nicht", [C.S., Leitprinzip, Manchmal]
    "All or not at all", [C.S., guiding principle, Sometimes]
    Everything else does not do anybody anything, at least not the really interesting, like blind trust.

    Comment of the Day #3
    Empty spaces - what are we living for?
    Abandoned places - I guess we know the score.
    On and on!
    Does anybody know what we are looking for?

    Another hero - another mindless crime ..
    Behind the curtain, in the pantomime.
    Hold the line!
    Does anybody want to take it anymore?

    The Show must go on!
    The Show must go on! Yeah!
    Inside my heart is breaking,
    My make-up may be flaking,
    But my smile, still, stays on!

    Whatever happens, I'll leave it all to chance.
    Another heartache - another failed romance.
    On and on ...
    Does anybody know what we are living for?

    I guess I'm learning - I must be warmer now ..
    I'll soon be turning, round the corner now.
    Outside the dawn is breaking,
    But inside in the dark I'm aching to be free!

    The Show must go on!
    The Show must go on! Yeah, yeah!
    Ooh! Inside my heart is breaking!
    My make-up may be flaking ...
    But my smile, still, stays on!
    Yeah! oh oh oh

    My soul is painted like the wings of butterflies,
    Fairy tales of yesterday, will grow but never die,
    I can fly, my friends!

    The Show must go on! Yeah!
    The Show must go on!
    I'll face it with a grin!
    I'm never giving in!
    On with the show!

    I'll top the bill!
    I'll overkill!
    I have to find the will to carry on!
    On with the,
    On with the show!

    The Show must go on.

    Queen, The Show must go on, Innuendo, 1991

    *<:o)

    Original vs. Inspiration
    BenQ-Siemens Snake phone concept (2009?)
    BenQ-Siemens→Snake Phone Concept
    BenQ-Siemens→Snake Phone ConceptBenQ-Siemens→Snake Phone Concept
    © BenQ-Siemens

    iRaiment Further steps
    The image of the model Papier Flottant No. 3 shown in the Further steps of the 11th of June 2016 was not finished, because the muse of Salvadore Dali has brunette hair and the muse of C.S. has black hair, and also too much of the axes of the tourbillon were visible. Both deficits have been corrected now.
    In this relation, we would also like to mention before we forget it, that the iR smartwatch models of the Cyberpearl series and the model Subspacer I Cybergraph Light Diamond shown in the Further steps of the 22nd of May 2016 are inspired by the models Oyster Perpetual Datejust and Daytona of the watchmaker Rolex and connected with the muse of C.S. as well, indeed.

    As announced in the Further steps of the 23rd of March 2016 and 12th of June 2016, we would like to show an image of the model Papier Volant No. 1, which is very close to its original sketch drawn by hand.
    The housing is a little smaller when compared with the Papier Volant No. 2 shown in the Further steps of the 12th of June 2016, but the Papier Volant No. 1 has a nice double gradation at the wristband attachments.
    We were really impressed when we saw a watch with a similar housing mounted on the hand, because it looks much more elegant than everything else what we have seen with a landscape layout (see also the Further steps of the 26th of May 2016).
    iRaiment Papier Volant No. 1
    © :I, Corum, Bulgari, Patek Philippe, Vacheron Constantin, :I, and iRaiment

    By the way: The painting of René Magritte shown as an example image on the display of the Papier Volant No. 1 is called "La Reproduction Interdite==The Prohibited Reproduction".

    In this sense and as usual, all industrial designs and machines are patent queueing. But we consider all these works as original and unique multimedia works of art, that also transport the discussion with the public about such devices and their applications and therefore should be protected by the international copyright, including the components that are essential for the expression.

    Furthermore, we would like to present a new model series of wrist-worn computers or smart bracelets, which on the one hand C.S. derived from the original model Serpenti of Bulgari and on the other hand we simply called Serpent No. 1.

    The next image shows a model of the Serpent No. 1 series, though without the proper head it has to be understood more conceptually.
    As it can be seen easily, many different sensors and Light Diamonds are included in the bracelet. Indeed, we are very curious how this Serpent model looks like in the dark. Wow.

    iRaiment Serpent No. 1
    © Bulgari, :I, and C.S.

    In fact, the model series Serpent No. 1 also marks the beginning of a whole new range of wearble computers called Serpent, logically. See also the other original mobile device, the Snake Phone Concept of the former joint venture BenQ-Siemens, in the Original vs. Inspiration of today above.

    C.S. created together with the OntoLab various basic variants of the wrist-worn Serpent series:

  • The first variant is more a wrist-worn computer or smartwatch with a long bracelet.
  • The seond variant has a projector and a camera included, which can be used in various situations and for many applications.
  • For the third variant we imagined a more smart bracelet.
  • The fourth variant features a bracelet with links, that are functional modules.
  • The fifth variant is a Serpent, which is based on our Flip-Flop technology and has a long display across the bracelet or strap.

    We have also created a second and a third model series of the Serpent series.

    The next image is a quick sketch of the first model of the new model series. This model is inspired by the classic Serpenti Tubogas of Bulgari and has not been coined, but might get the title Serpent No. 4.
    Its head or smartwatch will be made larger and might be removable by using one of our wearable computer attachments and smartbands in the version for smartwatches.
    iRaiment Serpent Turbogas I Small
    © Bulgari and C.S.

    Some anecdotes about the original Serpenti:

  • The Greek philosopher Plato once said that the image of a snake eating its tail is the image of everlasting life, which is called ouroboros.
  • Ouroboros is an ancient symbol of a serpent eating its own tail that represents the perpetual cyclic renewal of life, the eternal return, and the cycle of life, death and rebirth, leading to immortality.
  • Elizabeth Taylor wore a Serpenti watch at the set of the movie "Cleopatra" in the year 1962.

    Elizabeth Taylor wearing a Bulgari Serpenti at the set of the movie

    We also have created some new models of a newer series.

    And keep in mind: This is only the prologue to get warmed up, and the content of the Innovation-Pipeline of Ontonics is only a small fraction. Actually, we have around 1,500 concepts sketched without counting the various models and variants for sure.


    26.June.2016
    Comment of the Day
    Automobile 3.0™

    iRaiment Further steps
    A pure happenstance: At first we wanted to tell the story about the serpent that sits in the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil and tempts Eva to eat the forbidden fruits in relation with our Serpent series. Then we played around with the Serpenti Tubogas of Bulgari and a smartwatch. But when we saved the file we suddenly had the idea to call the model Serpent et le Pommes No. 1. But in the end we discarded the idea to name it Serpent et Pommes, because the story is not what we want to tell.
    iRaiment Serpent et ... No. 1
    © Bulgari, :I, and C.S.

    Also interestingly to note in relation with the model shown in the image is the possibility, that the head can be scaled larger than the original mobile device.

    We have also created another model of the Serpent series, which has little displays in the links of the bracelet. This inlay elements could be based on a flat Light-Emitting Diode (LED) or a reflective passive display based on e.g. the Interferometric MOdulator Display IMOD) technology that can be changed individually by a wearer.

    The show has gone on.

    Style of Speed Further steps
    After we already invented the Automobile 2.0 and for sure not another company in the field of automobiles, we are very pleased to announce nothing more than the Automobile 3.0.
    The Automobile 3.0 is a completely new vision, approach, and reali- zation of mobility, that has not been conceived before in such a coherent, perfect, and fantastic way as done by C.S., our OntoLab, The Lab of Visions, and we from Style of Speed.

    This is only the beginning, but we will change everything. Again.
    Forget the rest. Take the best.


    27.June.2016
    Comment of the Day
    Smartsnake™

    Picture of the Day
    Flashmob, Milan, Italy (25.06.2016)

    Celebrating Pride Flashmob in Milan, Italy
    © Guiseppe Cacace, AFP, and Getty Images

    See also the Comment of the Day of the 24th and 25th June 2016.
    What should we say? An image says more than thousand words?!

    16:00 UTC+2
    Ontoscope and iRaiment Further steps

    *** Work in progress; Transform the live log into text ***

  • 16:00 Together with iRaiment we are creating a sketch of the new model Ontoscope Snake.
  • 16:03 For sure, our smartbands and their attachments and mountings for wearable computers, specifically our accumulator band, can also be combined with
    • any smartphone that fits into the holder respectively attachment or
    • a modular smartphone by replacing its battery with our smartband.
  • 16:04 Simply replace the head with an Ontoscope or a (modular) smartphone.
  • 16:06 We are also creating a sketch of the Serpent with projector.
  • 16:11 We would like to remember that we handle both the Ontoscope series and the Serpent and Snake series as multimedia works of art created by C.S. as far as possible in relation with the guiding rule of an ordinary technological progress respectively a use and a technical benefit for the society at the date of creation.
  • 16:13 For everybody, who has not seen it immediately, we have updated the sketch of the Papier Volant No. 1 shown in the Further steps of the 25th of June 2016. Only missing is the tourbillon and a better gold gloss.
  • 16:22 Needless to say, hopefully, the Serpent and Snake can be formed for standing on a surface, hanging on an object, such as a pipe or the neck of the user, in such a way that the display can be viewed comfortably. Please take care, when you use our mobile devices, because you might run against a gas lantern or on the street or rail tracks. We heard there are towns that still have these infrastructure.
  • 18:27 So we have the mobile device attached. Note that the mobile device can be very thin and lightweight, because the electronics is in the band, specifically the battery.
  • 18:37 Unbelievable, we cannot find our Ontoscope Holo. We know that it is stored at the right place.
  • 18:38 Oh, how stupid was that not to read all the names of the directories.
  • 18:49 Aha, this is the way to go.
  • 19:05 If we have 3D, then we want 3D and more fun.
  • 19:07 Dr. Bunsen Honeydew remind us, that we can also attach a second device at the other end of the Smartsnake. Let us see how this looks like. Do we have a black Rolex or apple?
  • 19:31 We took a rectangular fruit but will also look for a round smartwatch.
  • 19:32 Where is Mickey Mouse?
  • 19:33 Yes indeed, an Ontoscope can be used as smart stethoscope, which went into the vision of the Ontoscope as well.
  • 20:10 And here is Mickey Mouse.

    iRaiment and Ontoscope→Ontoscope Snake with Ontoscope Holo and Smartwatch
    © Bulgari, :I, :I, and C.S.

  • 20:51 The shown variant has a runtime of around 130 hours or 5.5 days 24 hours a day in video mode and 12 days 11 hours a day in normal mode.
  • 20:54 Like it is done in the case of snake lights, another electronic device can be attached such as another battery pack, a solar panel, a lamp, a keyboard, various Mixed Reality (MR) devices, headphones, for sure another camera (e.g. system camera, and fiberscope or borescope) and various sensors following the Ontoscope approach (both added 28th of June 2016) and so on. In this relation it is also easy to see that for example the larger mobile device can be adjusted in front of the head for viewing and the small device is used as a touch pad or 3D mouse.
  • 21:11 We can also redefine the shown variant and say that 2 or more coupled smartbands are shown.

    Style of Speed Further steps
    We have begun with the development of our completely new door and bonnet technology as the next components, modules, and systems of the Automobile 3.0 generation.
    In the next step we will go on with the interior.

    We also worked on a special door and bonnet technology for our models of the 9x9 series, that is so to say old school or Automobile 2.0 generation.
    Doubtlessly, our fans and the other part of the public will be highly impressed and have so much fun, as we have everytime when seeing it in motion in the simulations.
    Maybe this becomes interesting for other vehicle manufacturers as well, specifically when combined with our Active Components for example.

    In addition, we are in the selection phase of our transaxle unit, that is close to its finalization.

    Eventually, we began the production phase of our 2D and 3D display devices for the interior and exterior of vehicles.

    King Smiley Further steps
    We also would like to show a preview of a long-term project of C.S. started in the year 2009 and simply called The Ring. Indeed, it is a fun spin on the classic Tiffany-setting diamond engagement ring.
    The initial concept was to make the shown ring, which on the one hand is made of transparent plastic and on the other hand was designed by Alissia Melka-Teichroew in the year 2003, out of a diamond and let the material, minimalistic design, and process of creation speak for themselves. But then C.S. thought The Ring must have much fire to transfer the expression of passion in the right way.

    Needless to say, to find a suitable raw gemstone is not so easy but also not impossible. We already have seen some few candidates, but literally spoken naturally one must have a great patience while wai- ting, which gives the whole creation process another extraordinary aspect.
    Another interesting problem that has to be solved is the calculation of the diamond's fire.
    But the most difficult task is to find the real finger on which it fits right, as usual in a fairy tale and also in reality, because it is conceived for Snow White of the Magic Mirror World, who is also related with for example the Ontoverse.

    Blueprint of Initial Concept of The Ring of C.S. 2009
    © buyAMT Shop


    28.June.2016
    Comment of the Day 2¹ UTC+2
    "Touch me", [C.S., Today]

    Website update
    We have uploaded the missing images of the Ontoscope Snake described in the Ontoscope and iRaiment Further steps and The Ring described in the King Smiley Further steps of yesterday.
    The reason for such mistakes is that we work so to say offline, because this is much faster without the uploading step in the FTP-client and the subsequent downloading step in the web browser after every single webpage update. But from time to time we forget to upload an image.

    Hopefully, the descriptions make more sense now, specifically the note about the raw gemstone and the needed patience in relation with The Ring. If not then note that ca. 200 carat may be enough and for example the raw Lesotho Promise diamond had 603 carat and a color rating of D.
    Isn't it funny how the meaning of the texts suddenly changed after the addition of just two images? Enjoy a fortiori.

    Original vs. Inspiration #1
    1. row: Sunman Kwon Finger Touching hand touchscreen and Devin Coakley Lifeline hand touchscreen
    2. row: Cicret Bracelet arm touchscreen and Chris Harrison OmniTouch projection touchscreen (2011)
    3. row: Chris Harrison OmniTouch projection touchscreen (2011)
    4. and 5. row: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sixth Sense, Pranav Mistry WuW (Wear yoUr World; 2009)
    6. and 7. row: Mac Funamizu Ursla

    Sunman Kwon Finger Touching Hand TouchscreenDevin Coakley Lifeline Hand Touchscreen
    Cicret BraceletChris Harrison OmniTouch
    Chris Harrison OmniTouch
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sixth Sense, Pranav Mistry WuWMassachusetts Institute of Technology Sixth Sense, Pranav Mistry WuW
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sixth Sense, Pranav Mistry WuWMassachusetts Institute of Technology Sixth Sense, Pranav Mistry WuW, Augmented Newspaper
    Mac Funamizu UrslaMac Funamizu Ursla
    Mac Funamizu Ursla
    © Sunman Kwon, Devin Coakley, Chris Harrison, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Mac Funamizu

    The technique and technology of the so-called Sixth Sense device is patented but it has to be seen in respect to the other prior arts, like the ones we presented today as well. In the end it could be that the patent covers no or only a very small protection scope.

    We also have seen a patent, that describes a smartwatch or wrist- worn computer including a projector and having a function, that scans the projection surface, which is a body part of a user, like a hand or an arm for example, to project informations on it without distortion.
    We think the multimedia works Finger Touching, Lifeline, and OmniTouch already show this feature and similar devices, which can easily be combined by a person skilled in the art. In addition, we have seen this anti-distortion approach so many times before in the last 15 years, that we cannot see what the inventive step is at all.
    You can all save your time and money that you spent for hacking our network and patenting what you found, because these patents are based on simple combinations of prior art, therefore disclose no invention, and eventually are not valid.

    In relation with the multimedia work Ursla see also the iRaiment Further steps of the 20th of September 2014 and the Original vs. Inspiration #3 of today below.

    Btw.: We leave it up to the developers of the Cicret Bracelet to prove that their projector can display black graphical items. Oh, oh, maybe they have also invented an anti-photon projector. :D

    Original vs. Inspiration #2
    1. row: Clint Spencer & Ryan Eder, Vyne snake holder or neck holder for a smartphone
    2. row: Naja King, snake holder or neck holder for a smartphone
    3. row: Umbrella shoulder holder

    Clint Spencer & Ryan Eder Vyne Snake Holder or Neck Holder for a Smartphone
    Naja King Snake Holder or Neck Holder for a SmartphoneSnake Holder or Neck Holder for a Smartphone
    Umbrella Shoulder Holder

    The problem with the snake holder is the weight of the mobile device. By moving the electric energy storage device into the neckpiece respectively serpent or snake we get a much better weight distribution with a counterbalance behind the neck and accordingly a significantly increased wearing comfort.

    Original vs. Inspiration #3
    Snake lights
    Snake LightSnake Light
    Snake Flashlight
    Snake Light with Solar Base

    Simply replace the solar panel with a mobile device, such as an Ontoscope or a smartphone for example, the snake with our serpent or snake band respectively smart electronic band or accumulator band, and the lamp with a projector. Or leave the snake as it is and take the electric power out of the attached mobile device.

    Ontoscope and iRaiment Further steps
    We would like to discuss the mobile device series iRaiment Serpent and Ontoscope Snake a little more. As it can be seen easily in the image shown in the Further steps of yesterday, we can put the projector at one end of the snake band.

    In the Original vs. Inspiration #2 of tody an image shows an adaptor for a handsfree umbrella. Besides that such an umbrella only works when there is no wind, which in fact is the other and even bigger problem besides water coming down from the sky, the attachements of our wearable computer with electronic band already comprises form-locking key and slot, and plug and socket variants, so the main problem is more a question of design.
    Easily to see, the umbrella shoulder holder looks like a prototype of the Flip-Flop Serpent mentioned in the Further steps of the 26th of June 2016 as well. See also the related ilamp shown in the Original vs. Inspiration and the initial disclosure of the Flip-Flop technology in the Ontonics Further steps of the 23rd of July 2014, that shows how it can stand on a surface for lighting and projecting when not worn on a body part of a user.

    Ontonics Further steps
    Please keep in mind once again, that we filed a patent about a wearable computer with electronic bands, straps, and belts including one or more batteries, and attachement therefor. Maybe it becomes our second or third killer patent.

    Furthermore, the snake holder with at least one electric energy storage device included is patent queueing. Potentially, another entity was faster on the one hand or it is not a valid invention on the other hand.
    This is only the beginning.


    29.June.2016
    Comment of the Day
    iSnake™

    iRaiment Further steps
    We have finalized the sketch of the Papier Volant No. 1 shown in the Further steps of the 25th of June 2016. It is really worth a look and honestly looks better than we have expected ourselves.


    30.June.2016
    Original vs. Inspiration #1
    1. row: ThinkGeek, Avengers: Age of Ultron Captain America Shield Backpack and Travel Boy Backpack inspired by Nintendo Game Boy
    2. row: Thrustmaster, Tron Backpack inspired by Tron's identity disc and Cheng Hang, Dong Qian Wen, Ye Zi Hui, Zhang Ting Yu, and Zhou Hong Ru Mountain Climber Shield with Oxygen Mask, Heating Control and Electrical Power Storage inspired by Tron
    3. and 4. row: Sharona Merlin, running backpack
    5. row: Tactical Tailor, X Harness for modular assault vest and LE Load Bearing Vest

    ThinkGeek Avengers: Age of Ultron Captain America Shield BackpackThinkGeek Travel Boy Backpack Inspired by Nintendo Game Boy
    Thrustmaster Tron Backpack Inspired by Tron's DiscMountain Climber Shield with Oxygen Mask, Heating Control and Electrical Power Storage inspired by Tron
    Sharona Merlin Running BackpackSharona Merlin Running Backpack
    Sharona Merlin Running BackpackSharona Merlin Running Backpack
    Tactical Tailor X Harness for Modular Assault VestTactical Tailor LE Load Bearing Vest
    © ThinkGeek, Thrustmaster, Sharona Merlin, and Tactical Tailor

    Original vs. Inspiration #2
    Balazs Soltesz-Nagy, Neckset

    Balazs Soltesz-Nagy NecksetBalazs Soltesz-Nagy Neckset
    © Neckset

    See also the iRaiment Further steps and the Ontoscope and iRaiment Further steps of today that discuss the Serpent and Snake mobile device series, as well as the related issues of our Original vs. Inspiration series.

    Original vs. Inspiration #3
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology, LineForm

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology LineForm
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology LineForm
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology LineForm
    © Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    We love it when the mobile phone tips on the wrist like a cat that is seeking for attention and some loving touches.

    Ontonics Further steps
    We have developed an own variant of a basic component and also substituted another basic component with an own variant of another component that both might provide such an increased performance and electric power efficiency when used together in relaton with a specific technology on the one hand and on the other hand would provide in this way the foundation for applications, which have not been envisioned by the originator of a specific initial project. It is really incredible how far this technology and devices based on it have progressed.

    Ontoscope and iRaiment Further steps
    Very sadly to say, the campaign for crowdfunding the production of the Neckset (see the Original vs. Inspiration #2 of today above) was a total flop with 0 backers. So much about the potential success of our Serpent and Snake mobile device series, but only at first sight.

    Pros for a behind-the-neck mobile device holder solution like the Neckset:

  • Mounting the snake holder onto the neckpiece is an interesting solution, which we provide as well as an optional configuration with a smartband, -strap, or -belt as the additional neckpiece that can be connected with a Serpent or Smartsnake or directly with a mobile device.
  • Our electronic band, strap, or belt, and the exterior of the neckpiece are also very similar to our flat Flip-Flop technology, which can be seen as a smartscarf.

    Contras for a behind-the-neck mobile device holder solution:

  • In fact, the developers of the various behind-the-neck snake holders made several mistakes not discussed here in detail.
  • Moreover, the aesthetical and practical aspects of the snake holders might not be convincing for the mass, though they might be advantageous for professional users.
  • In addition, the behind-the-neck or snake holders include no electronic components in the neckpiece, like e.g. a battery, in contrast to our Serpent and Smartsnake and also the related variant of our electronic band, strap, or belt. Therefore the weight distribution and corresponding wearing comfort is still not optimized.

    When we take all the pros and contras together, we can see that the neckpiece respectively electronic band, strap, or belt can be made larger by forming it like a

    • harness of a modular tactical vest or
    • running backpack,

    which are shown in the Original vs. Inspiration #1 of today on the one hand and can be worn on the back or on the chest on the other hand. In this way

  • a larger electric energy storage device can be included or/and
  • a storage compartment can be provided, as well as
  • the weight distribution can be more improved.

    Ontoscope, iRaiment, and Roboticle Further steps
    Do not ask us since how many years we wanted to do this:
    A robotic serpent, robosnake, or snakebot, as shown in the Original vs. Inspiration #3 of today, integrated with an Ontoscope as its head respectively the robotic variant of models of the iRaiment Serpent series, as shown in the iRaiment Further steps of the 25th and 26th of June 2016, and the animatronic variant of the models of the Ontoscope Snake series, as shown in the Ontoscope and iRaiment Further steps of the 27th and 28th of June 2016.
    Now, that we have enough electric power at hand literally spoken and also our Flip-Flop Serpent mentioned in the iRaiment Further steps of the 25th of June 2016 and Ontoscope and iRaiment Further steps of 28th of June 2016, and our iFlex technology, we can make it real.

    We think our Serpent and Snake series are so

  • original and
  • unique as well as
  • highly complex and
  • totally beyond the
    • ordinary technological progress and
    • use and technical benefit for the society at the date of creation

    that we are allowed to

  • call them multimedia works of art and
  • claim for copyright protection.

    If not, then put one or more rotors on it and let that thing roll, fly, swim, and dive. :D

    For the nice gals and guys, who do not know what to steal: Copyright, all rights reserved, patented, and patent pending and queueing.

    Roboticle Further steps
    We have overworked a complete robot. As the result we got a machine that defines a new generation of its class, which produces effects that might be a much more profound impact, which again is not perceived and understood in its entirety actually.

    Style of Speed Further steps
    Already some time ago, we had created a muscle car series and also designed several muscle cars of it.
    Muscle cars are highly emotional and must follow the local style. A one model fits all approach does not work and therefore charac- teristic for the basic concept of this series are the:

  • names taken from famous race horses and
  • special models customized for every country or region by following the regional interpretation of our SoS credo "More power, More speed, More fun", as it can be seen with for example the:
  • Matchem for the U.K. (see the Further steps of the 30th of November 2014) and
  • Cade for the U.S.A. (see the Further steps of the 1st of December 2014), as well as
  • an undisclosed model for Japan.

    Possibly, these special models could be based on the model A5 or more precisely the model S5 or RS5 of the marque Volkswagen→Audi. Accordingly, we called this muscle car series Hot Rings today, but maybe Hot Wheels is hot on the heels and joins up.

  •    
     
    © and/or ®
    Christian Stroetmann GmbH
    Disclaimer